VOTE: Doctor C. Neil Whatever
Also, anybody who votes for FuDuzn will earn a heaping helping of unbridled wrath. A vote for FuDuzn is a vote for Fandango,
Save_Us_Skullduggery? Fear not, for I shall break the walls down and save you all.In post 28, FuDuzn wrote:Three votes on me, where is this unbridled wrath that will save me??
The first time of many, I'm sure. Better get used to it.In post 65, Ravenpaw wrote:You leave me disappointed Skull.
Well, I saved FuDuzn from being the main wagon, didn't I?In post 65, Ravenpaw wrote:How does self-voting save us?
Dude, you only have two votes on you at the moment. That's not exactly what I'd call a wagon.In post 76, MonkeyMan576 wrote:More often than not, when I am wagoned day one, I am town.
Let's say that FuDuzn really was breadcrumbing that he was Fandango. What does that tell you about his role? Absolutely nothing.In post 78, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I was not rolefishing, I thought someone was breadcrumbing.
Sure seems that way.
Okay, fair enough. You just seemed a little defensive about it, is all. I'm trying to figure out whether that defensiveness is coming from exasperated Town or paranoid Scum. I know nothing about your meta and I'm too lazy to do any extensive research into it, so I'll regard you as exasperated Town...for now.In post 88, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I didn't say it was a wagon. I was speaking to those attempting a wagon.Skull wrote: Dude, you only have two votes on you at the moment. That's not exactly what I'd call a wagon.
Have you ever seen a Town player self-vote during the RVS stage to generate discussion or have you only ever seen Scum do it?In post 99, Fuzzyman wrote:I'm comfortable with mine on Skullduggery until she gives a better reason for her self-vote.
Ah, so the FuDuzn mini-wagon isIn post 102, Ravenpaw wrote:Yes, but it was your vague threat that originally started the Fuduzango wagon in the first place.In post 84, Skullduggery wrote:Well, I saved FuDuzn from being the main wagon, didn't I?In post 65, Ravenpaw wrote:How does self-voting save us?
You sound confident. This is the first time you've mentioned Nero. Are you seeing something that I'm not?In post 148, Desperado wrote:Nero is town.
Heeeey. Some of us have lives outside of Mafiascum and can only post on evenings and weekends, you know. I may not have a hundred posts already, but I'm still playing to the best of my ability.In post 310, Desperado wrote:There are also way too many people just not providing anything to read. Squidward, Goat, zach, Malcolm,Skull, fuzzyman, and DeMencha (1/3 of the player list) might as well not even exist.
That's the second time you've referenced my "threat." You do realize I was being facetious, right? Why are you so hung up on that?In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:And to clarifiy my votes: Malcomx was a random, Fud’s was an answer/challenge to Skull’s threat, Skull’s was a slight scum feel coupled with a wagon-a-go-go, and Nero’s was a serious vote.
Certainly. You said that my vague (facetious) threat is what started the FuDuzn wagon. In doing so, you're blaming me for starting a wagonIn post 231, Ravenpaw wrote:Explain how that is a deflection please.
FuDuzn answered that question. I didn't see the point of answering it as well when I'd basically just be saying the same thing.In post 231, Ravenpaw wrote:And Skull you missed my jib question, yeah I was making a Simpson reference, but I was still after a proper explanation off you.
Possible fear mongering?In post 240, Ravenpaw wrote:Plus I don't think it's a sure thing to say that Jericho would be town, the current heel/face alignments in WWE land are probably irrelevant to this game.
I'm sure they are, but keep in mind that there are only three members of The Shield. Three Scum in a 21-person game is really low, so either the three of them are super beefy or we might be looking at multiball. We'll have to wait and see how many kills there are on night one before we can say for certain, though. Not much point in setup speculation at this point in the game...so I'll shut up about it now.In post 243, TheEsquire wrote:Also, I was under the assumption that the SHIELD members are all the scum members. If that's not true, then my logic there is completely f***ed and I need to start rethinking that line of thought
Sure thing.In post 242, TheEsquire wrote:@Skullduggery: Who are your biggest scumspects/why? I'd value your input here since you're in my good graces and, well, I trust you right now
In post 371, Fuzzyman wrote:You're pretty determined to avoid explaining how your actions have been pro-town, eh? Skull, when you self-vote, you are either scum or you are voting for someone you know to be town, which is nearly as bad as being scum. You claim that you did it to "create discussion", but what that really means is that you created something for people to call you out on, so that you could lash back at them, painting them as scummy for questioning you. Not good play at all.In post 366, Skullduggery wrote: Fuzzyman - Voted for me because of my oh-so-scummy self-vote, which makes me Scum, somehow, I guess. Says he won't move it until I give a better reason for my self-vote (spoiler: it isn't coming, chief), which smells of Scum in cruise control. Also mentions appeals to emotions and lurking in post 190 seemingly out of nowhere. Scum planning ahead, maybe?
