Mini 1398 - Game Over!


Forum rules
Locked
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #369 (isolation #0) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:43 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Replacing for Dunhamganger and starting my read-through. Will be doing stream-of-concious style catch-up post. This will be super long. Read if you want. Conclusions will be in a second post right after this one. Note that if you plan to read all of this, then pull up the game in a separate tab so you can reference posts. I couldn't easily quote anything because it was night when I made this.


Post #13 - JMO acts a bit odd to early pressure. He tries to explain away a vote that looked random. He's newish to the site, so I'm not sure that this is indicative of alignment. Worth bearing in mind.

Oh god, iamausername's vote was perfectly fine. Silly wagon if I ever saw one. It's really not a big deal. It was a bad joke. I make them all the time. I guess I won't last long here...

Post #20 - Highly suspect. McStab should explain his vote if it's serious. Also, he definitely shouldn't be both making a serious vote and encouraging people to continue pursuing JMO. He should be taking a position on where pressure should be going early.

Post #25 - This feels like scum getting pissed off that they're being wagoned for a bad reason. Odd reaction to pressure again. JMO definitely should be looked at.

Post #31 - Okay, now JMO IS a little OMGUS-y

Post #34 - Yeah, JMO is scum.

Post #39 - "My second highest scum-read is iceninja, but I think iam is scummy for thinking that iceninja deserves votes because he's my highest scum-read." Disconnect here. Seems like Bacde is trying to turn everything that iam says into a scum-tell.

ICEninja's reaction was fine. It doesn't matter that McStab voted him. The fact remains that McStab gave a serious vote and refused to give the reason for it. That's scummy, or as ICEninja put it, "not good."

Post #43 - JMO is SCUMMMMMMMMMMY

Post #45 - Mirhawk gains town-points for this new analysis.

Post #52 - And the scum gives himself away. JMO says the following:

1.I'm not sure what would have happened if I wasn't drunk. But I probably would have made sure I wasn't voting the guy that was already voting for me.

-snip-

3. I didn't lie about it. Being drunk doesn't make it look worse. Like I said, I voted randomly. If I hadn't been drunk I would have made sure that I wouldn't have voted disturbed one because he was already voting me and I know people regard that as a scum tell/newb move. Simple.


If you're town, why would you care so much to carefully avoid giving off scum tells? Scum, in general, are far more aware of being sure not to give off scum-tells than town. I find this super-scummy.

Post #53 - Absta is super town.

Post #60 - Mirhawk is also town.

Post #61 - Odd post. A very vague defense of JMO. Somewhat suspicious of Bacde. Worth looking at later.

Post #65 - This is notably the first time JMO posted about something other than the votes on him, IIRC. That isn't something that town would do. Town would have started scumhunting before the third page if they were posting as frequently as JMO.

Post #68 - "Good question." Combined with post #61, I have some strong suspicions about Bacde and JMO. Their interaction is odd. Call it a gut-read, but I think a Bacda-JMO scum team is very, very possible.

Post #72 - Disturbed = town. His reasoning regarding Ice = not correct.

Post #74 - Absta is town for sure. So painfully obv-town.

Post #78 - Why hasn't this guy (JMO) been lynched yet?

Post #81 - You're breaking my heart, disturbed. Don't switch off scum.

Post #84 - The first line of this post made me lol. Also, Mirhawk is my strongest town read by far.

Post #87 - Not liking ICE's reference of the post where he "obviously" forgot to change his vote. We don't know that. We don't know you accidently didn't change your vote. What we do know is that you didn't vote any of the wagons in the first post and then voted later with the claim that you "forgot." In my experience, people don't forget things nearly as often as they claim to in Mafia, and I'm automatically skeptical of that claim. Much more so now that you're bringing it up as an obvious thing that town should take for granted.

Post #98 - Enter Shamrock. Okay, I cheated. I looked ahead and saw he flipped scum. So, here's the stage when he enters the game. Disturbed has made a good case against JMO. JMO reacted badly (and I mean, BADLY) to pressure from Disturbed and others. Bacde had odd interactions with JMO and has since attacked Disturbed. Shamrock, who we now know is scum, joins the game and hops onto Disturbed while defending ICE. Now, I'd like to assume that Shamrock, who is somewhat experienced, would not defend his partner directly in his first post. But might he defend his partner indirectly by defending ICE, who was being attacked by Disturbed, who was attacking JMO (if that made sense)? I think so. In other words, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." If Disturbed is attacking JMO and ICE, Shamrock would totally be willing to defend ICE in order to discredit Disturbed (and maybe even secure a lynch). I think a scum-team of {Shamrock, JMO, Bacde} is very possible.

Post #103 - Hate this post.

Post #104 - Dislike this OMGUS even more. Post #103 didn't warrant a vote.

Post #105 - Username is town.

Post #106 - Woah, woah, woah. This raises giant red flags for me.

Post #113 - For the record, saying that you should vote someone for pressure greatly reduces the effects of pressure.

Post #114/Post #115 - The old 1-2 tag team by scum central. Gotta love how JMO chimes in parroting Bacde as soon as Bacde posts. JMO had posted in other places on-site between his last post and this post. There were plenty of things for him to post about in this game. He waited for his scum-partner's cue to post. This is not a coincidence. Look at the Bacde/JMO interactions in this game. They are joined at the hip.

Post #139 - Great catchup post. Nacho is likely town.

Post #157 - Ice sounds town to me. I know a lot of pressure has gone to him, but his posts have a lot of good scum-hunting in them.

Post #160 - Oh god, Bacde. Burn it. Burn it with fire.

Post #167 - See above.

Post #177 - HOW DID BACDE SURVIVE DAY ONE?!?!?!?

Post #178 - In the interest of being fair, I actually agree with this point. I too use rhetorical questions rather liberally.

Post #184 - This is the point in my re-read that I'm no longer going to comment on Bacde unless I notice something that everyone else seemed to miss. Otherwise, my analysis is going to be cluttered by me getting increasingly agitated that he's still alive. Needless to say, I think he's far and away the best lynch in Day 2.

Post #187 - Okay, I'm already ignoring what I said earlier, because this might actually be useful. Notice how Bacde votes Shamrock. Some may say he's unlikely to be scum because he drew attention to his partner. This is total hindsight. In reality, his vote didn't put any real pressure on Shamrock. With it did do was twofold. First, it served to allow Bacde to put his vote in a position that is totally non-controversial. I mean, no one would argue with him for wanting lurkers to speak up, especially in this game. This could lessen pressure on him or at least prevent an increase in pressure, and he was certainly under fire. Second, it served as a subtle indicator to Shamrock that he needed to get his ass in the game, which was definitely true at this point. No real pressure was put on Shamrock by this vote. This vote does not make Bacde look like town.

Post #188 - And by the way, this post proves my point. Ice suddenly becomes conflicted because he doesn't want to disprove of lurker hunting. This is literally Bacde's plan in action.

Post #191 - Sends up a red flag on Jabberwock. This is entirely a gut read.

Post #195 - I concur, and this is essentially where I got my gut read. The fact that he hit on two scum in his first post with no stated reasoning is just ... off.

Post #200 - Nevermind, Jabberwock is probably town. Gut-read overruled.

Post #203 - Why are you so stuck on McStab, Ice? It sounds so forced.

Post #207 - @Nacho, where did your read on Bacde go?

