Mini 1449 - Ordinary Town
Forum rules
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
While I have not left the building, I certainty am still here though I admit a bit more silent then I wish. Regarding my post while yes strange (and admittedly a bit noobish) as it might be and I'll admit quite noobish a one post wonder isn't something I would not necessarily say any alignment. Though I would agree with suspicious; it could be a varied amount of different reasons for just the current one post.In post 79, Cheery Pie wrote:
But 1-post wondersIn post 78, hapahauli wrote:
'cause he's not here. He'll have some 'splainin to do for why he's late to the party,In post 77, Cheery Pie wrote:
Is there a reason you didn't include Dyslexicon in this statement if you're investigating low content producers?In post 65, hapahauli wrote:Anyway I'm more concerned at this point with some of our 1-post-wonders right now, Daemon385 and Varsoon.but absence is not alignment indicative.area cause for concern? (ie. theydooffer an alignment indication?)
So let me see if I'm following this thought train correctly:
- i. The locomotives (posters) who pull out from the station and start puffing (posting) along are not of concern (at least, in our current thought train)
ii. However, the locomotives who pull out from the station and travel one stop (1-post-wonder)areof concern
iii. Yet the locomotives who sit idly in the station showing no signs of pulling outare nota concern
- i. In this game we have had a public confirmation take place. Dyslexicon's "confirmz" is there for all to see.
ii. Yet why are his no posts of no concern to you? Why is there an arbitrary line drawn between a no-poster and a 1-post-wonder?
iii. It's strange that you respond to the question about reasoning with an attempted reason. But'cause he's not heredoesn't work, 'cause hewashere.
iv. I'm willing to see a greater implication by not including Dyslexicon in your 'concern for low content producers' post; you know something most of us don't
FoS @ hapahauli
As I said before the actions (or lack there of) of the one time posters so far I can see looking suspicious but not completely finger pointing since there is a lack of evidence. I am at fault for the lack of content but not at fault for a positive ID. Which I will soon correct. Anyways I myself can agree and would like to know as well can see what Hapa means in his statement regarding how that all brings just suspicion on us but as well as you as a possibility.In post 122, hapahauli wrote:@ Varsoon
In post 115, Varsoon wrote:In post 102, hapahauli wrote:In post 100, Varsoon wrote:Don't agree with the vote.
I agree that NicCage's wagon is being pushed really fast.
Also elaborate on Dyslexicon an Daemon please. Them not jumping on wagons isn't allignment indicative - hell you yourself are suspicious on that basis no? Are there other reasons why you could "see" them as scum?
What's laughable about it? You've given us no content - what are we supposed to think?As far as people calling me scum, I find it laughable. I just haven't been very active or produced much so far, and for that, I do apologize. I should really be on V/LA this week, but I will be peeking in from time to time.
Anyway you seem more active now, so I'll give you time to do your thing. I do expect you to contribute though, as if not for you claiming to be "busy", your behavior so far is worthy of suspicion.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
That's fair it does bring up ideas and topics that were not going on in the first place. Which is a bit of what I did in my original post (though again a bit mis-launched on my part)In post 151, Varsoon wrote:I've also had more free time in my other games, and I was trying a more direct approach. Notice that I'm also fairly direct in previous scum games, too.
Sometimes I just write things to see what people'll say about 'em.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I was reading the forums just not as well as I should have.In post 161, hapahauli wrote:EBWOP again (I'm terrible at formatting, everything is spoilered below)
Spoiler:
Not really an important question now I think after reading over a bit more through the storm.
Also sorry for the word cluster craziness I think that was poor editing on my part I read over it again and dear god.
As for current suspicions I personally have a bit against NicCage I don't have much evidence though atm except more so of a hunch and some of his previous actions have been odd.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Sorry I've been on a bit of a strange sleep deprivation lately. Some of my previous sentences have even confused me after going back to read them.In post 145, Varsoon wrote:
In other news, Daemon385 needs to put more effort into making his sentences understandable.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I would disagree with me giving half a dick about this game. I simply have a little experience in regards to this type of mafia. The reason I am voting Nic is because he has just been wrenching at my gut for quite a while now and he is giving me no reason not to. Something doesn't register right with him. Finals or not if true is understandable, but that still doesn't keep me from being suspicious of him. I also don't trust Scott so much because in my opinion a lot what he says seems scummy.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
It has been quite a while since you put up anything against me. If I wanted to tack you up for that for any reason, believe me I would have done it a long time ago.In post 215, Scott Brosius wrote:In post 211, Daemon385 wrote:I would disagree with me giving half a dick about this game. I simply have a little experience in regards to this type of mafia. The reason I am voting Nic is because he has just been wrenching at my gut for quite a while now and he is giving me no reason not to. Something doesn't register right with him. Finals or not if true is understandable, but that still doesn't keep me from being suspicious of him. I also don't trust Scott so much because in my opinion a lot what he says seems scummy.And I'm the only one to draw some attention to you for sheeping and providing nothing, and conveniently I'm a new scum read! Very interesting.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I think I can just iterate through his ISOs:In post 224, hapahauli wrote:
What's good in his filter? I think it's awful (for reasons I'll explain later).Scott Brosius:Mainly good stuff so far.Not bad- "Wagon time!" Didn't like it initially but it's just like any other RVS reason.
