Open 337: Twin Trap (Game Over)

[Shinki]

Hi guys
Just saying I'll catch up with the game by this evening after class.

• Votecount 1-5
  
  
  
  pinkfloyd
  - (1)
  Thomas
  
  
  Isa
  - (1)
  pinkfloyd
  
  
  Thomas
  - (1)
  Shinki
  
  
  princesskdw
  - (1)
  Collyer
  
  
  Neil1113
  - (1)
  bv310
  
  
  
  Not Voting:
  
  
  neil1113
  ,
  Isa
  ,
  Fakinha
  ,
  Cav
  
  
  
  Notes
  
  
• With
  9
  alive, it takes
  5
  to lynch
  
• The deadline for Day 1 is Sunday October 9th, 12:00PM UTC

[Shinki]

Ok, I'm done reading and... first of all

UNVOTE: Thomas

I'm fine with a neil lynch for today.

VOTE: neil1113

And we gotta keep an eye at pinkfloyd just in case, imo.
That #28 was a bad joke, yes.

[Shinki]

Ahm.. if you say so

[Shinki]

Wow, I'm failing at keeping updated, and all day yesterday my internet went out. Stupid Joplin. Ugh.

Real quick update for the question I see most relevant: (with what little time I have I'll try to explain this.)

Why did I specify that I wanted the spotlight on me and BV? Because up until I read through the game again with a clear mind, I was pretty confident BV was scum. Therefore in my mindset when I was posting, I was coming from a point of view of I don't care if I'm lynched for tunneling on you, I'm so confident that you're scum that I'd be willing to come under heat and possibly a lynch if it meant you'd get lynched too.

I wanted to "keep the spotlight" on us because I felt pretty confident like one of us was scum

, and my win condition is to eliminate them. Unfortunately after re-reading with a cleared mindset, I'm not so sure anymore. And since I haven't had the time to really pressure anyone, including BV, I couldn't accurately say rather or not he is. His last post in particular stands out to me.

Which reminds me, hopefully sometime today I'll be able to full respond to your post BV and whoever it was that was questioning me, I'll respond to you as well. Sorry for the delay. Oh and I'm pretty sure there's opportunistic scum somewhere between the two new replacees.

Now, that sounds weird. "One of us was scum"? Really?
That's not opportunism by any means, it's the obvious thing to do.

[Shinki]

Apparently when you vote for someone without a walltext, you're just opportunist.
I don't know if that's a scumtell, but it really doesn't work.

-

Because he's scum, that's not a good reason?

[Shinki]

Shinki, please explain your vote in that case. Neil is far and away my biggest town read at the moment and there's no way that I'm going to push for his lynch today if you don't supply very convincing reasoning.

...pinkfloyd, really? You have no thoughts at all about Neil, who seems to be the focus of the entire game so far?

I was about to ask why he's your biggest town read atm, when I saw #110 in your ISO ( Actually, I didn't read all the wall texts before, just some parts. ) and at #58 he has some good points about bv, indeed.

UNVOTE: Neil1113

I'll do a re-read with wall texts included this time.. if lazyness allow me to. But I will really try.

[Shinki]

That was such a bad wagon.
I blame myself for being lazy, but my thoughts on pink were:

He was trolling? Yes.
He wasn't posting and lurking? Yes.
He didn't argue against his lynch properly because of the bad reasons you guys had against him? Yes.
Does that means he's scum? No.

It wasn't an amazing town play, but it's wasn't worth lynching for now -_-
Well, let's move on...

VOTE: neil1113

Your hammer wasn't good. Not a bit.

-

And hardly we'll get successful night actions for the town, it's kinda difficult only with a watcher and tracker, isn't? ( and one of the scums being immune ) I'll try to be more active at day, as I think we'll be relying solely on day discussions to lynch scum.