Mini 1451: A Memory of Light (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I fail to see how this line of questioning is helpful to town.In post 27, Ghostlin wrote:
Define 'harm'. Three possibilities exist.In post 26, MattP wrote:
I'll counter your questionIn post 25, Ghostlin wrote: Why would you claim this?
What harm is there in claiming VT?
You could be an actual VT. In which case, you're telling the truth, no harm no foul. Although we're not massclaiming Day 1, or even all the VTs claiming Day 1.
You could be a PR that wants to claim VT to hide what you're doing. This, in and of itself isn't harmful to town.
You could be a scum, claiming VT in a bid to deflect suspicion on yourself. In which case this could be a gambit, and harmful to Town.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
You're next.In post 34, Nero Cain wrote:
LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.
vote: selkies
I like how you tried to come up with a legitimate reason to disguise your OMGUS. Why not just play it as it is?In post 35, Demon wrote:
If Matt's aim was to argue theory, he could've easily breezed through what Ghostlin said because what he said was weak. Meaning it looks like Matt's trying to get a read on Ghost.
...Meaning you have now managed to make not 1 but 2 horrible votes in the course of 17 minutes.
Unvote, Vote: Selkies
Your first paragraph makes no sense. Matt is trying to get Ghost to argue theory with him, no?- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I never said OMGUS was scummy. Try again.In post 40, Demon wrote:...
Come on man it's almost like you didn't even read my 31.
Keep preaching by the wiki... show me 3 examples where you've caught scum by using OMGUS
And no Matt is attacking Ghost's agenda.
As far as I am concerned Matt is asking asinine questions and baiting ghost to sink into a deep shithole of theory discussion.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Nope, that's my tactic, not yours.
Not scummy. Just stupid and probably anti-town.In post 46, Demon wrote:
Yup my bad there.In post 44, Selkies wrote:I never said OMGUS was scummy. Try again.
So you think Matt is being scummy and your vote is still on me for some unexplained reason...
I'm voting you for the same reason I vote everyone in RVS.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
don't feel left out, orcinus will get around to you.In post 34, Nero Cain wrote:
LYNCH ALL LIARS!!!!In post 15, Selkies wrote:I already have my lynchlist. You guys are so transparent.
vote: selkies- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Are you trying to say something here?In post 50, Demon wrote:So you found Matt antitown and found the reasoning of my vote on you to be illegitimate and you still just waltz around in this game chilling in the RVS.
I find Matt antitown, I don't know if he's scum yet or not.
I find the reason for you voting me to be illegitimate, but why should I find that scummy?
I wouldn't call this RVS (which I equate with a waste of time) given I already have a pretty decent town read. I know what I want to achieve with my votes and posts, which fundamentally differs it from "random" voting. But okay, feel free it that.
Who's scum from your POV?- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Stance on what?In post 53, Demon wrote:Can you take a fucking stance wow, is your vote on Matt right now random or because what?
You and Matt are my scummiest reads (as I have been stating basically this whole game so far).
Matt is null but I think I can figure him out.
Why are we a scumread again- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Can't remember if I posted these
orcinus - http://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist.p ... le&u=20360
fferyllt - http://forum.mafiascum.net/memberlist.p ... le&u=20541
Our previous Selkies game - http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=27165
We should have named ourselves Jekyll Hydra.- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I'm liking you for town, too.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I (fferyllt) don't do RVS at least as it's defined at MS. orcinus does, and he was still doing it at the time he voted you, though we we were already discussing player reactions.In post 93, Demon wrote:@Selkies A lot of my scum read on you was predicated on you not being in RVS... so either I'm missing something big here or you were just being cryptic. Why am I town? What part of my 43 did you find town..? And who's scum, ty.
orcinus thought your reactions to his vote and to Matt's VT claim looked townish. I agreed. Your reply to my "wake me when RVS is over" joke gave me an opportunity to say what I was thinking, so it wasn't so much your post 43's content. It was just a good place to directly interact with you in the game (though you've been interacting plenty with orcinus).
