Open 421-Pamplona II: Electric Bullgaloo! Game over

[Hyperion]

VOTE: JohnnyFarrar Nice to play with you again Johnny

[Hyperion]

VOTE: Andrew94
Because "bandwagon his ass" is not a legit reason for a vote.

[Hyperion]

^Your point?
Inte is playing it cocky.

Why did you feel the need to say that Inte is playing it cocky for him, instead of letting him explain?

[Hyperion]

Ya you're right. UNVOTE: VOTE: rachmarie, beause you're piggy backing and wrote two paragraphs to defend what still amounts to a RV

Missed this on my first read through, why did you wait until being told by Rachmarie that it was real vote time to make a real vote?


And @DLG: I know you said yo asked a question, but I can't find it what was it?

[Hyperion]

Not particularly. I dont expect many scum to be on it anyway just because its a super early wagon. Whats more interesting to me, is the people not interested in it at all. Like mr bk201 for example.

VOTE: bk201, talk to me baby. Whatcha thinking about? Are you pro or anti bit!

This was supposed to go into the above post too but I forgot, lurker pressure, really?
UNVOTE:
VOTE: DoubleJD

[Hyperion]

Holy Catch-up Post Batman!!

Hyperion, im no veteran mafiascum player and all, but it seems to me that reading the thread is beneficial to playing the game.

Also, why are you defending bk?

Yes but just going after someone for not posting is an easy way for scum to contribute. And I'm not defending bk, I am pointing out your vote and its badness.

Here's the basic points against Bitmap. I don't think anything has really gone unanswered, I just don't buy the answers given.

• Contradiction between adding a fourth vote to the early wagon on McStab and simultaneously casting suspicion that calling for an early wagon is scummy.
  
• Making that fourth vote as another RVS vote. This indicates a desire to not be held accountable for the vote.
  
• Pro forma defenses that aren't really applicable.
  

  Maybe next time you could quote or say the post numbers so I can at least know what I'm defending against?

  
  Three posts by Bitmap at that time, and two were called out as scummy.
  

  DLG and Greywing have been tunneling me really hard lately

  
  Not true. I haven't neglected paying attention to other players, nor is applying pressure the same thing as tunneling.
  
  
• The misrep with respect to who was originally being pressured as part of the justification for voting me.
  

  Grey pointed out that your post is reaction-fishing me.

  
  This isn't true. While I could understand someone on the outside of this debate getting confused over the references, it was an integral part of the back and forth between me and Bitmap. I'm not sure how he could make that mistake legitimately.

Pedit: I'll get to the newer posts in a bit.

The problem i have with this, is that they can be explained away by noobieness.

Point 1) Its common for 2nd votes in the pregame to be points of interest. The attack though, following the 4th vote on Mr StabbyMcStabberson is weird for both town and scum to do. So null

Point 2) RVS is RVS. As if anyone thought the mcstab wagon would go anywhere. I dont see scum motivation in voting mcstab, when its just as easy to ignore the wagon entirely and keep the RV on andrew. I see 'for fun' as a reason. So i null this too.

Point 3) Would you be interested in why youre being attacked as town? I would. He got 2-4 votes very quickly over nothing. My response as both town/scum would be "wait wut" So Null again. The tunneling thing is just misuse of the word >.> I got called out for using omgus wrong as town in my last game.

Point 4) I dont follow. post 21 follows bitmap responding to a dlg post. post 19. So it is true. It feels like your baiting to see if bitmap will point this out, but you've said before that you were done debating with him.

Granted, i think Bit's accusation of DLG and Grey buddying is scummy. So theres not nothing to this bitmap thing, i just dont think there's much.

I dont know why more people arent getting their feet wet with this issue. Be a man, doooo the right thing and post.

Going through the entire case on Bitmap and defending him, noted.

I put Bitmap at L-1 b/c he apparently had a guilty conscience and thought he had been accused of rolefishing rather than reaction fishing (?)
+ L-1 usually creates pressure. His response seems townish.
UNVOTE:

VoteToReplace: Inte

don't like his trolling. Sad thing is he is probably town b/c in my other game with him we were both scum and he wasn't an idiot there.

Idk where to put my vote, sue me.

So you vote, get pressured, unvote and try to replace the person pressuring you? Really?????
VOTE: BK201

VOTE: Inte

Policy lynch.

VOTE: Inte This is ridiculous and not at all helpful to town.

These two go together, both jump on the inte wagon, not because he is scummy, but because of policy.

First of all, Inte relax.

Secondly, it's better to lynch scum than people who appear to have a negative influence on town as town.

If we waste a lynch on Inte, scum is one step closer to winning.

This post is completely empty and doesn't help the game at all. Please post something useful in the future.


Thinking out of the people who just jumped on inte(BK201, Rachmarie and Greywing), there is at least one scum, and I am pretty sure it is BK

[Hyperion]

Question: WTF is ad-home-la-blah-blah-whatchamafuckin-hell-you-call-it mean?
Uber needs to step it up.

[Hyperion]

Sorry guys, I picked up another job to help pay for college, and don't have enough time to play anymore. Currently using my ten minute break during my second job to replace out of all my games.

@ Mod, I need replacement