Newbie 1371: Max Steel, Max Finished!

[Majiffy]

VOTE: Anorway

p-edit: Way to take my thunder.

[Majiffy]

Majiffy, you'll always be my thunder <3

Welp, you just got me hard.

[Majiffy]

I can't even think of a good way to insult your name. Congrats!

[Majiffy]

VOTE: PhDScar

[Majiffy]

Oh forgot about this tab.

AA9: I've only played one game with Anorway, and Anorway and I were the scum team. (Newbie 1353, in my wiki if you'd like a peek.)

Lets not talk about how awesome and simultaneously fail I was in that game.

[Majiffy]

Hey Majiffy, any particular reason for voting PhDScar?

Cuz he has a scum role PM. Vote him with me.

[Majiffy]

Did you think we were out of RVS?

I do. I've been out of RVS since I placed my vote.

Sakura may be town.

[Majiffy]

PhD have you played a lot of mafia elsewhere? I don't remember if I asked or if you got a response, and I'm far too lazy to check.

[Majiffy]

No I have never played this game before on this site or others. I know a bit about this game because my friend who has played a lot has been giving me tips. Are you asking because I'm so bad it's obvious or I seem a bit experienced?

Saw something that might have been a town tell. But you're not experienced, so I can carry on with voting you.

OK, someone clear things up for me. What "answers" are we trying to get out of PHDScar by putting him at L-2?

Because it really just seemed that Majiffy voted PHDScar for no discernible reason.

Vote: Majiffy

We're not trying to get answers, we're trying to lynch scum.

Your vote is weak.

Did you think we were out of RVS?

I do. I've been out of RVS since I placed my vote.

Sakura may be town.

So why are you

really

voting PhD?

Number of early-game scumtells and a really piss-poor reaction to someone's vote. Possibly mine, maybe one of the others on the wagon, can't remember.

His posts since my last post have also been heinously bad.

PhD also isn't showing any fear toward Majiffy or myself.

Chortle.

[Majiffy]

Hey Majiffy, any particular reason for voting PhDScar?

Cuz he has a scum role PM. Vote him with me.

... What the hell kind of logic is that?! First of all I don't have a PM saying I'm playing scum. Secondly if I did how the fuck would you know? You can't see my Pm's.

Here's that really bad reaction. Also it clearly shows he's afraid I'm going to come at him with a legitimate case.

Hint: his fear is well-placed. I'll put together a comprehensive step-by-step "why we should be lynching PhD" case either tomorrow night or the weekend.

[Majiffy]

Looks very caught-scum to me.

And ok. Give me till tomorrow night or something. I have to study chip stack values...

[Majiffy]

I'm actually really excited to read what Majiffy has to say.

Tonight... you.

You know what? I've haven't played a lot of forum mafia, but I've played enough on other sites to know one thing.

The person that is the scummiest D1 is never mafia. Have you all realized that?

No. Because I've led lynches on scum d1 plenty of times.

EST.

Back in a few hours.

[Majiffy]

Hello.

Wow a lot of votes without anyone actually doing anything that's... unfair. I guess I'll do the same.

I'm not voting for Does Bo Know because I love Scrubs and not Majiffy because he made me laugh.

I do agree with Patzer so I too shall vote for TMTOLBTWNTOF for having one of the stupidest usernames I have ever seen in all my years of using the internet.

VOTE: TMTOLBTWBTOF

Bolded:

What?

Underlined: Buddying.
Italicized: Trying to add credence to an RVS vote.

Are you trying to defend your name? Not working I hate Mel Gibson.

Subtle push on the wagon while still playing it off as RVS/joke.

Not really it's just that I was the only who hadn't voted so I went with any reason I could think of to cast a vote.

Not a town mindset. Why so worried about fitting in?

More buddying in 31, 32. Not worth quoting.

----

That covers my original vote. The following are poor reactions since my vote that have reinforced my believe that PhD is scum.