- Made logical points.
- Mostly found this to be null. Nothing in there that reads either way.
- Calls out reasonless reads, gives a pair of townish reads and a pair of bad posts.
- Parts 1 and 3 were kinda meh; part 2 was not bad.
- I originally thought this was a null post, but your 227 made me realize otherwise - while Daemon did post about being suspicious of SB in 211, he didn't say it was a "new scumread"; it could have been one he held previously and didn't bring it out until then.
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
In post 215, Scott Brosius wrote:And I'm the only one to draw some attention to you for sheeping and providing nothing, and conveniently I'm a new scum read! Very interesting.I'm wary of these "hmmm, very interesting"-posts. Implying scumminess without saying it directly. Inviting everyone to question a certain behavior while avoid responsibility. Not a good colour on you.
@ Dyslexicon Can you tell me which "Hmm, very interesting posts? Also I feel like he has been doing that a bit throughout the game if not openly but subtle.
@Ac1983fan That is a good question but I think he evenly split up a good amount about himself and others the one phrase above that I have bolded was actually about me being suspected a bit by Scott for what he thought was me jumping on him after (from quite a while before I even casted the vote) that I had voted him as a counter for drawing attention to me. Though I've had a lot of people question that fact already as I am sure you already know. Though I guess he could also just be catching up =P- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
In regards to you bit on Scott, thank you! That is what I was mentioning in my post #250, but with much more detail! I've had the similar things appear like that from him as well which again is a reason he is one of my main two scum reads right now. He hasn't proven much other reasons for me to think other wise and I honestly don't think he will. So maybe your not as biased as you think.In post 261, hapahauli wrote:UNVOTE: Toomai
I'm not as convinced as I was of his guilt. I looked over some of his town games, and his activity levels/posting style isn't THAT much different from here. His posting certainly makes it difficult to read his alignment, but it's not a scumtell afaik.
The three players I have clear scumreads on areNic Cage,GBGC, andScott. I'll explain a bit more in detail later, but here's the rundown:
Nic Cage- Useless lurker showing more interest in "smoking weed" than playing the game.
Spoiler:
GBGC- Definition of an active lurker.Bad Copis plenty content to call people scum and "poke" them, but literally has 0 actual scumhunting analysis in his filter (Seriously, look at it). Most ofGood Cop's posting/analysis has been based on him not catching up with the game. Since he's caught up, this is his only analysis:In post 246, GoodCopBadCop wrote:- I agree with BC's Varsoon vote. All his posts are IIoA.
- Scott is slight town due to him having similar thoughts to me.
- Cage is slight scum at best, I don't see good enough reasons to lynch him now. There are more scummy players.
I've read the whole game now.
- GCIn post 247, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Hapa's case on Toomai was okay, not that good though.Scott Brosius- While his inactivity is somewhat standard for his normal town-play, I'm just not at all satisfied with his content. For example, there are posts where he heavily insinuates suspicion on players and doesn't do anything to follow up on them. Case in point:
"You're scum... INTERESTING... does anyone want to bite?"In post 215, Scott Brosius wrote:
And I'm the only one to draw some attention to you for sheeping and providing nothing, and conveniently I'm a new scum read! Very interesting.In post 211, Daemon385 wrote:I would disagree with me giving half a dick about this game. I simply have a little experience in regards to this type of mafia. The reason I am voting Nic is because he has just been wrenching at my gut for quite a while now and he is giving me no reason not to. Something doesn't register right with him. Finals or not if true is understandable, but that still doesn't keep me from being suspicious of him. I also don't trust Scott so much because in my opinion a lot what he says seems scummy.
He has a lot of these short insinuations of suspicion of various players.
On Varsoon...
On Daemon...Oh good a list of baseless reads. Exactly what I meant.
