Newbie 1351: Hyrule's Under Attack.. Interesting..-GAME OVER
Forum rules
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
SHit....
I was crossing my fingers hoping to replace in as scum so i didnt have to read these walls of text
are flips not revealed? There is a blacked out blank where id expect dead players flips to be in roster post.
Everyone give me a summary based on your perspective... But beware of the new summary meta lol http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=28238- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Quite obviously a town vs town debateIn post 1452, VisceraEyes wrote:He's like willfully ignoring my filter - repeatedly asserting that "I'm not doing any scumhunting" as his reasoning for being suspicious of me when I'M ONE OF THE ONLY PEOPLE ACTIVELY TRYING TO DISCERN OTHERS ALIGNMENTS. Why, when feryl's and my playstyles are almost identical, does he have us on opposite ends of the scum spectrum? WHY?!
So that makes 3 people i want to clear for today and including myself thats 4 soo---- 7 people? That means if im right i have a 2/3 chance of hitting next vote right....
UNVOTE: VE- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
I just townread you harder than i have in any of the game we are in and any of your other active games ive been lurking---- reason? You defended barcode's slot really hard - and for good reason...... I doubt you are a scumteam so that leaves you as town... Still confused?In post 1587, fferyllt wrote:what?- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
these two are not a teamIn post 1555, Mac wrote:In post 1553, Z7-852 wrote:GuyInFreezehave been inactive quite sometime. Unlike Mac (#1533) I don't certainly see this as scummy but at least it's suspicious. He have been posting yesterday but not on this game.
that's not what I said I found scummy about him & is, quite frankly, a big misrep.
That leaves my process of POE with one confirmed scum if all the reads are correct
VOTE: GIF
Final answer... Sheep plz- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
this might be a helpful hintIn post 857, goodmorning wrote:People I will not vote today, even if it would be as a compromise: VE, ff, Deras
People I would vote today as a compromise only: AA9, Rev
People I would happily vote today: Z, Fe, Mac
PEDIT: CAPSLOCK FOREVERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
DON'T BE A DICKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Im not doing random stuff barcode- i explained every step of the way - ffer has good meta on your predecessor - your playstyles clash with VE and you both look like buthurt town - if im wrong about my POE i really dont care because im voting in one of the 3 remaining players regardless and second guessing yourself is a garbage strat after you have followed a reasonable line of logic.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
how did this guy not get instalynched after his first post?In post 80, Mac wrote:Hello everyone. Nice to see someone familiar faces, and not so familiar faces too in this game.
I've had a brief scan through on my phone and Deras makes me feel uneasy for his blatant OMGUS on Rev and it looked like a bit of a shotgun defence of himself. I think it's worth keeping an eye on, it could be a scum reaction but similarly, it could be newbtown too.
Currently off to work, will have a more indepth look when I get back.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
So mac and revenus voted the same obvious town for bad reasons and both asked carey to replace out and. Mac townreads revenus based on last games meta... Seems buddyish... Worthy to note that mac is the one doing the echoing of revenus and townreading him so could be scum cozying up to town
VOTE: mac
I vould see a goodmoring/mac team fairly easily- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
By voted i mean "pushed" i dont think mac actually voted or i havnt seen it yet.In post 1610, Ineffective wrote:So mac and revenus voted the same obvious town for bad reasons and both asked carey to replace out and. Mac townreads revenus based on last games meta... Seems buddyish... Worthy to note that mac is the one doing the echoing of revenus and townreading him so could be scum cozying up to town
VOTE: mac
I vould see a goodmoring/mac team fairly easily- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
goodmorning has both of the others in his middle of the line null category early gake... Which is the best place to have your scumpartner in at this phaseIn post 148, goodmorning wrote:@Deras: If you're actually paying attention and have time to say you are, you have time to post a brief post with a read or two instead of "lol I'll try again later".
Votes stand out in thread. It is very easy to skim the thread looking for a vote on you to OMGUS if you're into that sort of thing.
@ffffff: I am aware that that was the vote you thought was an OMGUS vote, being the only vote I have made on Fro so far. What I am not aware of is why you think that. Overreaction is a valid reason to vote someone and, should he explain himself reasonably, I would not then have a reason to keep voting him. So far he has not done so, therefore I do have a valid reason to keep voting him.
In case anyone is interested in my reads:
Town
ffffffffffffffff (dropping towntells everywhere)
Fe (this is, of course, Eye Urn) (for future reference) (pretty townish, but somewhat vague at times in a way?)
Null
Deras (hard newb rea, not so hard any other read)
Mac (few posts)
Rev (I am flipflopping on him. I do not know why.)
