Random.org says
Discuss.
It's my thing D1. Will give more input as the day continues.
Not at all. I merely gave a summary of previous discussions and their results to summarize things as best I could.In post 67, zachattack wrote:You asked us to discuss. This sounds like you don't want to discuss after all.In post 62, The Goat wrote:It's my thing D1. Will give more input as the day continues.
I've had this argument repeatedly. In summary, if you do not like it, too bad.
I can't determine which I find more amusing: The proposition, or the fact that everyone completely ignored it.In post 361, Nero Cain wrote:So anyone wanna kill Goat with me?
:blank stare:In post 485, Nero Cain wrote:nope!!! Your vote was scummy just like my vote on skull was scummy. Only scum can be scummy.
If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
Yah. Crazy work week.In post 515, Svenskt Stål wrote:In post 494, The Goat wrote:If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
For those who have commented on my slacking, I do that a lot on D1. The manic and outrageous finger-pointing and stick-poking wears on me, so, admittedly...I let others do it. I like to have fun on D1. I said I will analyze and post tomorrow. And I will.
FWIW, my early read on Nero is town.
My early read on GCBC is scum.
Thank you, and I agree with your reads. I am not talking about my level of obsession but like, a few posts of reason and thoughts per real day.
This was the icing on the cake.In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It will hurt town if you don't...I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.
You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them. If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.
In fact:
Vig: Sven
Good riddance.
I was wondering this for a little bit, too...then I realized he's doing a couple little things that set off my scumdar. And he's doing them more than once.In post 495, Amethyst Actor wrote:Why are the cops scum? they are null on my radar
I don't think GCBC is a vig. I think he was being demonstrative.In post 558, Desperado wrote:Alright, either that was a ruse or something else is going on here.
You weren't a vig.In post 564, GoodCopBadCop wrote:He's talking shit and he's obv scum.In post 555, Desperado wrote:What exactly is passive-aggressive about using his ability to kill someone? That's about as far as you can get from passive.In post 552, Krab Bucket wrote:Whoa, I misinterpreted the Neutral claim badly lmao.
I still think that GCBC is acting passive-aggressive though.
---
@Goat - How is your first reaction to a Vig claim to vote the claimer?Makes sense!1) Lots of little "this looks scummy" implications without actually pursuing them. Looks like planting seeds for later "I told you so" sort of stuff.
This would only work if the people I was accusing were scum. Otherwise, how would I say told you so?
Here's the other part that clued me in.In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It will hurt town if you don't...I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.
You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them.If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.
In fact:
Vig: Sven
Good riddance.
I'm pretty sue this is a bad call.In post 586, Svenskt Stål wrote:Welcome to the scum pile.In post 583, RATEDR wrote:Wow, has it been 48 hours already? I felt like it was just yesterday when I made my effort-post. Will read later today.
-Grazie
Please elucidate and be specific, and pretend I've had 17 beers. Because that's close to being accurate.In post 593, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat - Aren't you going to respond to me challenging your first point on why i'm scum? Do you agree that you doesn't make sense?
---
You referring to post 730?In post 629, Amethyst Actor wrote:I'm calling a bluff on Krab's part
He does scum AtE when his wagon builds up on him and he makes us think that he's has some kind of important role by soft-claiming before his wagon gets to L-2
Good God, I was drunk off my ass.In post 657, Skullduggery wrote:Now that you're (presumably) not drunk anymore, can you explain what the heck this means? Keep an eye on fun for six months? What?In post 632, The Goat wrote:Working under the assumption that there's someone who can do so...
...someone please keep an eye on Fun. for about the next six months.
I actually like you, but is there any chance at all you could pull your head out of vendettaland?
As far as I can determine, this is the only reason you find me even remotely interesting.In post 664, Nero Cain wrote:Why would I have a vendetta against you?