Post #215 - This is full of lulz and definitely makes Bacde the second scum.

Post #222 - There's a gay joke in here, somewhere. Feel free to pick it up, anyone.

For the record, Bodygaurd is a great fakeclaim for scum. Common enough to be a believable fake-claim, rare enough to have a much lower probability of a CC as compared to other popular power roles, and just weak enough to be able to explain away the fact that you aren't dead by Day 2 after claiming it.

Post #252 - This stands out as scummy. JMO contributed nothing this game day. Seriously. And he's still preoccupied with the reasons he was being voted. I get it, he's bitter. This is a classic case of "caught for the wrong reasons."

Post #261 - This needs to be substantiated, Nacho.

Post #281 - I lol'd at the discussion of dominance.

Post #285 - JMO pulling out dat WIFOM.

Post #286 - Bacde is, again, joined at the hip with JMO. No. JMO's post was bad. It was all WIFOM. Why do you need to qualify it with "Good post, but..."? You're like best friends.

Post #301 - Melmond's post is null.

Post #312 - This looks like it comes from town (from username).

Post #324 - Ice's post made me lol. Also, town.

Post #325 - A proper defense against "your analysis is crap" is definitely not "but I didn't provide any!" Use this space to do something Cheery, and maybe you'll look more like town.

Post #336 - Not liking this post by Mirhawk. Sounds too annoyed. Could just be town emotion, or could be "caught me for the wrong reason."

Post #344 - The first bit is Bacde essentially screaming "Look! Someone's taking me seriously and thinks I'm town! I AM scumhunting! Give me all of them town-points!" Also, this "case" made me want to throw my computer out of a window. If you are town (highly unlikely), then you're tunnelling on Nacho because you know that a switch at this point would give you away. If Nacho dies during the night, I strongly suspect Bacde because he's backed himself into a corner with his overly aggressive Nacho attack.

Post #352 - Woah. Where did the backtrack on your position on the Bodygaurd claim come from, Disturbed?

Post #353 - Cheery is making me paranoid. He's supporting the Shamrock wagon but refusing to hammer on it. Reads to me like scum trying to get town-cred without actually killing their partner.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #370 (isolation #1) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:43 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Conclusion Post:


Here is my list of reads.

Town:

Jabberwock
Mirhawk
ICEninja
Nacho
Absta

Lean Town:

Username

Null:

Melmond

Lean Scum:

Cheery
JMO

Scum:

Bacde

Bacde is the clear lynch today in my opinion, for reasons stated in my catch-up post. Assuming he flips scum, JMO is next in line as a scum read because of Bacde's weird interactions with him, his bad responses to pressure, and his complete lack of any real scum-hunting. Cheery is a third option because of his unwillingness to commit to a hammer on Shamrock - I would look towards him if Bacde (by some miracle) flips town.

In conclusion,

Vote: Bacde
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #385 (isolation #2) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:47 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Can't write new stuff tonight because finals (only got those earlier posts out because I wrote them on the weekend). Will answer questions tomorrow afternoon.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #390 (isolation #3) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:19 pm

Post by Rob14 »

jmo16mla wrote:@ 385 Monday exam?

Will post in the morning. I'm still not home.


Double Monday exams and an absurdly late midterm tomorrow. FML

Also, for the record, the Disturbed NK does actually point to Bacde-Town to some degree. I don't see scum making that NK unless they want to deliberately choose someone who is not an obvious choice (i.e. not a likely protection target). If scum knows a bodyguard is in the game, then I can definitely see them making that NK.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #394 (isolation #4) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:50 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Cheery Dog wrote:
Rob14 wrote:Also, for the record, the Disturbed NK does actually point to Bacde-Town to some degree. I don't see scum making that NK unless they want to deliberately choose someone who is not an obvious choice (i.e. not a likely protection target). If scum knows a bodyguard is in the game, then I can definitely see them making that NK.

It could also be that it was made by a bacde scum, who wanted to choose someone who wasn't an "obvious should have been on them" target.

The nightkill is making me definity think jmo town though, he had his vote on disturbed the whole way through day 1, and if he would then go and nightkill him, it would be a waste of their cheif suspect. (unless he really wanted him dead for some reason, but I don't see the vote as that serious)
If there was a scum using Disturbed wagon as a counterwagon to their buddy, it would be Melmond.


Could you explain the bolded? You lost me.

And I can see how that can be WIFOM. Hadn't thought of it like that.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #409 (isolation #5) » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:08 am

Post by Rob14 »

Sorry, guys, but I don't have time to look at this game today. I have some major revisions to do on three essays that I have to hand in as a writing portfolio tomorrow. All the time I do have for Mafia is being directed towards the other two games I'm in, both of which have deadlines very soon (one of them in like four hours). Again, sorry. Will catch up Thursday for sure. I'll have plenty of time then.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #423 (isolation #6) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:16 am

Post by Rob14 »

Going to write up my case on Bacde now and then catch-up on what's been said so far today. Expect my Bacde-related post in ~30 mins or less.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #424 (isolation #7) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:47 am

Post by Rob14 »

Here's a few posts that I thought were scummy by themselves, but my read on Bacde is mostly the product of his interactions with JMO. Will go into that later:

Bacde wrote:Sticking on iam for still not seeming genuine. 2nd fos = iceninja

I don't like how iam thinks iceninja is a good wagon.


I don't like this post because he identifies iam as being scummy because he likes a wagon on iceninja, who is Bacde's own #2 scum read according to the same post. There's a disconnect between the reason he gives for not liking iam and his own read on iceninja. It seems like he's trying to turn everything iam says into something that's scummy/anti-town.

Bacde wrote:I'm not really interested in defending me being town right now. I'm much more interested in lynching scum you.


Cop-out for not being able to defend himself.

Bacde wrote:-nacho is scum
-nachos posts are really scummy
-i want nacho to be lynched

I'll keep my vote here.


Refuses to defend his vote on Nacho. He can't point to any posts at all that Nacho has made that are scummy. He just repeats that he thinks Nacho is scummy.

Bacde wrote:
If jmo and dunhamganger hop on this wagon too it practically proves that I'm town. Choo-choo


I see Nacho as a cautious player who is concerned with how other people see him. Thats scumplay in my book. I've already stated my points before so I don't know how I am supposed to reiterate them for you in a bullet-point format.
This is a big gut-read for me as well.


@Mirhawk, what about my logic is bad?


Don't like either of the bolded parts. Having a wagon on you does not prove that you're town. That's just flat-out false, and I don't like that you pushed that at all. It doesn't make sense. Second part, he basically admits that he has very little case on Nacho. Instead of re-evaluating his read on Nacho when he's unable to defend it, he just refuses to post his reasons or explain them and claims it's just a gut read (but still worthy of voting and getting a wagon going, as he called for earlier). He's not scum-hunting if he's unable to give any reasons for where his vote is.

Bacde wrote:Nacho, I like how you are finally addressing me as a threat to your scumship. I'm not someone to be "hahahaha'd" lightly away, and you are finally realizing this aren't you? I really like how you are concentrating on your read of me as town (as though that will affect you being scum in any way). You KNOW I have a good case on you, so you finally have to address my points. I KNEW I'd catch you.


I do not consider this to be genuine in any way. This reads to me like begging for town-points. I do not see the purpose that this portion of the post serves for town. I certainly see how it could try to emphasize Nacho's town read on Bacde and how good of a case Bacde has supposedly made if Bacde is scum.