On Dyslexicon...Out of everything that has happened since your previous post to this one, THIS is the one point you make?
On Myself...Don't like this at all. The blatant sheeping with no addition, then the following post is just empty talk about everyone agreeing? Looks like filler. Still like my Varsoon vote, but Dys is my second choice.
On ac1983fan...My concern is that you unvoted immediately after a single post saying I GUESS WE CAN EXPECT MORE CONTENT! Yet after I post its HEY GONNA POST MORE?! My issue is with you treating people differently for similar circumstances. So to fawn to your demands, the answer is yes.
And what's more about all of this.. he just seems really... angry. He has a very critical tone, and seems like he's going after players because he's critical of their playstyle rather than because he thinks they're actually scummy. I'm unsure how much of this observation is me being potentially confirmation biased, so I'll look at it again and attempt to articulate it better.I don't understand the unvote and lack of revote if that is all that sticks out. This is not town behavior.
I'm still not sure on GCBC yet though. But I have a question for him. GCBC if there are other more "scummy" players to get instead of NicCage who are they? Would you be able to enlighten up on who you think is a bigger threat? Obviously you seem hard struck on Varsoon, but why does he seem more scummy to you then NicCage? Or anyone else for that matter? Your pointing fingers but not giving much reason if any about what.
PS. I lol'ed at the video hapa xD- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I agree! And with the time counting down on us looks like we will have to decide what we need to. Scott seems more scummier to me then Nic now but I still believe both need to be tried. My vote still stands for now.In post 326, hapahauli wrote:Anyone who's voting Varsoon at this point is an idiot or scum.
It's clear that he doesn't care about his image, and is basically playing suicidally. You can say what you want about him playing "anti-town" (though he's actually provided quite a bit of analysis in the last few pages), but his play makes no sense from a mafia perspective. He's showing no survival instinct, and that's mega townie.
We should be lynchingNic CageorScotttoday unless someone goes about and acts even scummier.
Also as odd as what Varsoon I don't see it as that scummy. Annoying sure but I think he is trying to pull what he can out of the people he needs. Or for other reasons, but I don't believe he is the one we need to vote off right now.
Also I still LOVE Scott's post. Again all he does is state how he isn't playing and will get back to us and hardly ever does. I applaud you sir, just applaud you. Not.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I'm honestly suprised NicCage and Scott aren't defending themselves more to be honest. Though it is true not everyone can be on all day everyday. You'd think when they do post they would give more of a reason why they should not be voted for. Also I'm working on my posts a bit more since I started this game, trying to get a bit more content and learning what I can do to make that content better.In post 358, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:While I wait for Toomai, I decide to look over the low posters.
Dyslexion - hasn't posted since Saturday but has managed 11 posts between yesterday and today (if you are town, diaf)
AC1983 - doesn't have posts anywhere else but here so while I want him to increase his activity, he doesn't seem to be avoiding the game
Nic - Has only 1 post since his last post here, and his posts here haven't been that great. Still think he is scum.
Daemon - same as AC1983 basically
Zelfind - same as AC1983 basically
Scott - Same as AC1983
my biggest issue with AC/Daemon/zelfind/Scott is essentially lack of activity is slowing the game down. I realize not everyone can be online all day/every day but these guys really need to try and post more.
Dyslexion gets a big FOS from me, because avoiding a game has no town motivation at all. If he is town, like I said above he can go diaf.
/rant
-J- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Wow that is some solid data. Very well done on your dig Hapa. I'd like to hear from him as well to see what he has to explain, but with that kind of proof I am willing to sway my vote that way. How much longer do we have till days end?
You have the stage acfan I suggest you give your case before it is to late.
VOTE:ac1983fan- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
1. You may be reading into that far to blindly.hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4957231 time=1368652830 user_id=10128]Actually wait. Doesn't it bother anyone that this wagon went from one vote to L-1 in a single page? Toomai's reasoning is already terrible; but daemon and dys came back from their inactivity just to hop on this bandwagon. I'm willing to bet serious $$ that at least two of them is scum.
