↑ PimHel wrote:Waiting on all the set-up discussion to stop.
Not liking Serra voting 'with reason'.
Untrod should explain why Monkey is omgus-ing according to him and I want to know his opinion on the Sharper - Syryana votes against each other.
And after one day, we're talking about 'not-so-talkative' people ._. Bad ._.
↑ PimHel wrote:No, you didn't. But if you start talking about 'not-so-talkative' people, you should have at least players in mind.
Because it's way too early to talk about things like that. Take me for example. Just after you posted it, I was done with dinner. Before I started posting, I only had 1 post. Why? Because of my sister's birthday, staying over at my boyfriend's and work. People have lives and calling them out after one day of playing is bad.
I want the pre-game over and you, Serra and Untrod caught my interest during it. For me, it's good enough to look at it.
↑ serrapaladin wrote:
It's more that he responded to an 'accusation' that wasn't even made.
Sharper is also a good vote, though.
↑ serrapaladin wrote:
Sarcastically calling Syr's post vacuous or disagreeing with a mass lynch?
There are some setups that could certainly be broken with a mass claim, but if the game is already slightly scumsided with no protection roles, a mass claim can seal the game against town very quickly by pointing out optimal NKs, of which there are probably several.
Varsoon, if you expect 112 to be a reaction test, why point that out straight away?
!vote Varsoon
@MM: last time mod said he does prefer bold votes though.
↑ shos wrote:@voided 121:
that a good post, I like you. I would like to add that in the first game, the setups were completely useless in figuiring the setup - the flips were not. we had more than one kill a night, and when someone flips 'beta werewolf' you know that there's an alpha one, and with more (other) scums flipped, the setups are really, useless.
@Molla 123: why UT? I don't recall anything from that slot?
@124 varsoon: wow, you realy are scum. you really deserve that vote. that reaction test thingie is not how it's done and it smells fake. the fact that you immediately changed the subject to the smiley just shows that you're lying and trying to divert attention. Then there's the two lines that say absolutely nothing about nothing combined with nothingness and big words - and a bad vote without reasoning.
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gmmUAqE7nQ <<<<
~~~
someone needs to explain to me why people are voting UT and Molla. perhaps I missed something.
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:↑ Varsoon wrote:On the real, about Voidedmafia hyperbolizing what I said about not bringing up our personal lives in game to avoid AtEs, that's equally embarrassing. I don't know if it's scum or just asinine to go into a game and employ rhetoric that's inflammatory and littered with hyperbolic interpretations of what people say.
Note that I only said so in context of what Pim was saying, not about AtE in general (the part about it being unavoidable is a separate thing from the others). You looked like you were honestly chastising Pim for eating dinner instead of talking about the game, hence my reaction.
BB: Meh.
Eh?
↑ PimHel wrote:Post 81 - Varsoon
Pre-game is over? Since when? Barely any suspicions were made (and when done, barely pushed) and after that we went to game discussion. So no, it wasn't done yet.
If you think that one of the active players is scum, you should give us something. Not a possibility, as that's fake.
P.S. an example is not ATE.
There's too much set-up discussion >.<
!Unvote: BBMolla; !Vote Untrod
Better wagon than Molla or Voided. Both aren't scummy to me. Varsoon is just a bit below Untrod.