As far as scum go, I'm not liking Nero Cain too much for town. And milkshake's entrance was a little unsettling as well.
When orcinus is around we'll discuss what to do next with our vote because our next vote will be probably be all serioous and stuff.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Yep, RVS is always me. Fery always signs her posts with -f, and I think i'll sign my own posts in this game too since nobody here really has enough meta to tell us apart.
My RVS play is focused on getting reactions and getting reads on people, throwing my vote around *strategically* helps me do that.
This, however, is a scum vote.
VOTE: Milkshake
-o- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
hmm. Let me say it another way.In post 101, Demon wrote:Selkies I'm not sure if I understand what you're trying to say by me "giving you an opportunity to say something"?
I could have just said "hey, demon is looking pretty town" in a random post. But, since you quoted and replied to me, I used that post to reply directly back. Post 43 wasn't some sort of tipping point in my analysis of whether you look town or scum right now. Makes sense?
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Why are you asking Demon this question and not us? I'll let him answer though if you want.
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
IT'S COLORADAN QUINOA DAMN IT!!!In post 106, Selkies wrote:(while fery murders bolivian children...)
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Look at this mind reading.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Oh.
Oh I thought you were addressing the post to demon.
WHOOPS.
Thanks, I don't agree but okay. We don't view you to be our #1 suspect, we have both of you as probable scum, and we both felt that we would get more information from hopping on the milkshake wagon rather than trying to divert it to you.
I personally think milkshake's wagon is probably town-driven.
-o- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
No there is meaning to my ordering of your names. It is chronological.In post 116, Nero Cain wrote:
So my name being first has nothing to do with anything. okIn post 96, Selkies wrote:As far as scum go, I'm not liking Nero Cain too much for town. And milkshake's entrance was a little unsettling as well
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Yesterday it was mostly gut on both our parts. Today it looks like you are trying to influence bandwagons while keeping your hands clean.In post 119, Nero Cain wrote:
Any reasoning?In post 117, Selkies wrote:
No there is meaning to my ordering of your names. It is chronological.In post 116, Nero Cain wrote:
So my name being first has nothing to do with anything. okIn post 96, Selkies wrote:As far as scum go, I'm not liking Nero Cain too much for town. And milkshake's entrance was a little unsettling as well
- f
milkshake's page 4 posts ping pretty hard.
Sticking on top of page as well to make sure this gets seen.
I have decided that certain things have been implemented in a harsher way than I intended them to be. As a result, I have changed Procedural Rule 7, which now reads:
7. Nights last 72 hours. The first 24 hours of night will be a 'twilight' period during which Day actions may still be submitted (it will otherwise by identical to Night). Weekends count as one day for purposes of both twilight and night.Last edited by Cephrir on Mon May 13, 2013 3:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
So fery and I are mostly satisfied with the last two posts. Milkshake can be town for now.
VOTE: Nero/VOTE:
In post 80, Nero Cain wrote:
I'll always be wary of Matt. Him lying/gambiting/reaction fishing is null but I'd strongly consider his lynch in a few days if we seem to not be hitting on scum. My vote is on Selk and yea it was RVS. I wouldn't consider a Selk lynch at all. I haven't found anything to yell at yet hence why I'm sitting on my RVS.In post 81, milkshake wrote:Considering that you have no better options right now, why aren't you considering Matt right now? After all, you seem to be amenable to the idea of lynching him. And see also my reasons in post #75.
(you later state that this 'bait' is scummy)In post 83, Nero Cain wrote:Why is milkshake trying to bait me into lynching Matt?
I dont' understand this, and I would have asked the same question. It's not protown to sit on your ass like you were, leaving your vote on a person you think is *town*. It seems a legitimate question, and I don't see why it's scummy at all. It didn't seem to me like milk was trying to bait you into voting Matt, rather it was an honest question as to why your posts seemed contradictory.