These are some of the reasons I'm suspicious of Bacde, but another major one is that him and JMO are like Siamese twins. They're joined at the hip. Here's a few examples of this:

Bacde wrote:
jmo16mla wrote:
Bacde wrote:Sticking on iam for still not seeming genuine. 2nd fos = iceninja

I don't like how iam thinks iceninja is a good wagon.

Bacde wrote:
Vote: ICENinja


absta seems town


@Bacde, what changed between these two posts? iceninja hadnt posted between the two.


Good question. iceninja didn't post but iamausername did.


I don't like the "good question" bit at the beginning. It sounds unusual. It seems like he's trying to encourage a good opinion on JMO. The interaction is just a tad "off." If anyone found an instance of Bacde doing this in a town game, this would be a null tell, though.

Bacde wrote:The fact that Disturbed thinkts Dire_Drenz is a good target for pressure makes me want to not pressure Dire_Drenz. Staying on Disturbed.


jmo16mla wrote:
Bacde wrote:The fact that Disturbed thinkts Dire_Drenz is a good target for pressure makes me want to not pressure Dire_Drenz. Staying on Disturbed.

probably because he wants the pressure off of him.



JMO parroting Bacde.

jmo16mla wrote:I find that nacho getting off the wagon quite fishy also..
But. He has played enough games on site to know that people would suspect him about it. I'm pretty sure he's town. Why would he as scum do it like that if he knows it would attract attention?


Bacde wrote:^Good post, but you are using WIFOM logic. Why would scum do anything scummy if they know that it is scummy?


If you're going to dismiss everything JMO is saying, why is it a good post? Why put this qualifier in there that makes JMO's post seem more town-like and legitimate if you're going to dismiss the entire thing? This is similar to the "good question" from earlier, establishing a pattern. Notice he doesn't do this with anyone else in the game, as far as I noticed. JUST jmo.

These are some examples of a pattern I noticed throughout the game. Bacde also was attacking Disturbed whilst he was going after JMO. Note that Disturbed was also killed following a day full of pressure on JMO and to a lesser degree Bacde.

The Bacde/JMO interaction is just really, really strange and I don't think it comes from town. I do consider them a package deal based on this interaction. If one flips town, I doubt the other one is scum and vice versa.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #448 (isolation #8) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:14 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Ok, catching up on this day. Sorry for not more constructively contributing earlier. I've been all over the place this week, and my other games have demanded a lot of time due to deadlines. My activity will definitely pick up as I move past finals. Apologies for wall catch-up in advance. Won't become a habit.

Jabberwock wrote:#334 in particular is awkward and a really weak reason to pull back from his Nacho town-read.


Are you sure this isn't hindsight now that you know Shamrock flipped scum? Wanting to wait for a claim with a week before deadline is rather standard, and I don't see it as abnormal. Shamrock's six posts were not bad enough to warrant not waiting for a claim, in my opinion. If Shamrock flipped town, would you consider this questionable still?

Jabberwock wrote:Still not lynching Bacde - him claiming BG and then starting up a counterwagon on his goon buddy is suicidal and non-sensical from a scum PoV.


I don't think Bacde's vote put much pressure on Shamrock. With it did do was twofold. First, it served to allow Bacde to put his vote in a position that is totally non-controversial. I mean, no one would argue with him for wanting lurkers to speak up, especially in this game. This could lessen pressure on him or at least prevent an increase in pressure, and he was certainly under fire. You can actually see how this worked well for him in the very next post by Ice:

ICEninja wrote:PEDIT: I'm a bit conflicted now regarding this most recent post. The first paragraph once again seems to be him recognizing that he simply has no case but still wants Nacho lynched. I approve of lurker hunting as a rule, though.


Second, it served as a subtle indicator to Shamrock that he needed to get his ass in the game, which was definitely true at this point. No real pressure was put on Shamrock by this vote because Bacde didn't provide any case against Shamrock - he identified him as a lurker, which was going to happen anyway.

Also, Bacde was trying to put pressure onto Nacho for much of the end of that day. He also didn't keep his vote or pressure on Shamrock. I don't think he intended to put real pressure on Shamrock, and the pressure certainly didn't come from him. The real case on Shamrock came from others.

Bacde wrote:
Rob14 wrote:
Post #344 - The first bit is Bacde essentially screaming "Look! Someone's taking me seriously and thinks I'm town! I AM scumhunting! Give me all of them town-points!" Also, this "case" made me want to throw my computer out of a window. If you are
town
(highly unlikely), then you're tunnelling on Nacho because you know that a switch at this point would give you away. If Nacho dies during the night, I strongly suspect Bacde because he's backed himself into a corner with his overly aggressive Nacho attack.


That's a weird thing to say. Why would I care about "giving myself away"? I think you meant scum here. What about my previous case made you want to "throw your computer out of a window"? I appreciate your rhetoric but don't see your logic.


That sentence by me is borderline incoherent. Hell if I know what it was supposed to read. I was on very little sleep when I wrote that. Sorry 'bout that. I explained what I meant more coherently in my case on you posted earlier today.

Bacde wrote:What about my previous case made you want to "throw your computer out of a window"? I appreciate your rhetoric but don't see your logic.


Bacde wrote:Nacho, I like how you are finally addressing me as a threat to your scumship. I'm not someone to be "hahahaha'd" lightly away, and you are finally realizing this aren't you? I really like how you are concentrating on your read of me as town (as though that will affect you being scum in any way). You KNOW I have a good case on you, so you finally have to address my points. I KNEW I'd catch you.

Nachomamma8 wrote:
OTHER PEOPLE
not me
OTHER PEOPLE

Blaming other people, focussing on having a townread of me. Guess what, having a townread on me won't stop the thunder. Why is it so important for you to emphasize both that YOU specifically have a townread on me, but that other people don't?

This doesn't indicate alignment. He just pointed out that your post #339 didn't make much sense. You acted like him thinking you're town and him identifying that other people don't like your claim is a contradiction. It isn't.


Nachomamma8 wrote:
Bacde wrote:1)Shamrock will claim PR

no, i am going through a worst case scenario IF SHAMROCK CLAIMS PR

You didn't say that, and now you are backtracking. Its ok, go ahead and flail loud enough for everyone in the thread to see. You got away the first time but now you are seriously caught.

A whole lot of rhetoric and very little substance. You fail to acknowledge that Nacho's post was specifically in response to a post that asked "What if Shamrock is a PR?" It was obvious from the context of the question he was responding to that he was talking about a hypothetical.


Nachomamma8 wrote:
Bacde wrote:2)Neither PRs will die at night if Shamrock claims PR

WORST CASE SCENARIO

Again, something you were caught on. I like how you respond to my really good arguments in all caps. It lets me know that I'm hitting close to home.

Again, a lot of rhetoric, little substance. Townies can't assume specific night kills because they don't know who scum will target. Indeed, if we acknowledge that Shamrock's claim wouldn't be well received, then it's possible that scum wouldn't kill them off because they are targets for mislynches.


Nachomamma8 wrote:
Bacde wrote:3)Only one of me/Shamrock is scum

worst case scenario
if both of you are scum, then cool, hammer shamrock now

My vote is on shamrock, no need to tell me to hammer him. Why would you imply that only one out of me/shamrock is scum? You slipped bro, plain and simple.