----

48 is a possible testing-of-the-waters to find out what he could feasibly get away with pushing.
49 and 50 bear no mention of my very serious vote on PhD.
66 (as I've brought up) is a caught-scum reaction when presented with no case they can defend against. I draw particular attention to the last two sentences and the facepalm emoticon. This is not a town mindset.
78 appears to be trying to play off a wagon as "no big deal". Also mentions that he's 'ready to do a serious vote'... Where is it?
82 "I haven't discovered anything"... Then why were you 'ready to do a serious vote' if you had no serious target?

----

So vote PhD.
Also don't like anorway's 102/"reasons for voting Majiffy". The entire thing is just weak and possibly chainsaw'y, but I can't imagine a buddy of caught scum would blatantly chainsaw d1.

[Majiffy]

If RVS is over for you, specifically you, that means that you should have someone in mind to place a vote on. Furthermore, you've called (I think 2?) players scum, and have as of yet declined to lay a vote on either. Why?

[Majiffy]

You should probably stop doing that, PhD.

[Majiffy]

I'll explain the postgame / dead QT.

[Majiffy]

Pretty sure PhD isn't self-voting, Nacho.

You're a sharp one.
~Nacho

[Majiffy]

DBK who do you think could be scum if PhD were to flip town?

[Majiffy]

TM, you were voting me, not PhD. Why unvote?

[Majiffy]

That's L-2, so no more votes on PhD until everyone has had time to check in and give their thoughts on the matter.

[Majiffy]

Let me know when you're available.

[Majiffy]

Nnnnot reading this page till tomorrow.

[Majiffy]

UNVOTE: PhD

DBK hurry up.

[Majiffy]

VOTE: PhD

Changed my mind. PhD needs to die.

[Majiffy]

To the bolded section: That was just a bad joke. At the time I had no idea what RVS was I just new you guys were kidding around but I wasn't sure why. So I expressed my confusion as a joke.

To the underlined: I was just being friendly. I do like to be friendly to people I just meet especially since I have never played this game before. On the other hand I can from friendly to anger very easily because I have low tolerance for people. I'll come back to that.

To the italicized: A lot of people were giving joke reasons to their votes so i followed example.

...

Of course I'm worried about fitting in. I'm in a new complicated game with people i have never met before. Also this game sort of depends on people liking you no matter what side you're on.

...

Extremely weak vote.

...

As I said earlier I have a low tolerance for people. Especially stupid people or people who think they are funny but aren't. At the time I thought you were one or the other and quickly rushed out an angry "What the fuck is wrong with you" response. If I actually stopped to think about I probably would of thought it was a joke and ignored because again at that point most people thought you were RVSing. I don't even understand how using a face palm emoticon is not "town".

...

Okay this was me being all around idiotic. I actually thought this at the time. "If I say let's get serious instantly everyone will have a million reasons and ideas why everyone else is scum and this will pick up” : facepalm: . I was just getting bored and had no idea how to get the game into serious mode. So I gave that a try.

...

I think most of your argument is based on stuff i did after you voted me but you seem to think that my pre vote stuff is still a strong case. There a full proper response it's something i have been putting off due to laziness but now I've done it.

Because the above is a scum defense, not a town defense.

[Majiffy]

What do I know what you're talking about?

I think I do but I might be wrong.

[Majiffy]

Majiffy, thoughts on Sakuna?

I originally had her down as town, haven't really bothered reading her since. I'll look at her again whenever I have time.

I'm really torn with the PhD wagon. Part of me keeps seeing what I'm almost 100% confident is a surefire towntell being dropped a few times, but then the other part of me knows that I'm going to have paranoia on his slot if we don't powerlynch it today.

I need to seriously sit down at some point in time very soon and look at all the people who have wagon hopped. Pretty sure at least one, if not both, scum are on the wagon - if PhD is scum, his partner was certainly going for the bus.

I have you as a firm town read. Probably the only one of any merit.

[Majiffy]

Oy, Majiffy, as far as PhDScar goes, what does your

gut

say?