This is dumb as hell considering it was, y'know, nero cain that had his vote sitting on a townread.In post 92, Iecerint wrote:Why did you want to ask Nero Cain in particular...?- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Considering you never voiced suspicion of us before this this seems OMGUSyIn post 120, Nero Cain wrote:
I could buy that. You think he may have listed a buddy in Demon/Selk?In post 118, Ghostlin wrote:SOO's vote seems to be a follow the leader vote- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I like your analyses, Amrun. Welcome to the game.
orcinus takes some getting used to. by some accounts, so do I. My RVS joke was to let folks know that it was orcinus moving our vote around earlier. I don't do RVS. Our first serious vote was on milkshake, but we changed our minds pretty quickly based on his response to the quick pile of votes. Our current vote is also serious.
- fferyllt- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
If Nero is scum, Bel is the partner.In post 203, Belisarius wrote:Nero: #83 shows that he was leery of 'shake before the vote was placed, which makes #85 null, not scummy; #105 shows a kind of mindset which I share, which makes me more sanguine about him.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
FFery is more interested in figuring out if people are town or scum than in what they think about her alignment, especially when playing as a hydra. And an effortlessly well reasoned argument for finding something I post questionable usually makes a townish impression on me.In post 208, Nero Cain wrote:town don't say this. FFery seems like she'd fight things tooth and nail.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
lolIn post 222, Nero Cain wrote:
Why do you have a problem with me calling out cops for lurking? Selk is lurking but that's likely scum anyways. You're lurking a bit. So, sure, I'll entertain the idea that you are scum but I'm more interested in a milk/selk/soo group but sure, I can do a milk/selk/soo/missdes group.In post 215, Miss Destroyer wrote:why are you calling cops out for lurking when others are doing the same?
So who wants to claim to be the stupid townie?
no we're not lurking. orcinus is busy with school and I've been busy with a bunch of almost-nightfalls and daybreaks and lylos and shit. Right now, I'm waiting to catch orcinus online again to catch up our thoughts on this game.
last time we chatted, we thought milkshake was looking better. that might change. I'm still liking Amrun for town.
- fferyllt- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
I am usually pretty vocal about my town reads. orcinus is not so free with them.In post 228, Ghostlin wrote:
That was it. The kind of sucking up+the not a defense.In post 226, Amrun wrote:Ghostlin, if you mean that they're sucking up to me and I suspect them, well, yes, that's true, but I haven't decided if it's genuine or not. It's something scum might do to town that enters the game strong and it's also something town might do with a town read, so...
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
damn it.In post 235, fferyllt wrote:
I read your post. For the most part you were asking about orcinus' posts. I believe I did say something about the post of mine that you pointed up. orcinus should be posting in this thread later today. I've told him he'll find some of Nero Cain's posts interesting. IMO Cain is doing exactly what he accuses me of doing. He's sucking up to you.In post 232, Amrun wrote:I'm more concerned with Ghostlin atm, and I was waiting for you to give some semblance of reply to my post that featured you, which you have so far failed to do.
And it is my experience that engaging with disorganized hydra such as yourself is fairly unproductive. That being said, when the time is right, I will engage as I see fit.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
god damn it.In post 241, fferyllt wrote:
Apologies. I got you confused with Ghostlin.In post 239, Nero Cain wrote:
I accused you of sucking up to Amrun? no. I think I rather kill this today instead of Milkshake. Make it so guys.In post 236, Selkies wrote:IMO Cain is doing exactly what he accuses me of doing. He's sucking up to you.
- f
I'm going to bed.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
In post 184, Amrun wrote:
I interpreted that as a town read, as only people I read as town are people I "wouldn't consider a lynch at all."In post 80, Nero Cain wrote:
I'll always be wary of Matt. Him lying/gambiting/reaction fishing is null but I'd strongly consider his lynch in a few days if we seem to not be hitting on scum. My vote is on Selk and yea it was RVS.I wouldn't consider a Selk lynch at all.I haven't found anything to yell at yet hence why I'm sitting on my RVS.
