Mini 1344: Murder on the HMS Regalia - Game Over
Forum rules
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Oh dear, this is going to be one of those games.
OK FIRST POINT: It might be the start of day one but I don't think that gives anyone permission to not use their heads.
Second point: Vote: Malakittens
You have started this game in the stereotypically scummy fashion of appearing overly nervous. You have commented on absolutely everything, and you keep repeating yourself every time someone says something you have agreed with. Already yuou are exhibiting IIoA with your refusal to follow up on alot of your 'ideas' which cooinceidentally seem to fit in with the bog standard neutral reading which is another sign of trying to artificially fit in. I think that's enough for now.
Now my claim. With a mechanic like Quarantine, I figured that everyone would be jumping to claim VT if they are in fact VT in the hope that it would mean that there is less likelihood of wasting it on someone that doesn't have a power. For the cynical ones, there are 'likely' to be goons who would also claim VT as it is the most safe claim to make, and goons also have nothing to do at night as kills are 'generally' a team thing meaning kills should go through regardless of quarantine. I want to make this point very clear so that we don't waste time early game in the case that a townie gets quarantined and scum think they're smart but no killing. This won't work until there is only 1 scum left.
Next point: Phill, NEVER I repeat, NEVER use an RNG to choose your rvs vote. The idea of the RVS is that people can start to get reads. But by RNGing your vote you effectively skip this and instead disassociate yourself from your vote which is anti-town. I won't be following this up yet, because Mala is already doing scummy stuffs, but bear it in mind for future games. You help literally noone.
And closing words, No I'm not a Ythan alt. I'm myself, I have my own alts. I just haven't played in quite a while. Uni9 semester and such things. My claim has been explained above.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
@ Mala: Self meta is unreliable at best. Also, It's just a vote.
@ Image:
No I don't want everyone to claim. I expected a couple of claims which was one of the reasons I wanted to get in early. I was assuming everyone in the game power role or not to be claiming VT on the first day. I wouldn't consider it to be rolefishing. I have been working under the assumption everyone would respect the mechanic instead of ignoring it. Or using it stupidly. Why would you ever vote to quarantine who you are voting for like someone people have. If you want them dead then why the hell are you roleblocking them after they are already dead. It makes no sense.
Second point: Phill did it to, that was the one I saw. Shame on you too them.
Also you have completely missed the rvs. If everyone treats it seriously then it is actually useful. By not trying to come up with something serious from the get go you are holding town back. Every post that someone makes can and should be put under scrutiny. (makes grumble comment about how MS has been going downhill for the past two years.)Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ Phillammon wrote:I'd say it's probably more useful as a public jail, and use in a similar manner- ie, going for people we suspect to be scum to stop them making the kill,particularlyONLY in the endgame.
LMAO FTFYDon't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ brundibar wrote:Espeonage wrote:
Second point: Vote: Malakittens
You have started this game in the stereotypically scummy fashion of appearing overly nervous. You have commented on absolutely everything, and you keep repeating yourself every time someone says something you have agreed with. Already yuou are exhibiting IIoA with your refusal to follow up on alot of your 'ideas' which cooinceidentally seem to fit in with the bog standard neutral reading which is another sign of trying to artificially fit in. I think that's enough for now.
I'm surprised you see this as scummy, and not just newb. I'm not saying it's not scummy, but I am saying his behaviour thus far has been incredibly newbish.
I go by the philosophy that everyone knows what they are doing until they prove themselves otherwise, simply because alot of people try to play to the I'm a newbie, it's not my fault sympathies. If you want examples I know alot of players that at least used to do this ALL the time. This is why having discernible meta is very important. I hate it when people come in to non newbie games without having played here before.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ drmyshotgun wrote:I think Espeonage is Town, but what he wanted us to do with his claim I'm unsure.
I think we should quarantine confirmed non-PRs. Like people who were cleared by Cop.
If we quarantine the Cop, he can't investigate no more. But when he's out there, he has chance of Doc protection and maybe keep investigating.
I would think it highly unlikely there is a doc in this game considering the jailkeep machanic. There might be, but I just think that town would be WAY to powerful if we had a doc as well.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Well here used to have alot of large posts until people realised it stagnates the game.
