Newbie 1339 - Game Over! (Scum Win)
Forum rules
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:
Finding scum is our first priority. Never lose sight of that as town, and you'll be alright.
none of you are true newbies
some are still tenderfooted
but we only have one who is truly new.
Well, yeah, if we don't lynch people then the scum gets to just kill us off without any resistance. I suppose pushing everyone around and riling them up is a good way to have accusations flung all around/make the scum step out of line, but it seems to very violent and forced at first. I guess what's important your first impression of the other players? Instinct!
Regardless, I'll hold my vote for now. I wanna see what all you guys have to say before I make my decision.
Am I the only true newbie? Oh man.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ RandomYoshi wrote:How is discussing the likehood of a Town Cop existing in the setup relevant to Town's success?
Well, because there's 100% chance for Mafia to have a cop, we know that if anyone outright says they're a cop or that they investigated anyone, etc, they're either lying or they're likely not town. However, there's a pretty high chance that town has a cop, so I was saying I feel bad for that guy. He basically can't say -anything- about being a cop without falling under scrutiny.
Can we have conversations about things not directly related to the game? Like, I'm at my desk job right now, so that's why I'm replying so often. It'd be cool to hold some conversations that would let us know each other a bit more. If that's something generally off limits, that's k.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:↑ RandomYoshi wrote:
What specifically were you replying to? His reason for his RV or his RV in and of itself?
Sorry, it was the "he is creepy" part. I should have deleted the rest of the quote.
And @Varsoon, it's highly unlikely that scum would fake a cop claim unless it was end game, imo. It would just be pretty damn ballsy. So not much to worry about there.
Well, dude, that's the thing. What if, on second day or something, he exposed the other guy as scum and got his partner killed? Everyone would think he was actually the cop and then he'd have free reign to investigate town while seeming like a good guy.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Vote:RandomYoshi
Your user title is 'Mafia Scum'. I think I'm gifted with the Sight.
Yeah? I guess so--at the very least, it'll get the game rolling a bit more.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ RandomYoshi wrote:How is discussing the likehood of a Town Cop existing in the setup relevant to Town's success?
Furthering my vote from before, I'm a little suspicious of the way you say "relevant to Town's success". I know not all of us have written in, so it's probably hasty to make this judgment, but it seems like a subconscious slip to refer to Town as if you're not a part of it. In fact, if you were town, wouldn't you want to discuss things that might possibly lead to our success?- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ RandomYoshi wrote:
Yes, of course I'd want to discuss things that are beneficial for us Townies to win. I just wanted you to highlight how it could be contributing to our success as Town. In fact, all I wanted to know was your mindset behind the topics you brought up. Now that you have explained satisfactorily how it can help our success as Town, my question has been thoroughly answered.
Fairnuff, but I won't change my vote until we get some more discussion rolling.
I feel like I might be too chatty, but I think it's really important that we all chat as much as possible.
The best way we can route out the scum is to talk a lot. This way, the people who aren't as active are under scrutiny and scum is forced to be more social, leading to a higher chance of slipping up. We should hold a quota of so many posts per real-time day. Falling under the quota doesn't benefit town at all, and so those are people we can lynch if we don't agree on a definitive mafia target.
Does this sound like a good plan, everyone?- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:
Super eager and ready to get the ball rolling. I like this guy.
And it's a great plan! Discussion is our greatest weapon. In my first newbie game I started getting really frustrated because the game wasn't active enough for me. It makes it nearly impossible to move forward when it's day 3 and most of the people in the game aren't even saying anything.
Let's not forget that people do have real lives, however. So it should be something within reason. I'm thinking like 4-5 posts per day?
I think that 5 posts a day is a healthy benchmark. Honestly, it only takes a minute or two to write something or respond to someone else. If you can't take 5 to 10 minutes out of a day to ensure that your fellow townsmen aren't wrongfully lynched, you probably shouldn't be playing the game.
But, yeah, let's talk about the quota for a bit.
Does a 5-post-per day quota work for you? Why or why not?