No, that's not how that post works. When you say you wouldn't consider somebody's lynch at all, you imply that you wouldn't consider them being scum (assuming you want to lynch scum).In post 185, Nero Cain wrote:No. I had no reason to suspect Selk yet. They weren't a "town" read but they weren't a scum read and I try to lynch my scum reads and not my null reads.
Forced misrepresentation of own post to make your OMGUS on us seem more natural. Pretty sure scum intentions.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
What firm opinions do you want me to have on like page 3In post 181, Amrun wrote:This post pinged my scumdar hard. Demon is right on the money that Selkies is saying a lot without having any firm opinions, and this post (while it gets points for being unapologetic about it) only makes matters worse.
Matt is null, but I'm voting him while criticizing others for not voting scum reads, "but I think we can figure him out."
Tell me, HOW is making a vote and then declaring that you only read him as null going to help you "figure him out?" You haven't engaged Matt in any way. You are NOT trying to figure him out.
And early image consciousness.
Yup, definitely liking Selkie for scum at this point.
That's why I throw my vote around and see what sticks. To establish those firm opinions.
In retrospect, my answer to that question probably wasn't optimal wrt scumhunting or determining Matt's alliance. But I was asked it straight up by a person who was scumreading me, so I thought it best to be honest in that situation.
Anyways, you've shown it to be bad town play, but not scummy. Where's the scum intention?- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Wait whyIn post 221, Ghostlin wrote:1) No, I'm voting for Milk because a push on a claimed VT is pretty terrible, actually.
Why is a push on a p1 claimed VT by a person with a meta of claiming VT "terrible"- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Neither did you. Town players usually don't give a shit about "die scum".In post 253, Nero Cain wrote:Orc doesn't deny they are a scum slot.
- f- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
We're having more of a mismatch in terms of online time this game due to school and stuff than in our previous game. There's a 15 hour time zone difference involved. This delays our discussions about the game and players' posts.In post 258, Amrun wrote:
You can have an unfirm opinion on page 3, but you were trying to weasel out of saying anything one way or another until you were asked directly. The scum motivation is not committing to a stance early on so you can take whatever stance is most advantageous later on. The most dangerous thing scum can do is take an early arbitrary stance.In post 249, Selkies wrote:
What firm opinions do you want me to have on like page 3In post 181, Amrun wrote:This post pinged my scumdar hard. Demon is right on the money that Selkies is saying a lot without having any firm opinions, and this post (while it gets points for being unapologetic about it) only makes matters worse.
Matt is null, but I'm voting him while criticizing others for not voting scum reads, "but I think we can figure him out."
Tell me, HOW is making a vote and then declaring that you only read him as null going to help you "figure him out?" You haven't engaged Matt in any way. You are NOT trying to figure him out.
And early image consciousness.
Yup, definitely liking Selkie for scum at this point.
That's why I throw my vote around and see what sticks. To establish those firm opinions.
In retrospect, my answer to that question probably wasn't optimal wrt scumhunting or determining Matt's alliance. But I was asked it straight up by a person who was scumreading me, so I thought it best to be honest in that situation.
Anyways, you've shown it to be bad town play, but not scummy. Where's the scum intention?
Agree with this. It's NOT terrible ... at all.In post 250, Selkies wrote:
Wait whyIn post 221, Ghostlin wrote:1) No, I'm voting for Milk because a push on a claimed VT is pretty terrible, actually.
Why is a push on a p1 claimed VT by a person with a meta of claiming VT "terrible"
Right now, our strongest scum reads are Nero Cain and Beli.
