Newbie 1391 - Game Over - FINALLY!!!
Forum rules
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
My first game post of mafiascum.
Best I don't RVS vote anyone because I saw quite a few votes on specific people and my vote could push them too close up the hammer. For the sake of a joke vote just not worth it.
No point in making specific thoughts on comments made at this stage as most will say it was a joke. Best to include it with anything later when it truly begins to matter.
On a lighter note, hello all.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
He was referencing my post and voting for me.
And either he has misinterpreted my comments as caring how I look (in which case why would I even post to say I wasn't going to comment if I cared how I look?) or he is trying to misrepresent me.
Either way it says more about nachomamma than me, very trigger happy. Unless that's how you do it around here, I would have just probed the suspicion further.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Immediately gen wolf stood out with the 'lets wrap this one up early' comment, but as I expected it was explained away as a joke.
Why are you so keen to press me further now nacho, you already threw down your vote, I would hope you weren't so trigger happy that you didn't feel it was justified in your mind, why now trying to assert my alignment with the interrogation?- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
@missstranger, I wouldn't call it forced passiveness, although I can see why. It's restrained passiveness because I'm aware this is a newbie game and my usual openings in games are more aggressive and antagonistic, because I want emotive responses from people because to me they are the most honest responses.
I am also finding it amusing that the way people like to draw attention to things they find off in another player is to sarcastically go 'riiiight' or 'okaaaay' or an equivalent of instead of getting into the meat of it. Why hand wave it away when the more posts you get from someone the more they are likely to scumslip?
@champinoman, you guys had been on while I was asleep (I'm English) tossed around a lot of votes and unvoted and had I just gone with a funny one on say ten wolf for having half my name I realised I risked putting so done at L-2 in RVS. And if I'm going to spend time seeing who had the most votes before I joke vote someone else to avoid this, what's the point? I may as well forgo it altogether and get on with it.
And my opening post has sparked quite a bit of reaction, so I think I made the right call in what I said.
@Nacho, a very good point about putting pressure on players, and yet again your third post has been even more pro town to me. That's a three degrees of separation there, from thinking you had an agenda to thinking you made a smart play. Your vote is still wrong, but it's early do when I'm not on my phone I will hopefully be able to analyse the game better.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
On the flip side not participating and making a point of saying I won't makes me stand out more. And now you are telling me I have to choose someone in the RVS just to show participation, that's you setting rules to lynch people by, not me. I chose to ignore a phase that was already done and paranoia phase was starting, why turn up late to a party that's already starting to descend into a fight and shout "WHO WANTS TO DANCE!?"
Where I see links generally are when a couple if people think they have something they can exploit to try and push through a mislynch. Two of you really have got issues with my opening post, yet one of you has held off voting me instantly. Would that make it too obvious I wonder.
I have opening suspects, feel free to assume OMGUS btw, but I want to see what you have for your next trick.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Of those who have posted so far, heres my opening feelings...
Fegelein – Nice opening RVS vote. Makes a point of saying miss stranger has been put at L-2 (she hasn’t, gen wolf didn’t unvote first) and says antagon is probably town. I think he is by his posts up to that point, but no explanation to the thought process is no use to anyone. Tries to theorise on the post editing that its concern on appearance, although nobody seems concerned with maybe quizzing her on WHAT was edited. If its something they already know because they saw, use it to explain how she is concerning with appearance. Doesnt press gen wolfs loose and scummy looking comment, just shoots it down with a ‘no’ and moves on. That in itself sits badly for me. Tries to justify the wagon on fegelein, seemingly unconcerned that miss stranger is believed to be at L-2. A jab at nachomamma, with a follow up on what he was meaning (feels like a bit of a prodding pressure play, but could be just to put the seeds of doubt into peoples minds about him).
So far sits in the middle because he seems to not dwell on anything or expand on things unless pressed. Is jabbing at opponents rather than seeking a sound blow. For now he is on the fence for me and i want to see more from him in the analysis.