Keep in mind, this is wholly a construction of our game and wouldn't be enforced in any way. It'd just encourage us to keep the ball rolling and better ensure that we don't lynch the wrong people. The thing Mafia are scared of most is good communication, as they thrive off of miscommunication. If we stay in good touch, it should be a solid way to evaluate every player involved. Those who don't post very often will be under higher scrutiny as they aren't contributing to the well-being of the whole.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nobody Special wrote:This is my first post of this real-life day.
I think posting quotas are stupid.
Yeah, I'd like to know, too. I can understand that we all lead lives outside of this game, but why join a game if you can't even contribute a minimum of five posts?- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nobody Special wrote:Yes, Varsoon is very much town.
I think attaching an arbitrary number to a player and saying YOU MUST POST THESE MANY TIMES PER DAY OR... is folly. Some people post more substance in one or two posts a day than some other people who post forty times a day.
An arbitrary number is just that, arbitrary.
If you feel someone is lurking (or active lurking), vote them.
If they don't improve their quality of posting, lynch them.
It's very simple.
I can definitely see the value of quality of quantity. However, working on a system of 'feeling' will only lead to disorganization. A line needs to be drawn in the sand. Of course, I encourage everyone else (and try to, myself) to have substance in every post and to lead towards a better game for everyone. If your playstyle is to lurk, post lengthy, quality missives, and that's it, I'm fine with that. You don't -have- to post to the quota, and weekends and holidays make sense, but the quota does allow for the entire playerbase to be more aware of who is and isn't lurking, and to stay in more active communication with each other. All of these things contribute to a better game for everyone, I feel. Mafia has to actually stay on their feet and town gets to feel involved. I like it.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:@Varsoon, have you played mafia on any other sites before mafiascum?
Nah, this is my first game ever. I learned about the game about two weeks ago. I honestly thought this one would start earlier, haha.
I just figured I'd get the ball rolling. Placation is laaaame.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
That's understandable as well, but even with 'deeper' discussion, simply punctuate your responses between each person you are responding to. If everyone holds up the quota, it isn't difficult for discussion to happen. You don't have to grasp at straws for something to talk about because everyone -is- posting and there's always something to reply to or offer insight into. Again, this is all to route out scum and keep us in healthy communication. I think that, as we progress, the quota won't be difficult to uphold and we'll allow more leeway towards it as well.
If you guys have any good ideas, please put 'em forth. Getting out of RVS seems pretty important, and stagnating discussion is something that only benefits scum.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ kuror0 wrote:Everybody looks so happy about Varsoon... anyways. I strongly disagree with the whole quota thing. While I too get really frustrated when people just lurk around, you can't forget people have a real life or sometimes there is nothing important to say, the quota may lead to policy lynchs on inactive players wich can be either way town or scum(and based purely on numbers it is most likely to be town). Also to avoid failing under that "inactivity" state, some people may start fluff posting just to look active wich is not helpfull at all. The whole idea can be really counterproductive for town(And yes i just used town instead of us). Also to avoid inactivity you can vote for people to pressure them, that's usually the best way to promote someone's participation. Also a policy lynch usually doesn't give so much information to town as a normal lynch wich is another huge set back.
On another topic discussing about PRs is also bad for town imo. If there is a claim at any point there are ways to prove it is a legit one, and we will worry about it when the time comes.
Lastly you may notice my english grammar is terrible(maybe my vocabulary too), so if you can't understand what i am trying to say let me know, so i try to make things clear. (I also receive any advice if it helps to improve my grammar )
Aww, man, sorry to hear that. I don't have much experience with this game, so that does make sense. However!
As far as fluff goes, it should be apparent, which allows us to easily target scum.
There isalwayssomething important to say.
If we prioritize lynching players who seem more scum over policy lynching inactive players, we have a higher chance to find scum. Why?
If the scum are active, there's a higher chance for them to slip up. This is like being questioned at a police office. They keep you there for awhile to make sure you don't say something contradictory or indicting.
If the scum are inactive, then they are in the pool to be voted for out of inactive players.
