Mini 1451: A Memory of Light (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
FINALLY~~!
I've wanted to play a WoT game since reading through all of Kinetic's before I'd even posted on the site.
/confirm- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Milkshake, please clarify your stance on the whole Matt situation. Your iso is pretty unclear.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Why did you want to ask Nero Cain in particular...?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Nero Cain had already clarified his standing re: MattP AFAICT.In post 133, Selkies wrote:
This is dumb as hell considering it was, y'know, nero cain that had his vote sitting on a townread.In post 92, Iecerint wrote:Why did you want to ask Nero Cain in particular...?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I'm bothered by a lot of milkshake's playchoices (e.g., the stuff with Nero -- didn't seem like a natural/organic interaction to me from milk's side). Milk's explanation that he was exploring people's take on the MattP situation doesn't make sense to me because Nero is someone who had already been pretty clear. Milkscum trying to push a wagon from the sidelines accounts for this kind of stuff.
But I'm not sure enough to end the day, really, especially when some players have basically only posted to replace out. And I don't really want to prematurely invest too much energy into milk's wagon when I think milk is fairly scummy, anyway.
That said, I think Sword looks more questionable than Ghostlin, partly because I liked some of Ghostlin's post-milkwagon posts.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think his vote was decent at the time that he made it, as it wasn't really until your posts after that that I changed my mind about you. I can also buy his "L-1 takes guts" reasoning on discounting SoO relative to you. So that particular vote doesn't really push me in either reason; at most, it's less telling than other stuff.
Like, I remember starting reading your long-post after that one with a "HMMMMMMMMMMM this looks like an awkwardly-disproportionate response..." kind of mentality going in, and I didn't change my mind until I came back a second time and read it more carefully, so Ghostlin suspicion at that time per se feels pretty nullish at worst to me.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I like Amrun's posts coming into the game; it's pretty rare that someone can pick up on things that are pretty different from what I've noticed without my finding it weird and awkward. I can see part of where someone could find Ghostlin scummy (cf., earlier posts), but I'm leaning town there. Selkies wasn't really on my radar much one way or the other. Looking over it in iso, stuff like 231 is pretty town, though. I'm not crazy about either of these options.
I'm liking either milkshake or SoO at this point for scum at this point.
Vote: SoO- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
This is the sum total of everything you have written about me in this thread:
I don't see anything to respond to.
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Different people use their vote different ways. In your case, you spent the first part of the game rapidly voting different players. I figured there was a method to whatever you were doing.
I don't think it's productive to call attention to stuff that I don't think is alignment indicative, unless I think it's already serving as an inappropriate distraction.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
BTW, I would appreciate it if you'd use an avatar. It will help me to keep track of your posts.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I am intrigued by SoO's promises of catch-ups and regular contributions.
Please do not forget to happen.
/drunkpost- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think you have gotten some pronouns from my 176 mixed-up. My 176 is aboutIn [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4970884#p4970884]post 381[/url], sword_of_omens wrote:@Iecerint - Why is your vote on me, especially after your #173? I want to know why I am suspect, considering you came back stated (#176) that my L-1 vote didn’t mean anything to you either way.milk's vote for Ghostlin; it's only about you insomuch as your vote was relevant to milk's decision to vote Ghostlin [brackets added for pronoun clarity]:In post 174, Ghostlin wrote:
While we're at it, what do you think of Milk's current vote, Ice?In post 173, Iecerint wrote:I'm bothered by a lot of milkshake's playchoices (e.g., the stuff with Nero -- didn't seem like a natural/organic interaction to me from milk's side). Milk's explanation that he was exploring people's take on the MattP situation doesn't make sense to me because Nero is someone who had already been pretty clear. Milkscum trying to push a wagon from the sidelines accounts for this kind of stuff..