Miss stranger – nice opening RVS vote. Picks up on antagons RVS vote and questions it a little, unvoting her own choice for the time being (possibly readying an early pressure vote is antagon responds badly?). Must be very new to online mafia if she isn’t aware of the no editing rule that every site i have seen mafia on enforces. Wasnt actually waiting for antagon to respond it seems as she puts down a pressure vote on him (decidedly un RVS voting). Justifies her vote ton antagon, and acknowledges the ninja’ing but not the posts content that ninja’d her. Explains her editing well and defends the spurious push against her for changing votes. #22 is a good post against very flawed logic for her votes. Admits to having some experience which makes me concenred she isn’t aware of the strict no editing rules of mafia. And is hung up on being accused of too much vote hopping, mafia do tend to get hung up on appearance in game but this could also because she thinks she is at L-2 still and is panicking. Her early reads on people seem ok, although im not actually sure at that stage what fegelein has done beyond being behind her vote so is this trying to be nice to someone she fears could push on her later? Follows up with a quick summary of people with reasons, which is much better, but this really needs separating out to individual opinions of the people in my view. In answering fegelein it seemed genuine but also felt like fence sitting.
Feels very n00b in most of what she has done, but i wonder if gen wolf and her are in the process of bussing in some places, although for now she gets a spot on the fence while i figure out how new she really is.
Feel it – scummy opening (only kidding, again nice opening RVS vote). Responds to the RVS vote on him although seems to be running with it in a light hearted way. Doesnt unvote when he votes miss stranger so unsure if he is playing that vote tactically or hasn’t realised the general voting etiquette. Joins in on the early pressure on miss stranger for her post editing error, and this seems to be the basis for being happy to see someone at L-2 (which she isn’t) on page 1. Claims the push was not major, she miss stranger just scum slipped first. Moves on to gen wolfs bigger scum slip but doesn’t vote gor gen wolf, instead deliberates whether to give him the benfit of the doubt or not. Unvotes miss stranger based on her defence, seems legitimate too given his suspicions growing on gen wolf. Good throw down of the gen wolf vote, liking this because it comes at a time when gen wolf has been reactionary and contradictory of everything he is trying to defend. Feel it then goes into a bit more analysis of the few players who have only just started posting.
Im getting more town vibes than scum vibes from him at this point, and not knowing who has what experience here i am leabing towards not being the strongest analyser of games.
Gen wolf – nice, if crude, opening RVS vote. Jumps on miss stranger for her editing error. Even in a newbie game the idea that her editing in that post was to hide a scum slip is a reach, so the justification for this vote feels forced. Bizarre comment to say ‘lets just lynch her and be done with the day’. We have begun to leave RVS well before here, so this comment is loose and not a good sign for gen wolf’s mindset. Now the posting begins to open up as he goes on the attacking defensive, reacting to everybodies comments. Claims he doesn’t like RVS yet antagon tried to drag us out of it very early and long before his comment about wanting a quick lynch and yet returns to that point saying it was a joke. That suggests he doesn’t like RVS yet tried to put us back in it again after we were leaving it. This isn’t looking good right now. The excuse he gives to feel it is AWFUL, now claiming he did it for reaction testing, to END RVS (?) and then pats himself on the back for being the one who ended RVS.... post #31 is damning gen wolf. Jumps in when he thinks nachomamma is talking to him, very jumpy on everything at this point. Moves on to trying to turn the whole thing back on the person by comments such as them wanting to continue RVS and their reaction to the ‘reaction test’. Leaps on the first bit of praise like its water in the desert.
A strong scum read from him right now. There are leads that will come from whether im right on him, but for now he stands out way more than others.
Antagon – interesting vote to open with, especially the reason. I can see it remains harmless as its only a 2nd vote on someone, and although not random is in the spirit of RVS in potentially being jovial (we shall see). Responds he was trying to end RVS, a nice point about RVS being a smokescreen for scum slips so justification for wanting a quick end. Runs with the analysis of sorts from miss stranger and asks two open but still relevant questions.
Leaning town, although would like more from him because he started well but is not pushing heavy analysis yet.
Nachomamma – good opening on his read of the editing fiasco, doesn’t jump to conclusions which i like. A good question to me, but to follow it up with a vote after gen wolfs actions is odd to me, not even waiting for a response to his question. A good follow up to my response, although at this stage everything is a question which isn’t going to get you anywhere without your analysis to back up the importance of the question. Second part of the response to me is insight into his thoughts which is what im looking for. Again no mention of gen wolf at all. Doesnt bite on the fegelein comment which is a positive in my view. The comment was clearly to inspire a reaction and the reaction back from nacho was as sarcastic as the initial prod. Again questioning me, but a good follow up comment on how he does things.
While the vote was very reactionary, he does seem to have analysis in him. He along with champion both will leanb town based on strong analysis but forthcoming posts will sway this one either way for me.