He clearly identified in his post that this hypothetical was if we got to a LyLo situation in which we have to choose between the two of you.


Nachomamma8 wrote:
Bacde wrote:How can he make those three assumptions without outside knowledge?

Assumption 1: How would I know with outside knowledge? If I told Shamrock to claim PR if he was wagonned? But now I am pushing Shamrock to be hammered now, and not give my scumbuddy with a fakeclaim a chance to claim. Why would I do that?
Assumption 2: How would I know as scum? You're a bodyguard, right? Which means that you could successfully protect someone and die overnight?
Assumption 3: Okay, let's assume that I'm making this assumption. And I am pushing to lynch Shamrock. And I lynch Shamrock. He flips scum. Now you are town and I cannot push you because of my assumption. So...?

you say that I am making assumptions that I am not
you say that I have outside knowledge to be making this assumptions
but that knowledge doesn't help at all


1) Yes, exactly those things. And because you are worried about looking town, which you have been interested in doing the WHOLE GAME. And lets be real, you just slipped that Shamrock is scum.

This is a clear hypothetical. He's typing from the POV of scum-him and asking you to identify why he would do what you've claimed he's done as scum. It's frankly funny that you're claiming that he slipped and said Shamrock was his scumbuddy.


2) Scum know more about who is going to die at night than town do.

True, but again, he was clear in his post that he was looking at a hypothetical situation. He was looking at the worst case scenario, as he's already explained to you. And scum doesn't know for sure who's going to die. Doctors, bodygaurds, roleblockers, bulletproof, etc.


3) Why are you focusing on your belief that I am town, rather than my argument that you are scum? You see, I'm not worried about looking like I'm town. And I really don't give a
[removed]
if you read me as town, because you are scum. You are focusing on the wrong thing. I caught you
slip
bro. How would you know that only 1 out of me and Shamrock are scum?

Again, he clearly identified in his post that this hypothetical was if we got to a LyLo situation in which we have to choose between the two of you. That's why his hypothetical situation has only one of you as scum.


Why is your defense that "outside knowledge wouldn't help me" rather than "I don't have outside knowlege"? This post reeks of "I'm caught but disagree with your reasoning" mentality.

He's arguing that your premises of your post on him don't even make sense because the outside knowledge you claim he must have had in order to make those assumptions wouldn't even help him make those assumptions. Disproving your argument by disproving the basis of it is a valid way to prove you wrong.


Responses in bold.

Mirhawk wrote:ebwop @rob
FUUUUUUCCKKK that's a ton of bullshit to read.


In hindsight, I shouldn't have posted my notes. I kind of did it out of laziness so that I could tell myself I didn't need to write a more formal catch-up post with quotes, but I'm always kind of lazy while writing my notes, so it didn't really help make it clear where my reads came from and why I like certain people as town or scum.

Cheery Dog wrote:
Rob14 wrote:
Post #53 - Absta is super town.

I'm not seeing this from that post, it still is just a weird post to me (and in my reasoning for voting absta yesterday), what makes absta super town?


absta101 wrote:VOTE: Disturbed

Hit a wall with jmo, i'd be okay with a lynch of him.


This post struck me as an attempt to see how Disturbed reacted to pressure because he hadn't been under pressure from anyone but iam yet. Absta kind of sided with Disturbed against JMO early on. I think this is an appropriate reaction to the JMO argument, which wasn't getting Absta or Disturbed anywhere, and the fact that Disturbed's switch to ice was a bit odd and deserved looking at.

jmo16mla wrote:I was shit loaded with finals. I know I didn't give my fair share of scum hunting. I even acknowledged it. I will re read thread and probably post tonight.


Okay, look forward to it.

Mirhawk wrote:Also, there's no merit in lynching someone who's very survival (or lack thereof) could prove their alignment in the later days. Lynching him before day three at the very least is stupid.


I don't have much experience (read: none) with bodyguards and hadn't thought of this. I still think Bacde is scummy, but if he'll be dead in a future day as a result of a PR claiming, then I have no problem moving to pressure others instead.

Unvote


ICEninja wrote:
Mirhawk wrote:
He's claiming a role that has double the chance to die at night as any other player. Just being alive makes him suspicious.

Not at all. The likelihood of scum shooting Bacde is just about zero. If he's scum, obviously. If he's town, then he's going to be an easy mislynch. So the only way he's going to die is if he correctly guesses who scum is going to shoot. I guessed Jabber was going to eat the bullet, apparently Bacde (if he was town) thought so also. Scum shot someone who wasn't the obvious protection. Duh?


Well, scum may shoot town-Bacde early (probably Night 1, which notably didn't happen) in order to free themselves up to kill a claimed PR later in the game without having to go through Bacde first. As scum, I would have shot Bacde Night 1, even though he was the "easy" mislynch. The benefit of potentially killing a claimed PR later in the game that could have horrible effects on scum would outweigh the mislynch of Bacde.

Mirhawk wrote:ebwop
@Rob
I don't see it that way. Scum don't know who is or isn't a PR at this point, why worry about accidentally killing the only known PR. I doubt this was the reason they targeted Disturbed.


I concede this point, now that I think about it more.

ICEninja wrote:Jabber just spent an extensive amount of effort buddying up to me. This feels sketchy as hell, as since there was no pressure on me what-so-ever, the only reason I can think of someone would want to do this is to continue to get me to follow along with their reads.


Identifying you as a town read and supplying reasons isn't buddying.

ICEninja wrote:Jabber I'm not saying it's suspicious that you've got good reasoning for having a town read on me, but Nacho's "still liking ICE for town" is pretty much all town needs to say. Scum on the other hand would want to make me feel good by really delving in to why I'm town. Now if I was on the chopping block, then yeah you'd need to convince people that I'm town, but I don't think very many people need much in the way of convincing.


It's just as pro-town to explain why you're town now as to explain why you're town when you're about to be lynched, if not more so. If Jabber spends time convincing others you're town now, then town won't potentially waste a huge block of time considering your lynch. See what I mean?

In response to Posts 410 and 411: I don't think a doc should claim until the day before LyLo. If the doc is NK'd, then we lynch Bacde the next day and he's no longer a problem as scum. If the doc makes it to the day before LyLo, then he more days to try to prevent a NK (and hopefully succeed) and he still calls out Bacde and Bacde dies. We are down one scum either way, but a doc waiting to claim gives us a higher chance of a protect.

Mirhawk wrote:@iam
Well you're completely wrong for the record but if you don't want to discuss it anymore that's fine.

Also Robs "catch" on Jmo is terrible. Any town player who acts scummy and gets lynched is regarded as a bad player, but somehow mentioning that you're trying to avid this is a scumtell.


There are other reasons I think JMO is scum. I'll write up a case on him Soon (TM). Probably tomorrow after my last class.

Post #414 by Ice feels like it comes from town to me. I already had a town read on him, but this confirms it further. I can go into this if needed.

Melmond wrote:@rob: Why do you think absta is so town?


I gave my reason for liking one of his posts for town above. I can respond to specific points in my write up earlier if you want, or I can respond to any posts you bring up about him if you write a case on him. I'm not going to go through his ISO and explain why every single post doesn't look scummy. He has a near absense of scummy posts from my first read-through.

jmo16mla wrote:
iamausername wrote:
this is an excellent catch and i can't believe i didn't notice this myself.

I feel like this is a fabricated reaction.

