Open 437: Town of Semi-Nightless Plots (Game Over)
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:31 am
by Equinox
The old don sat behind his desk, his hand holding a broken glass. Sometime forever ago, he had slammed it down in fury and spilled all of his beloved wine when he had heard the news from his subordinates. They were new hires, fresh off the street, and the thing that they had to screw up was this, the most important shipment. He sighed deeply and glanced down at the varied papers set in front of him. Balance sheets, inventory, invoices, and notes of different sizes were gathered here, but the one that caught his attention was a short, typed memo, stating only that the ammunition he had ordered would be delayed by two nights.
Two nights! Did they not see how critical those two nights could be? He had been so careful in teaching them to get their goods transported as quickly as possible, too. On the other hand, he supposed, they were new goons; mistakes were inevitable. The town to which he would be sending them was a quiet one, he had assured them, and it would not take much force to subjugate its citizens. Without the guns, however, that task would be much harder. He raised his glass to drink it but sipped at nothing. That was all right. All he could do now, drunk as he was, was to await news of success. Anything less would not be acceptable.
Days will have a deadline of two weeks, and Nights will last 48 hours. Deadline extensions will be granted only in extreme circumstances.
Prods will be issued to players if they have not posted within a 48-hour period. Players who have been prodded have 48 hours to respond in the game thread before a replacement is sought. Saturday and Sunday will be considered a 24-hour period.
Lynches occur through simple majority (50% of living players + 1, rounded down). If no majority is reached at deadline or there is a majority of votes for No Lynch, the Day will end without a lynch. Once majority is reached, no further votes or unvotes will count.
All players, including the lynched player, are allowed to talk in twilight phase until the thread is locked, at which point Day ends. Dead players may not post until the game has been officially declared over.
Actions not received by deadline will be considered forfeit. Actions may be submitted ahead of time and can be changed as many times as desired; at deadline, the last action that was submitted will be used. Actions may be submitted via PM or QuickTopic.
Flavor is for entertainment purposes only and has no significance in the game.
Any situations not covered above will be handled on an individual basis.
Setup
The 11-player semi-Nightless open setup is a vanilla ("mountainous") setup consisting of 9 townies and 2 mafiosi where the mafia cannot kill for the first two Nights.
Nine people have received:
Welcome to Open 437, XXX!
You are a
townie
.
You have no special abilities beyond the right to vote.
You win when all threats to the town have been eliminated and at least one member of the town remains standing.
The game thread is here. Please confirm by responding to this PM with your role.
Two people have received:
Welcome to Open 437, XXX!
You are a
mafia goon
with
YYY
, who is a
mafia goon
.
You and your partner may talk in this QuickTopic during the Night phase. From Night 3 onward, you may choose one player to eliminate each Night; you may not utilize a Night kill either Night 1 or Night 2. You may not target yourself or your partner.
You win when all threats to the mafia have been eliminated, or when nothing can prevent such an occurrence, and at least one member of the mafia remains standing.
The game thread is here. Please confirm by responding to this PM with your role.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:07 am
by Equinox
TeChNoWC replaces Pressed Bunson.
Day 1 begins now.
Mod Notes
Hiraki is V/LA until August 20.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:24 am
by Cheery Dog
Just making sure a replacement can't get the first post of the game, oh and also VOTE: sisterman
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:30 am
by TeChNoWC
Vote: andrew94
for being a liar. He knows
OMGUS FOS CheeryDog because yeah, that should have been my post slot.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:33 am
by ProsecutorGodot
VOTE: Mr. K
How dare he be one place above me on the player list!
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:07 am
by Sisterman
VOTE: ProsecutorGodot
Overdoing it. Real vote. Jokephase has been slain by me.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:17 am
by funkybike1
VOTE: Sisterman
Back to jokephase.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:33 am
by Sisterman
sorry bud. there's no joking around now. it's do or die. lynch godot or lose the game.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:44 am
by ProsecutorGodot
There's 5 of us who have posted out of 11 players at this point. Care to explain how you can form a serious vote when the majority of the players in this game haven't gotten a single word in?
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:49 am
by Sisterman
I don't need six other people to post words to analyze your words to know that you are scum. Not to mention that the majority of the players who HAVE posted have just posted nothing. words that mean nothing. So I'm not sure why I would expect anything from the rest of these jokers. Oh, also? I'm the ghost cop. yeah. there's that.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:02 am
by ProsecutorGodot
So we haven't left the jokephase after all. In that case, it's chainsaw time.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:04 am
by Sisterman
sorry, no. it's not a joke. the ghost cop thing is a joke. you dying today is not a joke.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:44 am
by Voidedmafia
The seriousness here...It's choking...