Champinoman – Nice opening RVS vote. backs gen wolfs post #20 even though all explanation to it was shocking. Attempts to put the focus on feel it, but the stick he uses to beat him with is that he voted for miss stranger over the scummier gen wolf... the same gen wolf he liked the post of at the start of this analysis opener. From there the analysis gets stronger, and i like both his pressure on me and his equal pressure on nachomamma. Thats not picking a side, thats analysing both our starts to get to a conclusion of who is up to what. Next post is a total focus on me because he clearly isn’t happy with what i have said OR has seen an opportunity to push on something specific, either way he has reverted from a measured view of the back and forth to picking a side quite easily. Interesting buddying process going on there.
Had a strong town lean followed by a scummy focusing post. Need a bit more from him to know whether he leans town or mafia, but based on a strong analytical post there is promise there so leaning town.
With that in mind,vote gen wolf- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
That was the brief moment I got to use my laptop champino :p I thought while I had the chance I would get that down.
I will respond to the questions when I can, not avoiding just back to the phone and my wife is staring at me as I type as I'm meant to be helping fit this new kitchen... Bear with me, and don't let me forget I have questions to answer, some good ones amongst them...- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
The opening suspects mulled when I got to a laptop and could read posts more thoroughly. Nacho and champ were my two, but both of you have strong town comments beyond the tunnelled reads I had made based only on comments to me. It's early days, I will do this for a bit until people start showing consistent tells one way of another.In post 62, champinoman wrote:
I never told you you had to vote for somebody. All I have done is question your motive behind not voting for somebody. Your current explanation just isn't very good.In post 57, Generic wrote:On the flip side not participating and making a point of saying I won't makes me stand out more. And now you are telling me I have to choose someone in the RVS just to show participation, that's you setting rules to lynch people by, not me. I chose to ignore a phase that was already done and paranoia phase was starting, why turn up late to a party that's already starting to descend into a fight and shout "WHO WANTS TO DANCE!?"
Where I see links generally are when a couple if people think they have something they can exploit to try and push through a mislynch. Two of you really have got issues with my opening post, yet one of you has held off voting me instantly. Would that make it too obvious I wonder.
I have opening suspects, feel free to assume OMGUS btw, but I want to see what you have for your next trick.
Can you please clarify which 2 people you are referring to?
And you never did explain your erratic sleeping patterns.
And what erratic sleep pattern?- Generic
-
Generic
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
I think it's when you abandoned the comments to both of us and focused on pressing negatives on me.In post 65, champinoman wrote:Before I isolate Generic's comments on me I wanted to point out that Miss Stranger didn't actually edit a post. You can't edit a post on this site. So no need to wonder what she actually edited. She actually says this in post #12.
The underlined section has been misinterpreted by you. My interpretation of Gen_Wolf's post #20 is irrelevant in this instant. I was referring to the way Feel It had interpreted it.In post 61, Generic wrote:...
Champinoman – Nice opening RVS vote. backs gen wolfs post #20 even though all explanation to it was shocking. Attempts to put the focus on feel it,but the stick he uses to beat him with is that he voted for miss stranger over the scummier gen wolf... the same gen wolf he liked the post of at the start of this analysis opener. From there the analysis gets stronger, and i like both his pressure on me and his equal pressure on nachomamma. Thats not picking a side, thats analysing both our starts to get to a conclusion of who is up to what. Next post is a total focus on me because he clearly isn’t happy with what i have said OR has seen an opportunity to push on something specific, either way he has reverted from a measured view of the back and forth to picking a side quite easily. Interesting buddying process going on there.
Had a strong town lean followed by a scummy focusing post. Need a bit more from him to know whether he leans town or mafia, but based on a strong analytical post there is promise there so leaning town.
...
It's apparent you clearly don't like me asking you to justify your words though.
You have also said I have picked a side. And that there is buddying going on. Can you please show me where I have done this?
(Unrelated: Impressive post from a phone Generic!)
I'm a sensitive soul but seriously, I think that was cos I was in the zone and firing off thoughts, if I read you wrong it will show over time won't it. My read on you at this point is leaning town, but you may move either way in my mind from here.... I will call it as I see it, if I'm wrong I will likely be the only one who reads the content in that way.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
In post 67, James May wrote:I'll get onto my reads, I had a full post written up but then I had pressed the post preview, server timed out and my post vanished -_-
Anyhow questions:
Fegelin: Why would you be suspicious of nacho asking questions? It's highly encouraged at this phase to suck the living information out of people.