I suppose. The way I see it, if someone does end up claiming Chris Jericho, I can totally see Ravenpaw pointing back to post 240 and saying, "That doesn't prove anything; they could still be Scum, you know." Perhaps I'm just being paranoid, though. Wouldn't be the first time.In post 385, TheEsquire wrote:Nah, I read it as pointing out the possibility of what I saw to be a breadcrumb to hold not as much weight as I might have thought. It's a good point.Skullduggery wrote:Possible fear mongering?In post 240, Ravenpaw wrote:Plus I don't think it's a sure thing to say that Jericho would be town, the current heel/face alignments in WWE land are probably irrelevant to this game.
Well, I don't have much of a meta to speak of. This is only my second game on Mafiascum, and I would not recommend looking up my first game since my play was pretty horrendous there (just ask Nacho).In post 392, Svenskt Stål wrote:Skull, I have completely ignored you and your wagon this game, if I were to do some ISOing on you and maybee pull up some of your past games what should I be looking for in your play that sudgests that you are town this game?
Not intentionally, no. I never jumped on the FuDuzn wagon, nor did I endorse it in any way.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:Or do you believe that Fuduzn’s wagon had nothing to do with you?
He did, but we were still in RVS at that point, so I didn't think much of it.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:Also, don’t forget that Fudz would vote you because of the votes he’d gathered.
Okay, I think I see what the problem is here. I thought you were just asking what that figure of speech meant, but you were actually asking why I said it, right? If that's the case, I apologize for misunderstanding the question.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:And this is becoming a little pet peeve of mine in mafia games. I asked you a question, yet someone else deemed it necessary to butt in before you could answer. I wanted your explanation because you were inferring a town read on Fudz because you liked the cut of his jib, that's why I wanted your thoughts. But seeing as Fudz answered before you could, you can now sheep his response, which you just did do (and hey, I don’t blame you).
I do, yes. Thank you for clarifying.In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:No, it’s called keeping an open mind, which is essential for mafia games.
Fun fact: my introduction to the delightful world of mafia games actually came from a WWE themed game, and scum won that. The relevant point here is that the last mafia member was John Cena, which everyone had written him off as “oh he’s Cena, of course he’s town”. So it’s not a sure thing to write off facey faces as obvious town (or heely heels as obvious scum).
That’s why I brought it up. Do you see the point I was trying to get across to Esquire?
I don't know if "hesitation" is the right word. I only have one vote, so I can't very well vote for all four of you at once, can I?In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:This reads list is slightly weird because it really feels like you should be voting for me, not Nero. Why the hesitation to get on my wagon Skull?
This..."trap" of yours has one glaring flaw: it can catch both Town and Scum indiscriminately. How do you intend to tell the difference between the players who have fallen for your masterful mental machinations?In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post.
In post 496, ferretlover wrote:I don't really have any scumreads for now, so I will make a vote in my next post for the person with the post longest ago.
In post 497, ferretlover wrote:Squidward has been prodded so there's no point, so zachattack is the vote for me to get people talking.
UNVOTE: <MY PREVIOUS VOTE>
VOTE: ZACHATTACK
Any plans to remedy that in the near future?In post 499, Jebus wrote:I don't see how you can say that about me when, thus far, I've said more or less nothing.
Well, I'm the only one voting for Nero at the moment, so it's not much of a wagon.In post 504, Ravenpaw wrote:Yes, however the reasons you had listed it felt like your justification was stronger to vote for me, especially when you’d question your Nero tell by saying that town can also do that. Plus you haven’t been talking with Nero much at all, but you still have your vote on him, so why aren’t you pushing his wagon?
It doesn't have anything to do with anything. Ravenpaw asked me why I said it and that was the reason.In post 567, Nero Cain wrote:And this is a mafia game...what does you liking a person have to do with anything?
I was referring to these:In post 527, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@SkullWhich post did this happen in?Skull wrote:Ferret's reaction has me thinking that he's probably Town. Seemed genuinely confused about the sudden wagon, so either he's legitimately baffled or he's a really good actor.
In post 468, ferretlover wrote:So I get back from school, and I get a wagon on me. lolwut
What is being expected of me currently? There are so many posts when I get back from school that I get overwhelmed. I have no idea what questions people are trying to ask me, because they are just getting boggled up with all of the other (for the lack of a better term) "filler" posts.
Could someonepleasemake a post with the questions they would like me to answer, and I would be glad to comply.
Do you believe that this bewilderment is fabricated?In post 474, ferretlover wrote:Well, I just C+F'd ('cause I have a life and can't read through all of the posts right now) the last 10 pages, and didn't see any questions pertaining to me. Could someone just have some questions that you want me to answer?
In post 519, ferretlover wrote:If I assumed that I could be able to shootanyone, I would shoot myself. I haven't been helpful very much and need to be more actively scumhunting. If I couldn't shoot myself then I would have No Action.
Did you just say that if you had a Vig shot, you would either shoot yourself with it or not use it at all? Are you serious? If I had a dollar for every brain you didn't have, I would have one dollar.In post 520, ferretlover wrote:This is assuming that the vigilante wouldn't be killed in this process, i.e. I either wasn't the vigilante or the role passed to someone else.
