i am not letting scum escape this time!
Mini 1436 ~ Mafia Through a Puppy's Eyes (Game Over.)
Forum rules
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
was thinking i might like ice for scum today...
i didn't like the fact that he told Mhork not to claim...he was defending Mhork because he thought that there was no way in Hell he would get quick-lynched and then once he realised Mhork really was hammered did he finally change his tune and say that ok, Mhork could be scum.
Also didn’t care for Panzer much…his self-vote could be seen as trying to deflect the attention away from Mhork which he was starting to get from his awkward reply to my vote.
For now:
Vote: Iceguy- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
actually if flavor is anything to go by , then yeh, pretty sure Safety redirected the kill to himself...considering it looks like the butterfly stopped sixty from "catching a ball and showing it who's boss". And safety’s #83 does point to ice most likely being his target…
And this also gives me reservations about Spy who keeps saying ice is probs town but probs needs to go…he’s said it more than once (#128 and #133) and then he defends him in #153.
I also don’t like his #138 saying that Safety probably was the target of the NK which subtly deflects away from the Ice issue…
definitely liking my vote where it sits...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I can't see any hints as to who he was going to target, therefore I have nothing that well give useful information as to whether he was the intended target of the night kill or not.
Useless information and guesswork really won't get us anywhere.
so what do you think of his #83 then...
don't you think as a self redirector he would want to crumb his target in case he successfully caught the NK?- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
Alright…
Re-reading Cheery, he did seem to try and ignore the Mhork debacle on D1.
Even to go so far as to drop another RSV on Safety after Safety pointed out Mhork’s exaggeration..
He conveniently had Mhork as “Null” at L-1 until after the hammer, where he graduated to “felt like town made the right decision”
Funny that he almost mirrors iceguy….
I still prefer Ice, but I will settle for Cheery if I can’t get him.- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
Parama wrote:...hmm. 252 is actually one of the worst posts of the game.
I don't really give credibility to Messiah's argument on its own, but sword's reaction is stupendously terrible.
but I really want to kill Cheery too... this is hard.
Why was it terrible? I didn’t even take Messiah’s post as serious...he hadn’t said a word the whole day , only to come in and ignore the main discussion and simply slap a vote on me ... i wanted him to comment on current events...i didn't realize i had to defend myself against one vote...
But ok..i’ll respond:
↑ Messiah wrote:Did anyone else notice that sword was around during the whole time Mhork was being run up on March 25th and around for at least an hour prior to the hammer on March 26th only to avoid posting until right after the hammer dropped saying that Mhork was "scum through and through?" Because I did, and it gives me all these bad feelings.
Apparently because i didn’t post again in thread between Monday @ 4:33pm til Tuesday @ 10:18am , this makes me suspicious?
Here’s a quick run down...Standard ops for me to be on a computer is Mon – Fri 8:00am to 5:00pm give or take an hourish, depending on if i am staying late or coming in early..not to mention scattered throughout depending on how crazy it is at work..
Nights and weekends are bad for me cause i can only get on by phone, and my house is pretty much a dead zone...so if i’m out somewhere like a coffee shop or something, then i can post...it won’t be elaborate or anything, cause my phone is pain to post or quote from...
Meanwhile Morkh had already pretty much self-imploded.. he always gets mad and seems to genuinely not understand why he gets voted or lynched when he is scum. It’s kind of funny actually (see the last 2 games i was in with him where he was scum. (WOW cataclysm Mini and most recently Simpson’s Mini). I wouldn’t have even put him in that situation if we were buddies...
i called him out in RVS like i promised i would at the end of our last game ( i was mad cause i lost to him both times) ....and then after his wierd“scum only once”post, i told Messiah don’t fall for his excuse considering i had just lost to scum Morkh TWICE in a row...
So when i checked in and fully read up on Tuesday morning, Morkh’s posting had reinforced the scum read, but by then Spy had already quick-hammered...i posted in thread because i wanted Ice to answer my question to him about not wanting morkh to claim, which came off sounding like Ice was worried for some reason and it seemed oddly out of place to me...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
@Parama - his argument was...hey he didn't post in our thread overnight night, but waited until Morkh was quiklynched to say anything.. other than that, he had no comments at all today...why should i have taken that seriously?
@KKB - Mhork was scummy for his "it was only one time.. and seriously, here's an RVS..."
and i've already stated what i thought happened with Safety...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
naw, ice... you said you've decided to vote me on "gut" rather than writing out your promised post...
so either you're lazy town (which i seriously doubt) or your scum taking advantage...
seeing as my vote is already on you, you probably already know which one i think you are...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:@KKB - Mhork was scummy for his "it was only one time.. and seriously, here's an RVS..."
Kanye, My response to that post of his (where he tries to downplay his scum game) was my #10...
where i explicitly say that it was more than 1 time...his post was BAD...
i could have explained about how he goes off when he gets lynched as scum, but we were already in twilight and i wanted an answer from Ice before the thread was locked...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
not much to say as it's only 3 posts long...
keep in mind Day 1 only lasted about 18hrs real time...
first was an RVS based on my last play with Morkh..
Second was me stating that he was most likely scum for his post...
Third was me stating that he was pretty much caught scum and at the same time asking you a legitimate question.
If anything, it's consistant...- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
↑ sword_of_omens wrote:also...how relevant is Sixty's flavor normally?- Sword of Omens -
Claiming at L-4 since 2011- sword_of_omens
-
sword_of_omens Mafia Scum
- sword_of_omens
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1648
- Joined: July 18, 2011
- Location: The Cat's Lair
- sword_of_omens
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens
- sword_of_omens