The reason I am voting you is that I was sympathetic-but-not-sold on milkwagon, I thought your votepost was probably most questionable-y given milkTown, and I wanted you to post more.In post 176, Iecerint wrote:I think his vote [i.e., Milk's vote for Ghostlin, not SoO's vote for Milk] was decent at the time that he [milk] made it, as it wasn't really until your [Ghostlin's] posts after that that I changed my mind about you [Ghostlin]. I can also buy his [milk's] "L-1 takes guts" reasoning on discounting SoO relative to you [Ghostlin]. So that particular vote [milk's vote for Ghostlin] doesn't really push me in either reason; at most, it's less telling than other stuff [i.e., the early stuff with Nero]- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
SoO, any reason you didn't lay down a vote last time?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
SoO, it looks like you were bothered by Ghostlin's indicating that you didn't vote in your post, but it didn't bother you when I basically asked you the same question (albeit in a much less inflammatory fashion)?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Reposting this for SoO.In post 511, Iecerint wrote:SoO, it looks like you were bothered by Ghostlin's indicating that you didn't vote in your post, but it didn't bother you when I basically asked you the same question (albeit in a much less inflammatory fashion)?
I am doing my best to stay reasonable up on things during the meet, but anyone who has outstanding stuff for me should probably repost. My computer is hidden away in my secret sleeping area that I never venture into.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I do not follow. How are these things at all similar...?In post 604, Ms Marangal wrote:it does, but Fake Claiming PGO as a Macho Inno. Child is Just as Odd.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Unvote; Vote: milkshake
This should put him back at L-1. Neither Marangal nor milkshake really have great claims, but claims like milkshakes should be lynched rather than go around and pull more claims.
ThAd would not be a terrible lynch as his softclaim has already been pulled, BUT a) I think that milkshake's lynch will be more informative and b) ThAd may have a method for his behavior if he is town.
I can understand frustration at my level of activity. Balto ends Wednesday, so it should change by D2 or so.
I will mention the deadline to MattP and Amrun.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
So, that was a complete accident. I had thought that SoO had been voting milkshake and had just unvoted her in #774, but he had been voting MsMarangal. I was in a little bit of a rush because Amrun was making crab soup things downstairs at Balto and people had told me like 3 times that I needed to get downstairs before I missed it, but I knew that deadline was super-soon.
I think milkshake was the proper lynch on the basis of the claims, anyway, though. The outrage at a hammer with like 5 hours to deadline was a little hyperbolic.
As far as stuff today goes:In post 815, sword_of_omens wrote:What i want to know is why [ThAd] felt the need to share that part of it considering there were 2 kills last night?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think SoO, Selkies, and Demon are probably town. I don't have as much of a read on players I didn't directly interact with much yesterday because my Balto activity was pretty limited to ctrl+f iec-ing every other day or so.In post 822, Amrun wrote:Iece, what are your reads? Your actual reads?
I remember Ghostlin getting scrutiny for reasons that didn't make much sense to me, so that's probably what I'll look over when I get a moment. IIRC one of the main drivers of that was milkshake, though, sooooo ye know.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I don't think you were even in the game yet during the scrutiny I'm remembering....
I actually initially had you as a 4th town in SoO/Selk/Demon, but then I reconsidered before posting it. I did kind of get townvibes from you during Balto, but I've also learned to be kind of more wary of those townvibes.
I am much more comfortable with my town reads than any scum reads this game so far. I will need to reread D1 to convert my "X event was weird" memories into reads post-flip.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
(We obviously did not discuss the game during Balto, other than that I told her and Matt about deadline after my hammervote, and Amrun showed me the milkflip on her phone at karaoke.)- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I don't have scummy players in my head; I have scummy/suspicious events.In post 828, Amrun wrote:Who are you leaning scum on pre-reread, Iecerint?
If I had players in my head pre-reread, I would have already told you about them.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
At the time I judged them as highly relational-but-informative events. Depending on how everyone involved in X flipped, everyone else can be evaluated more clearly in hindsight.
An example is the Ghostlin stuff. I didn't understand the various players' strong opinions about Ghostlin. This can mean different things depending upon the alignment of Ghostlin and the various players, or it could mean that I had missed a post somewhere or whatever that would have made it clear. Another is that I remember not really grasping the impetus behind the Marangal/ThAd wagons; I remember stuff about them, but it was all after the wagons had already got going.
I don't have a strong memory of the role of every player in every event because I only had like 10 minutes with the game every few days, hence the need for a reread.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think he claimed/crumbed something involving the dream stuff.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I guess I would say null-leaning-town.In post 825, Iecerint wrote:I actually initially had [Amrun] as a 4th town in SoO/Selk/Demon, but then I reconsidered before posting it. I did kind of get townvibes from you during Balto, but I've also learned to be kind of more wary of those townvibes.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Lanfear spends most of AMOL in the dreamworld, but her allegiance is pretty ambiguous for most of the book. Moghedien can also enter the dream world. Probably Hessalam, too.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
OK, I've reread through page 18.