Don't think that it's a rhetorical question just because I worded it in a joking manner. I want to know the full extent of this "trap" you had planned.In post 490, Skullduggery wrote:This..."trap" of yours has one glaring flaw: it can catch both Town and Scum indiscriminately. How do you intend to tell the difference between the players who have fallen for your masterful mental machinations?In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post.
In post 604, Krab Bucket wrote:Really, if all it takes is "It was a reaction test" to change your mind, then I seriously think you need to bring your A-Game in scumhunting here.
WhoIn post 606, Krab Bucket wrote:Geez, Desp, I wasn't even talking to you specifically
You want to talk about easy ways out? Let's revisit this, shall we?In post 604, Krab Bucket wrote:Also, I see that "reaction test" as an easy way out of GCBC, and by god, I honestly found it very scummy.
Your continued refusal to explain this puerile plan of yours indicates that you never came up with such a plan in the first place. You purport that you're deliberately making yourself an easy target so that you can preemptively justify any scummy behavior that you exhibit in the future -- like the kind you're exhibiting right now, in fact. This "plan" is just a bogus smokescreen that you can use to weasel your way out of any suspicion that happens to befall you.In post 569, Skullduggery wrote:@Krab Bucket
I need an answer to this:
Don't think that it's a rhetorical question just because I worded it in a joking manner. I want to know the full extent of this "trap" you had planned.In post 490, Skullduggery wrote:This..."trap" of yours has one glaring flaw: it can catch both Town and Scum indiscriminately. How do you intend to tell the difference between the players who have fallen for your masterful mental machinations?In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post.
Looks like you're the one in defense overdrive, chief. This is the first time all game we've seen you get so riled up over a bit of suspicion. Guilty conscience, perhaps? You know you messed up, so now you're flailing about to try to muddy the waters and make your biggest accuser (Desperado) seem scummy instead. That's what it looks like to me.In post 606, Krab Bucket wrote:why are you in defence overdrive (you have no reason to be).
All the multiball speculation up to this point has been just that -- speculation. However, this post makes it sound like you already know that the game is multiball. Why is that?In post 607, Krab Bucket wrote:I'm going to guess that the other mafia is probably 3 Man Band (Drew McIntyre, Heath Slater, Jinder Mahal) or some random heels in WWE as a team (Jack Swagger, Ziggler, CM Punk etc)
Oh, no. Just early day one tomfoolery, that's all.In post 621, Nero Cain wrote:Fair enough I guess. Just seems weirdish, idk. I do think its a slight scumtell to "imply" a read and I thought that's what you were doing.
Fuzzyman thinks I'm Scum because I self-voted at the beginning of the game. According to him, I shouldn't have done that since I'm putting a Town player (myself) in danger, which is "nearly as bad as being Scum."In post 371, Fuzzyman wrote:You're pretty determined to avoid explaining how your actions have been pro-town, eh? Skull, when you self-vote, you are either scum or you are voting for someone you know to be town, which is nearly as bad as being scum. You claim that you did it to "create discussion", but what that really means is that you created something for people to call you out on, so that you could lash back at them, painting them as scummy for questioning you. Not good play at all.
If you want to try to refute anything I said in Post 622, I'm all ears. Who knows, maybe you'll make me change my mind. You won't know unless you try.In post 624, Krab Bucket wrote:Well, this hydra sucked major ass because my partner never bothered to fucking post once. Not going to bother trying to waste my effort countering some inevitable lynch. Can't be fucked getting into any debate, because people are just going to be stubborn and adamant.
Might as well claim soon.
~Krabs
Now that you're (presumably) not drunk anymore, can you explain what the heck this means? Keep an eye on fun for six months? What?In post 632, The Goat wrote:Working under the assumption that there's someone who can do so...
...someone please keep an eye on Fun. for about the next six months.
Oh, fuck me sideways, he's right. The deadline is May 8th. All the vote counts say "Day 1 ends in 10 days" and that's the only part I was paying attention to. Well, that certainly took me by surprise.In post 667, Amethyst Actor wrote:What?In post 661, xMALCOLMx wrote:We've got four days until deadline
In post 689, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat - I mean, it would've been so easy for Bad cop to say "Oh ma gerd, I was so drunk when I made those posts". The drunk is excuse is a perfect excuse for scum.
Watching people get suspicious of Goat for drunk-posting makes me scrunch up my face. Is this really a valid reason for suspicion? Really? If I was Scum and I got got drunk, I imagine I'd want to stay far away from this site for fear of drunkenly revealing my alignment.In post 708, ferretlover wrote:Goat, however, has been much worse. If you're drunk, then don't play werewolf.
Can you elaborate a bit on why you think Krab is a bad lynch choice for today? You do say on page 13 that you're adding Krab to your Town pile, but you don't really go into detail about it and everything after that is just "Don't lynch Krab; I've got a Town read on him." I'm also not convinced that Post 637 is a good reason to avoid lynching someone. As others have pointed out, emotional outbursts can come from either alignment. The fact that he also hasn't posted since then makes me think that perhaps he's angry about being caught, so he took his ball and went home.
Elaborate.In post 708, ferretlover wrote:I have seen this stuff and have felt that the Krab wagon is unneeded.