Generally people here now will do alot of short posts.
For example if I need to respond in depth to four things I will make four separate posts one after another instead of doing a large post. Noone likes WoTs. I've also been in one of the top five most post heavy day 1s. Then again that game had real time mechanics that meant we had to carefully pick how long we wanted each day to go for.
What does CI stand for?Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:I am not in agreement of Quarantining vanilla Town. The only position that I'd jail a VT is if he/she were confirmed and there is no heavy suspicion on anybody else.
Nope try again. Ok think about what the quarantine is. It's a jailkeep, the person both can't be targetted and also is roleblocked. It's imperfect art so it's hard to judge it by the roleblock portion. Math says to not roleblock anyone simply because even if mafia have powers (which is likely given the mechanic.) they are unlikely to have more than town.
The priority is to Jail the most suspicious players. Scum would love this to happen. They'd know who not to target and they can use whatever power they have.
Why? Hmm, what happens if we hit the multitude of town that also should have power roles? So what if they know they can't kill someone, That person still can't die. Let me ask you a question. It may help me understand where you're coming from: Why do we always lynch day 1? (btw this is a highly relevent question as to why you are using the fallacies you are using.)
Like I said previously, most of the players that are advocating to jail known VTs are assuming that mafia has no PR. 3 scum players seems likely for a game this size. (Albeit, I don't know what is likely on mafiascum. I assume that the proportions are similar to were I am from.) If mafia has 2 PR and we jail one scum, they'd have to sacrifice the PR in order to kill, assuming they can only perform, one action. This PR could be Busdriver, Roleblock or even watcher or role cop. I would like to hinder mafia as much as possible.
No we're not, at least I know. It would be a pretty messed up game to have a communal jailkeep and not have mafia power roles, js. Yes there are most probably three, unless we have two scumteams, in which case there are probably four scum. That's a pretty big assumption. Not speaking for Richard here but site meta here is that the kill is the factional ability so anyone can perform it IN ADDITION to their normal role, so it becomes highly unlikely that they would have to give up a power role. Also, tbh, if you look at the maths of it, you are more likely to be a hindrance to mafia if we quarantine a VT because it takes out of the NK pool and we can choose who we want to be able to stay in the game. Remember if it's done on (psuedo aka scumreading based) randomosity like you are suggesting then we are most likely more likely to hit a town power role than a scum one. As much as you might have good intentions, harming town outweighs harming scum (given the inherent scum advantage that seems to be going around these days.)
responses in blod
Also I've never understood the point of voting lurkers. Why pressure them into voting when they aren't even looking at the thread. And considering most people will unvote if they get replaced there is actually very little incentive to actually respond to anti-lurker votes.
Brains people, we have them for a reason.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
@ sword:
1. okay
2. Yes it does. A couple of them. So? How so?
3. Ok, I didn't trivialise my claim. I explained that I though everyone would want to do it. I wanted to make sure I was in the few to claim before it became dangerous to have more people claim. I claimed to give town knowledge. When we are ready to roleblock someone then my claim can be ignored. However when we are this early and the like it would be a bad idea to be blocking out town power roles. I would rather let scum be than to hurt the town in the early game. Especially considering it appears we have a weak day game.
4. Covering all bases to make sure I let him know of the posibilities. Read bro, it was right above it. You're missing the point, the claim isn't a cry for cred, it's to take me out of the power role pool. Goons are really the only scum that can get away with claiming VT, any of the scum could use the factional kill. What I'm trying to say is, what kind of difference does it make if I or anyone else that hypothetically claimed vt is actually a goon. The rationale behind it is the exact same. In addition scum gain nothing from that whole process. So basically even if I was scum, you're argument would only amount to barking up one tree and have me fall out of another just coz.
Unvote, Vote: The Trollie
That is in no way an acceptable post at this stage of the discussion.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ PeregrineV wrote:I think the Quarantine can be used to do either protect strong town read or, after we lynch first scum, as a second vote after the lynch. Once we nail the first scum, if we are lynching scum, then we should be quarantining our second suspect to prevent the NK.
I'm less worried about blocking a town PR, since there is less likelihood (percentage-wise) of doing so.