Generic & Feel It: I want to know why you think that Champin & Gen Wolf are buddying/white knighting. Please enlighten me with quotes on the reasons supporting it.
unrelated to the questionings: nice sarcastic remark on lynching Ms. Stranger gen wolf huehue.
Will rewrite my reads later when I have more time @_@
Champ isn't so much buddying as gen wolf, it was how champ liked what gen wolf said even though the explanations attached to it were all over the place. But champ qualified he liked what the post sparked from other players, not the content itself and I accepted that answer. Gen wolf leapt on the supposed compliment like it qualified what he was saying... Which it didn't. At present it's floundering mafia dining off scraps from a potentially town player.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Miss stranger, I cannot access mafiascum at work (believe it or not it's a banned site on our Internet :p ) but I think I remember some of the questions you asked to answer by phone.
You asked about buddying of champ and gen wolf. Tat was more to do with champ liking a gen wolf comment and gen wolf leaping on it as the only morsel of positive feedback he got over it. Gen wolf comes across as new scum, but champs positive comment wasn't at the post but at the reaction from others it got (which he later explained), so the buddying comment was misplaced at this time.
On your editing mess up. I never said it was proof you were scum, I played devils advocate on the analysis. I can't just write you off as new and give you a free ride. I'm new here, would you accept me at my word that I've never played mafia before? I would hope not. So I looked at both sides of the coin, but your paranoid frustration is the most telling town tell you have at present, so my read on you is new town and not new scum.
There were some other questions I'm sure, but if you want to re ask them I will answer.
Right now gen wolf I would like to give me an assessment of the players in this game and a brief read on each. What I believe is called a T/S list (town/scum?) on mtgs. Tell me at this point who you read as what alignment (or null).- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Oh, there was more. On feel it:
"Do you get town vibes because you both find the same person scummy? What scum vibes do you get?"
Feel it has been showing early signs of gentle pressure application although some of it has been misguided, and also thinking about the vote.
His scum plays included hesitancy on the gen wolf vote when he wasnt so hesitant in miss stranger, and a couple of occasions where he has done something without explanation only to fill in the gap later when someone questions it (can be a scum tell as he uses the time to make the reason fit the agenda or mood). But the explanations that have been forthcoming have made a lot of sense. He is more town than scum to me at this stage.
And on gen wolf:
"Push it back in how?"
I LOLed... But moving in from the question looking odd in isolation, this was referring to my comment about gen wolf and RVS. He makes a comment that his desire to quicklynch on page one of day 1 was because he hates RVS and wanted to end it early. But he also said it was a joke. And he also said it was a reaction test. And he also said it was the secret password to the land of narnia... Ok, I added the last one.
But my point was, antagon had hit a serious vote down and the paranoia stage that always follows RVS was in full swing when gen wolf pops up with what he says was a joke (outside RVS) to END RVS. If anything joking when it's already ended is trying to return to RVS. So he is either lying about it bring a joke or that it was to end RVS. The reaction test comment is a cheap trick to cover scummy play by saying you wanted to provoke a reaction with a provocative comment.
"Yes, he's scummy. What do you think it would happen if he flips scum, and what if he flips town?"
Don't quite see the relevance if this question at this stage. I will answer this as the game progresses if gen wolf enters L-1 territory. Right now everyone should be looking at identifying a top three suspects list. Don't clear anybody and guaranteed town, the ones slipping up on their words occasionally are more likely town than the completely clean players.
Townies don't vet their posts, scum do more often than not. So a town player won't realise or care to notice if a comment seems scummy, a mafia player will ensure every comment has purpose.
But what do I know, I'm a n00b- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
I answered your questions stranger, have you responded?
Interesting analysis gen wolf. I spotted one major good and one major bad though.
I recently made a comment a out the little miss stronger and her frustrations showing town tells. You conveniently drop in your frustrations... I have to determine whether It was deliberate and forced, or just a coincidence.
The good insight was calling me town nah, the good insight was the comment against feel it, and his waiting for how the game trended before laying down the vote. I also like the point about insta clearing that fegelein tried but the swearing was unnecessary (think of the children... Now who are we hanging today?)
Anyway, a lot for me to digest there, just grabbed a few highlights that stood out for now.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
It wouldn't be a joke then if it was a test. It would be deliberately pro active for reaction, this not a joke. It can be one or the other, not both. And I suspect by hedging the bets on that there is hope everyone will be dissuaded from probing into a very poorly answered reason.