And also rob, your case against me about voting, tell me you have NEVER in RVS, even as town, tried to not vote someone who was already voted. Same theory.


Your reactions were bad, not your vote.

iamausername wrote:
Nachomamma8 wrote:why else do you think jmo is scum?


total lack of scumhunting, mostly. also post 252 is pretty bad in light of Shamrock's flip.


That post was bad before the flip too. On page 11, he's still focused on the reasons why people were voting him on page 1 rather than on scum-hunting. That doesn't look good at all.

Cheery Dog wrote:
Nachomamma8 wrote:
Cheery Dog wrote:The nightkill is making me definity think jmo town though, he had his vote on disturbed the whole way through day 1, and if he would then go and nightkill him, it would be a waste of their cheif suspect.

Dangerous reasoning. It's called a scumteam for a reason, and a scumpartner choosing who to kill and jmo going along with it is not outside the realms of possibility.

That could be the case, I just don't see it when jmo had been on him all day yesterday. (unless it was to get him to move onto someone else I guess)


Watch out with this reasoning. It's WIFOM. I've used this exact reasoning to kill someone before as scum. See Newbie 1295. I killed N because I had pressured him all day and felt I had nowhere left to go with attacking him. I then argued that I would never have killed N because it left me with little chances of winning in LyLo when the other two players were people that I had said were strong town reads of mine all agme. I wound up winning mostly because the confirmed-town casting the deciding vote didn't think that it was likely that I performed both that gambit and another where I claimed to accidently have soft-claimed (when in reality I soft-claimed VT somewhat on purpose).

Note to self: Need to return to Post #422 and re-read Cheery. This will take a while, so I'll post the results of this later.


Bacde wrote:@Rob13 has JMO had any actions that you consider scummy or is it just this interaction that is throwing you off? Cuz I'll admit I have a townread on JMO so I've been cutting him slack in places such as his WIFOM logic post because I see him as a weaker player. I said "Good Post" because he said he thought nacho was fishy. I still don't see him as scum and he hasn't been trying to lead anyone astray, as a scum player would.


There are other reasons. Will write a case tomorrow. I think I said this earlier in this post. Not sure, so putting it here too.

Bacde wrote:I was expecting Nacho to be hardcore pushing on me.


Why?

Bacde wrote:Something about saying that you
have
to lynch me makes me uneasy. Why am I a necessary lynch?


You can't make it to LyLo, in my opinion. If you get that far in the game, then you'll be lynched because you aren't dead yet as a bodyguard. So we lynch you a day earlier, which gives us a chance to focus on other people in LyLo just in case you're town.

Mirhawk wrote:@Jmo
Who are your current scumreads? I see no mention anywhere of a single person you suspect other then disturbed.

@Rob
When you wrote your thread synopsis did you read the thread and then write it, or did you write it as you read the thread?


I want to see the scumreads of JMO as well. Preferably an explanation of his reads on everyone, actually.

I wrote my catch-up thing as I read the thread. I was lazy, and it is next to useless now that I look at it more closely. I can explain anything vague in it upon request.

Cheery Dog wrote:
ICEninja wrote:
Cheery wrote:
I was just about to come and hammer him though :(

And it just feels really faked to me. It's the only emoticon I've seen him use all game, and reading the context of everything, it just doesn't make sense. ESPECIALLY considering how the rest of the post is his little "case" against absta, and he hardly mentions Shamrock from that point on. It reads very much as a fake reaction to me.

That would be reading take because out was, as per my second line of said post.
If I had actually wanted to hammer,i would have done so anyway even with someone requesting that we didn't hammer straight away. I don't think I ever use emotes seriously.


Please explain the bolded sentence. Not sure if English.

Also, please supply an example of you using an emote in a town game. A few, if possible.

Jabberwock wrote:Rob13--that case on Bacde is nice and all, especially the bits where you blatantly parrot us, but have you actually noticed all that discussion that says Bacde is not an optimal lynch Today? Why did you jump over that discussion without mentioning it, and instead keep pushing at a vote that is worthless because it won't lead to a lynch?

Bacde is not Today's lynch. Move your vote elsewhere.


Hadn't really read this day much yet. My attention has been elsewhere. Hence this catch-up.

Would like more of an explanation of the Melmond case from Jabber, which he promised in #441.

Cheery Dog wrote:
ICEninja wrote:Still feels weird to me. Care to explain why you're responding to things but not scum hunting? Who do you think is scum, and why?

I'm working on that (in my head anyway)
Also have been waiting for Rob's call on why post 53 is super town, since it hasn't happened, I'll have to put him down as plausible scum, he had time to right a case on bacde but not to answer a simple question.
My small case still stands on absta.

VOTE: Rob13


Can't respond to what I haven't read yet. Sorry?

Jabberwock wrote:The point is:
he was drunk and made a move he perceives as scummy.
Do you think such a self-conscious person would have been posting in a game while drunk if he was worried he was giving himself away? No, he wouldn't--the fact that he was posting then is indication that he lost some of that inhibition and posted because heck, he's Town and can do whatever he wants.


Drunk people to silly things regardless of their alignment in an online forum game. I don't agree with this reasoning.

@447: Sorry. I didn't know you were trying to quit, or I wouldn't have shoved a wall right in front of your face. :P

All caught up. Will get to writing up something on JMO and looking at Cheery tomorrow, as well as deciding where to place my vote. Probably will look at Melmond too, since Jabber seems to see something in him.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #451 (isolation #9) » Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:52 pm

Post by Rob14 »

A lot of it is responses that were specifically asked for. I feel no need to respond to less things as a result of not being able to post more frequently lately. I would encourage you to at least skim it for your name (mostly in the form of quotes) and look at what I wrote in direct response to you. If you don't want to read it though, don't. That's your prerogative. I'm not going to write another post just to single out the things that were direct responses to you. I trust your ability to operate the Ctrl+F function of your browser.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #456 (isolation #10) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:54 am

Post by Rob14 »

Cheery Dog wrote:
Rob14 wrote:
I don't think Bacde's vote put much pressure on Shamrock. With it did do was twofold. First, it served to allow Bacde to put his vote in a position that is totally non-controversial. I mean, no one would argue with him for wanting lurkers to speak up, especially in this game. This could lessen pressure on him or at least prevent an increase in pressure, and he was certainly under fire.

Second, it served as a subtle indicator to Shamrock that he needed to get his ass in the game, which was definitely true at this point. No real pressure was put on Shamrock by this vote because Bacde didn't provide any case against Shamrock - he identified him as a lurker, which was going to happen anyway.

Also, Bacde was trying to put pressure onto Nacho for much of the end of that day. He also didn't keep his vote or pressure on Shamrock. I don't think he intended to put real pressure on Shamrock, and the pressure certainly didn't come from him. The real case on Shamrock came from others.
Though why would be have chosen his scumbuddy out of the other lurkers at that stage, such as RedRabbit (now me) or dumhamanger (now you)?
If either of those happened (looking from what you call your perspective as town - though I currently don't believe you are), wouldn't he have got a mislynch if town went for a lynch all lurkers policy?
His vote stayed on Shamrock for the rest of the day after he placed it (at least according to the votecounts, and since it was at the front of the wagon the whole time, I'm fairly sure it didn't move) Shamrock was also still lurking and not interacting with anybody, so what actually is the problem and/or scum motivation from hunting someone else while the person you're voting isn't actually active enough to even be pressured?