Probably town. But paranoia, man, paranoia...

I'd be willing to go for Patzer if you find yourself with a PhD town read. Seen some posts by him I didn't particularly enjoy.

Anorway

- you avoiding the game? Get in here and comment on shit.

[Majiffy]

Yeah, that was kinda meant to happen.

You intended to have links going to the wrong places?

[Majiffy]

Right underneath the page numbers; "Activity Overview"

[Majiffy]

I'd be willing to go for Patzer if you find yourself with a PhD town read. Seen some posts by him I didn't particularly enjoy.

Why do find Patzer suspicious? I too have a bad feeling about him but I doubt it's for the same reason, similar maybe but not the same.

If I decide to go with a Patzer push, I'll give you a case. Until then, I'm a lazy man.

[Majiffy]

VOTE: Patzer

C'mon DBK.

[Majiffy]

You should vote Patzer.

[Majiffy]

You. Bo already stated his lack of intent to vote for someone he's already claimed a scum read on, or at the very least has had a few posts he's found scummy.

[Majiffy]

[Majiffy]

Maybe eventually. I'm going out to the bar in like 5 minutes.

[Majiffy]

I may have to save that meme picture.

One should simply.

Majiffy, I don't like how you are trying to start a wagon on me, without even making a case against me... you haven't said why you think I am scum? Maybe you should do that.

Don't go there. I already went through this. My advice pretend he isn't there and go scum hunting. Then when he makes his case bunker down and hope it doesn't get you lynched.

Actually this is a really efficient strategy against my playstyle. Kudos.

Okay Patzer's scumhunting, he can be town.

No he's not. He's defensively trying to grab associatives out of thin air.


---


Full case on Patzer tomorrow.

[Majiffy]

Majiffy, can you please just lynch Sakura with me? She's asking why PhD thinks she's scum when PhD has been talking about why Sakura is scum the whole game.

No. PhD has a superbly weak case on Sakura, I had an early townread on Sakura, and he's not even currently voting her. There is no way I am getting on that wagon.

I'll get to the patzer case once I'm caught up in my other games.

[Majiffy]

PEdit: So what do you take of TMT's case on Sakura then, Majiffy?

Haven't seen it, but it's probably dumb too.

[Majiffy]

Spoiler: Look at all the scummy posts Patzer makes!

That's actually why I replaced into this game, so I would have an idea of some players' metas.

>Hasn't made a single meta argument yet. Why? Because he doesn't know how to fabricate one.

These posts contradict each other.
at the moment PhD looks like the most likely scum.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: PhDScar

Wagon hopping. Can't remember what L this was, but I do remember it sticking out to me.

UNVOTE:

I'm not sure, but I think PhD's at L-1, and I'd rather look back at the game before voting him and risking a lynch. The Sakura wagon looks promising, so I'll have a look at her posts.

Look at that shining opportunism.

I reread the thread from page 6.
Now PhD is looking neutral. His posts have been natural, and I could easily see him being town. slight FoS on Sakura, she has said some things that may be coming from a scum point of view, but not certain by any means. I'm not sure what to do now, I don't have any major reads and from my past experience here that is regarded as a scumtell...

Yeeep.

Seriously? Since Page 10, you've been thinking I am scum.
Let's have a look at those posts:

• Post 245- "Maybe I'll try to lynch Patzer later"
  Post 270- "I'm too lazy to give reasons why, but I will do if I try to lynch him."
  Post 292- "Let's try to lynch Patzer. DBK, come and join me on this wagon."
  Post 313- "Sakura, you should join me on this wagon. DBK isn't interested."
  Post 319- "Off to the pub; maybe eventually I'll give a reason."

What happened to those reasons promised in post 270?

Lol, here comes a pile of pre-case defensive BS.