In post 426, Nero Cain wrote:Is it a bad thing that I think you are prob town but I still want to stab you in the face?
Doesn't it seem just a little hypocritical to hop on the ArcAngel wagon and then imply that anyone else who hops on it is Scum?In post 827, Nero Cain wrote:Well I want to see what scums hop on the Angel wagon. Despo already did. + even if ths were to go through I will not shed one tear
In post 620, Nero Cain wrote:Krabs seems scummy but I think they may have town told, I'm going to wait and see.
Deadline's coming up soon, man. I don't know what tell/slip you're talking about. If you see something about Krab that makes him Town, now would be the time to point it out. Otherwise I don't see that wagon dying down anytime soon.In post 868, Nero Cain wrote:I think he may have townslipped. I'll read him in more detail tomorrow.
Ehhhhh...In post 885, Nero Cain wrote:I was in a game awhle back and I really really really thought some newbie was scum and they made a post that I thought was really really scummy and too dumb to come from town. Krab said something very similar and it made me pause.In post 872, petapan wrote:elaborate on thisIn post 868, Nero Cain wrote:I think he may have townslipped. I'll read him in more detail tomorrow.
Sure, its not impossible for this to come from scum and I don't think I'll cry but well, I just rather see other players lynched.In post 551, Krab Bucket wrote:Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?
Except Krab didn't have to make the decision of whether he should go through with it or not. He realized that he shot himself in the foot and replaced out specifically so he wouldn't have to go through with it.In post 887, Svenskt Stål wrote:I have a hard time seeing scum first playing with the idea of claiming...then not going throu with it.
How are we not "involved with one another"? Who are these "certain groups"?In post 892, Darthe wrote:I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?
Put yourself in Krab Bucket's (probably soggy) shoes. You get some heat on you, and in an effort to get rid of some of it, you decide to say "Might as well claim soon." Under what circumstances would you make that statement? Would you make that statement if you were a Vanilla Townie? No, you wouldn't. You would only say that if you were a PR whose claim was worth a damn or if you were Scum who was trying to bluff her way out of a sticky situation. Which of those two possibilities do you think applies to Krab Bucket?In post 893, ArcAngel9 wrote:What kind of claim this is? I didn't understand.In post 886, Ravenpaw wrote:^ This felt like a soft-claim to me.In post 624, Krab Bucket wrote: Might as well claim soon.
How so? Have you never seen Scum replace out of a game before?In post 932, RATEDR wrote:I don't think this is the case. Also, this might be a little bit cheap of me, but the fact he replaced out kind of gave me Town vibes.In post 931, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Just lynch Krab already. He replaced out as soon as we caught him.
-Grazie
On day one? Absolutely not. How do you propose we catch the Scum team if we don't lynch anybody?In post 946, ferretlover wrote:I don't feel like there are any good lynches today, so should I just vote No Lynch?
Sven, cut it out. Your insistence on a Malcolm lynch is starting to become a detriment -- to the point where I'm beginning to suspect that you know this and you're doing it on purpose.In post 948, Svenskt Stål wrote:I am still open to lynching malcolm if you or anyoneelse is interested.
From what I've seen, yes, people replace out of games here all the time regardless of their alignment. Replacing out of a game is not a Town-tell.In post 1045, RATEDR wrote:Not really, no, is it a common habit here in MS? I don't deny that Krab would be equally frustrated as Town or Mafia with his situation, but I thought that frustration was the first piece of organic reaction krab gave in the whole game (and last), he had come across as wooden the rest of the game, which is what made me suspect him in the first place.In post 964, Skullduggery wrote:How so? Have you never seen Scum replace out of a game before?
This:In post 1045, RATEDR wrote:Crumbed traitor? What?
In post 55, RATEDR wrote:Also, its with shame and guilt that I admit that I am not part of the Shield, and would love to be.
Keeping your options open, I see. And hey, look at that, this is almost all the players on the Krab Bucket wagon. What a bizarre coincidence.In post 992, MonkeyMan576 wrote:My possible votes today are Desperado, GCBC, Malcolm, Ravenpaw, ArcAngel9, and Skull.
In post 1002, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Mostly the people on his wagon.In post 998, Ravenpaw wrote:Why do you think he's town?In post 992, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I would, if I thought he was scum.In post 990, Ravenpaw wrote:Do something helpful and vote for Krabs.
How do you know that the Krab wagon is mostly Scum? You know all of our alignments already? Also, how do you make the logical leap from "This wagon is probably mostly Scum" to "This wagon is clearly on a Town player"? Wagons can form on players of any alignment. How does a wagon you don't agree with make Krab Town?In post 1018, MonkeyMan576 wrote:No one looks like they are moving from the Krab wagon(cause it's a scum driven wagon and they are mostly scum)
In post 1014, Svenskt Stål wrote:my biggest concern with krabs is the people voting him.
In post 1036, Svenskt Stål wrote:I wouldnt care if krabs was my number one suspect, I would never vote with that group.
Are you serious? If you wereIn post 1037, Svenskt Stål wrote:Let me explain this. Krabs could be my number one suspect, I would never vote him with that group of people.