VOTE: Toomai
2. I have been quite a bit more active as of late. I still am doing what I can to post more.
Come on man you can point fingers better then that.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I can agree that we need to all make our decisions soon since the clock is ticking. It sucks we have this limited amount of time at this point with such a claim that should be talked out more. With the time constraints though we don't have that luxury. With my past experience with mafia games (not form mafia) this situation happens a lot. Which makes the lynch both frustrating and hard. It's kind of a 50/50 shot in this case in my opinion, but with me being as skeptical as I am it is hard for me to decide either way. I'd like to see a scum get lynched in our first day, but I'd hate to be wrong and get a power role lynched instead. Given that the mafia knows whether he is scum or not and also knowing that if he isn't scum he may just be the doc. If that is the case they could either kill him off now and save some trouble later, or they could drag it out keep suspicion on him for as long as they need to. Even if it is just to stall the killing of one of there own/pointing the blame at another townie. I would say that it is not a good idea though to have a cop check him tonight if he is not lynched due to the fact that if ACfan is town then both our doc and our cop(if there is one) would then both be revealed weakening our survivability and insight. Or if he is town and the cop just doesn't say anything then we would have the problem of the still hanging suspicion over him which my still get him killed if not already. If he is scum then he has a free ticket to at least another day and the scum will surely use that to their advantage. It would be far better to have the cop search someone else in my opinion due to the pros out weighing the cons.
As for my vote I'm rattled and torn between 3 possibilities. NicCage and Scott are still on my watch list, but Hapa does make a good case against ACfan. It is just that this PR claim sticks a wrench in that. Do I trust the PR claim myself? I'm not quite sure. Not 100%.But do I want to change my vote? Not exactly. I'm going to keep my vote for now, but it may change before this day is over I need to look some things over real quick. I feel ACfan could be buying himself off with the PR ticket to live another day. Scum will do anything they can to survive.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Two quick question for you Nic:In post 472, NicCage wrote:Well, the first one was to see what distinction hp was making between Toomai and I, so that one doesn't have anything to do with me thinking Toomai was scum.
After Toomai's post voting me the first time I was suspicious of him. Like I've said, I think he's scum.
The second was to see why dys called out Toomai in 117 and then said nothing about it from then on. I was trying to see if there was a connection between the two of them.
1.Why do you feel/think Toomai is scum?
2.Do you feel like you found any connection between the two at all?- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
The one problem I have personally with ACfan currently that he came out with his post with all that it had and left it at that. He hasn't given any more reason for people to change their vote or anything. It is almost like he is just sitting on his role claim and hoping that it doesn't get him lynched. Now he could either be very comfy with that because he knows he is town or because he knows he is scum letting his role claim sail him into another day while we all pick away at each other. It is only speculation but I feel it is a bit odd he has nothing else seeing as he was just L-1 away from being lynched. Now that he has claimed role he is just sitting back relaxing.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I'm willing to go for a scott lynch as well, but there isn't much more time to think though. It is nearing our time to act. If enough people are with me I'll shift my vote to Scott since it doesn't look like either party going to sway on the ACfan wagon. Scott has seemed far more scummy then Cage. If he didn't hammer him maybe he wanted to keep a scum buddie alive? Though that would have to mean they are both scum. I can see scum coming out of one of them but idk if they both would flip scum. Though I feel a Scott lynch right now would be better then NicCage atm. What does everyone else think?- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
That's true I suppose.In post 503, Toomai wrote:Clearly I was not prepared for this amount of posts.
I don't really have any idea what to think. As it stands I prefer the NC lynch over the acf one because I feel it will provide more useful information overall. If we're lucky we have a Vig that'll shoot acf and solve that question simultaneously.
SB has 0 votes right now and I don't think we should try to pile them on today, since that'll just make things more complicated should it turn out that not enough people join in.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Well idk in all fairness Scott is definitely in my opinion someone to watch. Out of him and NicCage I can see one of them flipping scum. Maybe or maybe not both that is a bit harder to decide. He is willing to go for the NicCage wagon if needed. I am also ready to cast my vote either way, but Nic needs to say something before it is too late. With as little time as he has it won't be long till one more person hammers in the nail.In post 512, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:AND hap also gains scum points for also trying to start a new wagon after I announce we have only 18 hours until deadline.
Nic is at L-1 now, so he needs to claim ASAP, like his very next post.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Wait...what?! Why? Why is this scummy?In post 519, GoodCopBadCop wrote:
VOTE: ToomaiIn post 515, Toomai wrote:So with the suspended deadline maybe we can get a wagon rolling on SB.
I'm not unvoting NC yet though. He's been at L-1 twice now and needs to claim.
This is so incredibly scummy.
- GC- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Yeah Dessx you can just click there ISO next to there post number. Still in day one and have a few days till lynch so it gives you some time to catch upIn post 521, Dessx wrote:Is there anyway to see someones filter for Day 1?- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
In post 27, Cheery Pie wrote:
Does this mean goodcop might still be scum with him?In post 20, GoodCopBadCop wrote:All 3 posts have been brought to you by BadCop
Vote: ac1983fan
because I'm not scum w/ ac and I don't want to trip myself up on a technicality and start assuming that I am scum w/ ac
-BadCop
Clearly means you'd investigate guilty.
scum found.