First, I confused his vote on you in his ISO with moving his vote. My mistake.

Second, I think that he voted Shamrock in part to try to signal to him to get his ass in thread if he was reading but not posting. If Shamrock had gotten in thread early when it was only Bacde's vote and started contributing, I don't think he would have been lynched.

Third, the pressure he put on Nacho was bad, in my opinion. His case was unconvincing and I do not think it came from town. It was a lot of rhetoric and very little substance, as I said earlier. If he had been actually scum-hunting, it wouldn't look bad at all. He wasn't though. He was attacking Nacho for nonexistent reasons, as he had been for a lot of the day. And there's certainly scum motivation in trying to set yourself up to push a mislynch in Day 2.

Cheery Dog wrote:
Rob14 wrote:
Cheery Dog wrote:
Rob14 wrote:
Post #53 - Absta is super town.

I'm not seeing this from that post, it still is just a weird post to me (and in my reasoning for voting absta yesterday), what makes absta super town?


absta101 wrote:VOTE: Disturbed

Hit a wall with jmo, i'd be okay with a lynch of him.


This post struck me as an attempt to see how Disturbed reacted to pressure because he hadn't been under pressure from anyone but iam yet. Absta kind of sided with Disturbed against JMO early on. I think this is an appropriate reaction to the JMO argument, which wasn't getting Absta or Disturbed anywhere, and the fact that Disturbed's switch to ice was a bit odd and deserved looking at.

A few things that need further explaining then.
1. Why was Disturbed's Ice vote not in your notes then?
2. The post before it by jmo in your first post says that jmo had just outed himself as scum, why is reacting the way Absta did appropriate against someone you say had just outed themselves as scum?
3. How do you know the switch was because Disturbed vote worth looking into?
4. How does voting the other person that was pressing on your suspect make sense when they may not have hit the wall yet?


1. I didn't go back and add anything. At the time Disturbed made that post, I didn't know it would become controversial later. I didn't bother writing about it because I thought it was fairly obvious. Evidently, it wasn't.
2. "Outed himself as scum" is an overstatement - something which there are a lot of in my first post. On page 2-3, he had done the scummiest thing in the game yet. Did it make him definite scum? No. He was the best target at the time. But people miss things all the time or don't agree. Just look at the other opinions of that post that come from people I think are town, Mirhawk for example. Not everyone is going to agree with that tell. Even if JMO is the scummiest person in the game at the time, it's not bad to pressure Disturbed to get as many reactions as possible in the early game. You shouldn't tunnel on one person from page 1.
3.

absta101 wrote:
iamusername wrote:if he thinks that lying about omgussing makes jmo obvscum, why was he only voting him "for now", and why was he happy to switch over to iceninja when that wagon started looking more popular?
Disturbed definitely looks scummy as well. I'll have to look through some of his games before I support the waggon on him though.


This was a post on the preceding page. This is how I made that assumption.
4. If you have a scum read on both JMO and Disturbed, as Absta did based on his posts, then I see no problem pressing Disturbed and seeing what happens. You can always return to JMO later when there is more substantial content to use against him.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #457 (isolation #11) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:57 am

Post by Rob14 »

As for why I asked for the smilies, it makes the smilie you used in post #315 a null tell. I'm not a huge fan of the first line still.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #460 (isolation #12) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:06 am

Post by Rob14 »

Vote JMO


Will ISO JMO later when I'm done eating lunch, but I think that last post warrants pressure practically by itself.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #462 (isolation #13) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:20 am

Post by Rob14 »

1. Overly defensive to the opinion of one person on a post that others have not thought was a scum tell.

2. The whole post, but especially the first line, reads to me as "caught for the wrong reasons."

3. You have time to read the thread and respond to criticisms of you, but not to contribute at all or scum-hunt. You're obviously following the thread closely (as evidenced by the fact that you responded to me four minutes after I posted and to iam only 3.5 hours after he posted). So where are your reads? Where is the content? What are you contributing?
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #466 (isolation #14) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:33 am

Post by Rob14 »

Those were all your reads?

jmo16mla wrote:Iam has played in quite a number of games on site, although ive never played any games with him, id like to think he is a better player than in , and . Especially the last one.


That's the closest you came to a scum read. It wasn't even strong enough for you to vote him, evidently. I had expected something more substantial/helpful.

P-edit: The JMO post is coming when I have more time. It will be happening tonight.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #471 (isolation #15) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:43 am

Post by Rob14 »

jmo16mla wrote:As pointed out in , yes, by Bacde, Cheery said "my current scum reads are pretty much level with the current thoughts of the town. " I'm not sure exactly what he meant by this, but how does he know town from scum? he also hadnt directly answered this yet. Id like to get his response.


If you meant to communicate that Cheery was a scum read of yours, then I didn't get that from what you wrote. It read more like "I'm keeping an eye on Cheery" to me. Not "Here's who I think is scum, let's pressure him," which is what I was hoping to see from you.

Not sure if you've done this before in this game, but you could you link me to your most recent completed town and scum games if such games exist JMO?
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #477 (isolation #16) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:00 am

Post by Rob14 »

JMO's Town Game: Link

JMO's Scum Game: Link

For those interested. I'll look at them before I post my case on you.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #481 (isolation #17) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:46 am

Post by Rob14 »

Bacde wrote:
Vote: ICENinja


Since I know I'm going down? Your post feels scummy as balls to me. Remind me again why I'm confirmed scum, or are you just going to refer to other people's cases? I'm beginning to think its not genuine town-fear thats motivating you, but instead a desire to appear you are really town and you really have this strong scumread on me.


You either die by NK or die by lynch. You will not live to LyLo. This has been well-established.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #483 (isolation #18) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:02 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Bacde wrote:Rob, what do you think of ICENinja's assumption that I am scum, and also his unvote when I was voting for the same person as him?


I don't particularly like it, personally, but I don't think it's scum motivated. His sequence of posts this day that led to him unvoting you seemed very genuine and like they came from town, in my opinion. He shouldn't be adjusting his scum reads with the assumption that you're scum, though. If he's later proved wrong, then he'd have nothing left.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #485 (isolation #19) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:23 pm

Post by Rob14 »

What was your opinion of Ice's early posts today, Bacde? i.e. When he was gradually moving off of you.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #486 (isolation #20) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:24 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Also, writing up my thoughts on JMO now.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #489 (isolation #21) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:50 pm

Post by Rob14 »

jmo16mla wrote:
McStab wrote:
Vote: JMO


OMGUS votes this early on, hmm?

Lmao, I saw someone had voted me, but I didn't care. I just went picked out a name in the list. How does that happen?! XD


This post seemed off to me. This is entirely a gut read, but it's what first got me looking at JMO. The reaction was just - too much. Smilie, the question mark AND an exclamation point. Just seemed excessive response to a simple observation that he had voted the person that voted him in RVS.

jmo16mla wrote:I honestly didn't know it was him that was voting me. Like I said I was wasted off my ass(I should probably stop playing drunk) and voted someone. It's not obscum. I don't see how it could be. It's just a vote, and it seems like you're the one taking it too far. Is it you that's overly defensive because I happened to vote you back, unintentionally might I add.