Right now I am probably most suspicious of Nero, GCBC, and maybe ThAd. I think Nero is scummy for his sidelines-y approach to most of the wagons he's pushed this game. Town can sometimes do this via consensus-seeking play among town-reads, but I don't get the sense that Nero Cain has uniformly done this with players he thinks are town. I think GCBC is scummy for a) disconnect between his voting/rhetoric/plain scum reads (e.g., voting SoO, then going into detail about AmrunScum) b) connections to Nero Cain (e.g., distancing from Nero Cain in 131 before voting SoO despite having previous suspicion of Nero Cain; Nero awkwardly calls out GCBC lurking). ThAd hasn't really done much so far, but what he's done has been background milkwagon cheerleading.
I'll read the rest tomorrow. If someone can explain the Ghostlin/Beli interaction on page 13, that would be helpful.
Spoiler:- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I was at a family reunion before Balto during which I was V/LA, so my disrupted period is longer than just Balto. I am reading again from the beginning of the game.
SoO is his town self, which I'm basing mostly off of a FFVI game I played with him some time ago. It took me awhile to be sure about this because I thought there were some discrepancies in how he treated other players that could indicate irrationality, but it was all dealt with D1.
Nero stuck out from the wagon given the flips so far, and your calling him out at length in the next post and subsequently voting SoO solidified the sketchiness feelings.
My spoilered comments are intended mostly as notes to me to remind me of things that seem odd to me. They are not intended to be a rhetorical document, though they might help people to understand where I'm coming from. If you think I missed context somewhere or want clarification or whatever, please clarify/specify.
What is your read on Nero?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
The foxhead medallion passively renders the user immune to direct effects of the One Power in flavor. Mat is indeed the fellow who has it during AMOL, though some other heroes get to use it, or else there ended up being 2 (can't recall). I can't think of any villains using it.
The commuter element doesn't make much sense to me, unless the commuting and awareness-of-being-targeted are separate effects (e.g., Mat has the accumulated knowledge of great generals of the past in his mind, so he's a great strategist).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Last half of reread is being put off a bit due to [redacted]; apologies.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
OK, so the rest of D1 was pretty familiar to me, and I didn't notice much that stood out to me except that Nero Cain linked milkscum -> GCBCscum in the early 20s on grounds that didn't make much sense to me somewhere in the early 20s.
Flavor brainstorm: Is there someone in the flavor who can force people to enter the dreamworld in the flesh? I think this is the only way the body would disappear ala the D2 opening flavor, but I don't remember people being pulled into the dreamworld in the flesh as a "thing." Perrin, Luc, and Gaul do it voluntarily, but that's it.
The Nero Cain-Amrun interaction totally totally throws my Nero read on its head, specifically in Amrun's 884 BUT this is messed up by Nero's response in 886, which means the dynamic was different from what I thought it was. 884/886 obviate my Amrun concerns related to this interaction.
Mara looks town to me from the circumstances of her claim today. Mara, does your PM make explicit reference to the "dangers" of the dreamworld ala Beli's claim?
SoO makes good points on Beli re: doubting fakeclaims and simultaneously doubting a Mat claim (963), especially since Beli seems to know the flavor pretty well. Beli's vig crumb claim on Demon also looks solid.
Waiting for Mara's answer before continuing....- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Are you saying that you have been thinking leads-as-scum this entire game, or is that a possibility that just occurred to you?In post 1005, Belisarius wrote:Wait a minute, why are we assuming that if ThAd's flavour name actually is Mat, that makes him town? What's to stop the scum from having names that are aligned with the Light in the source material? The wiki specifically cautions against this.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I understand that -- I am asking when that particular possibility dawned on you.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
HMMMMMMMMM
VOTE: Amrun
This is mainly sheeping Nero, but it's also coming off of Amrun's "I think I might know why he thinks this" post, too. I think this is consistent with Amrun perceiving that the night game may have implicated her as scum and crumbing for an alternate-history story.