In post 8, Nero Cain wrote:1. Jebus
2. zachattack
3. ArcAngel9
4. Desperado
5. Squidward
6. Doctor C. Niall DeMencha
7. MalcomX
8. Krab Bucket
9. ferretlover
10. Ravenpaw
11. Amethyst Actor
12. Fuzzyman
13. Goodcopbadcop
14. FuDuzn
15. Skullduggery
16. MonkeyMan576
17. RATEDR (Vifam/SGRaaize_ Hydra)
18. TheEsquire
19. The Goat
20. Svenskt Stål
21. Nero Cain
Hrmmm...who do I want to policy lynch? Well I don't want to policy lynch myself so I'm out. I like the Jebus name, so he's out. Zack is supposed to be a pretty good player so he's out. Angel is a lot better than people give her credit for + she has a Tabret Bethell avatar. We are definitely keepingTHATaround, so she's out. Desperado is new and I wouldn't want to kill him right off the bat so he's out. Kise is muy boi and he's a good scumhunter but bitch called me a garden tool and that's shits just inexcusable. He's in the running. Slot 5, 6 and 8 are silly gimmick hydra's. Do not mind killing those. I can live with loving pokemon and ferrets, he's out. RavenPaw sounds Indianish and I'm part Cherokee and we Indians gotta watch out for each other, she's out. I like MS and TAM, so they are out. Fuzzyman is tempting but there are better lynches. He's out. GoodcopBadcop is an obvious hydra gimmick alt (with Matt P?) I definitely want to kill that. FuDuzn made a funny so he's out. Punk Rock gurl is cool, she's out. The hate on Monkey is dumb, he's out. RatedR has Vifam in it.VIFAM!!and everyone should be ok with killing that but it has Graize in it, who wanted to play in this game so, against my better judgment, we'll let it live. TheEsq made a Cena crack so dude is cool in my book, he's out.Goat threatened to put me through a table so lynching him would just be returning the favor in kind. Sven seems like an irritating horny trollANDhe uses images of the great Dean Winchester for his trolling purposes. The offences are too much.
At this point we have
Squidward
Doctor C.
MalcomX
Krab Bucket
goodcopbadcop
goat
sven
vote:sven
tonight I'm shooting all 4 gimmick hydra's and then tomorrow we'll day vig kise and lynch goat. Then, and only then, will we be ready to scumhunt.
It's happened before. Not quite sure what your motivation is otherwise.In post 666, Nero Cain wrote:You honestly think RVS/obvious joke post would translate into a serious vote?
In that case, I'm astonished you're acting so sober.In post 689, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat - I mean, it would've been so easy for Bad cop to say "Oh ma gerd, I was so drunk when I made those posts". The drunk is excuse is a perfect excuse for scum.
Fair. Stand by.In post 669, Nero Cain wrote:In post 66 Goat votes for Squid for voting Monkey. Angel agreed with this and GCBC also voted Monkey so its some selective scumhunting.
In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them.
Then in 663 he's claiming that I have a vendetta against him for an obvious joke post. I mean yuck.
Pretty much all his other posts are fluff. I want your top 4 scum reads.
In post 3212, The Goat wrote:To be fair, this is what raised my eyebrows as a "vendetta." Not just voting me, but calling for others to do so. Struck me as odd.
In post 647, Ravenpaw wrote:Why Goat again?Then this exchange. Seemingly without reason, and reluctance to GIVE a reason.In post 648, Nero Cain wrote:Why not Goat?
Then in post 669, after I call you on it, you do this:
Again, I fluff on Day 1. Always have, always will.In post 669, Nero Cain wrote:In post 66 Goat votes for Squid for voting Monkey. Angel agreed with this and GCBC also voted Monkey so its some selective scumhunting.
In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them.
Then in 663 he's claiming that I have a vendetta against him for an obvious joke post. I mean yuck.
Pretty much all his other posts are fluff. I want your top 4 scum reads.
Here's what I really dislike about your most recent quoted post - you're being very selective (if not flat-out lying) with your reasoning:
1) "In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them. "
No kidding. Here's the actual post. I'm gonna bold a couple important parts.
The next day, as I said I would, I analyzed and posted. Here's post 553.In post 494, The Goat wrote:If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
For those who have commented on my slacking, I do that a lot on D1. The manic and outrageous finger-pointing and stick-poking wears on me, so, admittedly...I let others do it. I like to have fun on D1.I said I will analyze and post tomorrow. And I will.
FWIW, my early read on Nero is town.
My early read on GCBCis scum.
How on Earth is this not directly in response to something that happened BETWEEN my two posts? That's blatantly evident.In post 553, The Goat wrote:This was the icing on the cake.In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It will hurt town if you don't...I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.
You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them. If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.
In fact:
Vig: Sven
Good riddance.
vote GCBC
Nero, if you want to say, "I'm voting Goat and trying to get him to do something because he's being all fluffy", fine. It won't change my general D1 behavior, but I get it.
This just looks like you're making shit up, and made me tilt my head and wonder about your alignment for the first time.
That being said, thank you for asking for my top four reads, because it made me read.