I then noticed that Majiffy had slowly been preparing a wagon on me, while still being on the PHD wagon, then when the PHD wagon fell apart, he switched to me, while not bothered about the new Sakura wagon. So I reread the thread looking for conversation between Majiffy and Sakura. Here's all I found:
There was no conversation between Majiffy and Sakura, until the last few posts, which was just Majiffy trying to get Sakura to join the wagon. Nothing much.
Sakura has not mentioned her opinion of Majiffy.
Here is Majiffy's opinion on Sakura:
Post 83- "Sakura may be town." A bit vague ...
Nothing else for a long time while Majiffy focuses on PhD.
Post 210- Majiffy responds to Bo's request for an opinion on Sakura. Replies with a short sentence, before switching the subject back to PhD.

So I switched to another scum read after very clearly having hesitations on the player I was on - instead of jumping on a bandwagon on my town read? Is that... supposed to be scummy? Somehow?

To conclude, the lack of reaction between Majiffy and Sakura, despite them both being quite active, is startling. Plus, Sakura has been displaying scummy behaviour, as already mentioned, and Majiffy has been inconsistent with regards to his attempted wagon on me. I wouldn't be at all surprised at a Majiffy-Sakura scum team.

I won't vote just yet- I would have voted for Sakura, but it would put her at L-1 and I don't want to risk an accidental hammer.

Lol.

tl;dr - has made no effort to legitimately scumhunt. Show me one question that he posed to another player that wasn't either retaliatory/defensive in nature, or fluff. This is the PepsiMax Challenge. (Hint: there isn't one.)
Furthermore, he has opportunistic voting habits, and his "argument" for Sakura-Majiffy scum is defensive, associative-without-flip drivel.
In addition, he has claimed to have joined this game based on knowledge of other players' meta. He hasn't discussed anything regarding meta, insofar as his reads, thus far.
To conclude - he's scum. Vote him.

[Majiffy]

"Nice try"? Seriously?

You scum, bro?

[Majiffy]

Patzer has made not a single effort to legitimately determine the alignment of another player in this game. This is blatantly fucking obvious if you look at his ISO. All he does is wagon-hop on popular targets and attack them. There is no way he is town.

Maybe if I make it huge, you'll fucking get it.

[Majiffy]

He brought up Bo's meta.

On the subject of your scum win, I noticed a big similarity between this one and that one. There nobody suspected you of being scum and you were scum, here nobody has suspected you of being scum. This must mean you are scum.

Well it’s the only time he's done it and it seemed very jokey but he has done it.

That is

seriously

stretching it.

[Majiffy]

That's true. It's also stretching saying that a reason he is scum is for not putting a case on someone based on past Meta.

Not when they expressly state the reason they joined was so they could play with players they have meta on.

And I think you'll note that wasn't my

only

reason for why he's scum.

[Majiffy]

"Nice try"? Seriously?

You scum, bro?

Nope. I just don't agree with the majority of your case.

Then argue it.

[Majiffy]

It's certainly showing that he should have

some

inkling to try to meta players. I've seen no serious attempt to do so. That's like someone saying "yeah I'm a great chef" and then proceeding to mop the floors during a dinner service.

There are a number of ways to use meta. For example; "This person was town in the game I played with them. They look kind of the same. Here's a link. Here's another link. They can be town for now".

Why are you ignoring the rest of my argument for why he's scum?

[Majiffy]

Spoiler: Patzer responses

My replies in yellow.

This should be entertaining.

I was actually considering the argument that you might be town because both in that game and this one you were being highly aggressive towards townies. But then I decided against it because, firstly, your posting style here seems a bit different, although I can't pinpoint what it is. Plus you're quite experienced so your scum and town styles are going to be quite similar.

Translation: "I umm umm was like um going to ummm do that? but like umm I guess like uhhh I guess it wasn't like really a very good umm point so I didn't. But I was going to, so this point is like totally refuted!"

what? Are you suggesting that only scum jump onto wagons? Is there a reason why a town player shouldn't vote for someone they think is most likely scum, just because some else has voted for them?

There's a difference in how scum and town hop on wagons. Yours was the former.

I'm not sure what this means...?