This encourages town to be active, to not post fluff, and to be true to themselves. The scum will become apparent.
I like the idea of using votes for pressure, but if we all start becoming voting bullies it'll lead to fights between townies and only foster unhealthy communication.
As for talking about PR's, I do agree. The only reason I mentioned it was to call it to everyone's attention for future notice and to get some discussion started.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
That's totes understandable. I don't think we should enforce a quota during weekends (friday-sunday) and holidays, as most people are super busy in those times. If you do have a busy day, popping in to let us know why is always a better idea than silence.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ kuror0 wrote:↑ Varsoon wrote:
As far as fluff goes, it should be apparent, which allows us to easily target scum.That's the problem by forcing people to post X times during the day you will make towns to post fluff. So it won't direct us to scum but to anyone.
There isalwayssomething important to say.Sometimes there isn't, and sometimes personally i like to wait.
If we prioritize lynching players who seem more scum over policy lynching inactive players, we have a higher chance to find scum. Why?As i said before policy lynches give away much less information than normal lynches, wich is very detrimental for town. Also if we focus on reasons and not on policys we can account people for their actions and that way we can find who is really trying to catch scum and who just want to lynch anyone wich is a scum trait.
My coments on red and i will leave it there cause i have to go. Also i am sure someone can link something that explains why policy lynchs are bad for town.
Well, clearly. I'm saying that we don't lynch based off of policy, but off of a communal agreement.
No one's forced to do anything. Simply encouraged.
As for your third point, If we, as town, focus on reasons for actions alone, it will be easy for us to identify scum, who are more likely to build a case based off of policy.
I was hoping to not have to spell this out because scum are always watching, but yeah. The whole point to instilling a policy such as a Post Quota is that it engages the players, encourages them to post, and allows everyone to easily identify scum because scum will either not post OR they'll try to manipulate the policy. Town has no reason to manipulate the policy. They're town. The policy exists to protect them.
Regardless of if we decide to have a quota or not, I think we're at the point where lurking/inactivity is going to be more apparent anyway.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Really? I thought comments in blue were the ones we should stray from. I could see how using any color would be bad, though.
I used enlarged text, but I figure that's fine.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nobody Special wrote:It's been tried here and there, and it generally falls by the wayside after Day One.
With an attitude like that, I can see why.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
How is pointing out that that town cop is in a bad position, should he exist, scummy? Just trying to heighten awareness for the fact there is a mafia cop. This probably won't come up again for a few game-days, so it's really a non-issue.
↑ Nobody Special wrote:
Bland, boring, needs to get started.
Someone do something scummy, so we can get started lynching.
I think we need to get rolling, but as I said before, baseless accusations of eachother is only going to have each of us calling one another scum. We have to work together and stay in good, active communication or else the mafia will take advantage of our aimlessness.
Just outright saying "Get scummy" isn't going to make scum step out of line. The only way we can do that is to stay hyper-active and post a lot. Those who only lurk become more suspicious and the people who post mostly fluff/baseless finger-pointing are more scummy than others.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Who do you find most scummy?
I don't blame you for thinking I'm scummy. I guess my noobishness is showing, I thought that encouraging people to chat a lot would be a good way to foster communication for town.
Here's my reads.
Varsoon - From an outsider's standpoint, I could see how I seem scummy. I was trying to get out RVS with some suggestions. Guess it worked, if not for the best. Tbh, the discussion of post-quota and seeing how more experienced players dealt with it let me figure a lot of things out. I'm not going to share all of those things, but here are the more obvious ones.
Fuzzybutternut - I don't blame you for the scumread on me or whatever. I -am- the most active person in this game and I could see how that'd be suspicious. I -do- think it is pretty scummy to tell everyone outright to start making reads on eachother, because it's just going to turn us against ourselves.
Approximately Normal Guy - Seems really town to me, but not incredibly active. Posts don't seem fluffy, and he's not accused anyone of anything.
Nabber - Anoter townread for me. Seems busy with things outside of the game, but hasn't done anything anti-town.
kitiekatt - Nothing to go on. Either lurking or inactive.