- fferyllt- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
^^ - oIn post 264, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:
...yeah, scum.In post 256, Belisarius wrote:
????In post 250, Selkies wrote:
Wait whyIn post 221, Ghostlin wrote:1) No, I'm voting for Milk because a push on a claimed VT is pretty terrible, actually.
Why is a push on a p1 claimed VT by a person with a meta of claiming VT "terrible"
It's MattP who has the meta for claiming VT, not Milkshake.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
@Ghostlin I attributed this post of yours to Nero Cain. The behaviors I thought were sucking up (and still do) were his solicitous conversations going over assorted potential scum partners of mine.In post 228, Ghostlin wrote:In post 226, Amrun wrote:Ghostlin, if you mean that they're sucking up to me and I suspect them, well, yes, that's true, but I haven't decided if it's genuine or not. It's something scum might do to town that enters the game strong and it's also something town might do with a town read, so...That was it. The kind of sucking up+the not a defense.
I am not scum. Right now, I think that Nero Cain and Beli are scum. Orcinus agrees.
- fferyllt- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Well, no.In post 258, Amrun wrote:You can have an unfirm opinion on page 3, but you were trying to weasel out of saying anything one way or another until you were asked directly. The scum motivation is not committing to a stance early on so you can take whatever stance is most advantageous later on. The most dangerous thing scum can do is take an early arbitrary stance.
I have unfirm opinions on page 3. There's no point in me voicing them because they're next to useless. I wasn't trying to weasel out of it--see here, you contradict yourself. I didn't want to say what my stance on Matt was, but once again, Demon was getting very irritated with us and we were townreading him and so in that situation, I wanted to be honest.
I use all my votes in RVS as reaction tests. I try to stir stuff up so I have something to work with (and bring us out of RVS). Demon's vote helped me in getting a read on him. However, when I voted Matt, Matt just...left. So that was not my intention, and gave me nothing wrt information about his alliance.
I didn't want to say blatantly that Matt was a scumread, especially since this hydra is coming off a game where we got a lot of flak for fakeclaiming PGO as innocent child, and Matt wasn't really a scumread. And like you said, if we said that voting Matt was a reaction test, it would negate the point of the reaction test. So what the fuck was I supposed to do? I went with trying to quell Demon a little by giving him the truth. So obviously, that wasn't pro-town play, but it was pro-me, and I'm town, so I'm still moderately content about how that went down.
Anything more?- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
It was a confirmable IC, as in, it wasn't announced at daystart and could mod-confirm us whenever we wanted at any point in the game.In post 294, Ghostlin wrote:
I'm not sure this is comparing apples to apples. Also, this is stupid considering how Innocent Child works.In post 292, Selkies wrote:I didn't want to say blatantly that Matt was a scumread, especially since this hydra is coming off a game where we got a lot of flak for fakeclaiming PGO as innocent child, and Matt wasn't really a scumread
And not really. I'm comparing them because that experience made me less prone to lying about stuff, even when I think it benefits town.- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
What the fuck is this postIn post 313, Belisarius wrote:So may I assume you're totally unwilling to lynch Selkies today?- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Hello it's Orci that has been posting you should feel bad for not telling us apartIn post 318, Miss Destroyer wrote:Ugh...
Damn HD
VOTE: Demon
I'm currently feeling this the strongest. his seemingly opportunistic hops on the most popular bandwagons (first milkshake, and now Beli) is far to much for me to ignore.
Ffery, why so?
~Miss
How exactly is Beli vote opportunistic hop?
This post rings alarm bells- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
- Selkies
-
Selkies Mafia Scum
- Selkies
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2111
- Joined: April 8, 2013
Yes I can agree with thisIn post 346, Demon wrote:Seriously... we should be lynching Beli mainly for his 256. He's trying to look like he's a participant in the scumhunt and is just sniping comments out from the sidelines. 210 - same thing... the single most significant thing he's talked about is theory and later slaps down a vote on Ghost for an alleged misrep. Literally no taken stances on anything else.
Did you see 313 - Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies
- Selkies