Two things wrong here. Quarantine gets locked in when the lynch majority does. No changing it after the flip.
And bear in mind that town most likely have more or even PRs than scum. Your argument of percentage is flat wrong.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Lol BK.
You have all the right things but in the wrong order.
Ok let me tell you your argument. What you said is this: Yeah VT's shouldn't claim just to do it. This whole approach is scummy and the jail-mechanic is not an excuse to get away with rolefishing.
If you want to use the one the others are using it does like this:
VTs shouldn't claim. (leave out the other bit, you're trying to get me lynched not put holes in. I didn' do it just to do it. You even say this later, hypocrisy is a scumtell in many people's eyes no idea why because everyone does it, but anyways.
His approach is scummy and the jail-mechanic is not an excuse to see:claim.
I think he was rolefishing.
See those two things don't have a direct relationship. It has to do with how people see the motivations of the claim not the fact that the claim itself happened. So fixed.
Also, faily sure I've addressed the reasons brought up for why it could be seen as rolefishing so maybe best to leave that out.
Glad to help.
Also Shotgun, I don't think that was a slip. It's an important thing to keep in your mind, I think it's a very safe assumption that there is at least one scum power role. Now if you can point out WHY his sounded like it was bolstered by knowledge then you would have an argument.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:I was on the fence of whether you were Mafia or Town. It seems that this vote of yours, without a valid explanation as to why, other than you feel threatened by me. I count 5 votes on you. I'll add the sixth because I am now convinced that you are mafia.
Nobody Hammer yet, because we still need to decide on the Quarantine.
Vote Espeonage
BTW,You haven't really placed a case for trollie and Methat deserved your vote. They seem like OMGUS votes.
Sorry forgot people are stupid and can't read between the lines. OMGUS only applies when there is no evidence. Again, brains people, use them.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ BK201 wrote:
You have a point. I think Mala seem like anxious scum.↑ drmyshotgun wrote:VOTE: Malakittens
You've been playing newb-card for a while now, and I certainly don't see you as one anymore.
Why is Sword_of_Omens obtwTown again?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Malakittens
Quarintine: Trollie
LMFAO.FoSyour iso, three posts long, already terrible.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:
Your barking up the wrong tree. You need a better case against me than: you have a different opinion, and that I am attacking you.
However, there is something odd happening around here. Malakitten is Buddying up with Espeonage. I doubt that they are both Mafia buddies. If Espeonage were to flip town, it would look positive on Mala that was against his Lynch. Mala is looking worse than Espeonage at the moment for me. I've been getting a bad feel from her for a while, but her votes do not reflect her agreement to Espeonage.
Vote: Malakitten
Quarantine: Espeonage
Do I really need to explicitly spell out everything?Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:You do not have to. But if you do not explain yourself, nobody is going to follow your bandwagon.
You say that like I want people to lynch with me. This day has way to long to go for me to care if people are reading the same stuff as I am.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
I think you have scumtell and scumslip mixed up. You're free to see whatever you want as a scumtell but scumslips are where I accidentally say I'm mafia, assuming I am.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:Gut feelings really wont get you far. If you are going to vote for me, you'd better put a valid case on me, and also, I expect others to respond as well. I don't want to get lynched without my flip telling town who is likely mafia and who is not. I am trying to get information from Mala and Espeonage so as to better judge what to do after they flip. As far as I can tell, both are incompatible as mafia, I find it unlikely that scum would defend scum this early in the game.
However, If Espeonage is lynched and he flips Town. Mala is going to come out and say "See, guys, I told you that he was town", convincing several of you that she is town.
She says that she buddies up with experience players, and that that has gotten her lynched before. She could be town making this mistake, or Scum setting up the above scenario.
The thing is that, I have not heard an argument against me from those voting for me, and in turn I have given a valid argument for those I am voting for (And I admit that my logic might be wrong, but I need to hear a valid reason why it is wrong).
@Espeonage, Ser Arthur, and Malakitten:
Can you give me a detailed reasoning why you are voting? It would be nice if you could include a second suspicion and Explain why.
Bolded is the most incorrect thing you have said all game. My sig speaks the truth, learn it.