In post 1058, Mutleyddmc wrote:I suppose I should claim. I am VT
This...seems really peculiar to me. You saw your role, but not your character name...even though they're right next to each other?In post 1059, Mutleyddmc wrote:Kofi Kingston at that! Didnt even see that bit in the PM. Was wondering as I posted why I wasn't a WWE superstar.
Here's the problem with that. Krab's "Might as well claim soon" shenanigans were in post 624. Post 625 was his last post of the game. At that time, his wagon had six people on it. The only other person to join the wagon after that is Ravenpaw in 676,In post 1017, Svenskt Stål wrote:If they share your view that krabs, as scum, would go "might aswell claim"... then he doesnt and states that he will fight, then he subs out. Yeah that seems pretty fucking scummy. SCUM would just claim doctor or cop or whatever. What I saw from krabs is doubt.
Scum prob knows this and wants to get krabs lynched.
You are retards and scum voting krabs.
...who said anything about getting mod-killed?In post 1087, ferretlover wrote:I still don't think that "he replaced out" is a good argument for being a PRorscum. I understand the argument for the "pro-*stated before*", but it just doesn't seem real. Townies don't want to get Modkilled either, y'know?
What makes you think that Shield Scum would choose to vig GCBC when he was still a valid lynch choice? Why not push the lynch through so they could vig someone else?In post 1161, Fuzzyman wrote:CGBC's wagon consisted of Goat, Krab, RatedR, Svensk, and Jebus. RatedR, Krab's replacement Mutley, and Goat are giving me town reads. I see Jebus as a bit scummier now than before.
How is it impossible for both of them to be Scum?In post 1187, Svenskt Stål wrote:Krab and gcbc are not both scum, thats a known fact.
What? GCBCIn post 1198, Svenskt Stål wrote:It is a known fact that they are not scum because gcbc was not scum.
If we can figure out why the Shield team wanted GCBC dead, we can take one step closer toward catching a Shield player. How is that a waste of time? You don't really think they killed GCBC for lulz, do you?In post 1206, Desperado wrote:I'm not stopping you from doing whatever speculation you want, I'm merely making it known that in my opinion, trying to figure out why GCBC is dead--rather than just acknowledging it and moving on--is a waste of time.
In post 890, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat@SvenIs your reason for voting Nacho meta (only)?Sven wrote:would have liked a malcolm wagon more thou. nacho is supposed to be a good player.
* Malcolm's wishy-washy opinion of GCBC:In post 891, GoodCopBadCop wrote:So your read on him is based solely on meta...Sven wrote:I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO VOTE FOR NACHO. GOOD LYNCH. NAY, BEST LYNCH.
In post 616, xMALCOLMx wrote:GCBC is mildly aggressive here but I still find their responses/actions to others as anti-town. As explained by my partner, anti-town =/= scum all the time. In this case, I would still vote GCBC.
* Malcolm soft-defending GCBC:In post 619, xMALCOLMx wrote:I like the Krab vote more than ever. His switch to GCBC has already been poked at by others, and I do feel like easing off GCBC for now.
Yeah, I think I can buy GCBC and Malcolm being Scumbuddies. I'm game.In post 958, xMALCOLMx wrote:eh..Krab was 4 votes away from lynch and also a blank slot. GCBC was 6 votes away from a lynch at the time.In post 938, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Since it's getting close to deadline, I need to go on the wagon more likely to go through, I guess.
Unvote:
Vote: GCBC
We had Krab at seven votes for more than twenty pages. He may be obvScum, but until there are enough people who realize it, that lynch isn't going through.In post 1327, Amethyst Actor wrote:You guys are stupid. the Malcom wagon is being pushed by scum, and he was pushing the Scum-Krabs wagon which I still highly advocate. why do you want to put the Krabs-scum read on the back burner?
Or, more likely:In post 1338, xMALCOLMx wrote:When... GCBC wasn't scum... he was probably neutral...In post 1326, Skullduggery wrote:Yeah, I think I can buy GCBC and Malcolm being Scumbuddies. I'm game.
Uh...thanks, I guess. You do realize that my read on Krab/Mutley hasn't changed, though, right? It's just that the prospect of convincing people to lynch that slot and building that wagon back up from scratch sounds only slightly less unappealing than sticking a potato peeler up my nose and turning it counter-clockwise.In post 1342, Svenskt Stål wrote:This level of quality posting tears my eyes. Thank you. You are awesome.In post 1330, Skullduggery wrote:We had Krab at seven votes for more than twenty pages. He may be obvScum, but until there are enough people who realize it, that lynch isn't going through.In post 1327, Amethyst Actor wrote:You guys are stupid. the Malcom wagon is being pushed by scum, and he was pushing the Scum-Krabs wagon which I still highly advocate. why do you want to put the Krabs-scum read on the back burner?
I want that slot dead -- I really do. Realistically, though, with the current group of people playing the game and the number of players who are either vehemently opposed to that lynch or who just don't give a damn one way or another, I just don't see it happening right now. I'm just trying to be pragmatic about it.
