sven you are a competent enough player and I'm sure you have played alot of games here where the etiquette is "you must reach the majority..."In post 1733, Svenskt Stål wrote:i am pretty sure that if there is no one with 11 votes before deadline then majority will rule, meaning that the person with the most votes will be lynched.
Good job lynching mutley btw, yeah he really seems scummy.
why didn't you vote mutley as the deadline was approaching then?In post 1649, TheEsquire wrote:I don't rule out any possibilities. Everyone else is making cases about other people, so I figured I should see if after some personal investigation I agree with another case more. Fuzzy doesn't have a lot of content in here, so I don't exactly have a lot to go off of, so another lynch may be more favourable. If I don't find anything that peaks my interest, my vote stays on Fuzzy. Simple as that.In post 1647, Nero Cain wrote:Why are you doing this if you want a fuzzy lynch?In post 1646, TheEsquire wrote:At work right now though so I can't do much more. Going to do some ISO-ing of our current vote leaders on my lunch break, and the rest when I get home and see what I can find.
.
That said, we aren't having a no lynch today. If I have to compromise my position to ensure we get a flip, I'll do it
doesn't really 'do' anything other benefit scum and we still have little to go off.In post 1742, ferretlover wrote:How will this work out without a D1 lynch? I'm not sure what's supposed to happen now if there is no D1 lynch. I understand how that gives us less information, but what else does it do?
no but sven is pretty competent and those rules are effectively sitewide..In post 1755, Desperado wrote:It's bothersome because the rules clearly say otherwise...with that said, I also wouldn't expect scum to make that blatant of a mistake.In post 1753, Mac wrote:Desperado what do you make of sven and his "mutley will be lynched at this rate anyway" post?
It reads like a townie who didn't bother checking the rules to make sure he was right, rather than scum giving an excuse for allowing a NL to occur. Especially when Sven's opinion on mutleyscum was pretty clear.
seriously this post sucks in every possible manner. combined with the fact he ended up voting neither wagon...In post 1718, Jebus wrote:I don't agree with the Mutt wagon, it seems somewhat silly. I wouldn't mind a goat wagon.
I lookws back at the GCBC kill and I simply cannot fathom out this post.In post 1161, Fuzzyman wrote:Heyman would probably be a scumteam with CM Punk and Brock Lesnar. So this would likely be a cross-kill.
CGBC's wagon consisted of Goat, Krab, RatedR, Svensk, and Jebus. RatedR, Krab's replacement Mutley, and Goat are giving me town reads. I see Jebus as a bit scummier now than before.
Vote: Jebus
In the very same post he says it's CM Punk's flavour for the kill & reading back it makes sense for him to assume that.In post 1811, Ravenpaw wrote:How do you know that was a Heyman Mafia kill?In post 1765, Skullduggery wrote: That's pretty much exactly what I was going to say. We had Mutley at L-1, but then, for whatever asinine reason, Malcolm decides to start a counter-wagon on Goat less than 24 hours before the deadlineeven though he had made it abundantly clear that he was going to kill Goat during the night.Why on Earth would you start a counter-wagon on a player that you intended to kill yourself? And hey, would you look at that -- there was only one kill last night, and it was from the Heyman Mafia (CM Punk's flavor).
just to expand on this Cm Punk's flavour he talks about, CM Punk is an associate of Paul Heyman in WWE (along with Brock Lesnar) and has a finisher called "go to sleep" - therefore the flavour of the kill suggests it was by Punk, because the rock was "put to sleep."In post 1813, Mac wrote:In the very same post he says it's CM Punk's flavour for the kill & reading back it makes sense for him to assume that.In post 1811, Ravenpaw wrote:How do you know that was a Heyman Mafia kill?In post 1765, Skullduggery wrote: That's pretty much exactly what I was going to say. We had Mutley at L-1, but then, for whatever asinine reason, Malcolm decides to start a counter-wagon on Goat less than 24 hours before the deadlineeven though he had made it abundantly clear that he was going to kill Goat during the night.Why on Earth would you start a counter-wagon on a player that you intended to kill yourself? And hey, would you look at that -- there was only one kill last night, and it was from the Heyman Mafia (CM Punk's flavor).
this just reeks of scum.In post 2009, Mutleyddmc wrote:It's not really irrelevant because its the truth. Not my fault that my change of mind is a scum tell.
Really? What an obvious thing to say. Makes me think you are scum feigning stupidity.
So he knew the shield were the killers. Ergo he is feigning stupidity to appear town.In post 1268, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Speculation: The Shield killed GCBC because we are right about most of the people on the Krab wagon being scum. They think this creates WIFOM that keeps us off of their back for a night or two. If they had killed a pro-town player, then it would have looked even more suspicious and led to a quicker scum demise.
Course of Action: Proceed with the malcolm lynch. Second best lynch is desperado.
but your first post after the GCBC kill indicates you knew it was the shield. now another daykill happens and you pretend like you didn't know the scum were daykilling. but it is plainly obvious from d1 you did know.In post 2037, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I obviously didn't know one way or the other. I was guessing.In post 2033, Mac wrote:Its not even a case of not reading the flavour. You knew the day killers were scum.
WIFOM.In post 2035, Mutleyddmc wrote:Because it was a clear framing kill.
