Open 363 - GAME OVER-SK WIN-They Ball No More

[vijay2vasandani]

GMT

I post whenever I can.

I've played about 13ish games on Mafiascum, and one game off site.

VOTE: vijay

Weird name much?

Hey guys. Um I am at leavers right which means I won't be able to post today after this. However, i'll have something up tomorrow.

In response to RQS:
1. GMT +8, I think. Western Australia.
2. As much as I can. Which is around 2 times a day I think
3. Um I think I've finished 9 games but you can see it in my sig. And whoever said something about win loss records, you're onto something there.

And to somebody who made fun of my name, you obviously haven't been hanging with right people. People named Vijay are pretty awesome.

I probs shouldn't post when I'm out of it.

[vijay2vasandani]

That's it? You have nothing else to say at all?

Dude he's SV, of course he has nothing else to say.

[vijay2vasandani]

VOTE: Amrun
You could have tricked the mod into thinking you are innocent. I got my eye on you scum XD

GMT

I post whenever I can.

I've played about 13ish games on Mafiascum, and one game off site.

VOTE: vijay

Weird name much?

T^T

VOTE: whispersilk

That'll teach you to make fun of my name. XD


Now on to the serious stuffs, I just wanted to get my joke votes in so when anybody uses the VC history thing they won't think this next one is completely random.

You don't think that was worthy of a second vote during RVS stage?

Are you serious?

It's RVS! Surely I can change my vote if I want.

Play, here DV (can I call you that?) admits that the actions of whoever it was is worthy of a second vote. This implies a slight seriousness to his vote imo. Yet he also says that he can change his random vote if he wants to.

Two problems are that these statements, while not direct, slightly contradict each other. Also, if DV had what he(she?) thought was a valid reason, he should have brought us out of RVS because only scum benefit from prolonged RVS. Sure its been 3 pages or so, but he should be taking steps to ensure it if he was lrotown.

@Tajun I don't see why I need great reasoning to change a RV.

Let's just say my vote on Acting is more serious than my vote on Xalxe and I think his reaction to me could be from scum.

Hmmm, I shouldn't need reasoning because it isn't a serious vote, yet he could possibly be scum tbh. Lol fencesitting and a bit of lolgic(i should trademark that).

I was confused as to why someone would claim that the reason behind a vote change in RVS was not worthy.

@DonJosh: Do you think scum tend to be more jumpy than town?

Okay, what? The reason for a vote change is either serious, aka worthy or random. So if it is a random vote then the reasons are not worthy. If there is a reason, then it isn't random. Please stop pussyfooting.around.

VOTE: DeasVeal

Sorry if my grammar or spelling is off, I'm still not at 100%. Cheers guys.

[vijay2vasandani]

I think it was being called out for the perceived logic behind it.

Xaxle, you may see RQS as a scum tell, but to me it's a null tell, especially when the questions I asked are essentially me saying "Hey, should I expect to have to wait for answers to any actual questions that I may ask or could I expect more frequent and hopefully more content filled posts."

I don't see how the questions that I asked are scum tells, can you explain that one?

And that is very interesting Vj...

Of course its interesting, I said it. Which part of it interested you the most and tell me why.

[vijay2vasandani]

Just the overall thoughts on DV's reaction to my reaction to him... I definitely didn't quite see it like that myself, but the way you worded it makes it seem even More scummy than I felt it was.

And to Matt, I'd like to know why we should answer those questions...

But for the sake of it:
I'd say my top scum read is probably DV followed by Xalxe, but even then I don't feel they are completely scummy, just the most scummy. They are probably more null-leaning scum for me.

On VJ he's null leaning town to me but that's my opinion.

So Matt now to throw a question at you: What are your answers to those questions and why should we answer them?

I think he wants it for some secret reason to see where to place his own vote.

Acting I'm assuming that first paragraph is in regards to my points on DV? Just confirming.

How much mafia experience do you have?

I have four completed games onsite and I play frequently on a live mafia site, although this is much different.

@At anyone who thinks that RQS is a scumtell

, I would really like for you to explain how you view it as so. It seems silly and idiotic to me that anyone could see that as an actual SCUMTELL. But, you know, alright.

I'm specifically asking

Xaxle

here as to what's "scummy and bad" about RQS. I don't have long, but I'll be back soon. Xalxe's posts sound very forced in tone and I'm happy with casting him off today, but I want to observe more before I make a choice.

Everybody should answer this questions:

Who is your top suspect today as far as day one goes, and why?

What do you think about the user vijay2, and why?

I don't think Xalxe has a problem with RQS in the sense that he doesn't like questions, he just finds that the stock standard "what timezone are you in, etc" is an attempt to make it look like you are contributing to town. But no, I don't agree that it is a scumtell.

Top suspect is DV, for the reasons posted when I voted for him. As to vijay2vasandani, that guy is awesome XD

[vijay2vasandani]

Lol I just answered the questions because it was about me XD I don't know if he could use my opinion of myself XD

[vijay2vasandani]

FoS The Acting Method

maybe just a tad too opportunistic there.

[vijay2vasandani]

Lol fail XD

HoS The Acting Method

[vijay2vasandani]

Really need to go through my posts before voting... hmmm, I may need to take a different playstyle approach if this one is making me constantly under suspiscion.

nice.

@ Amrun: because I still think DV is scummier atm, if only by a bit.

@ ProjectMatt: three things
(1) I'm a he
(2) why Xalxe?
(3) if you were supposedly "sparking discussion" why have you not questioned the null read on me?

P.edit:
@ DV: it just makes him look more opportunistic. Think about it, if he didn't realise he voted PM 5 posts back, it means he wasn't reading. If he wasn't reading, why would he place a vote, especially one on a wagon gaining steam?

@ Amrun: same thing as DV

[vijay2vasandani]

It doesn't mean he wasn't reading, though. It means he forgot what HE posted. It actually shows a kind of consistency in suspicion.

But the fact that it is the leading wagon currently notches up the opportunism and makes it so yes, I can understand that interpretation. Just not sure I agree.

Fair enough.

Okay, I'll look that post over, and Project, you misunderstood what I meant...

I meant that if you were scum and other townies found him scummy you'd have agreed with them and called for vj's lynch.

That's why I find your behavior scummy, My point is that if your wording and behavior were such that makes me think that if town was to all feel vj was scum you (if scum) would have voted him instead of saying he was town.

In other words, your wording and behavior sounded like a scummy tatic to get vj lynched.

And now my minds going paranoid with a different possibility...

@Tajun: I'll let the wiki do the talking for me: Mason Roles
M = Innocent Child (Confirmed at start of Day 1 by mod)
MM = 2 Masons

MMM = 2 Masons + Innocent Child

MMMM = 3 Masons
MMMMM = 2 Masons + 2 Masons (i.e. two separate pairings)
Bolded the possibility that makes sense under the mason theory.

Now, no he didn't say it, but he didn't say he wasn't positive either, at least that's how I interpreted it.

I see the possibility that he's scum more likely but that's my other theory besides it and just town playing scummy.

So if we aren't a mason pair, he's scum you say?