100% serious.
Doctor C. Niall DeMencha = T S O?In post 1393, T S O wrote:Will you be more active?y
What is skulls town meta?long-type posts w/ decent analysis like his one on Krabs, played with before.
Why is the collapse of krabs wagon (which had one anti town player atleast in it) worrying?There was more than 1 player on the wagon.
If you're Scum in multiball, your first priority should be to eliminate the other Scum team,In post 1365, Ravenpaw wrote:It's weird that the Shield chose the Cops, they were pinging a lot of radars and had a good chance of being lynched.
In post 1396, Skullduggery wrote:If GCBC was self-aligned, he would not have flipped "Heyman-Aligned Rolecop." He would have flipped "Self-Aligned Rolecop."
You, Desperado, TheEsquire...and I think I'm starting to trust Ravenpaw too.
I think our best choices for today are Malcolm, Mutley, or The Goat.In post 1415, ferretlover wrote:Lynch Suspects! Who shalt thy lyncheth?
I see Town motivation behind his line of questioning, and his aggression indicates that he's actually trying to catch Scum instead of just trying to look busy. He also makes a lot of good points that reflect my own thoughts, and I agree with many of his reads.In post 1431, Nero Cain wrote:Why do you trust Despo, Skull?
Elaborate. I'm not going to trust someone just because you tell me to, you know.In post 1437, Svenskt Stål wrote:@ Skull, you should definetly trust nero, towniest dude ever.
Tempting, but no, not yet. If we're both still alive, ask me again on day three or four. I don't want you anywhere near LYLO.In post 1442, ferretlover wrote:So you wanna PL me now?In post 1430, Skullduggery wrote:I also think Ferretlover is Town, but I don't trust him because he's a moron.
That wine was tasty. Thank you.In post 1444, The Goat wrote:Oh, and if I were to use lurking as a strategy, I wouldn't type anything.
Amished tell?In post 1446, Mutleyddmc wrote:It's hard to replace in, so I am trying to not focus too much on what happened before. Krabs did me no favours and has given too many wrong impressions.
Why? I think Desperado is asking perfectly valid questions. You should answer them.In post 1478, Svenskt Stål wrote:you are on permanent ignore for the time being.In post 1476, Desperado wrote:So you don't dispute that this playerbase has shown an inability to reach consensus (thus making it likely that we will approach the deadline), in which case mutley opportunistically voting an easy target now when that target could realistically become a viable candidate in that situation is scummy, but somehow I'm anti-town for "creating chaos" that we all already know exists?
How am I creating the chaos if you don't dispute that the situation I'm describing is likely to occur?
Trying to convince people to vote for Krab when Krab was ridiculously obvious Scum was like repeatedly bashing my face against a concrete wall. Like I said earlier, if it looks like there are enough people who actually want to lynch Mutley, I'll throw my support onto that wagon again. For the time being, though, I'm going to pressure some other folks. Like Goat.In post 1480, Desperado wrote:This goes for everyone, not just Sven: if you aren't voting Mutley right now, why not? Go into detail if you can.
Okay, you're going to need to explain this one to me. Why is ArcAngel Town? Here is a breakdown of ArcAngel's posts in the game thus far:
Cool story, bro. You gonna explain why you think ArcAngel is Town or what?In post 1497, ferretlover wrote:I never said...definitely
It also didn't seem like bickering to me. It seemed like an argument, which is different.
Well, if you're Scum, what you say may not necessarily be the same as what you believe. Perhaps you just said that you didn't believe GCBC's bogus vig because you needed a good reason to vote for him -- and you couldn't very well say that it was because you were rival Scum, right?In post 1508, The Goat wrote:Skull's implication was that I believed GCBC's dayvig claim. This is simply not true.
How is it silly? You think the Shield team didn't shit a brick when GCBC announced his dayvig? You think they didn't believe that GCBC was rival Scum?In post 1522, Nero Cain wrote:its a silly assumption from Skull and a huge stretch.
YouIn post 1525, The Goat wrote:It's more semantics than anything, but I dislike being pigeonholed for something I didn't do.
I didn't say that both Scum teams have a dayvig role. The fact that GCBC's dayvig did nothing should be evident that that's not the case.In post 1549, Nero Cain wrote:Even though its called multiball teams aren't always the same. I think its a stretch to assume that both teams have to have a day killing role. Though in general I do think scum are scared of killing roles so they could have thought he was crumbing a vig claim and wanted it dead.
Okay. I want to figure out your motivation, though, and I want you to help me with that.In post 1535, The Goat wrote:You're wrong about my motivation and my alignment, but I understand your thinking.
This:In post 1549, Nero Cain wrote:Mutley is ok with dying....how is that Amished? Did he say something that I missed?
In post 1496, Skullduggery wrote:Amished tell?In post 1446, Mutleyddmc wrote:It's hard to replace in, so I am trying to not focus too much on what happened before. Krabs did me no favours and has given too many wrong impressions.