As for your question: Nope, that would ruin half the fun. There's a case there, currently I'm waiting to see if you're going to continue on this path or if you're going to put your head down and think. Currently you're failing pretty bad and coming across as information gathering for how to make yourself look more town now that people are voting for you.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ guille2015 wrote:↑ Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Oh, I just read the word "detailed". No, I can't really give you a detailed explanation. It just your posts seem to be aimed at AtE and gaining the favors of the crowd, and trying to make yourself look good while at the same time soft-push a mislynch.
I see were you are getting at. I do not think I am using AtE to gain the favor of the crowds. I am using logic to gain the favor of the crowds. I am not soft pushing a mislynch because we do not know if it's a mislynch. You should use that argument after the fact. At this point your argument just looks like a Straw man.
This post made me laughDon't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ image wrote:@D3f3nd3r:You voted Espeonage during RVS and kept quite while his wagon got as high as L-1 without any justification other than his self-quarantine. This seems like a pretty weak point, at least compared to what else was said. Why would it be a scum-slip to self-quarantine? How would this help scum at all? Further, why do you think whatever scum-motivation Espeonage has for wanting to be jailed is more likely than the town motivation?
@Espeonage:In #149, why did you ask drmyshotgun specifically if he wanted to push a guille2015 wagon?
1. For alliteration
2. At that point shotgun was one of the few with their head screwed on.
How is this warning pro-town? I can see this as an attempt at message-passing or a catch-22 (if he posts more, "He's only doing it to look town after I called him out on it" or "See? I told you he was bad" if he doesn't); I can't see it as useful scumhunting. Wouldn't it be better to make note of it, file it away, and bring it up tomorrow if his play hasn't changed?
Further, you haven't really explained your case on guille2015. You may think its terribly obvious, but even if it is, it still helps us to have your opinion on record rather than just vaguely alluded to. If you are scum, forcing you to have backed, justified reads is one of our bests means of catching you, so please share.
Ok, today I will teach you about Espe. Espe likes to show people he doesn't like their play, not tell them why, wait for them to keep doing it, and in the last few irl days of the day reveal why I didn't like them in the first place and how they have kept doing it and doing it throughout. This lets me have a stronger case after the initial suspicion which is one of the perks of not playing all your cards at once as well as it means I get to skip the momentum on the game thus making it easier to get the lynches I want because I think I'm better than everyone else despite the fact that I'm quite likely not. I will admit it works much better in newbie games and it makes ICs tear their hair out.
@ catch-22: Now that was kinda a setting myself up for a case later however I clearly explained myself citing his three post iso. Considering every game post has been pretty much a one liner with a new vote I figured I'd give that a chance to change. And no, because it's way to weak a thing to try and say someone is scum for. It was meant as a warning more than a threat. Not to say the threat isn't there, just that it's not the primary function of the post.
I don't like sharing before I have to. It ruins my whole playstyle. I'll admit, I'm terrible at my townplay. I catch scum, but have a terribly hard time backing up my reads because I rarely understand them. So I pick out one thing that is scummy on who I think is scum and I make a weak vote for it. Then as I see everything else play out that usually becomes a stronger case and I flesh out why I felt that way about them. I trust my gut as far as it stays a gut read. I won't follow my gut reads to a lynch unless I feel they are scum the whole way. I've been lynched ALOT of times for trying to derail a wagon I pushed for ages right before lynch because I've had an epiphany that they aren't actually scum. Every single time I've tried to derail my own wagon it has been on someone that eventually flipped town, (usually after my lynch lol)Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ Phillammon wrote:
@Espe: What are your knee-jerk reactions to guile and trollie, and would you be willing to give any explanation on the latter?
Guille: Mainly seems scum from a bunch of little things which may or may not be due to alignment or personal playstyle.
Trollie: Terrible, terrible flopping.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ image wrote:There's a very large difference between something being viable and being so sure of its existence that you'd be willing to lynch based on it. But even worse, you have assumed that it is so certain that Espeonage must have reached the same conclusion of you and must see it as the primary motivation for his actions.
This comes across as an extremely weak attempt to justify your vote on Espeonage especially given that the wagon reached L-1. Together with the fact that you have done little to no scum-hunting and have tunnelled Espeonage for the entire game (you don't seem to have mentioned anyone else) I feel comfortable with aVote: D3f3nd3r.