RandomYoshi - Keeping my vote on you for a few reasons. If a post quota and policy lynches are such a bad idea, his flagrant support of it does seem a bit suspicious. Seems all-too-eager to scumhunt, and when Fuzzy entered the thread he was pretty quick to turn things about on me. The fact he wants everyone to produce reads factors into my deduction that mafia want town turning on themselves early into the day. Honestly, he's given me the most to work with, but he could just be a really anxious town.
kuror0 - I was pretty iffy about my read, but this guy seems pretty town to me. Genuinely interested in town's wellbeing, and his warnings about post quota make a lot of sense and are delivered in the way that a fellow town would. His employ of rhetoric doesn't betray a scumtell to me.
Nobody Special - Dude's got such a negative attitude. Looks like he'd be an easy target for scum to turn some attention to, so I'd keep an eye out for them pointing fingers at him.
Nachomamma8 - Has been really inactive, too. Don't think he's scum because of that early townread. Still don't know anything about him, though.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:You have the wrong idea about how this game is played. Reads are good, because it let's everyone know where you stand on the people in the game. It can also be a viable scum hunting tactic. It's pro-townnot pro-scum. To be completely honest, admitting your scuminess is rather pro-scum imo too, but you're the newest player here, so I won't hound you about that.
Aaah. Again, sorry, this is my first game.
I can see how reads are good, but it just gives scum way too much info to work on.
I guess it does help town know where they all stand, etc, but I just don't like the idea of fighting among ourselves and having to be on the defensive when people produce such early reads.
As far as 'admitting' scumminess, I just said I could see how I'd seem that way, but it seems like that's a losing argument. I can't claim town, because that's something scum are trying to do. I can't claim scum, because who would do that? The only thing I can do is acknowledge that, yes, I could see how my high-post count and suggestions might be scummy, but I hope that my posts speak for themselves and my alignment is obvious to everyone. I get the feeling I'm going to be either an early lynch or murder target because I'm so active and because of my litmus test earlier. Sucks.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nobody Special wrote:I find Varsoon very suspect for not finding me scummy, but rather pointing out that scum could use me for an easy target. Could be a scumslip.
unvote
Vote: Varsoon
See what I said about reads?
Scum's just trying to turn town on itself.
If you scum make town lynch me, it will only turn out poorly, because then town will see how obvious it was that they were being manipulated.
Sorry about saying that you'd be an easy target. I'm just trying to pre-empt any scum moves.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Newbie games are for Newbies who want to learn how the game is played. I'm probably coming off as an ass right now, but I don't want you to carry your current thoughts throughout the rest of your games on here, because you will DEFINITELY be the first lynch if you keep up your thoughts. Being active isn't bad, but can get annoying when only two people are posting. That gives scum a reason not to post. There should be no claiming as of right now anyway.
Makes sense, man. Don't worry about being ass, criticism is good and Iama newbie.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Just an asshole, lol.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:iirc, he's like that in all his games.
Yeah, it was just a bit jarring at first. You'd figure that people would be more approachable in a game like this. /shrug.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
So ANG can pass by with saying that having a post quota is a bad idea just because he's agreeing with someone whodidn't vote you? But, when I agree that having it is a bad idea, and the one who I am agreeing with votes you, I am suddenly scummy? Can you explain this?
I've been skeptical of him, but I think that's the nature of the game--to be skeptical of everyone.
Honestly, my gut feeling was that you were scum, but I couldn't deduce who else might be. That's why, when the player who was absent was replaced and the new guy decisively stepped forward and began shifting the weight of the game around, I thought 'wow, what if the afk was scum, too? is this guy scum?', but that wouldn't have answered who the -other- scum was. You guys seemed to bounce off of each other really well, but, tbh, you did the same thing with me. Now I'm considering the other players a lot more, which could be either a bad or good thing, but, ah, we'll see.
For now, I'll keep my vote on you, but should someone else betray a scumslip, I'll probably change it.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Yeah, that is a bit weird, but I think I am the only person who included himself in his reads.