Had he simply said "I was playing it for reaction" or "it was sarcastic, of course we wouldn't lynch that early, I was passing judgement on how stupid the fast wagon was" then I wouldn't have an arguement. But he took three bites of the cherry to explain it.
(Am I losing anyone yet with my English cliche sayings )- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Then I have an incorrect impression champino. I have looked at the DATE, it was Sunday... I'm a father if three... It was Father's Day on Sunday, so forgive my lack if interest in logging into this over enjoying family time.
I generally assume when I come in late to a lot of posts it's cos the majority of you are Americans. And I do work shifts, so expect very random posting times, but that wasnt the reason this time.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
I am enjoying champinos über paranoia at anything said. You are one of the more experienced players aren't you?
I thought this was a newbie game, am I not meant to be imparting general wisdom as we go so newer players get better? Anyone auto clearing at this stage of a game is a fool, that was my essential point. I didn't think I had aimed that at anyone in particular, was just off on a little tangent. But hey, that's two goes you have had now to try and spin a case in me, will they all consist of you taking us on a little story as to what the hidden agenda was or will you occasionally point to actual scum tells rather than loose theory?- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Btw, something of note.
Champino has so far chose to dissect my posts to death, down to my comments on time and story time about my motives... Can't seem to find a single comment on gen wolf beyond him getting quite reactive when I pointed out his positive comment towards him.
In fact I find it hard to find a strong focus from him on anyone outside of me and feel it who both have put pressure on gen wolf. Only when directly referenced by miss stranger is she brought into the mix.
Potential links already.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Miss stranger might be taking something I said to her and running with it as a general rule. I hope that's not the case.
Because without making this too much of a lesson, we have only scratched the surface of mafia theory. For example a scum tell can be frustration and overreaction because scum tend to slip when they are being lynched on bad logic. When mafia players play they like to think they are presenting a very pro town image, so when a wagon forms on spurious or weak logic in their eyes emotion supercedes logical play and they begin to aggressively argue back against the logic.
That's just an example, doesn't fully apply here to gen wolf, but this being a newbie game it's worth noting that simple frustration is t always a town tell. It's the same as tunnelling, not always a town or scum tell. But that's a whole other area :p- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Gen wolf might be frustrated at the logic that was being used to suspect him on. But he might also be town. That's the game.
And I think your issue with chdmpino is odd. Scumslips are effective in finding mafia, so there is nothing wrong with that. Selective attacking and having an arguement based on your own assumptions is not so great.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
It's always annoying when almost the entire game reads you as town and you ARE town :p my chances if survival tonight just took a major dip.
At least when you are under suspicion you might be kept alive for the potential mislynch, this is why I don't like a lot if positive feedback.
If I spot a scum player today though at least that works in my favour.
I will do another assessment sweep when I get time, still not a huge amount from some, has everyone at least offered early analysis on the rest of the players? Always useful if someone flips scum to see who they read as what.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
I was actually picking on you deliberately to see what happened miss stranger, but you are amusing with how much you care about how people perceieve you.
If you aren't totally fresh to mafia like you appear to me then I will applaud your brilliance in post game, because right now you are so newbie in everything you do I cant imagine anybody faking that.
unvoteAs that plan didn't work but feel it you came out of it rather well in my mind. It was subtle but you were very relaxed about it all.
But although im new to this I have weirdly seen a bit of meta about someone who turned up on another site im playing mafia in. I don't think its fair to vote for them based solely on a cross site spot (imagine being found out as mafia based on accidentally meeting up with another player in a different game on a different site... this could be a first!) but I will be asking nachomamma to respond to me and explain why his strong aggressive analysis has been lacking so far here. Yes he came for me, but that was VERY tunnelled on the one person. I think he is capable of more broad strokes and has yet to do that. So meta could be his downfall here.
fos nachomamma
lets hear from you before I do pursue this further.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Maybe it's a bit of a cop out, but I pointed out it was head vs gut.In post 204, champinoman wrote:
Can you outline your reasons for choosing Nachomamma over Antagon?In post 201, Generic wrote:Screw it, I'm not happy with the hand waving away if the claim at L-2, but I am feeling like its time to trust the gut.
vote nachomamma
I currently think they are as useless as each other and am having trouble deciding which one deserves it more. I'm not even worried if they aren't scum because they are useless townies anyway. So much for having IC and SE players to teach us all how to play and guide us.
James May hasn't logged in since the crash so maybe just hasn't realised we are back.In post 203, Feel It wrote:Oh btw could the mods give Gen_wolf and James May a prod?