Wagon is at L-1. Suddenly, you're unvoting at the peak momentum and considering hopping onto a counterwagon, so that when PhD flips town you can go "look I tried to stop it, oh btw this other person is scum totally not me at all no sir the person the counterwagon formed on is scum lets get them"

Again, what are you trying to say here?

PhD wagon loses momentum. Suddenly PhD is "kinda lookin town well hey what do you know", and [enter vague arguments for why I'm going to join the next wagon that might look viable here].

Initially, I was just going to argue about you promising reasons for me being scum, without giving them. If you want to try to start a wagon on someone, you explain it in the same post, not a day later. While I was looking back at tose posts, I saw your lack of votes on Sakura, so delved a bit deeper. Also see my answer below.

Protip: being busy is not a scumtell. Neither is being lazy. Nor is needing some poking and proding for productivity.

Your "delving deeper" is a really pathetically bad attempt to paint both of us as scum by way of associative tells with two unflipped players.

I don't believe you have yet said why she is your town read.

I think I have, actually. Or at the very least, have clearly stated that I had her as town; you've noted so much yourself.

So I make a fairly substantial case against you, and all you can say is "Lol"?

If by "fairly substantial", you mean "blowhard scum OMGUS", yes.

Why do you believe my arguments not legitimate, just because I made them while you were attacking me?

What makes you think my statement was limited to just your arguments regarding me? I'm talking about

everything you've done so far.

Yes, you read that right.

Everything

.

Aside from my arguments against you and Sakura that you're prepared to completely dismiss without reason, there is this.

That falls under defensive. He's talking about you.

So, just because my arguments were made while you were attacking me, you're prepared to completely ignore them, dismissing them with a "Lol".

No, I'm dismissing your arguments with a "Lol" because that's about all they're worth.

[Majiffy]

Why are you ignoring the rest of my argument for why he's scum?

Because the rest of your read is meh to me. The Meta argument is the only thing i had a strong enough reaction that made me want to respond.

That was like one of the most mediocre asides in the whole thing. What the fuck. Stop making me want to lynch the everliving shit out of you.

@Patzer When Majiffy said "Yep" I think he might be referring to a case I made about you based on that post.

No, it was a continuation of the opportunism noted in the quote before.

[Majiffy]

I prefer a Sakura lynch to a Majiffy lynch, because I think the chances of Majiffy being town and Sakura being scum are greater than the chances of Sakura being town and Majiffy being scum.

"I'm going to continue to play this game based off associative tells on two unflipped players, because that allows me to recklessly tunnel for two days on players I know are town, essentially avoiding any discussion or interaction with any other playerslots, and then just going 'dunno, lol!' on day 3"

[Majiffy]

No, ignoring the rest of the case, along with your general uselessness, anti-town behavior and shockingly low level of intelligence is a reason to lynch you.

[Majiffy]

Thankfully, for you, I'd rather lynch scum than push a policy lynch at this current juncture. Vote Patzer.

[Majiffy]

You could've written some more convincing arguments to vote Patzer than "Lol" and "Yeeep."

I agree with that post with them huge bolded letters you made about Patzer, but I'm sticking with my vote on PhD for now.

The 'yep' serves the same purpose as 'see above'.

And the lol was about things I've already covered.

If you agree with me, maybe you should place a vote on him. PhD wagon isn't a good idea for today.

[Majiffy]

other than Majiffy

Well what the fuck am I supposed to do then?

[Majiffy]

Early read in the game. If I have time later tonight I'll give a more sufficient answer, but don't hold your breath.

[Majiffy]

Sure.

I like mafia, and I like small games. So this fits the bill. I also enjoy Micros.

[Majiffy]

VOTE: Sakura

Anyone with half a brain should be able to spot the scumslip.

[Majiffy]

Majiffy: Null, now that i notice other than the wagons on PhD and you, he hasn't really said much, but he does look like he's trying to attempt to scumhunt,

even if he's been wrong in both attempts.