This struck me as OMGUS-y. He's pushing back on Disturbed just because Disturbed is pressuring him.

jmo16mla wrote:To make my vote random, I seriously just looked at the list and picked someone. I'm sorry your name stood out. OMGUS vote does not mean obvscum. But it wasn't even an OMGUS vote.
Now lets actually scum hunt with reason. Not on a random vote.


This struck me as "caught for the wrong reasons." The apology also seems off to me. Why say that he was sorry? This just didn't sit right with me at all.

jmo16mla wrote:Disturbed one. You keep thinking that. I did no back tracking. It wasn't an OMGUS vote.

-snip-


He's straw-manning disturbed. Disturbed's post #44 made it clear that he found the reaction scummy, not the vote. JMO misrepresented Disturbed's argument to defeat it.

jmo16mla wrote:1.I'm not sure what would have happened if I wasn't drunk. But
I probably would have made sure I wasn't voting the guy that was already voting for me.


3. I didn't lie about it. Being drunk doesn't make it look worse. Like I said, I voted randomly. If I hadn't been drunk
I would have made sure that I wouldn't have voted disturbed one because he was already voting me
and I know people regard that as a scum tell/newb move. Simple.


I find it scummy that he was so concerned about the scum-tells he was giving off, but others have disagreed with that. I still think it's a fair point. Scum is, as a rule, more concerned about the perception that town has of them than townies. Town wants to find scum; appearing town-like is secondary to that. Scum wants to appear town-like; finding "scum" (which would actually mean creating opportunities for mislynches) is second to that. I think that a post like this that shows how much JMO is concerned about his appearance in combination with his total lack of scum-hunting (he hasn't done anything other than defend his original vote so far) makes for a scum-tell.

Post #65 is the first time JMO addresses anything other than the case on him. This is his 14th post. That's not town-motivated.

jmo16mla wrote:So you doctored that quote. Meaning you set it up specifically for you to lie.
Find the post number.


This was in response to a paraphrase by Disturbed. Equating paraphrasing to doctoring a quote and lieing is flat out wrong.

Shamrock wrote:Disturbed's reasons for voting ICENinja are really bad.

Mirhawk wrote:Abasta, are you egging Disturbed and Jmo on? Because it looks that way from over here.


What is the point of this question?


Shamrock comes into the game and puts pressure on Disturbed for voting Ice. Disturbed has also been pressuring JMO all game. I find it interesting that that's the only person Shamrock feels like commenting on. Interesting "coincidence".

jmo16mla wrote:
Disturbed_One wrote:Bahahahaha.

I suggest if you want that vote to hold any water that you reference the game and post in which that happened.

I want a list for the same reason I wanted a list from Bacde. You're a scum suspect.

Unvote: Bacde
Vote: Shamrock


Post your reads, sir. I have no problem lynching you before we lynch Bacde.

Oh shit. An OMGUS vote?!?!? *gasps* lmao


Still pre-occupied by the original case on him from page 1 all the way at page 11. Why is he still so hung up on this if he's town? Still hasn't really pressured anyone except Disturbed (which I think was OMGUS), and hasn't identified anyone as a scum-read. Vote is still on Disturbed from RVS. Where is the scum-hunting?

jmo16mla wrote:I find that nacho getting off the wagon quite fishy also..
But. He has played enough games on site to know that people would suspect him about it. I'm pretty sure he's town. Why would he as scum do it like that if he knows it would attract attention?


Dat WIFOM. He's new enough that this is a null tell, but I think it's worth mention.

jmo16mla wrote:
iamausername wrote:
this is an excellent catch and i can't believe i didn't notice this myself.

I feel like this is a fabricated reaction.

And also rob, your case against me about voting, tell me you have NEVER in RVS, even as town, tried to not vote someone who was already voted. Same theory.


Missed this earlier, so I'll respond to it here. No, I never have. I did it once as scum out of the one scum game I played on this site.

#452 was notable in that it was the first time I saw him actually look like he was scum-hunting. He gave few conclusions and no solid scum reads, however.

I responded to post #459 earlier. I'll put it here so everything's in one place, though.

jmo16mla wrote:No. Omg. Fuck. I don't see OMGUS as a scum tell. Meaning IIIIIIII, ME don't see OMGUS as a scum tell. SOME people DO. This is why it wouldn't be recommended.

As in. If someone OMGUS'd me, I wouldn't say "oh shit, you're scum!" Now, someone else may have a different opinion of their OMGUS vote. Got it?

Keep trying to force your story that has no backing onto people.


Rob14 wrote:1. Overly defensive to the opinion of one person on a post that others have not thought was a scum tell.

2. The whole post, but especially the first line, reads to me as "caught for the wrong reasons."

3. You have time to read the thread and respond to criticisms of you, but not to contribute at all or scum-hunt. You're obviously following the thread closely (as evidenced by the fact that you responded to me four minutes after I posted and to iam only 3.5 hours after he posted). So where are your reads? Where is the content? What are you contributing?


Now, beyond all of this, add in all the weird interactions between Bacde and JMO. This is why I have a scum read on JMO. I'd be interested in hearing the reasons behind the town reads that a lot of people have on him.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #490 (isolation #22) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:51 pm

Post by Rob14 »

My read on iam is null. He's done some things I like and some things I don't, and I'm also worried I'll misread him because some people have suggested he's a bit out of the ordinary as town, and I don't have any background on how he plays.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #492 (isolation #23) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:01 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Bacde wrote:Also, your case against jmo hinges on the idea that I'm scum and interacting with jmo in a scum manner, so I'm inherently inclined to disagree with your reasoning.


No, it doesn't. That contributes to it a bit, but I would have a scum read on him even if you flipped town.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #493 (isolation #24) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:02 pm

Post by Rob14 »

If JMO can show me an instance of him getting as hung up about a case on him as he did in this game from any completed town game of his, then I will drop my scum read of him. I still need to look in his meta.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #494 (isolation #25) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:18 pm

Post by Rob14 »

I read JMO's town game. Well, kind of. More of a skim really. No one has time for that shit. Here's a few conclusions.

1. He scum-hunted more and earlier. This was a clear difference between this game and that game. He participated more in scum-hunting. I can provide examples if you want me to.

2. He
did
get stuck on some of the cases against him. This was a similarity, and it makes some of my case obsolete. However, he never completely abandoned scum-hunting to defend himself like he did in this game.

I read his scum game, if you can even call it a game. Not even two pages. I'll link the scum QT that JMO was in, though. It's comedy gold if anyone wants a quick laugh. But yeah, unfortunately I can't compare this game to his scum meta.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #501 (isolation #26) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:01 pm

Post by Rob14 »

@Cheery - Not confirmation bias, because I wrote my notes (which directly translated into that case) without reading ahead. In other words, I don't read ahead and then go back and write my thoughts on old posts. Those are only things I caught on my first read-through before I saw others reactions to the posts. If bias is present, it's a result of me developing a scum read on JMO early and being reluctant to let go of it. I don't think that's the case, though. He's been suspicious throughout.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #504 (isolation #27) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:28 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Cheery Dog wrote:(and then me as well the day after)


You realize I have never said I had any type of scum read on you, right? I don't get where this comes from.

I already dropped the idea of the Bacde lynch anytime soon after the reasons for doing so were explained. I maintain him as a scum read, but it's not pertinent to act upon it at this time. I will, of course, see if anything changes my read on him as time progresses.