Could have been that he left out people who he forgot were in game/people too inactive?
Either way, it was posted at like 1.30 AM and we've established not all of us are exactly night hawks.
Still, I'd like ANG to explain why.
Also, aaaah, now I feel a bit bad for persecuting Yoshi. ><
Do people usually ISO other players as early as this?
I guess there aren't many other ways to deduce scum without figuring out who thinks what and evaluating their posts.
I really wish the more inactive players would step back in. I'd like to see what they have to say, since it feels like half of us have been gone for 3 pages.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Could you bluntly explain how you feel about the other players so we can gauge where you are?
I initially felt like having everyone do reads was a bad idea, but it's produced a lot of pro-town information.
You don't have to say if you think people are scum or town--like you said, you don'thaveto do anything.
I'd just like to more assuredly know how to feel about you.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:@Mod-Can we get a prod/replacement on the inactives please? This game isn't going to go anywhere without them.
Agreeing with this.
I was iffy at first, but you're a cool guy.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:you said it could be a newb tell, but when you voted for him, it was more likely it was a scum tell
what did he do that made you think that it was NOT a scum tell anymore?
This.
I like that you're able to pin down exactly what it is that you'd like to know. It'd be neat if Fuzzy could get back to you on that, but I think that it was generally the way that I responded that made him realize I'm just kinda new to the game. Either way, I do like that kind of zeal, even if you swapped what I felt was a pretty logical vote in order to pressure Fuzzy.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
As far as Nacho goes, now that he's put a bit more into the game, I've got a better gauge of where he stands.
He's been making some really solid pro-town suggestions, but that might just be because he's an IC.
I like that he was able to cut through a lot of the fluff and get down to business.
While I agree with his initial vote on Yoshi, I find it understandable, if a bit awkward, that he quickly changed such a logical vote if only to pressure Fuzzy.
Although, it's funny, since he and Fuzzy were locked in such back and forth dialogue, but after asking what he did in post 139, Fuzzy hasn't responded to anything since. Could be chalked up to timing and Fuzzy just being like "screw this", but I think that's pretty important.
My questions right now:
Fuzzy, why did you leave so suddenly instead of vindicating yourself?
Yoshi, why are you so quick to agree with everyone who enters with a strong post? You did this with me, Fuzzy, and, now, Nacho. I would understand if we all made good points, but my post-quota suggestion -was not- a good point.
Nacho, how do you feel about Yoshi now that you've interacted with him and got reads from him?- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ RandomYoshi wrote:
I've literally just stopped doing that. Nacho's point was the last one I agreed with, because it was logically good. I think I'm making some good, independent points at the moment; what are your thoughts on those?
You were pretty quick to agree with him, then do what he said. It seems like you're really quick to try to cover your bases and do what people tell you, but you shouldn't have so many bases to cover if you weren't a bit suspicious.
Everything you've been doing is just highly reactionary, even recently.
I haven't been using my voting power as forcibly as I should and that's because my gut reaction to your first posts were that they were scummy. It became more apparent that when the post-quota was a bad idea, your quick support of it seems like more of a buddying move than anything. This is made even more apparent when you quickly latched to every new, decisive entry in this game. My vote (and opinion of you) goes unchanged.
You're either scum or really, really anxious town.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ RandomYoshi wrote:Why did you jump in to answer a question that wasn't even aimed at you?
Bored and no one is posting.
I'd also like to pressure Nabber into being more active, but I'm not going to use my vote to do it, since it's going to remain on you for now.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
:3 Sorry, I do post a lot. I wish this game had an 'edit post' option, but that would probably cause more problems than it would solve.
It's okay, man, you're more active than a lot of the people here. That situation is completely understandable.
Just look at what's been going on in the game and respond to everyone/put your thoughts down for us.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:Sorry guys. Didn't mean to just disappear. Forgot that I had first aid training today. I'll post after I'm done with my homework/Skype date.
It's k, just really weird/suspicious timing on your part. Same thing I said to Nabber goes to you. Make sure to read up and respond/put down your thoughts.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Just read over all this no-lynch nonsense and I'll agree with the majority here.
