Open 363 - GAME OVER-SK WIN-They Ball No More

[Voidedmafia]

Two quick housekeeping questions:
1. What timezone are you from?
2. How often do you intend to post?

1.) US Central
2.) Maybe once or twice before I got to work, a little more afterwards. Largely depends on how much I want to post, but I'll usually get one in before and one in after.

Xalxe: I can see where you would think that the 3rd question may not do much, but the first two can help cut down on "Dude, where is X?"-style posts, which is a good thing, IMO.

[Voidedmafia]

And, in a quick re-read to make sure I've got my head on straight, both Xalxe and Deas don't sit well with me.

I agree with Tajun that Deas's post 16 was major overreaction to a simple question. 'Course, he tries to defend himself in Post 20 with "I don't need to post reasoning". However, you don't need to act like it's a serious offense to be questioned, either.

For Xalxe, his 2nd post of the game just really irks me. It sounds like he's trying to make everyone have some sort of problem or issue. It's completely unnecessary (if possibly unintentional) antagonizing. Post 25 (his fourth) continues this largely unecessary overbearing, making a large AtE against people who have W/L records in their sigs, which is VERY unnecessary.

Later, in what seems to be a near-180 from before, he decides to lay off pressure in post 31, using an IMO flimsy reason of "well, there's not a lot of people here" (and later a defensive "I could be wrong!" in post 34). Okay, so there's only 3-4 out of 13 people currently posting. They can add their opinions when they get on, and there's no rush right now to get things out there.

Post 34 goes back to the taunting attitude of his pre-post 31 posts, and #38 shares the same attitude, pretty much saying "If they don't agree with me, they're wrong".

Overall, I don't like the attitude, and I don't like what he's done at all, not to mention rather flimsy reasons for not trying to push his cases.

Vote: Xalxe

[Voidedmafia]

1) I have not and will not vote someone for having win/loss records in their sig (unless it's RVS). So the idea that what I did was an AtE is a) wrong and b) not even the right definition of AtE.
2) I'm sorry for not wanting to place 3 votes on someone within 24 hours of the game start. My bad.
3) Your sarcasm meter is broken on my post about the MD threads.

1.) Perhaps. But seriously, there's no need for it.
2.) And what, exactly, are you so afraid of? 3 votes in a 13-player game isn't even much to talk about, especially on D1.
3.) Sarcasm or not, it still comes off as overly arrogant.

[Voidedmafia]

To be frank, though, I don't see where his scummines is.

Since you mentioned he had several posts in succession that you feel are scummy, could you link to them?

[Voidedmafia]

Specific posts, Xalxe. -_-

Not to mention that you can still at LEAST give one or two sentences of reasoning for why each post is scummy.

[Voidedmafia]

5, actually.

quote 1: RQS being good or bad is subjective, so I won't arge that.

quote 2: and you think that's worse than Deas' reaction to him being called out?

quote 3: Correction. He says he'll try to avoid doing it in the future, rendering your point null.

[Voidedmafia]

well, SK meta, but w/e.