VOTE: NicCagehp [leaves wrote: post_id=4928384 time=1367671342 user_id=10128]So let's start by lynching Cage.
VOTE: NicCageIn post 43, ac1983fan wrote:
Or maybe that was just, y'know, a random vote during the RVS?In post 37, GoodCopBadCop wrote:I'm not convinced about ac1983 fan
his vote was definitely trying to hide in the chaos, rather than contribute to creating order and information
hes scum basically
But thank you for providing the overreaction necessary to get us out of RVS.
UNVOTE:
Voting someone because of ridiculously terrible reasoning during the RVS/ending of the RVS? it's like you've never played beforeIn post 23, Toomai wrote:
Ridiculously terrible reasoning. Random is random; not joining wagons in the first 5 posts is beyond a null tell.In post 19, GoodCopBadCop wrote:4 posts, 4 seperate votes on different people?
this is bullshit, all 3 of you are actively trying to reduce town's information thus the scumteam is HP, Toomai, and ac1983fan
Vote: GoodCopBadCopIn post 59, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:My turn to post!
Vote NC
This is a really bad post to start as it doesn't actually attack any of the logic that was presented as to why its scummy, but instead tries to deflect part of what he is being called for to another as well without really giving thoughts on hp or Toom.In post 38, NicCage wrote:Why me and not Toomai?
This is a pretty ugly sheep. Apart from zef being one of my stronger town read at this point, it seems like more of a runaway vote following a vocal player who was calling him scum. I would love to actually see NC try and give reason for the vote before GCBC gives one (even though they probably both are missing reasons - zef is really town which anypony should see at this point).
I probably wont always remember to sign posts (chances are I wont sign anything) but if somepony cant tell us apart... well im not sure what else to say.
GCBC should headclaim too. Its amazingly anti-town to keep that hidden.In post 80, ɀefiend wrote:Can anyone briefly explain what "headclaim" means and why or why not it may be ethical to ask of someone to do? This is my first game on mafiascum, and I have never heard the term anywhere else.
I am all for prying information from someone, but only necessarily if they do something genuinely suspicious or questionable. It seems as though you are admitting to "forcing things", albeit for the sake of generating information... so, along with the fact that you are generally being proactive in regards to activity, I willhapahauli wrote:Sometimes that involves forcing things. Usually everything on Day 1 is forced to some extent, until it reaches the point where you can leverage *actual* suspicion on someone.Unvote: hapahaulifor now.
Can I be the one to officially say it??hapahauli wrote:... but that vote seemed a lot to me like someearly-game RVS anticsrather than a serious vote. ...We are out of the RVS stage of the game, and we have been for a while.Chalking up statements and votes to "jokes" and "antics" just keeps dragging on the notion that we are not playing seriously yet, and it provides an outlet to fall back on for bad play.
If you are talking about your first post of the game, 1) I detected sarcasm, so I believe that it was a "true" RVS-vote 2) If it wasn't sarcasm, then it certainly held no logic. Regardless, I am comfortable moving my vote there as well.Cheery Pie wrote:Just this mean I actually have logic with my vote on NicCage?
Well is it after his sheeping of GCBC and other lack of contest so far.
Vote: NicCageIn post 87, Toomai wrote:Cheery Pie and hapahauli are both pretty town. I'm not seeing poor logic on either side of their discussion.
Seems pretty simple to me: hapahauli looked for the people that weren't posting, saw the two people with 1 post, and found them to be scummy. You brought up someone who has no posts and hapahauli went either "hmm, didn't think of that, but you can't really do much to no-posters early Day 1" or "I noticed, but you can't really do much to no-posters early Day 1". That's how I see it anyway.In post 86, Cheery Pie wrote:How can I get round to any details of the points raised when I'm still trying to wrap my head around what's actually going on?
I'm gonna concur with the NicCage suspicion since, while Varsoon and Daemon385 made one bad post each that could be construed as RVS (if you have a really open mind), NicCage has made about three bad posts with about the same amount of content.
Vote: NicCage(that's 5/7)hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4936326 time=1367913245 user_id=10128]
The motivation for that post was coming from the right place.In post 132, hapahauli wrote:@ HP
Wall-o-texts are kinda my thing =/
Anyway what do you "like" about the post - do you agree with my logic? Or do you just think it's a "townie" post?