This is frustrating for me because I have Nero as gutscum outside of the Nero->Amrun thing that's happened today BUT what'd'ya do...- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Yes, this also crossed my mind. But, I don't think this weirdness from him makes you town, and given maybe-investigative crumbs from Nero, I don't think lynching him first makes sense, so.In post 1020, Amrun wrote:I was ALARMED by this because he concluded SK. In my mind, seeing someone visit someone dead and concluding SK was like WUT. I was really confused, because my gut reaction was to say only scum would do this, but I wasn't sure my gut reaction made sense, especially since it wasn't confirmed that's why he thought it.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Yes, my point was that I would've thought that you were different-scum if he flipped investiscum.
By maybe-investigative crumbs, I'm just referring to his dayplay today that we both noticed.
The fact that you have half-claimed investigative does make things more complex.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Above I'm lumping SK into different-scum.
My guess from flavor would be Forsaken/Dark One are one scum team, and Mordeth/Padan Fain/Ordeith/Shaisam/whatevernamehewantstouse as a 3rd party.
Pedit: Just read Nero's D2 posts.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Regarding the Ghostlin kill flavor, I think the body totally disappearing like that AND Tel'aran'rhiod being implicated implies that someone was killed by being forced to enter the dreamworld in the flesh involuntarily. This would mean that instead of just dreaming in the dreamworld, you physically enter the dreamworld with your body.
But I can't really think of any people who do this in the flavor. The only people who enter the dreamworld in the flesh in the flavor at all are Perrin, Gaul, and Luc/Isam/Slayer/whichevername, and they all do it voluntarily, and the only scumrole in that set is Slayer (non-channeller allied with the Shadow who serves as Perrin's personal antagonist), and I don't think Slayer has the ability to force others to enter the dream in the flesh.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Well, presuming Nerotracker, scum can use it to either find the SK or to find PRs/get nightgame info.In post 1028, Amrun wrote:Yeah, but there's no point of investiscum if it's not two scum teams.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Which stands to reason...
Mara, did either of the other players in the QT indicate that they had entered the dreamworld unexpectedly?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
You went after Amrun hard at the start of D2 despite taking a very different approach D1. You implied that you thought that she was the SK per se in multiple posts.In post 1034, Nero Cain wrote:What the fuck is this shit about me crumbing. Not an investigation role.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
My 900 is just my reread from the first half of the game. 995 is where I finish the rest of it.
But initially in 995 I did kind of write off the Amrun stuff when Nero didn't push when she crumbed "knowing" why he thought she was scum. At the time, I thought Nero not responding meant I had made things up in my head about the whole thing. IIRC Amrun also says something about "have you been reading carefully" in that post, implying that whatever she was thinking of wasn't night-game-related. But then I reconsidered when I came back to think about it and decided that that level of salience from Amrun was kind of weird, and then I decided that it was a scummy kind of weird.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Are you referring to her softclaim about "knowing why Nero thinks that," or to her "some kind of cop" claim?In post 1050, Selkies wrote:After this morning's discussion, we've changed our mind about Amrun. The possibility of L-3 still seems a weak reason to trot out a fake claim. Town players claim early in order to shed light on the game. Scum claiming at L-4 just doesn't make sense to me. Especially experienced scum.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
To me, given what Mara has said about the night-talk situation and what various players have said about the dangers of the dreamworld, the fact that the other dreamwalker hasn't yet gone into a 1/1 with Mara (i.e., and has instead remained anonymous) suggests that Mara is probably town.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think "claim 3 when there were only 2 so that the lack of CC confirms me as a result" is on the more complex side of things I have seen scum make up about a game, especially early on when there are lots of players and lots of opportunities for it to catch them by endgame. It's not impossible, but it's far on the unlikely side.In post 1073, Amrun wrote:
What gives you the impression that there are only two, it not just one, or that Mara isn't lying about the whole thing and there are none?In post 1070, Iecerint wrote:To me, given what Mara has said about the night-talk situation and what various players have said about the dangers of the dreamworld, the fact that the other dreamwalker hasn't yet gone into a 1/1 with Mara (i.e., and has instead remained anonymous) suggests that Mara is probably town.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
It's about theIn post 1077, Amrun wrote:I know what he's talking about. I just don't know why he's saying, "If Marangal is telling the truth about her role, it suggests she's town." A derp. If you're telling the truth you're town... What a revelation!kindof claim she made.