We haven't had a flip. How would she know if the two people I pushed on are town?

[Majiffy]

In the future, please don't bold responses inside of the quote of what you're responding to. It causes confusion, and is a formatting nightmare for people to read, respond to, or otherwise even want to bother dealing with.

[Majiffy]

Because the wagon fell on the first one, and the wagon didnt even start for the second one, a.k.a it failed, it was wrong.

Failed and wrong are two

very

different concepts.

[Majiffy]

You should never sacrifice your town play for any reason.

[Majiffy]

Sounds like a PL to me.

[Majiffy]

Either hammer or L-1, not sure which. Haven't seen a VC in a while.

[Majiffy]

Oh Nacho's the mod for this one, that's why the VCs are sporadic.

Mod doesn't have reliable access to internet at the moment, so it may be a while before we see a lock and a flip here.

[Majiffy]

Based on the slip, yes. If not... Still gunning for you. In fact, I'm still more confident that you're scum than she is. But I can't just ignore a slip like that.

[Majiffy]

That being said, if she flips scum, I'm pretty confident you and PHD are confirmed town.

[Majiffy]

Nacho inbound.

[Majiffy]

Doo doo doo. I'll probably get to doing some analysis on this later tonight.

[Majiffy]

Nope. But I'm pissed I don't get to tunnel Patzer.

[Majiffy]

Agree with the Patzer bit. TMT's I don't know definitively off the top of my head, but that's pretty easily confirmable.

I'm ok with progressing from here out with that bloc in mind.

[Majiffy]

Finally now I can sit down and digest this game.

[Majiffy]

VCA is telling me Anorway or Freezing-Hell.

ISOing them and Sakura.

[Majiffy]

Oh dear me, not even the first page and [anorway]'s already at L-2, this game's starting fast. Hi all, nice to get to know you all!

Yep.

VOTE: anorway

[Majiffy]

Like I said, it was easily confirmable. Anything more than a cursory glance at the VCs confirms that.

Freezing is definitely less likely to be scum than Anorway.

[Majiffy]

Oh dear me, not even the first page and [anorway]'s already at L-2, this game's starting fast. Hi all, nice to get to know you all!

Yep.

VOTE: anorway

I don't see how this makes

me

scum?

Associative. Wagon on teammate early in the game, "Wow this game is going fast! I'm not going to make a comment of any value on anything besides that!"

[Majiffy]

Oh dear me, not even the first page and [anorway]'s already at L-2, this game's starting fast. Hi all, nice to get to know you all!

Yep.

VOTE: anorway

I don't see how this makes

me

scum?

Associative. Wagon on teammate early in the game, "Wow this game is going fast! I'm not going to make a comment of any value on anything besides that!"

That's a pretty weak tell though. And it's not like there was a lot of value from other people during the RVS anyway.

Sorry, but it's not.

[Majiffy]

Rofl come on AA this game isn't even that long.

[Majiffy]

Possibly. But it wasn't DBK, now was it?

[Majiffy]

AA9 doesn't respond often to pressure, DBK.

You still on board with Anorway lynch when/if she responds?
Also, what say you of the associative I found?

[Majiffy]

I agree wholeheartedly in regards to the stalling.

[Majiffy]

This game is killing me.

[Majiffy]

Oh god why can't Patzer just be scum so things are right in the world.

[Majiffy]

I have an idea why scum would, but that'll be post-game discussion. Remind me then.

[Majiffy]

Probably more likely town.

[Majiffy]

I tried my best to give a votecount but am drunk am cannot figure out my phone. will prod abd vote,ount in thwpr nj ong. Proud and votecount in the morning.

Saving this for posterity, lol.

[Majiffy]

Wait what. Patzer obvious scum or what??
From phone.

I really want it to be true but it's damn near certified not to be.

[Majiffy]

Good attempt.

[Majiffy]

Stay proud, Nacho.

[Majiffy]

This fucking game.

