Ok everyone - read Quilford’s
Post 126. That’s a
moment right there and I don’t want in missed by anyone.
Furthermore
Post 123 and
Post 124 address some damn strong points about Ajax.
Oh and for the record I’ll just pipe up and say “Judging Group 1A” has completed their task. No-one from that group needs to say anything else on the issue.
--
So my teammates thoughts on the game:
Grey
– early on found Quilford to be obv-Town for his play here. Says ‘scum Quilford’ is pretty easy to spot and I tend to agree with that sentiment.
He is leaning BBMolla as Town based on fairly weak direct experience with him in Divided Germany Mafia and Blood Bowl Mafia. Wants to see more.
Early had Ajax as gut Town but dropped that shortly after the “Vote Hito oops nevermind Vote Quilford” series of posts.
Calls Fonz scummy for his defenses of Captain Ajax (41 specifically was mentioned) and says that his “oh, Ajax was just mis-using terminology” in his attack on hito when hito is obv-Town.
Says KK is scum lurking out the early game. Also says that KK’s posts are terrible.
Finally he agrees with me that 108 is Fonzie trying to divert attention from the growing Ajax wagon.
Also he gives DeasVail +10 ‘Vollkan points’ for his “Quilford I suspect because he was scummier the last time I saw him as Town post”
LLD
– She wanted Quilford dead for the exact same reason Reck voted him … his early 180 on Hito.
Also wants BBMolla dead on principle since he’s “an unreadable slug”.
Says “Reck is 100% golden quality assured Town”.
Llama
- Agrees that KK is scum and Reck is Town.
Doesn’t think Gaoth is scum based on a number of reasons that I’ll just leave there for the moment.
Current sentiment in QT– If I could sacrifice myself right this second to carpet bomb Ajax / Fonz / KK that we would be taking out 2/3 of the scum team.
--
Deas wrote:Also, someone please explain the reck townread. Last time I thought he could be scum and everyone was going on about how he was town, he was actually scum, so I'm not going to just blindly follow people in regard to him.
Unless you have something tangible you want to point to I think this is not something worth pursing at this stage.
Reck is pretty solid Town for immediately backing off Quilford after voting him. Scum Reck does not let what I would term a fairly possible Town lynch to swing based on the playerbase go just like that.
--
Ajax wrote:I'm trying to read as carefully as possible during times when I am NOT working, or cleaning house, or whatever. Inevitably, I'm going to miss some things.
This response is exactly why I think you are scum. You aren’t scum-hunting.
It’s been brought to your attention that I made the exact same comment as Quilford (who you called scum for it). And your response is this “Oops I didn’t see it”. No follow-up, no questions to me on the subject. Nada.
It’s as if you’ve been warned in your Team QT not to antagonize me because I have a tendency to go end up lynching scum who do that.
Ajax wrote:MoI, do you think the timing of hito's vote on me is suspect, or not?
Nope, not in the least. The functional difference between having 2 votes and 3 early in the game is pretty much exactly zero. And your “He’s scum for trying to divert attention from me” stance makes no sense in that it immediately attracted attention from you.
Let me ask – do you think Hito is still scum? If so why did you divert to Quilford other than his rather large case on you? Because your behavior looks like ‘shopping for a counterwagon’ to yourself as opposed to getting a read and pushing it honestly.
--
@Fonz
– please link me to completed Town games (especially Mini Themes) where you espouce “lurker hunting” Day 1 as a good tactic to utilize.
Fonz wrote:Player attacks another player on the basis that defending another player is 'something scum like to do.' I point out that the attack is based on bullshit. And that's 'Non-scumhunting fluff?' Pull the other one. Whether players' attacks on each other are justified or not is the very essence of content.
No, adding in that post is fluff. You didn’t directly link it to any particular case being made and just left it out there as “Hmmm, this is a nice Townie looking post”. Which case specifically were you referring to in indicating it was ‘invalid’?
Also – scum can and certainly do defend partners as well as defend Town for ‘Town cred’. To suggest it doesn’t happen is pretty bad from a motivation standpoint. Futhermore in this game-setup the fact that scum have an entrenched interest to not bus (the bigger their win the better for their team’s chances) defending their partners is a pretty solid motivation.
Fonz wrote:Well, for starters, the wagon on Ajax is bullshit, so I have no problem with being labeled as 'counterwagoning' it.
Well aside from just handwaving it why is it bullshit? Not providing reasons makes your statement at best worthless and possibly scumtastic.
Fonz wrote:Secondly, your characterization of my play in TV Mafia is off the mark. What I objected to was the fact that you jumped on a newbie straight away, and ramped up the pressure constantly, causing him to flail about and panic like nobody's business, and you never stopped to think 'Well hang on, isn't panicking and flailing under pressure a common newbie thing?' What I wanted to see was if that newbie would scumhunt when the pressure was turned down a little. I don't object to attacking weaker players in general, otherwise you'd never catch bad scum.
See I think you are trying to slip hairs right here. You don’t object to attacking weaker players in general but in that instance my interest in Rodion was ‘too pressure intensive’? Nope you went into great detail about your grand theory of the "Newbie Escalator" and how you believed in it strongly.
Fonz wrote:In this case (and I'll take your word for it that TheAm is a weak player, I've never played with him before... though your playing the newbie card on behalf of someone who's been on site nine months is noted) it's precisely the opposite of what you were doing there, where a newbie said something weird and you just rolled from there. Here, TheAmatuer was under basically no pressure, and chose not to scumhunt, and seemed, KK aside, to be getting away with it. That's not 'What a newbie does' it's 'What a scum does.' When I scumhunt, MOI, I look primarily for lack of town intent. That describes TheAmatuer best of everyone in the game.
Yes, TheAm isn’t a strong player. You may not have played with him but I’m guessing someone on your team has. Did you ask them about him at all?
I hardly played the ‘Newbie Card’ here. I didn’t say he was a Newb. I said he as a bad player and it’s damn convenient that of all the low content players who really haven’t been scum-hunting (KK, TheAm, T-Bone, Gaoth) you managed to land on the one that is pretty much the weakest of the bunch.
Fonz wrote:It's noteworthy that your post contains no actual defence of TheAmatuer as playing in anything resembling a pro-town manner. Just the newbie card, and the sound of chainsaws revving so loudly you can hear it a mile away.
Oh I see … I’m chainsawing for TheAm by calling you scumastic for your jump. But you aren’t chainsawing for Ajax by excusing his every move, ignoring the evidence of his scummy play, and trying to find anyone else to lynch in his place.
Your hypocrisy is noted.
Fonz wrote:Oh yeah, one last thing before I turn in for the night: this troubles me. This isn't the kind of game where we're going to accept noob/VI 'I always do it' excuses. It's not our job to say why not voting is bad (although it is): it's yours to demonstrate that there is a pro-town thought process behind your behavior.
Why do you feel it is better for the town for you to not vote on D1?
And suddenly after having been called out on his ignoring / excusing Ajax you suddenly finds
Post 55 suspect. A post he's had plenty of time to inquire about before.
Feeling like all your hardcore defense of your partner is catching up to you Fonz?
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.