Also, I still want an answer to this:In post 106, hapahauli wrote:
Those are reasonable points, but why didn't you bring them up before? You say he's worth pressuring today, yet idly stating he's suspicious twice, then not stating your rationale until I prod you about it isn't a very effective way of "going after" someone.hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4932314 time=1367795256 user_id=10128]Well, first, he took Cop's second RVS vote too seriously (unless Cop was also serious, which I doubt).Secondly, Cop wagon was evidently a wagon I didn't like and Toomai was on it. Thirdly, his overall play strikes me as overly cautious. I can't say he's the best good lynch for today, but he's worth going after tomorrow. And also today.
To answer that, I wanted to mess with him a bit. Also, my vote was on NicCage and reasons without a vote is even worse than a vote without reasons.
In post 164, Toomai wrote:
I don't like this post.In post 145, Varsoon wrote:Understand where you're coming from, Hapa.
You just seem way too eager to play town.
Which is what he was going for (or at least what I think it is)pijay wrote:Please note that it is NOT a fallacy to claim somebody is trying to "appear" protown
Also why am I not voting you yet? You've earned yourself a seat above Cage. This is yours until NicCage comes back and claims it from you.
VOTE: ToomaiIn post 176, Dyslexicon wrote:I'm sorry I haven't been contributing more. Finals are proving hell. With such vocal townish play from Hapa there's gonna be mostly baaaaa anyways.
I strongly agree with Zef's post #168 where he agrees with some other players. Sheepasheep.
VOTE: NCIn post 195, Daemon385 wrote:NicCage imo looks more and more suspicious as the days go by for me. It does seem like he is hiding. Since vote count 1.3 where he had 4 votes against him he has only done 2 not very influential post.
Vote:NicCageIn post 283, Cheery Pie wrote:
I don't know if either of can actually be described as having information.In post 269, hapahauli wrote:I mean honestly GC, have you looked at your partner's posting at all? Whatever IIoA means, it must apply to BC as well.
Vasroon is definitely appealing to emotions though.
UNVOTE: , VOTE: VarsoonIn post 277, Varsoon wrote: I am town.hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4951589 time=1368446843 user_id=10128]CHOO CHOO
VOTE: NicCageIn post 347, Toomai wrote:
Eh I guess you're right. We do kind of need enough time for him to claim.In post 333, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Why does it matter if there's a few days left?
Vote: NicCage[L-1]In post 364, Jake from Rainbowdash wrote:ok, I thought i had seen a weird toom/SB connection but after that response and going back and looking in detail, I mis-read.
Vote: Nic
back to L-1In post 380, Dyslexicon wrote:
I love you too, my dove. *blush*In post 374, hapahauli wrote:I love you Dyslexicon. Thank you for making me look at this guy again.ac1983fanis scum. No doubt about it.
I totally agree ac19 looks like scum, especially in light of his meta. He has seemed dodgy to me the whole game. His self proclaimed "conservativeness" does not add up to his play, and him stating being wary of me, but do nothing but a totally fail-jump on one of my posts. This is good enough for a vote from me, and then we don't have to worry about NC being lynched (although he might not be town either).
VOTE: ac1983fanIn post 381, Daemon385 wrote:Wow that is some solid data. Very well done on your dig Hapa. I'd like to hear from him as well to see what he has to explain, but with that kind of proof I am willing to sway my vote that way. How much longer do we have till days end?
You have the stage acfan I suggest you give your case before it is to late.
VOTE:ac1983fanIn post 409, Toomai wrote:Well I guess I'll go back to where I was then.
Vote: NicCage
That said, 1-Shot Doctor seems like a really weird claim to me. It's weak and unusual enough that it doesn't look like something that would be faked, but in the same way it's far easier to explain why he's not being killed (since if the claim is true the Mafia probably would like to keep him around for a while to keep suspicion high, as opposed to a full Doctor claim which would make everyone expect instant death).hp [leaves wrote: post_id=4958857 time=1368718115 user_id=10128]Well I'm all for NC or Toomai now so if we're not lynching Toomai,
VOTE: NCIn post 444, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@acfan- Use your ability tonight.
---
VOTE: Cage
This is a good lynch. Also, we need lynch RIGT NOW. The deadline is in a few hours.In post 510, Cheery Pie wrote:
What makes a 1-shot claim all that different from a full claim? It's still a PR claim, and since we don't actually know what the setup is in this game, limited shot powers may actually be all we have.In post 471, hapahauli wrote: All this "don't lynch the PR" stuffdoes not apply here.It applies to normal doctor/cop claims, but not this one. In the case of a 1-shot claim, we lynch the guy if we think he's scum. End of story.