Your claim that I'm trying to push through the lynches of three specific people in a row is severely lacking in support when you consider that I'm not actively trying to lynch one of them (Bacde) and one of them isn't even a scum read of mine at this time (you).
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #506 (isolation #28) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:01 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Did I say that? I seem to have selective memory at the moment. I need to re-ISO you and figure out
why
exactly I wrote that when I did my catch-up over the night phase. That's not a job for 1AM, though.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #507 (isolation #29) » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:06 pm

Post by Rob14 »

In the mean time, I will say that you've rubbed me as town so far this day. Not going to grab quotes to explain at this hour, but waiting for my opinion on that one post of Absta looked like you genuinely wanted to consider all possibilities and get my perspective before pushing for a lynch. That looked like it came from town, in my opinion.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #517 (isolation #30) » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:24 am

Post by Rob14 »

Can you explain what you don't like about Ice's case, Bacde?
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #518 (isolation #31) » Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:27 am

Post by Rob14 »

I think that if Melmond is scum, Bacde-scum is unlikely. Melmond had both Shamrock and Bacde in his four scum reads. I can see him putting one there for bussing purposes easily, but both? That's very risky.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #530 (isolation #32) » Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:08 am

Post by Rob14 »

ICEninja wrote:
Melmond wrote:
Also the reads weren't in order. Shamrock and Disturbed one were somewhat close, but I did vote disturbed one. Also, in the town reads, you would have been above nacho.

See I don't buy that. The psychology of writing them down would put them in SOME order. If nothing else, then the order you happened to think of them. Considering how absta, at the time, was your weakest scum read and you had very little to say about him, combined with the fact that he was your 3rd in the list of whom you explained, this doesn't track. I simply can't follow how your thought process would have placed absta as first in that list unless you meant he was the least scummy, which you actually did say so. Which would imply that Shamrock was the scummiest of the list.

And how can you go back and say that I was a stronger town read than Nacho? We can't exactly take that on faith.


If he writes them down in the order he thinks of them, then I would expect most scummy to be at the top of the scum list because they stick in his mind most. Also, many people don't write reads list in order. I, personally, go to the nearest vote count and place all the names in categories in the order they appear on the vote count so I don't miss anyone. I think this post is reaching a bit.

Nachomamma8 wrote:
Rob14 wrote:Shamrock's six posts were not bad enough to warrant not waiting for a claim, in my opinion.

So what's your read on me calling for people to lynch him without one?


Anti-town, and a slight scum tell. I wouldn't expect scum to lynch a partner without giving them a chance to claim, but it's possible if you thought the partner was useless and would be lynched regardless of a claim. That situation is possible considering Shamrock's play this game.

Nachomamma8 wrote:
Rob14 wrote:Second, I think that he voted Shamrock in part to try to signal to him to get his ass in thread if he was reading but not posting. If Shamrock had gotten in thread early when it was only Bacde's vote and started contributing, I don't think he would have been lynched.

But you're still not answering the why. Why would he signal with a vote? Why wouldn't he signal how most people do and just tell him to get in and post?


Assuming Bacde's scum, he had to move his vote at that point to relieve pressure on him. Shamrock was a non-controversial position that no one can attack him for. A vote on Shamrock doesn't involve him having to come up with a case on someone that could be picked apart to further attack him and push for his lynch. It also distances them for later in the game.

Having said that, we shouldn't be talking about Bacde this game day. The topic of his lynch won't come up until much, much later in the game, so I think it's best to focus on the here and now.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #540 (isolation #33) » Sun Dec 16, 2012 5:56 pm

Post by Rob14 »

absta101 wrote:
Shamrock wrote:
Mirhawk wrote:
absta101 wrote:None of this sounds scummy. Why do need the answer to this?


Never said it was scummy, just wondering if it was intentional.


Wait, if it's not scummy, why did you bring it up?

Shamrock seems like he's pretending to be surprised. Instead of just "why did you bring it up?", he adds the unnecessary beginning part to make it seem like he's genuinely caught something.


absta101 wrote:I like my 'find' on Shamrock more. What do you think of his post?


Some more reasons for Town-Absta, by the way. He's the first to bring up Shamrock and even drew attention back to it a few posts later when people weren't biting. Doesn't read like distancing to me, and certainly not bussing.

Also, my scum-read of JMO has slipped away for the most part. The majority of my case on him was based on his reaction to the page 1 case on him, but now that I've spent some time with his town meta, that's actually not that abnormal for him. I have more than enough doubt that I wouldn't want to lynch him today.

Unvote
Vote Cheery Dog


I do not like how he switched off of me and onto iam. It's an interesting coincidence that it comes the post after I said I like him for town in this day. I went from trying to push three mislynches through in his ISO #20 to being unvoted in ISO #23 with literally no explanation in between. He moved instead onto iama, who he had never talked about before that post. I don't buy the idea that iama suddenly was a larger scum-read than me. Cheery had been cultivating his scum-read on me all day until I said he looked town, whereas iama never even warranted a mention before now.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #545 (isolation #34) » Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:07 pm

Post by Rob14 »

Bacde wouldn't have made it to LyLo anyway, JMO. We pretty much already determined that. So it wasn't entirely necessary. I believe the claim, though. Scum wouldn't claim something so easily proved false by lynching Bacde just in order to lynch someone who was going to be lynched eventually anyway. It would be a 1 for 1 trade (which is hardly ever favorable to scum), and it would be for a townie that was already on the chopping block. No point.
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #571 (isolation #35) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 7:15 am

Post by Rob14 »

Bacde is trying to throw WIFOM at the Melmond wagon like crazy, which makes me much more interested in hopping on.

Unvote
Vote Melmond
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #583 (isolation #36) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 9:35 am

Post by Rob14 »

Wanted to see how Bacde reacted when I voted Melmond. More WIFOM. If he had laid off of it as soon as I jumped on, then I would be inclined to think that Melmond was scum. Didn't happen.

If we lynch Bacde now, then he either flips scum OR flips town and we lynch Ice-scum the next day (so, so unlikely). Why are we not lynching Bacde today now that there's essentially a counter-claim?

Unvote
Vote Bacde
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #590 (isolation #37) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 12:10 pm

Post by Rob14 »

absta101 wrote:@Jabb - What do you think of iam?


Why did you choose now to ask this?
User avatar
Rob14
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Rob14
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6219
Joined: October 5, 2012

Post Post #613 (isolation #38) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 2:35 pm

Post by Rob14 »

I was next to useless in this game, and I think it was because I replaced in. For right now, I don't think I'm good at doing that. Even without replacing in, I'm a stubborn person. When I'm there from the start, though, people can tell me when my ideas are stupid right when they're starting so that I can look in other directions. Without being here for people to critique my reads, I developed reads and started thinking that my scum reads were looking scummy no matter what they posted. Since I did this all at once with no feedback (catching up at night), no one was around to tell me I was seeing things that weren't there. I didn't even realize how retarded my catch-up post was until people started saying that a lot of it was just me calling people scum and not pointing anything out to support it. Many times, when I looked back at the posts I thought were super-scummy, I didn't see anything scummy in those posts at all and was confused how my tunneling self had in the first place.

tl;dr: I'm a stubborn asshole and it makes me bad at replacing into games. At least for now. I'll work on it.

P-edit: @Tierce - I don't understand that distinction. My thinking is that anything that has a town motivation has a scum motivation (i.e. to look like town), so I guess I don't see how you can extract the two. Care to explain that a bit more?
Locked