Nolynch lets Mafia sit back and kill town without any participation.
What I think is the -real- reason that fuzzy suggested a no-lynch is to see how other people would respond to that suggestion, so that he could get better reads.
That would work if he was a noob like me, but he's been in plenty of games, so it is way more suspicious.
Either way, I think lynching someone, or, at the very least, the discussion of lynching someone, will give us way more info then something as disengaging and non-confrontational as a no-lynch.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Ugh, I keep wanting to clear Yoshi of suspicion I have of him, but he keeps buddying with "X is town" and slamming votes against whoever we're against, like he's trying to get a wagon started.
Keeping my vote on him,
Fuzzy is my second choice for scum. His last play is either a bold, but obvious scumtell, or what I described above.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:
Maybe. But if that's what his purpose was, I don't see why he would suggest people look at his meta. That seems more like scum showing that it's an established pattern and thus doesn't actually make him scum, which wouldn't make me even a little bit happy.
You're right, he's being really defensive of that move.
It falls in line with an earlier assessment that I made of him being scummy.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:
yeah, i see this too.
do you think he'd be more cautious of sheeping as scum if he was already called out for it once?
I think he should be, but just because he isn't doesn't make me any less suspicious.
You'd think that, as town, if you were called out for doing something scummy, you'd try to avoid doing that kind of thing, as well.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ fuzzybutternut wrote:I'll put it as this: My interactions with him, though at first giving me newb town vibe, have shifted, mainly due to his sudden change of heart on me. He stated that he believed I was town, but as soon as another point came up, he was quick to jump onto it.
The same goes with Yoshi.
I shifted on you when you started to get more and more absurdly defensive.
I was initially nervous of you because...
You replaced an inactive player while the only scumread I had was on Yoshi,
and
You immediately built a case against the highest posting user right out of the gate.
But I gave you the benefit of the doubt. You could just be scumhunting and the inactive could have been VT. We had plenty of inactives, and one of them could be the other scum.
But then...
You stopped scumhunting to become super-defensive of yourself.
Your poise and rhetoric fell apart when you were called out.
At this point, I kind of want to vote for you, because even if you're town, then I'll know that people who pushed cases against you are more likely to be scum. If you're scum, then we get rid of half of mafia on day 1.
Even in light of all this, I'm holding that Yoshi is scum. Because, frankly, he's -still- more of a scumtell to me than you.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:[quote="In post 243
Why do these two things make you nervous?
At this point, I kind of want to vote for you, because even if you're town, then I'll know that people who pushed cases against you are more likely to be scum. If you're scum, then we get rid of half of mafia on day 1.
This doesn't sound like town logic to me. You say you want to vote him because if he flips town the people who voted him are probably scum. What would that say for you, then?
Well, if you only have a scum read on one single person and another person steps in and says something you find scummy, replacing a completely inactive player and assuming his role, then you've got your second scum read, don't you?
It's not town logic to say that voting scum is a good idea?
I know it can be hard to follow more advanced play, but here's a pretty simple breakdown of what happens if we vote for him and he's VT (like he claims):
He's lynched and revealed as VT.
Anyone who built a case against him without sufficient evidence is now under suspicion.
Ergo, we have better leads to follow on who is scum.
ANG, I'm going to chalk this slip up to you not following my logic, but it seems like a pretty fucked up thing to imply someone else is scummy when their suggestion is pro-town.
What's the basis?
Either way, like I said, he's my second choice for scum.
My first choice is, and always has been, Yoshi.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:
1+1=2, yes.
It's not town logic to say that voting scum is a good idea?
I know it can be hard to follow more advanced play, but here's a pretty simple breakdown of what happens if we vote for him and he's VT (like he claims):
He's lynched and revealed as VT.
Anyone who built a case against him without sufficient evidence is now under suspicion.
Ergo, we have better leads to follow on who is scum.
ANG, I'm going to chalk this slip up to you not following my logic, but it seems like a pretty fucked up thing to imply someone else is scummy when their suggestion is pro-town.