Out of the people who have wagons, yes Varsoon is the best option. (for information that may be confusing you, some responses/conversations have changed which hydra head is speaking, I think Pie is less clear on Varsoon than I am)In post 466, hapahauli wrote: You voting Varsoon implies that you think he's thebestcandidate availible. If he's not the best candidate in your mind, who is? Place your vote on that person.
I didn't like your attidtude about how acfan is scumscumscumscum.In post 466, hapahauli wrote: I don't like this attitude. I feel like you've been talking around things and doing everything in your power not to make a vote-committment. Your plan here is essentially to wait and see, and give the town your "stamp of approval" by hammering someone. This is unacceptable when we have 24 hours left in the day. We need to be discussing reads, not doing hwat you are proposing.
There was still hope that other people would see the sense in Varsoon, but I guess there isn't now that Scott has moved off. Yes I haven't argued that much about it, but then I'd be hypocritical of my hatred towards people trying to lead the town around.
If he is the only protective role, then unless he is scum sacrificing a night, then it is possible to verify without resorting to a cop. (it would probably require massclaim though)In post 482, hapahauli wrote: The problem is, I can't find any compelling reason for why the policy applies in the case of this current claim (1-shot doctor).
1) It won't be possible to verify his claim later, and outing a cop to do so is not a good long-term play.
2) The "suboptimal" decisions that scum could make here (NK'ing AC for example) are very unrealistic. If scum have a roleblocker, they can nullify his role without killing him. Secondly, I don't think it's realistic at all for scum to NK ACfan (if he's town) because he would be an almost sure-fire lynch for D2.
If he is a doctor, he has a protect in action tonight, scum may therefore avoid the optimal kill killing it would be protected. We do not know if they have a roleblocker or not. (and if who he protects dies, then we gain that additional information come his flip should he be telling the truth)
Somebody actually did this, we saw how quickly the acfan wagon grew, so why from the others with that suspicion is the reason for not voting not enough time?In post 493, Scott Brosius wrote: There seems to be support for this wagon lingering but nobody wants to take that first step.
unvote, vote: toomai
I believe this vote to actually be town motivated
What changed in the space between you calling him very scummy and ending the same post with this?
Anyway votecounts and deadline and needing time for him to claim as well tell me I need to vote my vote
UNVOTE:
VOTE: NicCageIn post 565, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@Hapa - The fact that your case is largely meta (which according to acfan is around 4 years old).
- That the waggon grew really fast (not that convinced by this though).
Toomai prob won't get lynched today.
VOTE: NC- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
There you are Jack from Rainbowdash there is everyone vote to unvote on and off NicCage. If it just has unvote or they just look like they voted it was them doing so off or on to NicCage. Cherry seems to be the very first person to ever have voted him up and then it has gone kinda up and down through out the game.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I'm back from a busy day and catching up to what I missed. Now that I see a lot from NicCage I actually kind of like what he has put up. I'm starting to not want to lynch him myself he seems more townie, but we do need to do something before the time runs out. My vote is ready. I will vote Nic if need be idk if we can start a different wagon at this point.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Right now the people I'm really looking at as scum or possible scum are as listed from most scummiest to least.
1.Scott I've mentioned through out most of the game how I feel he is scummy. At one point I felt NicCage was more of a need to lynch then him but it is more of a gut feeling for Nic then it is Scott. I feel he has been scummy and careless with what happens with the town. Nor do I feel he has made much of an effort to be town.
2. NicCage. Now that he has kind of given me more of a reason to believe he may be town it helps his case a bit with me but something still kind of bothers me with him but I am not quite sure yet. He is more of a gut.
3.GoodCopBadCop. While I feel he has been aggressive with some topics to get information I feel there may be something behind what these two are working on. I feel the aggression is a bit less townie and more for themselves. I could just be iffy on the issue but I feel like GoodCopBadCop has been kind of working on their own. And following when it feels convenient. But do feel that they may be town. Or at least I want to think they are.
4.Hapahauli. Now this is much more of me being a skeptic. Now it is good you are the most vocal player in the game and trying to get somewhere. I do think you are town, but I can see how doing all that you have will keep you alive if you were part of the scum. Which would help you turn the tables more to your whim to achieve your goal. You do have a good deal of support I've noticed through the game which can make you dangerous for either side. For right now I think your town but I do worry if you are scum. If you are your playing us quite well. Now needless to say you don't have all the power. This is probably not neither a gut nor a positive scum read, but just my skepticism.
