DemonHybrid wrote:I feel that there can't be two townies who ask the same exact anti-town question in a row. We can PoE through them if need be, but there's so much scum motivation between the two of them that I feel one of them need to die.
I don't see any scum motivation.
Hoppster wrote:hiplop wrote:VOTE: WLC HOPPSTER TOWNCRED IS WORTH EVERYTHING.
>> Hoppster: SHEEP ME FOR TOWN-CRED <votes: Wrathchild>
>> Hiplop: OKAY HOPPSTER <vote:WLC>
wat
one moar chance for town-cred hiplop
don't blow it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Isa
Isa wrote:So much scum motivation I can't even see it
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DemonHybrid
This looks like a vote that is deliberately vague so that it could equally be defended in retrospect as either a serious vote or a non-serious vote.
DH's derp is null, I think. But if he's scum projectmatt is town (assuming non-multi-scum).
I chuckled at Hoppster's town cred vote mess up thing. I think he confused DH's post with yours. (DH was the one who voted WLC)
Hoppster wrote:DemonHybrid wrote:I covered this, Hoppster.
Not to a satisfactory degree...
With one person, you were happy to write it off as 'ok maybe newb' (you say yourself there is only "that little bit of scum motivation", but with two people (both who have joined within the last 2 months and are thusly new to the site) you weren't? That seems like a jump to me.
I think it was ok for DH to pressure the newbs. Can't let them get away.
DemonHybrid wrote:Vote: Isa.
That last reply was fishy and deflective.
Fishy, how?
Parabollocks wrote:and also i do read the thread, i just quote things of interest.
Vote: DemonHybrid
I'll do the same.
Vifam wrote:That's delightfully annoying and if you're going to do that EVERY catch up we are going to have a problem.
Problem?