What's the basis?
First of all, you can cut the attitude. I didn't say nor did I imply that voting scum isn't a good idea.
The bold is trueregardlessof what he flips.
You seemed to be not that concerned about the possibility of a mislynch, and more focused on the fact that people on the mislynch would look scummy for it. Whether the people on the lynch look scummy should not depend on the flip. You can look at their votes and the cases they've built now and decide if you think their reasoning is valid.
In a nutshell, my point was that you had no issues supporting the lynch, but your attitude was that if he flipped town then the people voted him would look scummy. You would be one of those people, and not only that, but you would have been hopping on the end of the wagon.
Nutshell-inside-a-nutshell: lynching scum is pro-town, "lynch now, ask questions later" is not.
Okay, bro, chill your jets.
You're taking pretty obtuse methods to turn the phrase on me.
Look it over a few times and stop being so quick to change the issue at hand.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
Didn't really find it scummy, but let me try to make it clear to you again.
In a nutshell, my point was that you had no issues supporting the lynch, but your attitude was that if he flipped town then the people voted him would look scummy. You would be one of those people, and not only that, but you would have been hopping on the end of the wagon.
I never supported the lynch with a vote.
I also gave pretty sound reasons why I've always thought Fuzzy was scum and why I still have my suspicions of him.
My attitude was, and still is, that if anyone flips town that the people who started wagons on them are the ones I'd be most suspicious of.
If I do ever participate in a mislynch, feel free to suspect me. Until then, please don't make such big deals out of such small things. It makes you look scummy, especially when a wagon is getting started on someone else who many be scum, as it seems like a defense of an ally.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:I constantly poke and prod people to get them to flesh out their thought processes. It's how I mainly hunt scum. When something doesn't quite line up with my thinking, I get that person to elaborate on it, and it usually becomes apparently whether their thought process was natural or not. On the other site where I play, I've caught scum before, not for making bad arguments, but for not giving reasoning that properly supports the argument.
Your initial statement stood out as odd to me, so I called attention to it. You reaction was town, just annoying.
Still pretty new to the game, so bear with me on things like that.
I'll definitely defend any move that I make, though.
As far as not using my vote, I kept it on Yoshi because I still felt he was more scummy than Fuzzy.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Approximately Normal Guy wrote:I understand. A lot of concepts in mafia aren't intuitive
Can someone sum up the case against yoshi? I'm phone posting for tonight and digging it up would be a chore. I know in my initial reads I was null-scum on him but I don't know what's been presented since then.
My case against him is that he
-has used rhetoric that betrayed he wasn't very town and when corrected on it, made explicit with the line 'us townies (Not a huge point)
-was very quick to plead a case for himself within the first few days
-asked people to do something scummy early on
-gave reads immediately when asked to, despite it being so early in the game (anothing point that's fairly null)
-has addressed single other plays if they 'anything scummy you're noticing?', etc.
-just seems far too eager to scum-hunt in general (couples with my above point. This is why I made my initial assesment of 'anxious town' or 'scum')
-falls back on the argument that he was tired when he got called out
-sheeped my post-quota idea
-sheeped fuzzy's assessment of me as scum
-sheeped a few player's assessments of fuzzy as scum
-has been decisively calling people town all game (not a huge point, but the only people who know town for sure are scum)
There might be a few other things, but he just hasn't been very independent all game. He's quick to buddy and sheep and flip his reads on people.- Varsoon
-
Varsoon Scatman
- Varsoon
- Scatman
- Scatman
- Posts: 18738
- Joined: February 18, 2013
↑ Nachomamma8 wrote:Scumteam is Yoshi-kuror0. Kuror0 is lurking hard, keeping his head down, minimal contributions. Yoshi still has the problem of compulsive sheeping. If you would like to be useful, you could take a position on one of those two!
hint, hint.
I'm skeptical about that call on Kuror0, but he definitely has been lurking. His decisions of when to swap his vote around are all, at the least, interesting plays.
You know how I feel about Yoshi. - Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon
- Varsoon