He's town bro.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
You flopped on my wagon without any prior anything. It was just, ohey, this guy looks like he has a good argument and then voted. Didn't say anything about me at all just added the vote. Your only sizable posts are all either IIoA or part of a petty discussion.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ TheTrollie wrote:Espionage is the most popular quarantine right now. Saying its stupid but you wont explain why is just plain dumb and unhelpful. Same thing with an argument like "trust me, it's worth it." I think you are town but you are being utterly unhelpful to town with these posts.
Actually all the reasons why you would quarantine are now no longer in effect. So yeah quarantining me is pretty stupid.
Unquarantine, quarantine: Ser Arthur
Ok guille. You point has been made. There is no way to get a lynch on you today. That was a good post. You've gone from gut scum to niggling worry. I'll reveal if I feel like I want a lynch on you tomorrow.
I didn't know how close deadline was tbh. Anyways, I'm pretty sure defender isn't scum. So considering the other options close to deadline I'm going to have to go back to mala. Fairly simple logic right?
Unvote, Vote: MalaDon't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ Malakittens wrote:-Headdesks-, so you rather lynch someone who is trying to help the town out of D1 fluff instead of lynching someone who is unhelpful and just tunneling someone. Yep, great logic there.
I'm more sure of defender being town than you being town. I don't want myself to be lynched, so there is really only one option. See mala the point is that while he isn't playing optimally, I don't feel that he is scum. I've had reason to suspect you early so while tiny that is the deciding factor.
tbh I think all three of the wagons are on town so it's kinda messed up. But I was asked to make a compromise lynch so I'm doing what I can.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
This scares the shit out of me because it's not true. He even said he started crafting his post before he got his role. This is a stupid sentiment and should be stamped out until he's posted a decent amount.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ NabakovNabakov wrote:To clarify: I read the thread before my substitution was confirmed, but I did not start writing my first post until afterwards.
@Shotgun: Some play draws votes because it's disappointing, unusual, or frustrating. Your play drew my vote because it's indistinguishable from good scum play.
Still counts. As someone that used to do a fair bit of replacing. Taking your reads from before getting your role is much better than any other way of approach.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
Is that last line sarcasm, a theory that is waiting to be tested or actually what you think?Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:@phil, this seems like a total 180 from my last game with you...Its almost like you're affraid to call anyone scummy...i remember when you thought you caught me in a slip...and you were like "in your face!!!
you seem overly cautious this game and its starting to worry me...
This post has been noted for later reference.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
↑ TheTrollie wrote:I'm still for a defender lynch! and no one has argued against my case for an espe quarantine
There's no point to quarantine me UNLESS you want to potentially save me from a NK.
If I'm town, I'm a VT.
If I'm scum, there would be others that can kill instead of me unless there is a hidden mechanic which would be bastard and this game isn't advertised as bastard unless I missed it.
If you're going to make the scum PR argument then it's moot because the same goes for everyone in the game.
So lets do something useful and keep sword alive.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
So what if they kill him the next night. We had him for an extra day. If someone is an asset to the town they should be kept around for as long as possible. The only time it would be ok to take a stab in the dark is if there had been a massclaim. That's not going to happen, nor should it. So we should be keeping people around.Don't @ me.- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
We have 1 day and 9 hours. Trollie pull your head of your ass and do something productive. Does it actually matter who we quarantine?
If none of us have any more to go on then why the fuck does it matter who the hell we quarantine. We aren't going to stop the scumkill so we may as well make sure that we have one of the sane people around for longer. Hell you don't even have to agree. If someone doesn't have issue with being quarantined then there is literally no drawback for us to do it. If they are town and they don't have an issue well then who cares. If they are scum they need to look like they have no issue with it to even stay alive. WE LITERALLY HAVE NO BAD CONSEQUENCES FROM EVEN USING IT RANDOMLY AT THIS STAGE. Even if you don't think sword is town, who in the actual fuck cares. Just quarantine the guy and keep someone that is actually engaging in discussion alive. Why him? Why not him, it doesn't fucking matter who, but for now he has support and most people seem to think he is town so we may as fucking well.Don't @ me. - Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage
- Espeonage