Ladies Night 2: No Cover -- (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
About the RVS thing... Not really? Usually you want to get out of RVS as quickly as possible, I find. I mean, I've found a few minor tells that occur only in RVS, but if RVS ends naturally then it's nice that it's ended, and that was pretty natural to me.
That said.
Vote: Piggy
I do agree with the accusations, and I really dislike that she hasn't actually done anything about them, and that she hasn't moved her vote to try to actually hunt :/- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
↑ PiggyGal15 wrote:Seastorm, how exactly am I suppose to actually scumhunt when not even all the players have posted o.O
Exactly like that.
(Not to say that you all should vote for me but whatever~)
No, really, I guess it's less of an actually getting down to business and hunting thing and more the fact that your vote was just kind of sitting on yourself who you obviously don't want lynched?- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
Spoiler:
Questions pulled down here:
Huntress, what is scummy about Sucrose? You already explained slightly, but could you expand on it?
Sucrose, what kind of replies were you looking for before you unvoted me? I don't think you ever talked about them.
DGB, how is tbh a scumtell?
btw, further explanation for my earlier vote is the top paragraph of that huge wall.
Um... I feel like I should have more to say, but I'm pretty tired right now. Readlist below which kind of summarizes the above, town to scum, top to bottom.
Vote: Huntressis also under the spoiler.
Spoiler:- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
What really omg I'm sorry >.< I could have sworn you were in one of the newb games I wasstalkingwatching recently?
(Also thought you said something to that effect earlier in the game ._.|||)
Will go back and take another look at Sucrose later.- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
Prod-dodge, I'm probably not going to be able to post in-depth until late Saturday, but after a quick ISO on Tracey... Tracey, I was wondering why you voted Sucrose after your joke-unvote -- It didn't seem like anything had happened that would have changed your mind about Rach.
...Also is it possible we could get a tl;dr of your wall?- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
I want to write up a huge readwall like I did last time, but to be honest I'm not sure where to start so that it's still relevant, so I did votals and really horrible ISOs (Don't have the time to go further in-depth atm :/)
Huntress has been asking for this: I feel like you've been asking questions, but you haven't actually talked about what they mean or looked at the answers (Fujiko, Eidolon), which makes me feel like you're asking questions for the sake of asking questions and looking involved in the game. You don't actually react to the answers, which makes me feel like you don't care about the answers, which makes those questions fluff, which means that you've been fluff posting most of your posts.
Major wagons I'm using:
Spoiler:
*Dark green = townfirm (as I see it), Blue = Pseudo-clear, Dark red = Scum
Hm. Analysis:
Don't like Huntress any more than I did
Like Sucrose less.
Only one of the ^^^ are scum, probably.
DGB doesn't look particularly lovely
Amrun and Fujiko look clear(er)
If Sucrose is scum, Tracey's clear, Huntress is clear, Brandi and camn are clear, Piggy's clear, Spring's clear, Fujiko's clear.
If Huntress is scum, Sucrose is clear, Fujiko's sort of clear, and... Surprisingly it doesn't tell me any more than that.
Interesting.
Voting:HuntressSucrose
(My knowledge of votal analysis is very basic, I apologize)
...So now that warm-up's done, I guess it's time to look at ISOs.
(Fun fact: I had a good half of the playerlist listed as scum until I realized I probably can't use the same scumtells here as I usually do -- Namely, not giving reads and/or analyzing. I've struck out the places where I see that and changed my reads accordingly.)
There is text below this spoiler please do not miss it.
Spoiler:
Okay, there is no way I'm not coming back to this, this is actually kind of just horrible. That won't happen today and will probably not happen in huge chunks, more like one or two people at a time.
Addendum: Quick skim of Brandi, who I somehow missed: Don't like the amount of reads she's been giving, don't like how here posting's deteriorated (I've seen scum do that), too bad very few people give reads on this site, slight scum.- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
Votal analysis?
Also, I think Huntress, you and... Piggy and possibly Amrun would be labeled scummy, though I've chosen to ignore that you guys tend not to post reasoning because that opens up too many.
