chkflip wrote:VOTE: Beck
RVS WAGON GOGOGOGO
Gotta start somewhere,
Hey Mikehart! Glad to see a name I know ...
chkflip wrote:They have a purpose; please answer them.
1] Why did you decide to give mafiascum a try?
2] How do you react to people attacking you?
3] What will you be known for in this game?
4] What is your time zone?
5] How frequently can we expect you to post?
chkflip wrote:@mike/Nanook: How long has it been since you've played Mafia?
chkflip wrote:
Flavour Analysis wrote:Everyone on the Beck wagon: Why essentially are you on it? Have you played with Beck before? (Or seen his play)
FourseenCircumstance wrote:If I didn't join a wagon I'd be regretting it later on.
@mod I will be Limted Access from tmmrw till next thursday expect me to still get in a post here and there on my phone tho
bobsnox wrote:Beck just really doesn't like me, but I suspect he's not really a complete jerk. He's just a good guy to be voting right now.
bobsnox wrote:flavour - I'm waiting to see his reaction to having a bw on him. I don't have specific questions for him
nintendoaddict1 wrote:DonJosh wrote:Flavour Analysis wrote:
What are your recent thoughts of the game? Thoughts on the Beck wagon?
This is the point in the game where I am most laid back. Wagons in general, I might hop on, but only if I'm like second or third. I don't like when people join wagons late. Its scummy. My understanding is that Becks wagon is mostly RVS.
Am I the only one who was thinking "I join wagons early because if I join late I look scummy."
k e n d a l l wrote:@ everyone who answered chkflp's questions
why did you immediately answer them? did you consider that they could serve to help the mafia agenda?
k e n d a l l wrote:also, that still doesn't explain to me how tunneling can be considered pro-town.
even if you are "convinced" that person is a mafia member, there is still a chance that you are wrong. if you only tunnel that player and they flip innocent, you wasted a whole day where you could have been looking at other suspiscious members.
Beck wrote:Nanook, I actually voted bob first, than he voted me. Bob is actually on my blacklist but I love this theme so much I'm ignoring it
Beck wrote:vote: bobsox
I just don't like the guy
k e n d a l l wrote:@nanook
what specifically do you find scummy about his vote? i'm confused because you contradict yourself. if you think he is just voting for him because he doesn't like him, rather than actually having a reason, what make you believe he has a mafia agenda behind it?
Silver1337 wrote:I think bobsnox = Jester, actually. Look, he's simply posting dumb things.
mikehart wrote:PEdit: @Nanook: Could you be slightly more specific about what you would like elaborated on? I try to elaborate as much as I can ahead of time so further elaboration is easier with specific examples.
Mikehart, Post 186 wrote:One: its hart with a t. mikehard sounds like a pornstars name.
Two: You don't seem to read very well. Bobs point was it seems like like you are trying too hard to seem town. Not that your actions are too protown.
Three(this ones for ray too): it wasn't my intention to bring up offsite experience as an excuse or as anything regarding meta but just describing my thought process on reasons I could understand the extreme(again, my opinion) distancing when there wasn't really call for it. Also, I don't think your playstyle was discussed several times. A few maybe. But not several.
Four: In my opinion your attempts to seem pro town are over the top and I do find that scummy so there is your pinpoint.
Five: I'm not on any bandwagon. I FoSed you, not voted. Also, I'm not mirroring Umbrage or bob but pointing out that I feel you are scummy. It just happens to be the same reasoning as bob so I said so.
Six: I tend to disagree on about mafia members fear players with a voice. Players with a strong vehement voice like your draw a lot of attention that may have otherwise been directed elsewhere.
Seven: I understand about not trusting anyone but your distancing was just over the top.
mikehart wrote:She reminds me a lot of IS actually so maybe its a projection thing.
nintendoaddict1 wrote:NanookTheWolf wrote:
Would really like to hear an opinion from Soda, Beefster, Silver, Hiraki, Hipaddict, Glowball, Fourseen, Diddin, and Chkflip. Not to mention those that haven't even posted. Maybe some fresh brains could add to the mix.