Someone (don't remember who) mentioned this earlier, and I think it makes sense. You can't "triple powerbomb" somebody with fewer than three people, right?In post 1554, TheEsquire wrote:Maybe SHIELD has day kill only while all three members remain since it mentions Triple Powerbombing people, and neutral faction just has to be last one standing?
Except the Krab/Mutley wagon was stalled at the time. The Malcolm wagon was starting to pick up when GCBC was killed, which is where some of the suspicion on Malcolm is coming from. It's possible that he's Shield Scum (not Heyman Scum, Skullduggery, you fool) and the dayvig was performed to reset the vote count and shake that Malcolm wagon to pieces.In post 1554, TheEsquire wrote:If their day kill ability IS limited to only being used while united, perhaps we were on the right track with a Krab/Mutley lynch and they wanted to use their ability before they lost it.
The Shield team nailed a member of the rival Scum team. How is that unlucky for them? Hell, how is that unlucky forIn post 1554, TheEsquire wrote:I'd bet my life they didn't know there was a neutral faction included in the game and got unlucky when they hit it.
So? You said yourself that you didn't believe him, so in your mind, Sven was never in danger. You voted for GCBC even though you were already sure that GCBC never posed a threat to Sven?In post 1557, The Goat wrote:I voted him because of he suggested that someone who was clearly behaving in a pro-town manner needed to die. He basically said "I want Sven dead because he's posting too much and making it hard for people who aren't participating to catch up."
Fegelein is Krab Bucket.In post 1558, Amethyst Actor wrote:what does fegelin have to do with this game?
In post 1592, Fuzzyman wrote:Woah, what the fuck just happened here?
In post 1572, Nero Cain wrote:yes, I'm john Cena-compulsive lyncher. I have a new target and I must get them lynched each day or I loose. Today my target is Goat so pls help me fulfill part of my wincon.Unvote
Vote: Nero Cain
Alright, fair enough. I'll admit that part of the reason I pointed it out is because I just learned what the Amished tell is in my first game and I just wanted to show off a little. So, yeah.In post 1565, Nero Cain wrote:The amished tell is a mixed bag since I've seen both town and scum flip for it.
Ditto. It's been a long day one and we got a lot of shit done, but I'm ready for a break. Looking forward to turning my brain off and doing nothing for a few days when night one gets here.In post 1612, Svenskt Stål wrote:Day 1 is kinda over, i am pleased with the progress
You know what bothers the hell out ofIn post 1627, The Goat wrote:There's something that's bothering me a lot in this game thus far, and I figure I might as well flesh it out now.
It seems that some in this game are ready to lynch people because of their playstyle rather than their scumminess.
In brief: "I want to lynch Player X because they're posting fluff."
Player X: "I always fluff on Day 1. THere's not nearly as much to go on."
Player Y: "I don't like that. In principle,vote Player X.
Player X: "I've already told you that's what I do on Day 1."
Player Y: "Fine. Then I'm going to try to get you lynched for it."
Bothers the hell out of me.
In post 1639, The Goat wrote:You look like you would smell of a a hodgepodge of patchouli, vanilla, and death.
Why is it a bad thing for you toIn post 1664, Doctor C Niall DeMencha wrote:@Marangal, I will very soon.
You've voiced your displeasure with Ferretlover, but why are Goat, Fuzzyman, and Darthe Sum reads of yours?In post 1700, Mutleyddmc wrote:Yer goat said he would vote me then did. So goat. also fuzzy. Darthe too.In post 1698, xMALCOLMx wrote:Mutley, do you have any other reads?
No, one day. Less than a day, as a matter of fact -- day one ends about 15 hours from this post. The deadline is Saturday the 18th, not Sunday the 19th. Nexus clarified the deadline here.In post 1711, xMALCOLMx wrote:Two days.In post 1710, Doctor C Niall DeMencha wrote:With a day to go, on my top scumread. This puts him at L-2.
*ScumIn post 1716, Skullduggery wrote:You've voiced your displeasure with Ferretlover, but why are Goat, Fuzzyman, and DartheSumreads of yours?
In post 1695, Svenskt Stål wrote:I reffuse
Is a no-lynch better?In post 1718, Jebus wrote:I don't agree with the Mutt wagon, it seems somewhat silly.
ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUSIn post 1733, Svenskt Stål wrote:i am pretty sure that if there is no one with 11 votes before deadline then majority will rule, meaning that the person with the most votes will be lynched.
No. Absolutely not. You doIn post 1738, ArcAngel9 wrote:so bad that the Day 1 lynch didn't go through...
The only two deaths in the game thus far have been caused by Scum. Lynching other players is the only way for Town to assert some sort of control. I don't know about you, but I don't want to sit here and let the Scum players decide who lives and who dies. We have no chance of winning this game unless we lynch Scum. No-lynches must be avoided.In post 1747, ferretlover wrote:Yes it is a real question. Everyone is raving about how bad it is and I'm not sure about the full effects of it.
Never heard Scum sayIn post 1757, Mutleyddmc wrote:I can't wait for the time you see I'm not scum.