Carey (general behaviour BUT it's kind of his playstyle, I'll have a real read on him when he posts substance)
Null
AT3 (reads post)
Fro (pending explanation)
Scum- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Wait wtf... Gm built a scumcase against you after townreafing you and you fossing him for it??????????!?? talk about odd behaviorIn post 1614, fferyllt wrote:mac pushed but didn't vote iirc.
Mac also picked up a piece of the case that GM built for me being scum, argued it for a bit and voted me. He was gone for a few days and then unvoted after I rebutted the argument. There really wasn't much appetite for my lynch, which didn't make it worth pursuing maybe.
I could probably get behind a mac wagon, after I actually...you know...get some sleep and think about it with a fresh brain.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Id have to say that with no claims my vote is best placed on goodmorning for now.... Im gunna look up some completed scumflips.
Pedit the problem with a d3 lylo massclaim is that mafia will almost ceartainly claim pr--- which could mix things up in the right sequence of actual prs. Today a massclaim would almost force mafia to claim VT--- also mafia wont be prepared as to who is claiming what . D3 generally seems apropriate.... But lets say mac is town and isnt lynched - he would be an obvious VTfor not claiming at l-1 and if mafia rolecopped outside of him that leaves mafia with an excelent chance of hitting a PRanyways.
If you genuinely think i am merely rolefishing i have to pause a moment and scofff - i am much more efficient at role-fishing than blatently asking if it would be acceptable to massclaim- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
actually this is false and i am disapointed in you for breaking your IC promise relating to not lying about mechanics. It always entirely depends on the situation and if you are a PRyourself - actually - any case where you can pecieve a pr as town without letting scum know that you percieve that PRis benificial to town - also --- having that read and outting it to the public is not a scumtell because scum has no incentive to share that information when they can just night kill it --- i could list more scenarios where it is a total non-tell because of mechanic related reasons but suffice to say your broad stroke statement is bullshitIn post 1641, goodmorning wrote:And before I get questions:
Rolefishing is not ever proTown. EVER. The only motivation one can have to rolefish is that they are Scum.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Here is a perfect meta reference that i am sorting through
Here both mac and goodmorning are scum http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... &start=800
Short game. Good source to analyze tone and compare- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Where did that happen. Useful infoIn post 1650, fferyllt wrote:ton of buddying from GM in that game. Which reminds me of the cross-accusations of buddying between GM and Mac in this game.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
In post 216, Deras wrote:
Yeah sorry, I meant on those you hadn't.In post 150, Revenus wrote:Deras: I've already given out three townreads, they haven't changed and you should know where you and carey stand.
The people I haven't given reads on:
I don't like this reasoning, I feel like you're setting up an excuse because you KNOW you won't be NK no matter what.In post 170, goodmorning wrote:The good news is that Scum can't NK me or I'll flip, so if there's a Doc it throws the choice "IC or Towniest, who will Scum kill" right out the window.
Unless I'm misinterpreting this, the second point seems to contradict the first, on 132 you're arguing against ff for going easy on me because of perceived scummy behaviour, but in the first one you said going after Carey and me was the easy (and thus scummy) thing to do?In post 195, goodmorning wrote:129: Comes after several people have given reads, and doesn't really cover much new ground (if any). In one sentence accuses me of going after easy targets while staying off of the... easy... targets? SEEMS LEGIT.
Seriously, ask yourself: Who are the easiest targets in this game? Carey and Deras, right? Who's been going after them again? JUST SAYING. JUST. SAYING.
132: Who goes easy on someone acting scummy? SCUM- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
how teh fuk did this wagon dieIn post 880, Eye Urn wrote:GM:
1) I think you've way overblown the Fropome thing, looking for something to grab onto and continuing to do so for no good reason.
2) The fact that you explicitly asked me only for my read of you still weighs heavily on my mind as something that you would have done as scum in that situation and not as town.
3) The part of 170 that Deras pointed out in 216 and your reaction to that in 316. You were caught and tried to twist it, and it only got in deeper.
4) Continually not even reading and understanding what's posted, like when you asked what I find scummy about posts that I made (800 and 806). You clearly didn't even read them, you just assumed that I was being unspecific and wanted more details.- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective
- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
Dont call me that. I retired that account and quit EM due to it origionating as an account intended to prove i would be fit for a leadership role, and having no desire to continue on as a casual user, and having entirely incompetent people modded before me time after time for 5 months despite being triple nominated in my last attempt... And due to the aristocracy being revealed as nothing more than a "friends of shacky and riot" club as of late.. And having them forcefully block me out of a position that most people recognise i deserved more than half of the current team... And them listening to nasty rumors from my ex and using it as a reason not to like me...........
So much grrrrr- Ineffective
-
Ineffective Goon
- Ineffective
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 886
- Joined: April 1, 2013
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective
- Ineffective