My top four scumreads WERE GCBC, Desperado, Ferret, and Krab...but rereading and doing ISOs made me realize that I need to read this a little more thoroughly, because I didn't realize how diametrically opposed two of those scum reads are to the other two.
To be fair, this is what raised my eyebrows as a "vendetta." Not just voting me, but calling for others to do so. Struck me as odd.
In post 647, Ravenpaw wrote:Why Goat again?
Then this exchange. Seemingly without reason, and reluctance to GIVE a reason.In post 648, Nero Cain wrote:Why not Goat?
Again, I fluff on Day 1. Always have, always will.In post 669, Nero Cain wrote:In post 66 Goat votes for Squid for voting Monkey. Angel agreed with this and GCBC also voted Monkey so its some selective scumhunting.
In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them.
Then in 663 he's claiming that I have a vendetta against him for an obvious joke post. I mean yuck.
Pretty much all his other posts are fluff. I want your top 4 scum reads.
The next day, as I said I would, I analyzed and posted. Here's post 553.In post 494, The Goat wrote:If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
For those who have commented on my slacking, I do that a lot on D1. The manic and outrageous finger-pointing and stick-poking wears on me, so, admittedly...I let others do it. I like to have fun on D1.I said I will analyze and post tomorrow. And I will.
FWIW, my early read on Nero is town.
My early read on GCBCis scum.
How on Earth is this not directly in response to something that happened BETWEEN my two posts? That's blatantly evident.In post 553, The Goat wrote:This was the icing on the cake.In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It will hurt town if you don't...I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.
You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them. If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.
In fact:
Vig: Sven
Good riddance.
vote GCBC
I'm debating whether I believe your whole "this was only a test" thing, still.In post 698, GoodCopBadCop wrote:This ffs. Stop ignoring it.In post 628, The Goat wrote:Please elucidate and be specific, and pretend I've had 17 beers. Because that's close to being accurate.In post 593, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat - Aren't you going to respond to me challenging your first point on why i'm scum? Do you agree that you doesn't make sense?
---
Because of his follow of GCBC.In post 702, Nero Cain wrote:Where is squid on this list?In post 697, The Goat wrote: My top four scumreads WERE GCBC, Desperado, Ferret, and Krab...but rereading and doing ISOs made me realize that I need to read this a little more thoroughly, because I didn't realize how diametrically opposed two of those scum reads are to the other two.
Why is your RVS vote your #2 scumread?
[/quote]In post 701, Nero Cain wrote:Are you serious here? You do know that you have to get others to join a wagon to secure a lynch, why you think that's scummy or "proof" of a vendetta is beyond me.In post 697, The Goat wrote:To be fair, this is what raised my eyebrows as a "vendetta." Not just voting me, but calling for others to do so. Struck me as odd.
In post 647, Ravenpaw wrote:Why Goat again?Then this exchange. Seemingly without reason, and reluctance to GIVE a reason.In post 648, Nero Cain wrote:Why not Goat?
I also found it odd that in claiming I had a vendetta against you, you ignored post 415 whichDOESlist some early reasoning as to why I suspected you. Why did you instead claim that my RVS/joke post was my reasoning for the vendetta?
Just 'cause I didn't give my reasoning right off doesn't mean I wasn't. My asking Raven why I shouldn't suspect you is a pretty important question.
Well first of all, I disagree that you sayin' "STOP PICKING ON ME!!!" is calling out my lack of reasoning against you. I also don't really think that coming in the next day and laying down a vote on your top suspect is "analyzing" anything. Considering that there's more than 1 scum in this game...your lack of motivation to hunt for scum is alarming.Then in post 669, after I call you on it, you do this:
Again, I fluff on Day 1. Always have, always will.In post 669, Nero Cain wrote:In post 66 Goat votes for Squid for voting Monkey. Angel agreed with this and GCBC also voted Monkey so its some selective scumhunting.
In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them.
Then in 663 he's claiming that I have a vendetta against him for an obvious joke post. I mean yuck.
Pretty much all his other posts are fluff. I want your top 4 scum reads.
Here's what I really dislike about your most recent quoted post - you're being very selective (if not flat-out lying) with your reasoning:
1) "In 494 he calls GCBC scum but waits until 553 to vote them. "
No kidding. Here's the actual post. I'm gonna bold a couple important parts.
The next day, as I said I would, I analyzed and posted. Here's post 553.In post 494, The Goat wrote:If you read the game you're referring to, it's pretty damned evident I was phone posting and trying to prevent the town from doing something abysmally stupid.In post 415, Nero Cain wrote:Raven: I don't really care for any of Goats 5 posts he was not posting here but still playing in his other gamea. Put your vote on him and lets see what he does.
For those who have commented on my slacking, I do that a lot on D1. The manic and outrageous finger-pointing and stick-poking wears on me, so, admittedly...I let others do it. I like to have fun on D1.I said I will analyze and post tomorrow. And I will.
FWIW, my early read on Nero is town.
My early read on GCBCis scum.
In post 553, The Goat wrote:This was the icing on the cake.In post 548, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It will hurt town if you don't...I will not stop my activity. Although it will drop when my battery dies.
You complain about lurkers when you're making catching up way harder for them. If I was a day Vig, i'd kill you now. You piss me off.
In fact:
Vig: Sven
Good riddance.
vote GCBC
You are staggeringly mistaken. Go to :sj: and ask.In post 708, ferretlover wrote:Hello, I'm back. I have seen this stuff and have felt that the Krab wagon is unneeded. Goat, however, has been much worse.If you're drunk, then don't play werewolf.
UNVOTE
VOTE: THE GOAT
You know who hides behind policy lynches?In post 717, ferretlover wrote:Read those posts over and it seems like it was legit drunkeness. The next time this happens, policy lynch *points to Goat*
Pretty sure what you meant to say was "weren't".In post 719, Nero Cain wrote:ok so you were actually drunk, just scum. Thanks for clearing that up.
Hello, Nero.In post 710, Nero Cain wrote:the fuck is this shit?!? Squid never voted for GCBC...nor did Despo.In post 706, The Goat wrote:Because of his follow of GCBC.In post 702, Nero Cain wrote:Where is squid on this list?In post 697, The Goat wrote: My top four scumreads WERE GCBC, Desperado, Ferret, and Krab...but rereading and doing ISOs made me realize that I need to read this a little more thoroughly, because I didn't realize how diametrically opposed two of those scum reads are to the other two.
Why is your RVS vote your #2 scumread?
Again, the more I look at it, the more I'm starting to believe him.
None of this makes any sense what-so-ever. Can you explain this noobie style?
You okay now?In post 563, Desperado wrote:In post 561, GoodCopBadCop wrote:It was a reaction test.
Ah, I see what you were doing. Combined with Krab's earlier association with ferret, I think I'm going to move here
Unvote: Ferret
Vote: Krab Bucket
Again.In post 723, Nero Cain wrote:So snarky and defensive. Dude, you haven't provided ANY reads other than the ones in 697. So I'm going to ask you about the ones given.
I still think its silly of you to be giving Despo town cred for sheeping your #1 scumread.
Still doesn't explain why Squid is no longer a scum read.
I still don't follow you like at all, its like your bouncing here and there. Just w/e. Be sure to ask your scumbuddies to give you some help tonight.
Things you're wrong about:In post 731, Nero Cain wrote:Goat-You vote Squid despite having Angel and GCBC do the same thing (I.e;vote monkey) that Squid was "scummy" for.
I call you scum.
You call me town and GCBC scum.
You then vote GCBC for an obvious fake daykill possible vig/sk crumb.
I call you scum again and urge others to vote you.
You claim I have a vendetta against you.
I ask for your top 4 scum reads.
Your "old" list was CGBC, Despo, Ferret and Crab. So you dropped Squid 'cause you liked his other posts.
I ask you about your Despo read and you said that you liked his follow/sheep of your #1 scum read. You later get defensive and claim that you've explained why you had a Despo scum read but I don't see it.
Do you think this is an accurate portrayal? If not what am I wrong about?
How can one possibly know if they're scum or not scum on Day One, with the exception of being scumbuddies? This is why I saidIn post 890, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Goat
absta101 wrote:
Goat wrote:
1) Lots of little "this looks scummy" implications without actually pursuing them. Looks like planting seeds for later "I told you so" sort of stuff.
This would only work if the people I was accusing were scum. Otherwise, how would I say told you so?
This, FFS, THIS!
Your point doesn't make much sense to me.
In post 763, ferretlover wrote:If you were drunk then why be on the internet in the first place.
You also said "it reflects bad on your alignment", which makes it sound like your already know my alignment. Explain?
You and I differ in opinion on what a "scumslip" is, then. I would think that one would have to be scum to scumslip. Perhaps I'm using terminology I lack expertise with, but I think you know what I mean.In post 903, ferretlover wrote:And Town will make scumslips too if they are drunk and not careful, so that degrades your point.
You and I differ. For what its worth, e-mail and texting are off limits if I get drunk. But the Internet is a fun place while drinking. At least for me.In post 902, ferretlover wrote:I was just saying my opinion on it. I don't like the idea of alcohol in general, but I would stay away from the internet iff I was drunk.
Because he's the LVG.In post 909, xMALCOLMx wrote:Don't you have a QT to mention this in?In post 880, RATEDR wrote:Also, Vifam. Not much has changed since you left, at least not in my opinion
I have absolutely no idea what this is saying at all. Find scum.In post 892, Darthe wrote:Okay, perhaps I am missing something here but from my read of the game it doesn't seem that we have any sort of clear direction thus far. I mean, yeah it is day one but we should at least be involved with one another rather than certain groups on other groups right?
Why did you think this would be unpopular?In post 906, The Goat wrote:In what will likely be an unpopular statement...
...I do not support the Krab wagon.
I disagree, and fail to see why the comment is a sticking point.In post 927, Desperado wrote:And? Only 7 of us are voting him. There are 21 players. If anything it might be more popular to be against a Krab lynch, not for it. "Because he is the largest vote getter" is not a legitimate response to "why would that be unpopular?"
*makes a squidgy face*In post 999, Desperado wrote:If those are my only two options then I'm against. I'm not in favor of indefinitely extending the day...I think the other 19 of us should be able to figure something out without potentially holding D1 up forever.
ORLY?In post 989, xMALCOLMx wrote:When I want to lynch someone, 10.In post 969, Nero Cain wrote:Kise: On a scale of 1-10 how much do you think Goat is scum?I told you Goat will vanish overnight. Where is your faith?
I really dislike this post.In post 1019, xMALCOLMx wrote:You guys act like you've never been wrong about someone being town. Someone else asked and it hasn't been answered...why is Krabs town?
There are theories going around as to what scum may or may not be doing in this situation. How about some facts? Like Krabs' contradictory patterns?
Will reread.In post 1089, Desperado wrote:Goat, you just aren't reading my posts or interactions with anyone then.
Sven brought up that defense first. He made it an obstacle. "We can't just lynch Krab because he might be a PR" is what Sven said. Are you following me?
So now Mutley has claimed that he is not a PR, he is a VT. Therefore, the obstacle that Sven created ("he might be a PR!") is no longer valid. Do you get it?
Where did I say it is acceptable to lynch someone who is town because they are not a PR? I think Krab is scum. His claiming VT has literally no effect on my read, while had he claimed a PR, it very well could have. Are you saying this is unusual?
You very well may have stated why you find this. If you can, please link or summarize. If no, I will look.In post 1089, Desperado wrote:Goat, you just aren't reading my posts or interactions with anyone then.
Sven brought up that defense first. He made it an obstacle. "We can't just lynch Krab because he might be a PR" is what Sven said. Are you following me?
So now Mutley has claimed that he is not a PR, he is a VT. Therefore, the obstacle that Sven created ("he might be a PR!") is no longer valid. Do you get it?
Where did I say it is acceptable to lynch someone who is town because they are not a PR?I think Krab is scum.His claiming VT has literally no effect on my read, while had he claimed a PR, it very well could have. Are you saying this is unusual?
This would be awesome if I hadn't listed Despo as one of my earliest scum reads. You didn't like that. I didn't change it. You didn't like that. I didn't give a shit. Then I stated that I really didn't like ANOTHER of his posts. He asked me to read. I said I would. You snuck in and stated that I was now trying to DISTANCE myself from Despo.In post 1094, Nero Cain wrote:oo oo oo Despo and Goat are gonna distance from each other.
Explain.In post 1296, Svenskt Stål wrote:i just saw the vote and went "wtf lol scum obv"...
But goat, your post is kinda good, but for the love of god unvote
In post 1294, ferretlover wrote:That just increased my scumread on Goat^
Yes.In post 1301, Svenskt Stål wrote:Explain what?In post 1298, The Goat wrote:Explain.In post 1296, Svenskt Stål wrote:i just saw the vote and went "wtf lol scum obv"...
But goat, your post is kinda good, but for the love of god unvote
Why nero is town?
Amazingly, I would say this exact same thing to Nero...about me.In post 1305, Svenskt Stål wrote:Goat, I am not explaining why perhaps the most town friendly player in the lineup is town.
Now if this is spite then so be it... but you are the one that has to bring the reasoning here.
But I strongly urge you to ignore nero for awhile and do something constructive