Darn it, Desperado, you stole my thunder, you jerk.In post 1749, Desperado wrote:Vote: xMalcolmx
I'm putting the NL on him. Mutley was at 10 votes and almost certain to be hammered, until Malcolm unvoted to vote Goat, who had 2 votes on him at the time. So instead of it being mutley 10, Goat 2 with eight chances to hammer mutley, it was mutley 9, Goat 3 and then mutley, darthe, esquire, and peta all voted Goat when there was literally no chance of that lynch ever going through. They would have needed all four of Jebus, Arc, fuzzy, and Rated to join them, and that just wasn't going to happen in less than 24 hours.
Sven's opinion on the Krab/Mutley slot has been anything but clear! He's been flip-flopping on his opinion of that slot for the entire freaking game.In post 1755, Desperado wrote:It's bothersome because the rules clearly say otherwise...with that said, I also wouldn't expect scum to make that blatant of a mistake.In post 1753, Mac wrote:Desperado what do you make of sven and his "mutley will be lynched at this rate anyway" post?
It reads like a townie who didn't bother checking the rules to make sure he was right, rather than scum giving an excuse for allowing a NL to occur. Especially when Sven's opinion on mutleyscum was pretty clear.
No, Sven had that slot as Town at the very beginning of the game, but after that, he makes it pretty clear that he doesn't have a Town read on that slot but he still doesn't want to lynch it regardless. He gives us a million and one excuses to explain his hesitation to vote for that slot. You view that as indecisive Town, but I'm more inclined to interpret it as Scum who can't keep his story straight.In post 1772, Desperado wrote:I didn't say he knew why he didn't want to lynch Mutley, just that his position of "I'm not voting mutley" was pretty clear. I don't see a lot of flip-flopping in those quotes...I don't agree with his conclusions but basically all of them are some variation of "krab/mutley is town."
Aside from Malcolm, I'd say that Sven, Mutley, and Goat are my top suspects at the moment. ArcAngel and Fuzzyman need some scrutiny too. So many scummy people, so little time.In post 1772, Desperado wrote:Beyond Malcolm, who else are you looking at today?
Do you suspect Sven of being Scum as well? If not, how would that explanation be valid?In post 1775, The Goat wrote:The only valid explanation is that he preferred a no lynch over lynching Mutley.
They get to keep Mutley around for at least another day so we can spend two days lynching him instead of one. If Mutley is Town, there is no way in hell that Scum is killing him because he makes such good mislynch bait.In post 1778, The Goat wrote:What freaks me the hell out is...what is the benefit of a NL to scum...if Mutley ISN'T scum?
The fact that he didn't get lynched yesterday should give you the answer you're looking for.In post 1778, The Goat wrote:And if Mutley IS scum...WHY THE HELL DID HE CAMPAIGN SO HARD FOR HIS OWN LYNCH?
What?In post 1789, Nero Cain wrote:We'll also be lynching three players today so lets keep that in mind.
Have you flipped Town yet?In post 1776, The Goat wrote:See...the only down side to all of this is that there's no baby oil and a singlet.
That's not why I'm voting for Malcolm.In post 1791, Nero Cain wrote:There's no way that Malcolm forced those players to vote for Goat and I honestly think its fucking retarded that you, Skull and Mac? think that he did.
...okay, you totally lost me. What are you going on about?In post 1801, Nero Cain wrote:dat rolefish.In post 1799, Skullduggery wrote:What?In post 1789, Nero Cain wrote:We'll also be lynching three players today so lets keep that in mind.
Just out of curiosity, did you happen to see TheEsquire online at that time too? He said that he was online right at the deadline, so if you saw him, we'd at least know that he was telling the truth about that.In post 1810, Ravenpaw wrote:Why didn't you vote Arc, I was online for the deadline and I saw you online as well so why no vote?
Cut it out, Monkeyman. Ferretlover is the worst player in this game, so why are you trying to take that distinction from him? So selfish.In post 1821, Ravenpaw wrote:1) Lol, this is (I think) the first thing I've said to Arc all game:In post 1819, MonkeyMan576 wrote:It's suspicious that you are 1) Attacking Arc so hard 2) Not voting for her 3) Not on the major wagon.And you call thatWhy didn't you vote Arc, I was online for the deadline and I saw you online as well so why no vote?attacking so hard? Really? Really?? Really???
2) Have I even said I find Arc scummy? No, I haven't, I have just asked her a question.
3) My top scum read is Mutley so that's where I will vote (for now).
You make it sound like my vote is set in stone and I'm dead set on lynching Malcolm today. That is not the case. I don't want to say anything more than that until Malcolm decides to grace us with his presence and give us his side of the story.In post 1825, Nero Cain wrote:This very closely mirrors Despo's post. I mean, I just don't see Malcolm as the biggest contributor to NL. I'm also thinkin' that his vig claim was bullocks, but even if it was a real claim there's reasons that a kill may have failed so I'm not a big fan of this "you said you'd do this and it didn't happen. die liar scum!!" thinking.
In post 1825, Nero Cain wrote:I'm also thinkin' that his vig claim was bullocks
Under what circumstances is it not scummy to pretend to be a Vig?In post 1837, Nero Cain wrote:I DON'T think Malcolm is very scummy.