MaraScum could have left dreamwalking out of her claim, or she could have simply claimed to have dreamwalked with Ghostlin, and either of those claims would have been fine. Adding to the claim a 3rd dreamwalker, who is really only implicated in Ghostlin's death by inferences from the dreamwalk PM flavor, just opens MaraScum up to be CC'd by town who refuse to have dreamwalked (presuming that 2 scum weren't simultaneously in the dreamworld -- but that in case MaraScum is setting up her ally, and the 3rd person is still scum).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
V/LA through next Thursday due to yet-another trip. I should be able to post at night.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Demon and ThAd would be OK lynches. ThAd was pretty scummy re: single-mindedness on the milkshake stuff D1. The main thing he's got going for him from my POV is that Mat is a pretty popular character in the fandom, so, to the extent that that modulates anything, I think it makes Mat more likely to be town. But we've already seen tertiary characters like Birgitte and Siuan Sanche flip, so my sense of what would "normally" be expected is probably not correct. It also weirds me out that GCBC wants to lynch ThAd, but then made that post about Demon a moment ago. So that stuff makes me more comfortable with lynching ThAd of these 3.
Unvote; Vote: ThAdmiral
Demon I thought was town D1 but his play D2 has kinda shaken my faith. I also really don't like the his vig claim + softclaim. Preferable to NL, but not to ThAd.
MsM I think really shouldn't be lynched.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Mara, can you spell out the Demon stuff for me?
I actually thought he was pretty town D1, but it seems like you've read him as scum all game.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
The thing is, I think he was actually kind of aggressive at times D1, albeit never in a way that was very convincing to others (e.g., voting players rapidly, following-up on his votes at times).In post 1137, Ms Marangal wrote:He was only on the defensive
But I do think it's changed today; now his behavior is reactionary.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
The pattern of claims so far (GCBC null result on Selkies; MM protects deadAmrun) + likely mylo make me think a massclaim is what needs to happen.
I also like Demon going first. I'll take Selkies' advice.
VOTE: Demon- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Meh, fine. But Demon had better have a good reason.
I am Moiraine Damodred, Town Channeler 1-shot Motivator
My motivator ability is called Aes Sedai Wisdom. It is a day action. The target is told that they will get a second action during the following night. Flavor says that I lost most ability with the OP during my capture, but others finally listen to me. The motivator 1-shot is NOT One Power, which I had forgotten about until re-checking my PM. My channeler ability says that stuff is OP unless they contradict it (but it doesn't apply to anything).
I targeted Amrun N2 during the first 24 hours of N2 "night" after ThAd flipped. I thought it would be fine because the Doctor would die first. N1 I had thought about targeting Selkies, but I had forgotten that it was a day action at that time, and I missed the 24 hour "twilight" window during Balto.
The fact that I am Moiraine is part of why I disbelieved milkshake's Siuan claim. The characters serve a similar function in the books, except that Siuan is tertiary or quarternary and Moiraine is secondary. I thought it was slightly goofy that they would both be included. I mention the claim (non-specifically) as part of the basis of my vote in both my vote post and in my first post of D2.
I think just Nero and Demon remain. Or if Beli still needs to full-claim, I guess.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think Elayne makes an a'dam and uses it on Moghedien when they capture her early on in the series, maybe? I know for sure that she spends a long time studying one that they get from the Seanchan.In post 1350, Ms Marangal wrote:I know how the inventor role works, but I still don't see it's connection with a'Dam- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
One point is that a'dams are gender-specific. There are some a'dams that only work on females, and some that can only work on males, and be used by males/females.In post 1373, Selkies wrote:So, go crazy with the flavor and tell me if an a'Dan redirect could change the target of rand al'thor's role block.
So if your a'dam only worked on female channelers, it could be that it would not work on Rand, since he does not use the female half of the OP.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Demon needs to finish his flavor claiming ASAP.
Flavor elaboration: an a'dam is a collar that is worn around a channeler's neck that's connected to a bracelet. It gives the bracelet-user total control over the necklace-wearer. They're used to chain/enslave female channelers in Seanchan. - Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint