Mini 1451: A Memory of Light (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I exist. Let me catch up. Fair warning I am entirely canon ignorant.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Posts that jumped out at me and why.
In post 31, Demon wrote:Selkies elaborate. Also I really want to keep my vote on Matt right now but youir 30 is making it hard for me.
This exchange makes me suspicious of Selkies. Selkies is trying to shut down discussion for no valid reason. Plus, like Demon, I am immediately suspicious of them promising a "lynch list" and then not delivering or mentioning it again.
Later on, in reading, Selkies does elaborate a bit on why they didn't like the theory post, but it doesn't put me off from my original gut reaction. His stance, while more clearly stated, still makes little sense.
This is a bad try at RVS when there's already plenty of content to discuss. Later on, Nero emphasises this by saying he actually has a town read on Selkie, but offers no more content because "it's RVS." This strikes me as odd, especially for Nero who tends to be an aggressive player.In post 34, Nero Cain wrote:
LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.
vote: selkies
This is a useless post in the same way that Nero's was useless; it doesn't even attempt to move the game along. I am not familiar with this player, though, so I can't draw any conclusions from this post alone.
This post pinged my scumdar hard. Demon is right on the money that Selkies is saying a lot without having any firm opinions, and this post (while it gets points for being unapologetic about it) only makes matters worse.In post 54, Selkies wrote:
Stance on what?In post 53, Demon wrote:Can you take a fucking stance wow, is your vote on Matt right now random or because what?
You and Matt are my scummiest reads (as I have been stating basically this whole game so far).
Matt is null but I think I can figure him out.
Why are we a scumread again
Matt is null, but I'm voting him while criticizing others for not voting scum reads, "but I think we can figure him out."
Tell me, HOW is making a vote and then declaring that you only read him as null going to help you "figure him out?" You haven't engaged Matt in any way. You are NOT trying to figure him out.
And early image consciousness.
Yup, definitely liking Selkie for scum at this point.
This is a HUGELY waffling post. "I tend to treat such tactics as townISH, but quick, give me an excuse not to!"In post 74, Ghostlin wrote:
I tend to treat such tactics as townish, since attention whoring reaction tests, while can be done by scum, don't usually get done because they attract attention and require an amount of...sticking your neck out and misinterpretation.In post 73, Nero Cain wrote:eh, Matt's vt claim is prob some sort of gambit as he supposedly does them as either alignment.
That said, could you link me to some scum meta where he's pulled off this gambit?
In post 105, Nero Cain wrote:In post 96, Selkies wrote:As far as scum go, I'm not liking Nero Cain too much for town. And milkshake's entrance was a little unsettling as well.
This Milkshake wagon is going a bit fast and its making me worry...
I actually really like this response by Selkies. It's exactly what I would have asked.In post 106, Selkies wrote:(while fery murders bolivian children...)
Nero, if Milkshake flips town, who's scum?
Nero's original question pings my gut as scum with the combination of arrogance and distancing himself from a wagon he's on (which scum tend to do when they're on town wagons). That being said, arrogance can also be town indigence, and town are more likely to take a post by an opponent that names themselves and someone else as scum and poo-poo the other person's leading wagon.
Which brings me to the wagon itself.
I don't agree with the majority, it seems. Milkshake strikes me as town, and I absolutely followed her reasoning. She 'sa little hesitant and awkward but I think that's just posting style.
She was picking up on some things from Nero that I also picked up on (hesitance to commit to an opinion) and while she seemed to view this less negatively than me, she was harrying Nero to commit just the same, which is what I would have done in her shoes.
And how Nero only voted milkshake after Matt struck me as a bit disingenuous, though I'm still on the fence about him.
If milk is town, then Ghostlin is a good bet for scum. Notice the casual cognitive dissonance in this post. Milk is "unlikely" to flip town, but SOO's "follow the leader" vote is suspect? Treating her as town while calling her scum.In post 118, Ghostlin wrote:
The odds of one scum being on that wagon are good. Probably Milk's buddies if she's scum are treating her like a toxic asset hoping for a later deflection off the wagon, and if she does unlikely flip town...well, then at least one or two scum are making that push. SOO's vote seems to be a follow the leader vote--I've got my eyes on him and Nic next for scum.In post 105, Nero Cain wrote:This Milkshake wagon is going a bit fast and its making me worry...
I like this post by Nero, conflicting me further.In post 137, Nero Cain wrote:In post 133, Selkies wrote:I dont' understand this, and I would have asked the same question. It's not protown to sit on your ass like you were, leaving your vote on a person you think is *town*. It seems a legitimate question, and I don't see why it's scummy at all. It didn't seem to me like milk was trying to bait you into voting Matt, rather it was an honest question as to why your posts seemed contradictory
So I should have just switched my vote over and over like you did? Why are you so upset over a RVS vote? This also looks like mad backtracking here. In 97 you guys did vote for Milk, so if you thought it was a legit question and not scummy at why, what were you guys doing voting Milk?
As per 115, you joined this Milkshake wagon to "get information" which I don't exactly buy. This also makes 115 look like a lie since you claimed that I was NOT your #1 suspect and yet you are now claiming that what Milk did in 75, 79 and 81 was not scummy. So you're basing your entire Milkshake scum read on 72? Ok but if you actually believed that Milk was scum why then do you not think that 75, 79, 81 were not from a scum perspective?
But then on page 6
So to the other head does think 75, 79 and 81 were scummy....In post 125, Selkies wrote:milkshake's page 4 posts ping pretty hard.
Hydra dis is more annoying than scummy but could deff be used as a scum tactic.
The was no contradiction in my post. I have no reason to consider a Matt P lynch (other than utility) today and me claiming that I might consider him a viable lynch candidate down the road has nothing to do with today.
Actually, he said Selkies was a townread and then continued to keep his RVS vote on them for a while. So he did. Just correcting.In post 144, Belisarius wrote:
Even on D1? Whyever not?In post 128, Ghostlin wrote: My gut right now says town, but I don't listen to it.
These were addressed while I was reading through but after I popped them into notepad, but I'll leave 'em in for emphasis.
Looks neutral to me, and I play scum a lot. How is that scum-thinking?In post 131, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Also see a scum-mentality from 87.
Nero went from an RVS read to a stated scum read. I don't see him voting a town read ever.In post 133, Selkies wrote:This is dumb as hell considering it was, y'know, nero cain that had his vote sitting on a townread.
I like this larger post by milkshake a lot, and it goes a long way to demonstrate why I think milkshake is being genuine and therefore town. Ghostlin is milkshake's top suspect at a time when milkshake is leading in votes, and yet he says, "I find [Ghostlin's last post] somewhat good." I follow his reasoning 100% on the post in question as well.In post 160, milkshake wrote: I don't mind Ghostlin's last post. I find it somewhat good. I still think Ghostlin is scum. I think it is quite telling that all he/she summons all of his/her resources NOW, when someone has voted him/her. Also, although the post contained good logic on points unrelated to Ghostlin's alignment, the parts pertaining to my points about alignment were not good arguments.
From this perspective, literally every discussion with two viewpoints is a schoolyard argument. This point from Ghostlin, intended to refute my reasons for thinking that he is scum, is vaporous.
I can vouch that the behavior in question is normal for Nero Cain.In post 164, Nero Cain wrote:opps, forgot this.
NO!!! I'm too lazy to go through my games and quote all the times that I've said "these players are buddies, etc. Its tedious and uneeded so you can either trust me or go look at my past games. Also, I've played with several of the players in this game, most notably Iece, Thad and Matt, I think they'll vouch that I don't shy away from suspecting multiple people at the same time.In post 150, Ghostlin wrote:
Can I have a tiny chunk of your meta as town doing that?In post 147, Nero Cain wrote:
Yes. I don't think there's any reason to not speculate.In post 143, Ghostlin wrote:Also, Nero, do you often try to find buddies this early like you did in #120?- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
My top two scumreads are Ghostlin and Selkies. NC I am conflicted about.
However, even though there is more evidence against Selkies (and also some that conflicts it), my gut sings more strongly for Ghostlin.
Vote: Ghostlin- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I interpreted that as a town read, as only people I read as town are people I "wouldn't consider a lynch at all."In post 80, Nero Cain wrote:
I'll always be wary of Matt. Him lying/gambiting/reaction fishing is null but I'd strongly consider his lynch in a few days if we seem to not be hitting on scum. My vote is on Selk and yea it was RVS.I wouldn't consider a Selk lynch at all.I haven't found anything to yell at yet hence why I'm sitting on my RVS.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I understand how you or someone else might see it that way, but I don't. It's that simple.
I see it as a perhaps-misguided move that is easily exploitable by scum (and may be misinterpreted by town).
But to attempt to address it beyond the simple disagreement, your voiced opinion on Matt was fairly useless / noncommittal in and of itself, and your vote on Selk was a self-avowed RVS vote that you had no intent of pursuing. If they were scumbuddies, as you posit, your vote presented no threat and therefore required no transparent machinations.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Yes, scum like to bus, but the way you phrased it framed milkshake as town while you were saying the opposite.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
The amount of times you don't get it is kind of funny, Ghostlin.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I didn't say you were hiding anything. You clearly don't have any clue what I'm saying. I think that others will, so I won't bother with it anymore.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
@Ghostlin: You didn't actually ask me a question.
@Nero Cain: I am open to the possibility.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Why do you think milk and selk are grouped together? I find that unlikely, though not impossible.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Ghostlin, if you mean that they're sucking up to me and I suspect them, well, yes, that's true, but I haven't decided if it's genuine or not. It's something scum might do to town that enters the game strong and it's also something town might do with a town read, so...- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Summarize your opinion of Selkies for me, Ghostlin.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I'm more concerned with Ghostlin atm, and I was waiting for you to give some semblance of reply to my post that featured you, which you have so far failed to do.
And it is my experience that engaging with disorganized hydra such as yourself is fairly unproductive. That being said, when the time is right, I will engage as I see fit.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I did actually ask you a question that you didn't answer, though.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
You can have an unfirm opinion on page 3, but you were trying to weasel out of saying anything one way or another until you were asked directly. The scum motivation is not committing to a stance early on so you can take whatever stance is most advantageous later on. The most dangerous thing scum can do is take an early arbitrary stance.In post 249, Selkies wrote:
What firm opinions do you want me to have on like page 3In post 181, Amrun wrote:This post pinged my scumdar hard. Demon is right on the money that Selkies is saying a lot without having any firm opinions, and this post (while it gets points for being unapologetic about it) only makes matters worse.
Matt is null, but I'm voting him while criticizing others for not voting scum reads, "but I think we can figure him out."
Tell me, HOW is making a vote and then declaring that you only read him as null going to help you "figure him out?" You haven't engaged Matt in any way. You are NOT trying to figure him out.
And early image consciousness.
Yup, definitely liking Selkie for scum at this point.
That's why I throw my vote around and see what sticks. To establish those firm opinions.
In retrospect, my answer to that question probably wasn't optimal wrt scumhunting or determining Matt's alliance. But I was asked it straight up by a person who was scumreading me, so I thought it best to be honest in that situation.
Anyways, you've shown it to be bad town play, but not scummy. Where's the scum intention?
Agree with this. It's NOT terrible ... at all.In post 250, Selkies wrote:
Wait whyIn post 221, Ghostlin wrote:1) No, I'm voting for Milk because a push on a claimed VT is pretty terrible, actually.
Why is a push on a p1 claimed VT by a person with a meta of claiming VT "terrible"- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I haven't caught up since my last post, but...
V/LA until Sunday or Monday (probably Monday)- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Saying you were trying to weasel out of it is not contradicting myself even if you disagree that's what you were doing. (??) You admit in the NEXT SENTENCE that you didn't want to say what you stance on Matt was, so I was 100% correct!In post 292, Selkies wrote:
Well, no.In post 258, Amrun wrote:You can have an unfirm opinion on page 3, but you were trying to weasel out of saying anything one way or another until you were asked directly. The scum motivation is not committing to a stance early on so you can take whatever stance is most advantageous later on. The most dangerous thing scum can do is take an early arbitrary stance.
I have unfirm opinions on page 3. There's no point in me voicing them because they're next to useless. I wasn't trying to weasel out of it--see here, you contradict yourself. I didn't want to say what my stance on Matt was, but once again, Demon was getting very irritated with us and we were townreading him and so in that situation, I wanted to be honest.
I use all my votes in RVS as reaction tests. I try to stir stuff up so I have something to work with (and bring us out of RVS). Demon's vote helped me in getting a read on him. However, when I voted Matt, Matt just...left. So that was not my intention, and gave me nothing wrt information about his alliance.
I didn't want to say blatantly that Matt was a scumread, especially since this hydra is coming off a game where we got a lot of flak for fakeclaiming PGO as innocent child, and Matt wasn't really a scumread. And like you said, if we said that voting Matt was a reaction test, it would negate the point of the reaction test. So what the fuck was I supposed to do? I went with trying to quell Demon a little by giving him the truth. So obviously, that wasn't pro-town play, but it was pro-me, and I'm town, so I'm still moderately content about how that went down.
Anything more?
I understand the reaction test explanation, and acknowledge its validity, but that self preservationist attitude is ABSOLUTELY what I picked out early on, and it's scummy as hell. There were lots of other ways to respond to a potentially ruined reaction test than that.
I don't think you understand what you are talking about. A) Saying that "Milk is unlikely to flip town" is EXACTLY THE SAME as Milk flipping town being an "unlikely event" and if you seriously think those things are opposites then you are, in fact, sniffing glue.In post 299, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Still like my SoO vote, waiting on more substance.
This is a complete mis-representation of the quoted post. I don't see any cognitive dissonance. He didn't say anywhere that Milk is unlikely to flip town, he said in the unlikely event that Milk were to flip town, which actually means the opposite of what you are trying to present here Amrun. Care to comment with that in mind?In post 181, Amrun wrote:
If milk is town, then Ghostlin is a good bet for scum. Notice the casual cognitive dissonance in this post. Milk is "unlikely" to flip town, but SOO's "follow the leader" vote is suspect? Treating her as town while calling her scum.In post 118, Ghostlin wrote:
The odds of one scum being on that wagon are good. Probably Milk's buddies if she's scum are treating her like a toxic asset hoping for a later deflection off the wagon, and if she does unlikely flip town...well, then at least one or two scum are making that push. SOO's vote seems to be a follow the leader vote--I've got my eyes on him and Nic next for scum.In post 105, Nero Cain wrote:This Milkshake wagon is going a bit fast and its making me worry...
Also the fact that Ghostlin explained himself and youstillrefused to listen, but instead tried to make Ghost look like the fool, makes me think you mis-repped that post on purpose.
Ghostlin's explanation failed for the same reason your objection does. It doesn't understand what I have issue with. I am not saying that Ghostlin didn't say Milkshake was scummy in his eyes. He clearly DID, which is what he argues in the post you quoted. What he does, however, is call milkshake scum while TREATING milkshake as he might treat town. In other words, it's more how he worded it that makes me think he's not being entirely forthright about his thoughts on milkshake.
fact that YOU think WE think you are that stupid might indicate that there was actually a possibility of you being that stupid, because the knowledge is actually there in your mind. You're just smart enough to ignore it.[/quote]
You need to step up your reading comprehension if you think that post called Ghostlin stupid in any way at all. (Hint: it didn't.) I know it wasn't my post, but what the fuck. (Also I think milkshake has already responded - forgive me if not.)What is this round about theory about Ghostlin being stupid? This post makes no sense to me, not to mention you called him stupid and smart all in one paragraph...
Are you kidding me? It's literally like you don't read at all. What made me SUSPICIOUS of Selkies was the EXCHANGE I quoted. The pre-game post only piqued my interest in a way that none of the other pre-game posts did not. It is the type of things you look for in RVS to start the game rolling. Selkies' later response and follow up (or lack thereof) to this post is what is suspicious.In post 312, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Other head checking in. I'm a total moron that thought he had posted the post he had written, didn't bother to check it did post, and went la-de-da on a weekend of booze and moving houses.
I have one main thing to add here. Why the fuck has nobody noticed this yet?
Post 15 was prior to game's start. Amrun, why are you (and Demon same question, really) using pre-game jokes as a way to try and build a serious case on Selkies?In post 181, Amrun wrote:Posts that jumped out at me and why.
In post 31, Demon wrote:Selkies elaborate. Also I really want to keep my vote on Matt right now but youir 30 is making it hard for me.
This exchange makes me suspicious of Selkies. Selkies is trying to shut down discussion for no valid reason. Plus, like Demon, I am immediately suspicious of them promising a "lynch list" and then not delivering or mentioning it again.
Later on, in reading, Selkies does elaborate a bit on why they didn't like the theory post, but it doesn't put me off from my original gut reaction. His stance, while more clearly stated, still makes little sense.
As for the other content...
Ghostlin's response to my last question is how I thought he would respond, and it is suspicious. His basic response to me IS to try and suck up to me and appeal to my suspicion of "top suspect that isn't Ghostlin" which is very self-preservationist.
However, his later aggression makes me think slightly better of him. I think his attack is a bit silly, but the fact that he's making it is a bit aggressive. I know for sure I have nailed Ghostlin as scum before but I don't remember when/where so I don't know if this is based on anything or I am making it up. >.>- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
It's because you don't even remotely understand my reasoning. I don't want or expect you to say anyone is 100% scum, or town, or whatever.In post 334, Ghostlin wrote:that if I called milkshake 100% scum some asshat'd reason there'd be no way I could know that unless I was scum, or so someone would reason. Your. Reasoning. Is. Bullshit. There. I've fucking said it.
I'm trying to think of how to better explain it but I can't think of a good way, and you're not the one I'm trying to convince anyway so it doesn't really matter.
As for Beli, it made almost NO impression on me. I thought your attacks were stretches, but I didn't find the post themselves good either.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
MATT
YOU HAVEN'T ADDRESSED ME
OR MOST PEOPLE
AND IT UPSETS ME- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Are you kidding? I am willing to elaborate on my arguments, and I know perfectly what Ghostlin is saying. Anyone that tries to convince someone to lynch themselves is just stupid.In post 344, Demon wrote:Not exactly getting fuzzy feelings from Amrun. I feel like town would be more willing to elaborate on their arguments/points and get more of a feel for what the other person is saying. Can't tell if genuine frustration is warranted from the Ghost-Amrun back and forth, so.
In short, he always plays like this. He is extremely analytical.In post 348, Demon wrote:Can anyone who is familiar with Iecerint chime in with some meta?
OH HOW PREDICTABLE. Hahahaha.In post 352, Selkies wrote:Ghost being town also makes me worry about amrun
None of your original "town feelings" for me had ANYTHING at all to do with Ghostlin, but I was generally received positively so your view was positive too. As soon as you see a foothold, you "worry." You're scum. K. Moving on.
Someone asked me (Demon, I think) why self preservation is scummy. That is like mafia 101. Self preservation has always, and will always, be scummy. Not that town should be leaping on the sword, but there's a different mindset to being town and self preservation isn't part of it.
And as for Demon, your hypocrisy is ridiculous. You want to lynch Beli for acting like he's part of scumhunting when he isn't, and you can't even be arsed to read the game and have the gall to act like you're contributing to scumhunting in any meaningful manner. (Hint: you are not.)- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Of course it's somewhat situational. However, early on day 1 when you're not even close to being a leading wagon is one of those times when it's completely scummy. The time in question, in fact, was what, like page 2? Someone freaking out on page 2 because they might look scummy doesn't scream SCUM to you? Seriously?
And I never said that the two gameplays are SYNONYMOUS, just that refusing to read the game is at least equally as unhelpful as anything you are accusing Belphi of atm.
I happen to have a townread on you, which makes it doubly annoying.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
SOMEONE said self preservation isn't scummy (must not have been you, Demon).
I would put Beli on the scum side of null at the moment, and for the reasons you say as opposed to some other arguments brought against him. I wouldn't OPPOSE his lynch, but I wouldn't prefer it over several others.
Selkies, I tend to change my approach to the game with each new game. Sometimes, I play excessively transparently, sometimes not, sometimes in between. I try not to be predictable. Sometimes that leads to bad games but so be it. In this case, I don't think I'm being particularly obtuse.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuum
i kind of forget what happened in the name of the wind
and i vaguely remember that it was horrible
and/or i didn't read it
>.>- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
That was a p awful time of my life. Computer-dictated break from mafia came at a good time.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I vaguely remember that my cousin was murdered during the playing of that game. So yeah.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I'll have a go at explaining this again.In post 181, Amrun wrote:If milk is town, then Ghostlin is a good bet for scum. Notice the casual cognitive dissonance in this post. Milk is "unlikely" to flip town, but SOO's "follow the leader" vote is suspect? Treating her as town while calling her scum.
Milk is unlikely to flip town, ie is likely to flip scum.
But the way he talks about SoO's vote treats milkshake as town. I have never seen someone call a scum vote a "follow the leader" vote. Later, Ghostlin tries to explain this, iirc, but the original wording still doesn't seem like it's genuinely from a town perspective.
It's like saying "milk is scum, but these people scumfucking onto her wagon are also scum!" It's trying to have your cake and eat it too.
Who does that? Scum.
It's not like that wording CAN'T be explained away, with effort -- Ghostlin is not stupid and would not say something that blatantly contradicts itself. But SUBCONSCIOUSLY, I feel a confliction there.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Ghostlike, once again, I am not trying to convince you that you are scum. Let's be clear here, though; this is far from the only reason I said I suspected you. It's simply the only reason you chose to address because it was easiest to take pot shots at. It's also not at all about the "meaning" of any phrases. It's about your choice of words and mindset, and trying to play both sides of the field.
Short of a cop or similar, no one can have "proof" that someone else is scum. Everything is subjective, and everyone uses personal tells because that's what the entire game is about.
I think the very act of saying that sword of omens is scum no matter of milkshake's alignment is scummy, especially given soo's relative level of content. I think HOW you did this, and the words you used, are even scummier.
And your response now is scummier still. Trying to reduce my argument into a strawman and object to it on grounds that "it's subjective" and "it uses personal tells" is the same thing you did with milkshake by saying "it's just my word vs. yours!"
Of course it is. None of those thinks actually invalidate anyone's arguments and I think you're smart enough to know that.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Ghostlike lol. Sorry on my phone. Attribute any weird typos to autocorrect.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
ThAd, seriously? That's not a case. It's an explanation of one comment that several different people have requested expansion on.
If all you're going to do is tell people who ARE generating content to stop doing it, then you maybe need to re-evaluate why you aren't providing any content of your own.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
THAT
THAT RIGHT THERE
You act like Selkies is scum but then treat them like town.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
If Ghostlin flips red, Selkies is town. Period.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Stop pretending that any argument for anyone being scum that doesn't involve role information is "tangible," ESPECIALLY on day 1. It's just ridiculous.
As for sword ... honestly?
No, I don't find his milkshake vote especially scummy, really. At the most, it's only as scummy as YOUR entrance to the milkshake wagon, which I found fairly bad. Sword_of_omens is ALWAYS an infreqent "catch up" poster. Always. NEVER seen him not do this -- he provides content eventually, but it's in fleeting bursts.
Ducks... What.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
When Selkies calls Ghostlin scum, Ghostlin tries to get me to see Selkies as even scummier and says that he finds the spot suspicious after they "suck up" to me.In post 269, Ghostlin wrote:
Feeling slightly queasy about that slot. Like it's..not something I can name, actually. They hadn't been town or scum for me until that last post clanged. There's no point in such...cordiality from a hydra, particularly since you occupied a slot that was low activity and somewhat suspicious.In post 230, Amrun wrote:Summarize your opinion of Selkies for me, Ghostlin.
Selkies calls Ghostlin town, and now all of a sudden, he doesn't have to "hide" from them, meaning they are genuinely reading him, MEANING THEY ARE 100% TOWN. No one has to "hide" their towniness from scum.In post 390, Ghostlin wrote:
Someone's been paying attention this game. I'm glad I've not had toIn post 387, Selkies wrote:Ghost is town and I'm not saying anything morehideit from someone.
Ghostlin. Is. Scum.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Try content. It's nice, I hear.In post 396, Demon wrote:Please for the love of god stop responding to Amrun Ghost. Getting a headache.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
No, YOU try again. You don't THANK a scum read for reading you as town, ever.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
seriously
SERIOUSLY
seriously
if you're soft hinting some shit
i will fucking rage
either claim or do not. if that is a legit soft claim, i will ream your ass post game. terrible.
as it is, though, scum are far more likely to pull this kind of dumb shit when they're not even l-1 so yeah.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
ALSO EVEN IF IT'S A SOFT CLAIM
YOU STILL TREATED SELKIES AS TOWN
WHICH MAKES NO FUCKING SENSE IF YOU ARE TOWN GIVEN THE CONTEXT OF THE GAME
NONE, ZERO- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
This game is annoying me. I'm out. Wake me up when someone in the fucking game decides to be active.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I don't WANT you to fullclaim. I want you to NOT FUCKING DO DUMB SHIT LIKE THIS EVER. I'm mad that you did this, ESPECIALLY if you're not bullshitting. Like,I went out of my FUCKING WAY not to make a big deal about your blundering obvious hints and act like they were nothing, and you have to go and point a FUCKING NEON ARROW at them for scum.
Jesus Christ.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Like doing that in such an IDIOTIC FUCKING WAY makes me think you probably are town, but still makes your post about selkies make NO SENSE EVER AT ALL IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. Either way you shouldn't be able to hide it for terribly long.
Unvote
VOTE: Selkies- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
BECAUSE I was looking for an inconspicious way off of your wagon until you made that strange post about selkies that made me doubt. And then you decided to shout it from the rooftops for NO APPARENT REASON.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
No, I'm not AFRAID to back off. I just don't play on this basic abc level where everything is fucking literal.
I didn't want to give the impression that I changed my mind for a multitude of reasons, notably because scum is a lot more likely to kill a universal townread that they probably realize is a pr but may be inclined to keep him alive if the most active player still suspects him. I was TRYING to distract scum from his obvious hints and it had a chance of working until he decided to freaking announce it.
Pretending that seeing breadcrumbs and making them EVEN MORE OBVIOUS is a TOWN move is also ridiculous. Scum has no motivation to push on someone who is obviously a pr (they won't get lynched in the end and they are afraid of being openly "wrong," but being right and calling him town early makes them look good) but has every motivation to make it more obvious and not obfuscate it when they see it.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
UM
Which one of those aren't supposed to say Amrun?- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
It's not about scum sheeping, it's about how he chose to phrase it, and quite honestly, no, I have very rarely seen scum sheep onto a SCUM wagon. (Onto town? Definitely. That's my point.)In post 422, GoodCop_BadCop wrote:Demon, I will let the other head address your question.
Amrun! I looked over it again, and I was in fact... sniffing glue. Still think your case is/was silly on Ghost for the record. What I really didn't understand was how you got to the conclusion that he was treating Milk as town while saying he wasn't town... until you explained it. You really haven't seen scum sheep?
In post 196, milkshake wrote:that there was actually a possibility of you being that stupid
But that is neither here nor there.
Can anyone else confirm if Amrun normally is in rage-mode all the time as town? If no one answers/knows I will go meta myself, just don't have time at the moment.
As for rage mode, you can meta, and you will certainly find rage in some places and not in others. As I mentioned earlier, my play changes with my mood which I let happen quite deliberately for meta reasons.
I have been especially rage-y lately 'cause stress from moving cross country (I do it so much I should be used to it by now) and because what you may interpret as rage is actually just me having fun. (Curse words aren't meant offensively, I promise.)
I didn't even remotely "sledge someone into claiming." I voted for him and continued to engage him, as anyone should do to someone they suspect/are voting/etc. He was several -- let me repeat,In post 424, Selkies wrote:
dammitIn post 423, fferyllt wrote:
There is a middle ground between sledging someone into claiming and crowning them most obvtown player in the game.In post 421, Amrun wrote:No, I'm not AFRAID to back off. I just don't play on this basic abc level where everything is fucking literal.
I didn't want to give the impression that I changed my mind for a multitude of reasons, notably because scum is a lot more likely to kill a universal townread that they probably realize is a pr but may be inclined to keep him alive if the most active player still suspects him. I was TRYING to distract scum from his obvious hints and it had a chance of working until he decided to freaking announce it.
Pretending that seeing breadcrumbs and making them EVEN MORE OBVIOUS is a TOWN move is also ridiculous. Scum has no motivation to push on someone who is obviously a pr (they won't get lynched in the end and they are afraid of being openly "wrong," but being right and calling him town early makes them look good) but has every motivation to make it more obvious and not obfuscate it when they see it.
- fferylltseveral-- votes away from L-1 and I never once asked him to claim or mentioned his role in any way. I was also talking to other people, and the only reason I was talking to him more than others is because he is just about the only other person in this game who posts regularly, and you're #3.
p-edit:
I have a town read on milkshake. Not TOWNTOWNTOWN, but town. Sword I am much closer to null, but if forced at gunpoint to pick, I'd say leaning town.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
VOTE: ThAdmiral
Do something and stop bitching. You're capable of so much better, and I know it, which leads me to believe you're scum stalling and trying to shut down. This is NOT something I recall from your town playstyle.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Reals, Matt?In post 464, MattP wrote:
Pls don't answer for other players [:In post 419, Amrun wrote:It means "you're voting me oh god"
REAL?
If you don't get how that was a joke, you're not reading the game at all. It is time to dedicate time to this game instead of faux prod dodging.
vla until Tuesday
Work.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
He's hosting like a billion people at his house right now. I'm not there yet -- I was at work instead, but I will be there from Sunday evening to Wednesday. Iecerint will be there or is there because he's picking me up.In post 489, Demon wrote:Is Matt usually this disengaged with the game?
Shit like this makes me think ThAd might be a jester, but it's almost TOO obvious for jester... Even so he needs to go.In post 492, ThAdmiral wrote:^^ what I mean by that is you should probably vote me instead. Or do you plan to shift to me if my wagon gets any bigger?
This feels like a really weird response to a case on you. Also, Demon is very concerned with other people's level of activity without contributing anything himself, which puts me off.In post 536, Demon wrote:Quotes or it didn't happen?- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Yes, but it's not really scum behavior, either. I'm baffled.In post 542, milkshake wrote:Telling people to vote you is not town behavior. It is not jester behavior, either, actually, and this setup is not likely to have a jester anyway.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
OH, heads up, here on out I'll be scarce until next week -- and even then, I'll have one day before my regular weekend v/la.
I have work and then I'm going to Balto Meet (yay!). I"ll make posts here and there but don't expect good engagement from me for a week +.
Game-wise, I don't see anything I am particularly compelled to write about, except that sword of omens is painfully town. He's towwwwwwwwwwwn. TOWN.
Town, I tell you.
ThAd lynch should be a no brainer. I don't know why he isn't dead yet.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
oh gee i wonder why maybe because no one should ever talk about it everIn post 655, Selkies wrote:One thing about Amrun's posts, and I'm not sure it's a big deal. Compared to some players, Amrun mostly steered clear of discussion about MattP's vt claim.
i'm just checking in really quick to say I exist and see if there's some drastic shift that I need to examine
right now it looks like thad vs. soo, so my vote is 100% where it needs to be.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I almost got excited and was going to say I plan to report a read on Iecerint and Matt after tomorrow, esp. Iecerint considering we'll be spending some car time together...
But then I remembered this is not Always On and we're not supposed to talk about the game elsewehre. lolwoops. i'm tard.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I never said Iece was town. Currently undecided on that myself. I just said that this fits in with his meta and is not strange in any way, which is true.- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
Let's just put it this way... he may be scum, but his posting style is not an indication of this (ie noncommittal and distant).- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
OKAY SO UH
IECE WAS LIKE
"DID YOU KNOW DEADLINE FOR A GAME YOU ARE IN IS IN SIX HOURS" >.>- Amrun
-
Amrun Killed the Radio Star
- Amrun
- Killed the Radio Star
- Killed the Radio Star
- Posts: 22501
- Joined: January 24, 2011
- Location: East Coast US
I have missed your question and as soon as I post this I will go back and find it. If you read this first, re-state it quick to make it easier since that might have been the hammer!In post 676, Nero Cain wrote:I just want Amrum to answer my question.
In real life? How he looks into my eyes lol. But he totally fleeced me as scum last night.In post 677, Selkies wrote:
What would be indicative of his scum game?In post 672, Amrun wrote:Let's just put it this way... he may be scum, but his posting style is not an indication of this (ie noncommittal and distant).
He is more indecisive as scum than as town, but he is indecisive as either. I am still null on him, and I flipflop on the lean. I find it easier to read iece with flips under the belt to evaluate his past actions with.
Funny. Why do you say this? Milkshake and I have interacted quite a lot. I want this answered even if it must be answered tomorrow.In post 693, Selkies wrote:One curious thing...milk has hardly interacted with or mentioined Amrun at all.
Why? If you said why I missed it, I guess. Is it flavor? (I don't know flavor.)In post 711, Selkies wrote:Will bring this up with orcinus as soon as he's online. Our vote stays where it is in the meantime because I'm skeptical as fuck about this role claim.
- fferyllt
In post 700, milkshake wrote:Me too, especially now that you mentioned that. It seems like the kind of thing that might be a scum safeclaim.
confirm vote: Ms Marangal
Of course L-3 is not where doctors claim, but even so, day 1 scum doctor fakeclaims sort themselves out and should not be lynched.In post 725, Selkies wrote:
- fIn [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5002146#p5002146]post 725[/url], orcinus_theoriginal wrote:L-3 IS NOT WHERE DOCTORS CLAIM
NO IT IS NOT
I will shout at everyone until you see how scum Marangal is
And if we lynch milk today everyone is going to promise me Marangal is lynched to death.
The way the bolded question was asked puts me off.In post 737, Ms Marangal wrote:So your a channeler and nothing but?
I'm finding it hard to believe
and L-3 is where a doc would claim when the game is near deadline and she isn't sure if she would be able to be here for it, and if she was confident enough to guess when scum will try and target her so that she could use her other ability to try and dodge the kill
also, why are Thad and I the only ones who are getting shit for pre-mature claiming when Demon has done the exact same thing?
and Orci, I knew that you were going to bring up that game, like Jesus. yes, I have fake-claimed Vig as scum but how in the world does that mean my claim here is fake? I'm not scum Orci, My claim is legit and I'll do a full one if I have to but god, if you can't see the difference in tone here then IDK what to say.
as for the sucking up, I feel that it's a scum-tell when it's the only thing that the person does. She can like Fery's Iso, I like Fery's Iso it's helpful but if the sole Purpose is to butter someone up and get them onto your good side then they are probably likely scum. It's for that exact same reason WK'ing is a scum-tell, it serves as a way to get the person under good light. Make them look really good.
Once again, I have no clue what it is but I'll try to find it before the flip.In post 788, Nero Cain wrote:WHY ARE YOU AVOIDING MY QUESTION, AMRUN?!?
re: milkshake, I didn't like her vote on Maringal and how it was made but if this is the hammer I still suspect it will be a town flip, though I'm less sure than I once was (perhaps just wishful thinking). - Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun
- Amrun