[Majiffy]

You're pretty much conf. town btw so if you could read up and post some reads that'd be fantastic.

[Majiffy]

Lol

[Majiffy]

kk

[Majiffy]

Reasons? Because I'm leaning towards FH, tbh.

[Majiffy]

Also, Majiffy you are town.

No shit.

Also in reference to the post just above this; one scum down, scum would have to be insane to quickhammer.

[Majiffy]

Also, Majiffy you are town.

No shit.

Also in reference to the post just above this; one scum down, scum would have to be insane to quickhammer.

So FH and DDMC are conf town in your eyes?

Not FH. DDMC is town by way of Sakura's slip.

[Majiffy]

I also really don't like 628 but I can't put my finger on why.

[Majiffy]

TLASHASDHOEWOQHWE

That's an interesting sentiment. Please, continue.

[Majiffy]

Wow you're even worse than Nacho when you drunkpost.

[Majiffy]

Yeah just went through her ISO, I'll bite.

VOTE: AA9

[Majiffy]

Haven't bothered reading her.

[Majiffy]

By saying that scum would have to be insane to quickhammer, you're saying that scum has the ability to quickhammer, meaning scum is not in the wagon.

I was talking in general terms. Stop reaching.

[Majiffy]

AA9 is usually a stronger player than she's been in this game. I think it's probably a better avenue to go down.

[Majiffy]

VOTE: Majiffy

if you're town, you would know that i am not the scum,there fore you're ...thanks for making it easier Majiffy
now lynch the scum with me folks..

Great argument. A+.

Majiffy may actually be the scum. I need to think.

Dumb doesn't look good on you.

[Majiffy]

Prod dodge. Why haven't we lynched AA9 yet?

[Majiffy]

Scum isn't that dumb. And his reasons for a town read on AA9

are

.

So I reiterate. Why aren't we lynching AA9?

[Majiffy]

Angel you're online, lets talk, yeah?

[Majiffy]

[Majiffy]

God that movie was so good...

[Majiffy]

Doesn't matter now, I think that was the hammer.

[Majiffy]

VOTE: TMT

Easy enough.

[Majiffy]

VT.

Wasn't/Isn't necessary for me to claim to know who to vote for, Sakura confirmed your slot town when she slipped.

[Majiffy]

Fake guiltly obv.

[Majiffy]

More TMT lynch. I'll explain more when I'm sober if you really need it.

[Majiffy]

Uh ok but I'm still town and you're still confirmed town and TMT is still scum.

[Majiffy]

Also TMT is lying and you should be voting him, apparently. To be honest, I haven't been reading shit for a while.

[Majiffy]

IDFK I'm a VT. Jesus.

[Majiffy]

Either way my self-hammer was mostly because everyone was town reading him and as I was inexperienced as scum I didn't want to ruin it for him

Majiffy, you silly, you should have claimed a PR, that would've been safer than VT

Self-hammer was perfect and exactly what you should have done in that situation.

I thought Mutt was going to claim a PR when he asked me for my claim.

Either way I was pretty boned coming into this day phase.

Majiffy, why did you kill me? I thought it was clear my stubborn town bloc setup would've brought you to victory.

Couldn't chance you getting paranoid. You were my biggest threat in the game.

Majiffy,

Mafia Goon

, lynched Day 4!

Hold on a sec. Calling Jake over here.

Ha ha. Jiffy got lynched as scum. Way to go town.

T.T

[Majiffy]

Dead QT was a fun read.

[Majiffy]

If you can keep your activity to about 75% of mine in any given game, that's a good rate.

[Majiffy]

Either way I was pretty boned coming into this day phase.

you had a 50% chance with a cop guilty
but you claimed VT

Not if Mutley was any kind of power role at all.

[Majiffy]

Yes and that worst that could happen was statistically highly likely.

[Majiffy]

wut

[Majiffy]

wut

[Majiffy]

Freezing, what did you actually mean with that doc-situation?

^

This is why I killed Freezing, I thought he slipped as tracker.