Those are all I have right now that I have been looking into. May not be the best read list though >.<- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Oh and ACfan as well is on there probobly should be 3 instead because I really am not sure if he is the PR or not. Or if he is if he is the scum with a PR. I feel I disbelieve it more then believe it, but it is risky to try and lynch him if he is. I maybe trust his claim about....60% sureness. I don't know what to say on this case though really. It is a risky shot, but he could be lying.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
If we don't have enough time to lynch anyone with pretty much no votes on them atm then why are you suggesting myself Cherry and Jake? Which either have no votes or maybe like 1 vote? The only one on there that would go with what you yourself said would be NCIn post 711, hapahauli wrote:Daemon, NC, Cheery, Jake - agree or disagree? Let's get this taken care of.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
No that is fine I basically did that after I posted it I mainly posted that to see if I can get and snips or clips of what people thought to be honest I'm caught back up on the situation now.In post 844, hapahauli wrote:@ Daemon
Read and figure out for yourself.In post 747, Daemon385 wrote:I may be wrong but I was curious about the Toomai wagon I think I am oblivious to why vote him? I just need to know what is up with him >.<
I hate to be rude, but don't ask people to do work for you. Many people posted suspicions on Toomai, and it shouldn't take much to read through Day 1 and figure out why people are suspicious of him. If you are curious about a point someone made, I'd be more than happy to answer. However you refusing to do any critical thinking for yourself isn't very townie.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Yes a role who can kill and roleblock? Is there even a role that can do such a thing? I mean theoretically I guess there is. That is a very strange claim without more details for sure. I don't think a mass claim is such a good idea just yet. Maybe another day I'd say in my opinion or if something real insane goes down.
No one said there is a doctor but it is interesting that no one died last night. Even know we got a nice kill, what is the scum up to and who (maybe saved a life) has been running through my head.
As much as I am unsure of Scott being town, and I'm not very sure he is. This role claim does need to be clarified.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
And Toomai's VT call as well if your counting everyone who has roleclaimed/revealed through deathIn post 1013, GoodCopBadCop wrote:So town so far has:
compulsive neighbourizer (day talk)
One-shot Tracker
JoAT- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
For me my personal opinion on the HP JoaT claim is a bit sketchy for me especially on how he used the kill. Which I thought was silly to think about using on N1. And on that specific person? Sure I can see two people attacking the same target but stilll..wtf. Him RB Scott makes more since. There wasn't a night kill last night so either he is lying and a doc heal the person who really was supposed to die or he isn't. That is how I see it. But if Cherry's claim is true and he did heal the person that was to die last night then that puts an even bigger look see at HP. I would actually honestly believe Cheery's claim better then I would HP's at this current moment.In post 1068, hapahauli wrote:
Can you give us your individual thoughts on these claims?In post 1052, Daemon385 wrote:Yeah but the thing is how do we know if he does or not =P that is the big problem there
I see you popping into the thread from time to time, but you're really not offering much to the table every time you do.
Now Cheery's claim although rocky with how he has played if he is the doctor he has been doing well on not giving his role away. Which the longer a doctor lives the better usually (if he can pick and choose the right targets.
Scott I have been suspicious of since Day 1. Him and NicCage. Though unfortunately Nic wasn't the right target it seems. Though he did give us much insight on who is scum. Scott while still suspicious I'm not sure he is scum. I would believe he could be one of the rest remain or something else.
And also I'm pretty sure JFR is town the suspicion is nice, but I think it may be a bit misguided. They have proven very useful to town so far so I have no worries so far of them being scum.
I'd say my 3 biggest suspision right now are HP, Scott, and Dys (Dys being more of a null then a positive scum just not really sure)- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
I'm okay if someone wants to invest me with no issues I have nothing to hide.In post 1100, hapahauli wrote:.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
This is what I was quoting by the way sorry for some reason if bugged out on meIn post 1100, hapahauli wrote:Well actually, we could use HP's 1-shot check on one of the VT's. That might be best actually.
Checking Toomai or Daemon would be pretty good.- Daemon385
-
Daemon385 Goon
- Daemon385
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 174
- Joined: April 29, 2013
Exactly my pointIn post 1115, GoodCopBadCop wrote:
You'd also know we were wasting an invest on you if you were town.In post 1113, Daemon385 wrote:
I'm okay if someone wants to invest me with no issues I have nothing to hide.In post 1100, hapahauli wrote:.
- GC - Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385
- Daemon385