Hipaddict is a hydra I am in and posted form accidentally once, fyi.
glowball wrote:It doesn't make her scum- it's just the newbie way of thinking. It's easy for me to fall into that trap too, if I know I am town and then all of a sudden tons of people vote me it is very easy in the newbie mindset to think all of them are scum, the whole "it's not me, so it must be you" thing. It's null, and when they get a chance to breathe they will realize that friends aren't town and enemies aren't scum. It's a null tell, and so is all the reasoning against her.
SnakeSide wrote:nanook wrote:I am bothered that Beck is basically keeping a vote based on dislike, but I feel it's more personal then scummy.
Which is why bob voted for Beck in the first place. Point?
Scott Brosius wrote:k e n d a l l(6)- SodaSpirit17, Umbrage, bobsnox, Ray Montano, nintendoaddict1, DonJosh,
Umbrage wrote:Glowball oozes town btw. Bobsnox is also scum, butI doubt he's on the same team as kendall. Everyone else is null and posting too much. Chill.
bobsnox wrote:nanook - get your facts straight dawg. I DON'T think kendall is playing the newbie card. nintendo does, but he's using it out of context.
Ray Montano wrote:Eyes also watching: mikehart, Nanook
(I’m not a player to who nerves, but they always make me nervous. Any game I’m in with them I have them in my peripheral vision, more out of respect then suspicion)
Ray Montano wrote:As for mikehart/Nanook I just watch players like that like hawks because I know (from experience) they have the ability to manipulate and outplay me. I have a list on my computer of those players (and no I'm not going to share them all in this game).
glowball wrote:Also... TO EVERYONE.
Name 1 Player that you would NOT be willing to lynch today, and why.
inHimshallibe wrote:Scott Brosius wrote:
mikehart
NanookTheWolf
HOLY MOTHER OF GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
diddin wrote:I'd rather not lynch DonJosh yet because of the fact that he possibly flaked, and I wouldn't want to lynch, say, a Town Cop because they couldn't claim before their lynch. Umbrage is a safer choice.
jmurph3 wrote:I am sick and fucking tired of everyone's ego getting bruised in this game. IT IS A GAME. And one that we seem to have a severely less chance of winning if we don't get our fucking acts together and concentrate on flippingsomeoneso we can get some goddamn concrete evidence to work with. If you don't like that, sit down and shut the fuck up scum. Because we'll be coming for you next. [/rant]
FourseenCircumstance wrote:What are everyone's thoughts on me?
TheJakalope wrote:Hello everyone, Have to catch up, might be a bit before I post anything useful.
petroleumjelly wrote:Howdy, all! I'm replacing DonJosh.
I will try to finish reading the game sometime tomorrow and post my thoughts by tomorrow, or Thursday at the latest.
Rainbowdash wrote:Loving the double vig kills.
FourseenCircumstance wrote:Okay Fair Enough... I have my reasons for a certain lynch though.
glowball wrote:Also...NanooktheWolf lurking- NOTED.
glowball wrote:^ Seriously, Nanook? Deflection is not defense- just get more active. Try not to concern yourself with how everyone else views "the other lurkers" it's really not a good look.
DeathNote wrote:What was your reasoning Nanook?
farside22 wrote:Check please.
You are complaining about your time but decide to go into another game that is 40+ pages. You want me to empathize with you I don't.
I have the same issue but I'm sure as shit not whiny or not posting thoughts on people. Lets add to the fact you just inned for another game and it decreases to scummy posting
Don't worry sweetie I have a huge post in mind for you tonight (or in the morning if the hubby doesn't relinquish the computer tonight).
Mod: I'm giving up on Snake who seems to have all but disappeared on me and wish to have farside as the main account from here on in.
Thanks!
Ray Montano wrote:Flavour Analysis wrote:I think Nanook was hoping NOT to get a CC since Umbrage was his Godfather. He says the reason for that was because "Umbrage may have been full of fluff" SO? Second underlined statement, he states Bopeep was a town player unless hinted otherwise. Therefore, he supported Umbrage's fake claim openly. (In a fence sitty manner)
I 100% agree with this case. Very nice Flavour. And I would like for Nanook to address this case please and not the lurking case because this is what I find damning about him...not the lurking case bullshit.
NanookTheWolf wrote:I'm not going to jump on Umbrage as he's claimed BoPeep. I don't know if I support another player counter claiming this early in the game either just in case Umbrage is full of fluff.