Why Darthe?
this is your first post after the GCBC kill.In post 1268, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Speculation: The Shield killed GCBC because we are right about most of the people on the Krab wagon being scum. They think this creates WIFOM that keeps us off of their back for a night or two. If they had killed a pro-town player, then it would have looked even more suspicious and led to a quicker scum demise.
Course of Action: Proceed with the malcolm lynch. Second best lynch is desperado.
In post 2056, Mac wrote:Is it not?
this is your first post after the GCBC kill.In post 1268, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Speculation: The Shield killed GCBC because we are right about most of the people on the Krab wagon being scum. They think this creates WIFOM that keeps us off of their back for a night or two. If they had killed a pro-town player, then it would have looked even more suspicious and led to a quicker scum demise.
Course of Action: Proceed with the malcolm lynch. Second best lynch is desperado.
now tell me it's not true again. & explain how so.
does that make Goat scum?In post 2066, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's not an OMGUS. You were the last person Skull voted for before he died. Nice try though.
(his first post after GCBC day kill)In post 1268, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Speculation: The Shield killed GCBC because we are right about most of the people on the Krab wagon being scum. They think this creates WIFOM that keeps us off of their back for a night or two. If they had killed a pro-town player, then it would have looked even more suspicious and led to a quicker scum demise.
Course of Action: Proceed with the malcolm lynch. Second best lynch is desperado.
not only is this obvious enough as he said so himself on d2, but I'm of the opinion that this is scum feigning stupidity towards the kill in order to appear more town.
i didn't even notice you asked for one. i'll iso him later but the argument you are having looks like town v town.In post 2124, Nero Cain wrote:Why is Mac not telling me his Despo read?
In post 1491, ferretlover wrote:You're trying to be funny and it's just digging you into a hole. Krabs was a Town read, you are a scum read.
Town Reads:
ferret
Sven
Desp
AA9
Skull
Scum Reads:
Mutley
Malcom
RATEDR
AA
lol seriously ferret are you having a joke.In post 1910, ferretlover wrote:Skull, AA, Sven, Desp, and Nero all seem Town to me. I think that some of the scum are Mutley, AA9, and Raven.
maybe you should read the game and understand why I am voting Monkey instead of saying "he suspects two wagons; scum!"In post 2257, mastin2 wrote:In post 2232, Mac wrote:20. Svenskt Stål PeregrineV
21. Nero Cain
4. Desperado
3. ArcAngel9 ***
16. MonkeyMan576 **
town - scumVote: Mac.
Seems like a good place to start. Seems to think both leading wagons are on scum. Has a townread on Nero I am hesitant to believe is legitimate, and PeregrineV being there is equally concerning. Also don't like that Desperado is there, but I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.
you are right but posts like #2271 don't seem town motivated. everyone who says you are scum should be lynched?In post 2275, ArcAngel9 wrote:you read me as scum almost every game we play.. Stop being dumb and get a real case to call me scum or at least do the math.. A) I am rarely scum, see my status in sig. B) I can't just be scum in all games, remember that role selection is based on random.org site.In post 2273, Mac wrote:I find angel scummy no matter what to be honest which sucks and maybe should leave someone else to read here. nero is angel scum?
#2271 reinforces my above thinking about AA. what a shit fucking post.
so get some brains first, and stop reading me scum everytime you play, its point less.
nero's a townread of mine.In post 2277, ArcAngel9 wrote:Ha ha ha.. you sheep Nero for whatsoever reason, what if Nero is scum? Seems like you're not so town motiviated too.
Do you have any real reason for voting me???
he is town in my eyes at the moment. I'm happy to sheep his read on you. deal with it.In post 2281, ArcAngel9 wrote:Townread doesn't mean he is confirmed TOWN, there is good chance that he could be scum too
LEARN TO PLAY!!!
- goodcopbadcop killed during day one, flipped heyman scum. flavour tells us shield did it hence multi-ball.In post 2351, pidgey wrote:Not really because i just found out i replaced in today at 9 am and havent arrived home.
And i have not read more than the first post of the game and whatever happened since i first posted, which brings me to my point:
Can someone just please tell me in 3 or 4 fucking bulletpoints anything of note that has happened ie claims, lynches, fun facts
Mastin go ahead and vote me rofl after 2 or 3 games ive played with you i expect your stupid nonsense reads anyway that come out of the nowhere anyway.
In post 2388, Desperado wrote:Can you explain what you mean? I don't see the Amished tell.In post 2341, Mac wrote:darthe's amished tell was really horrendous & his excuse for including zach was horrid.
he is calling his slot scummy - this is an amished tell.In post 2222, Darthe wrote:Ooh now I get it (had to recall my halfway asleep brain from last night). I wrote that to compare how my predecessor played in my eyes with the rest of you.
I am asking you again to explain where your suspicions of me stem from.In post 2584, Darthe wrote:Fuck it, I will get the ball rolling here. I am sin cara.
unvote vote mac
hey look, this is kinda a direct contrast to how he's playing here. this was also post #102 and not fucking two thousand and something so what a shit point. character names weren't worth shit in that game (matt le blanc & churchill mafia proves this) so it's a moot point.Darthe wrote:Character claims are essentially worthless so I will go ahead and state that I know we can have movie roles because I am James Bond.