I also want to see Sucrose flip because of votals, I did a little color labeling assuming she was scum and everything looked okay.- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
PiggyGal15 (3) ((PiggyGal15) - DrippingGoofball - (Amrun) - Brandi -Seastormjt)
Seastormjt(5) (MathGirl277 - Bunnylover-Huntress-Sucrose-Brandi)
camn (3) (CityElectric- flinter - Eidolon)
PiggyGal15 (5) (DrippingGoofball -Seastormjt- camn -Amrun-Telo-Fujiko)
Fujiko(3) (Eidolon - camn -Bunnylover)
Brandi (3) (springlullaby-Sucrose-Huntress)
Telo(10) (RachMarie- DrippingGoofball - PiggyGal15 - Brandi - camn -CityElectric-Fujiko- Eidolon -TraceyLyn11-Sucrose)
RachMarie(4) (DrippingGoofball -Tammy-Apokalyptika- Huntress - (Fujiko))
Apokalyptika(4) (Sucrose-(PiggyGal15) -Fujiko- Eidolon - springlullaby)
TraceyLyn11(4) (springlullaby - camn - DrippingGoofball - PiggyGal15)
RachMarie(8) (Tammy-Apokalyptika- DrippingGoofball - PiggyGal15 -camn-Sucrose-Brandi- TraceyLyn11)
Sorry I'm not going farther, this is as far as I looked when I posted.
I said, my understanding of votal analysis is very shallow, but I know one thing: Scum tend not to vote right after each other (It's very difficult to fake, even if you know about it -- the votes come off as really awkward.)
I've also noticed that if you assume someone's scum and that clears a lot of people, then that person tends to be actually be scum.
While the 'clears' don't correspond 100% with my reads, it narrows down the field quite a bit, and those do correspond with my reads -- For example, the second RM wagon shows it's likely either you or Piggy are scum, and the Telo wagon makes that lean toward Piggy and Eidolon.
I also just sort of dislike it when people just announce _______ is [town/scum] in reaction to a post. If you want me to go more in-depth with people, sure, but I'd like to know who to focus on first -- I'm neglecting quite a bit atm.- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
Spoiler:
#1026: The only assumption I am using in votal analysis is that one. If you want, I can pull up links to games and posts where it has worked.
Voting Sucrose because she is scummiest that I currently see, disregarding some of the reasons I use for scumminess that about half the game seems to be doing, and a wagon flip will be informative. On top of that, I've noticed that when a lot of people are cleared if someone flips scum, then that person is usually scum, and I have an example, again, if you like.
↑ Sucrose wrote:1.... you still accuse me of being scum trying to shut up Telo... Istilldon't understand why people think scum would try and shut up their partners, even if there wasn't daytalk...2.Anyone should know that anything caught-scum says is going to be pure unadulterated WIFOM, and scum probably know this too...3.And why do you choose to comment on the Day 2 vig issue now...
1. You bring up that Telo had daychat. So does this mean that a scumteam would have /let/ her get away with not posting? I've seen a surprising amount of times when scum simply did not check daychat, or didn't listen. On the other hand, she was clearly answering certain people and not others. While this does make me seem scummier, I think it's worthwhile to look at this a little closer, and even at how she answered others -- and this is the kind of thing that you wanted to shut up.
2. I tend to disagree. I have found and others have found in my posts as a 'caught-scum' townies and scummates. It seems a lot like wine, I find that it actuallyisuseful.
3. I'm commenting on the vig issue mainly because I haven't been present during this game, and I had missed the entire thing the first time around. I placed you as vig and a townread, but missed the post where you started second-guessing yourself on who the scumkill was.
This is where I disagree. Questions are the easiest way for scum to show that they're 'thinking about the game', especially if they don't follow up on them. It's much easier to simply ask questions than to actually pursue them.
In #457, I felt like you were defending Telo against Rach, or at least seemed to think that Rach was scummier than Telo, therefore defending You said you had problems with the wagon, while still saying that Telo was scummy.
Hi this is what I have I was posting during class sorry I couldn't really focus on mafia.
See you all later~- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
Horrible, unexplained reads because I have no idea when either RC or the bus will come, so...
Looking at ISOs so I'm likely to under cover stuff.
Amrun -- Find it interesting she got sucked into the whole argument with Brandi about RVS. Interesting she's dropped the entire Sucrose thing since D1, though her disappearance is quite the excuse for it (If I haven't offered my condolences yet, I'm really sorry about it. However, it is annoying that you talked a lot making more excuses than providing reads). Hate hate hate in general when people declare posts scummy or towny without any explanation... Skimming her arg on Tracey it seems legit at first glance. Then hammers me :c
Brandi -- ...She's still alive? Right she's still alive I keep forgetting that. Still dislike and disagree with Brandi from D1, mainly because she was hung up on the RVS thing while trying to stop the conversation. Oh yeah, then she got caught up with Spring... Don't like that she tunneled so much but hey she could be town for that.
bbl bus is here.- Seastormjt
-
Seastormjt Goon
- Seastormjt
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 107
- Joined: August 1, 2012
- Seastormjt
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt
- Seastormjt