Ray Montano wrote:But if it was a fake claim then we wouldn't have known if Bo Peep actually was a power role, and probably wouldn't be. Although I can understand Bo Peep being a watcher I much more see it as a vanilla role. So you assuming Bo Peep would be the same role on Umbrage's fake claim doesn't make sense to me.
Flavour Analysis wrote:Ok guys. Time to be blown away.
I targetted Soda. You want a reason? Check my last posts at the end of the Day.
I am Woody. Town 1 shot Vig. Thanks Fourseen for being a nub and outing me early. You're lucky I got no more bullets.
Beefster is confirmed town for #962
Scott Brosius wrote:For this setup, there will be some mini-games in thread (toys and games and fun!). It will be Toy Story trivia. The first four people to respond to the questions will be in the running for an undisclosed power. Whoever gets the most questions correct will get the power. In the case of a tie, the first person to respond to me will get the power.
They will pop up randomly, but no more than one per game day.There will be three mini-games across the first four game days.I wouldn't expect any of them to pop up between 3am-9am EST though
Oversoul wrote:Pedit: convienent that all of your scum reads are lurkers.
farside22 wrote:Also NtW I asked you a question about FA you never answered
bobsnox wrote:WHO ELSE HAS LASERS IN TOY STORY NANOOK? WHO? You should be lynched just for trying to kill me.
That said, I don't have lasers ;_; I just have cool protective suit. And if Nanook is town, I guess my plan didn't accomplish much. But is he town? Is Rainbow town? Apparently Rainbow and her other buddy wanted Nanook dead. So maybe they aren't the soldiers. hmmm...
bobsnox wrote:We need to figure out why nanook thought killing buzz lightyear was a good idea
PeregrineV wrote:@Nanook- You've been outed as a neighbor. Since you know that everyone feels one of you three is scum, I'd like to here your thoughts on who it is and why. And how you feel about being the target of your "neighbors" last night.
petroleumjelly wrote:1.) Please explain why you chose to kill bobsnox on Night Two. I'm not quite seeing the reasoning in your latest post.
2.) You just claimed that you see both of your alien partners as being scum at the moment, and then you vote TheJakalope. Assuming TheJakalope is not the third alien, why did you choose to vote TheJakalope "for pressure" over two people you "see as scum"?
NanookTheWolf wrote:If one of the others is scum out of my group, then I couldn't tell you which one I suspect more as I see both of them as scum right now to be completely honest
Rainbowdash wrote:@NtW - If we lynch you today will you still activate the claw for us?
petroleumjelly wrote:1.) NanookTheWolf, I%u2019m not quite sure your explanation for targeting bobsnox in Post 1659 actually explains why you are suspicious of bobsnox (though I guess my question did not specifically ask why you were suspicious of him, just why you targeted him). Could you be more concrete?
Additionally, why did you want to kill bobsnox on Night One?
farside22 wrote:It doesn't say we can't talk outside of the QT, but I'm pretty sure MS rules alone falls under the category of not talking outside the game to others unless PM states otherwise.
We can only PM the name to the mod. The mod stated something about us talking in the QT about our choice, but would only accept the name through via PM.
PeregrineV wrote:farside22 wrote:
At the Neighborhood: can you guys talk about how you each reacted to having the shared kill? Who brought up how to decide on kills? Etc.
Nanook didn't say anything. I don't remember rainbow's reaction when she came in without reading back through the QT. I laughed my ass off and said cool.
My idea was to have everyone discuss their views on all the players and have everyone agree to one player to vig. This way if there was scum in the neighborhood if the vig hit someone not discussed I would be more certain (instead of paranoid) there was scum in the neighborhood.
As for whom to kill it was mostly me and Rainbow discussing our scum reads. I had certain players, she had certain players and we talked back and forth a bit on why. All Ntw did was list 3 players day 1 without a reason then he conceeded to both Rainbow and myself choosing Borge night 1 without really fighting or saying anything during the discussion (this is why I started to lean scum on NtW).
After my case and points on NtW he stopped talking in the QT (I think since that case he said 3 things in the QT at the most).
@Nanook- Is this true? Did it happen the way Farside said?