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:57 am
by Sisterman
Mafia is a serious game. It's like a courtroom. which is a serious place. And I'm the judge, jury, and executioner. Godot overdid his joke in his first post, a clear scumtell, to anyone with superior aarryyaan scumfinding abilities, and then makes a defensive post which actually doesn't make any sense. there's no reason for a bunch of people not having posted things like "i'm choking on the seriousness of this game" to be a factor in anyone's vote. especially not when it's a vote as good as this. in conclusion, kill that guy.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:13 am
by Voidedmafia
...I don't think I really understood what you just said.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:17 am
by Sisterman
You'll understand once the coffeeman is six feet under and the game is half won.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:28 am
by seilkops
Sisterman wrote:Mafia is a serious game. It's like a courtroom. which is a serious place. And I'm the judge, jury, and executioner. Godot overdid his joke in his first post, a clear scumtell, to anyone with superior aarryyaan scumfinding abilities, and then makes a defensive post which actually doesn't make any sense. there's no reason for a bunch of people not having posted things like "i'm choking on the seriousness of this game" to be a factor in anyone's vote. especially not when it's a vote as good as this. in conclusion, kill that guy.
This is me, seriously RVSING
VOTE: Sisterman
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:21 pm
by greygnarl
This is me not RVSing
Vote:Seilkops
for trying to form an early wagon on Sisterman.
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:11 pm
by seilkops
greygnarl wrote:This is me not RVSing
Vote:Seilkops
for trying to form an early wagon on Sisterman.
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Is their an RVS handbook? Nobody's voting you, and I definitely need to adhere to the strict RVS rules so UNVOTE: VOTE: Greygnarl
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Is their an RVS handbook? Nobody's voting you, and I definitely need to adhere to the strict RVS rules so UNVOTE: VOTE: Greygnarl
Are you being serious?
You come in and say that you are RVSing but you place the third vote on someone.
You come in and say you are RVSing but quote a post that could be considered scummy. (BTW I don't think it's scummy, just sayin it could be taken that way.)
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Is their an RVS handbook? Nobody's voting you, and I definitely need to adhere to the strict RVS rules so UNVOTE: VOTE: Greygnarl
Are you being serious?
You come in and say that you are RVSing but you place the third vote on someone.
You come in and say you are RVSing but quote a post that could be considered scummy. (BTW I don't think it's scummy, just sayin it could be taken that way.)
Then when I vote you, you OMGUS me?
Yup, being serious.
You come in and say you are RVSing but quote a post that could be considered scummy. (BTW I don't think it's scummy, just sayin it could be taken that way.)
You're blatantly covering yourself right their, so keeping my vote on you. Only scum suspect I got right now.
Why isn't Sisterman's post scummy?
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Who says bandwagoning is bad in RVS?
@Seiklops: You quoted a post, so obviously your vote wasn't RVS. That should have been established in your next post.
You should tell everyone why you think a Sisterman wagon is good, because I DON'T believe you were attempting a random vote.
Sisterman = prob town
While I don't agree with his Godot push ('one post scumfound' lolz) it's nice contenty reactionary stuff right there.
If you were RVSing you wouldn't have put the third vote on someone.
Is their an RVS handbook? Nobody's voting you, and I definitely need to adhere to the strict RVS rules so UNVOTE: VOTE: Greygnarl
Are you being serious?
You come in and say that you are RVSing but you place the third vote on someone.
You come in and say you are RVSing but quote a post that could be considered scummy. (BTW I don't think it's scummy, just sayin it could be taken that way.)
Then when I vote you, you OMGUS me?
Yup, being serious.
You come in and say you are RVSing but quote a post that could be considered scummy. (BTW I don't think it's scummy, just sayin it could be taken that way.)
You're blatantly covering yourself right their, so keeping my vote on you. Only scum suspect I got right now.
Why isn't Sisterman's post scummy?
I've got a better idea, friend. How about instead of posing the question "Why isn't Sisterman's post scummy," which could be deflected in eight thousand ways, all of them town, you posit why the post IS scummy, so that I don't have to post all eight thousand things for you to see the light.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:01 pm
by Sisterman
Actually, you said in your first vote on me that you were randomly voting. But now you're trying to say that, no, it wasn't random at all, my post was actually scummy. I agree with the guy whose name is hard to type. Is my post scummy or is it not, and are you randomly voting or not? I'd like an explanation, sealman. Lest you get the "club"