On the other hand, Nachomamma has posted numerous times on other threads and is just ignoring this one. Prod the hell outa him.
Head was antagon because I found the summary case against him quite compelling, but my gut read on him had been town to begin with.
Nachomamma is pure gut call, because I have recently had the privilege to see the man open with a far superior analytical approach into a game, and it bears zero reflection on this. And the moment I hinted that he returned with analysis... Something smelt fishy.
And the cop out was that the head vote puts a tag on at L-1 which is not a safe territory if I'm wrong. Nacho I think is put at L-2 so it applies pressure but with not as much chance of a fast mislynch. If anyone is fast lynched at L-2 both the final voters should be scrutinised to hell, but at L-1 accidents can happen, especially if there hasn't been a vote count for a while.
That's what it was. Not particularly positive I'm afraid, but st least its the honest answer.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Feel it, here's an idea. You play your game, I will play mine. I do not like that antagon opportunistically waits to put nachomamma, the other md in wagon, at L-1 straight after my vote.In post 211, Feel It wrote:
What are you doing? You've changed your vote a hundred times we had enough pressure to get a real response out of nacho.In post 210, Generic wrote:In fact I'm so annoyed by that play,
unvote, vote antagon
antagon is now at L-1
I already said L-1 allows for a mislynch much easier than L-2. Antagon could have voted anytime before me, chose to wait.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
It's comparing the tactical mindset though. She was simply drawing comparisons to the thought process and the alignment behind that, and I applaud it. May end up irrelevant, but it's showing placement of logic to what she sees.In post 219, Fegelein wrote:Problem is, Antagon is not Honest Abel. I can draw some parallels with their behaviour I guess, but you have to understand that you are comparing two different people here.
That kid will go far
Miss stranger, we can discuss mafia theory and such post game if you like, but I am not wanting to spend game time coaching or teaching, no offence.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
You have just gone off at the deep end because I chose to me my vote from nacho (taking him from L-1) to antagon (putting him at L-1). Your reason for the issue is you wanted nacho under the pressure of L-1.
Now look where your vote is.
That's right, it's on antagon. So I stead of bitching at me, how about you move your vote and apply the pressure yourself?
Hence why the suspicion, don't want to get your own hands dirty.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
In post 211, Feel It wrote:
What are you doing? You've changed your vote a hundred times we had enough pressure to get a real response out of nacho.In post 210, Generic wrote:In fact I'm so annoyed by that play,
unvote, vote antagon
antagon is now at L-1
This is your post. You want nacho under pressure. You don't care about whether I consider one scummier than the other, your anger at me stems from not keeping nacho at L-1.
I point out you could switch vote to achieve that very same goal and you come up with a weak excuse about finding antagon slightly scummier?
The same s racon I put at L-1 and you got angry about, right?
unvote, vote feel it.
I don't know why you need to make stuff up to cover your unwillingness to move the vote, but none of it is pro town to me.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
If antagon is mafia, I'm pitching either fegelein or feel it for teammate, both if its a three man team (forgot what the split was).
Feel it refused to move his vote to nacho yet was happy to post intent to hammer on him. It simply doesn't add up.
To me he wants to sit on the antagon wagon in case that ends in a lynch so he can appear a part if it, but was ready to wait for nacho to respond and then hammer him claiming the posts weren't good enough.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Ok, I think anyone who has any sense will see nachos effort here and realise he surely is t the scummiest option for day 1.
Antagon for me answers a lot of questions on players.
And feel it, I have recently spent a scum game elsewhere voting against my teammate each and every day phase. We managed to divide the town who believed the scum team was either me and a town player or my teammate and a town player. I named it castling, after the chess play where the room swaps places with the king. We subbed each other out by white knighting and distancing over a long period of time. Won us the game.
Anyway, the point to the story is that just because you are voting for someone doesn't suddenly make you unaligned pairs. And from my perspective you have just witnessed your second scum suspect put your third at L-1, you then offered intent to hammer that and when I switched vote to put your more strongest suspect at L-1 you had issues with it!
You forgot all about suspect number 1, gen wolf, and react to the potential lynch of a guy you just called scummier than nacho. To me you are a mafia player light bussing with no intent to see him lynched, meanwhile the chance of a mislynch is snatched from you and you react to it.
Pedit:
Was about to switch vote to antagon and put him at L-1, but given nachos case against champino I want champino to respond before I do anything else.- Generic
-
Generic
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
I saw incidents that made others scummier. You were desperate for nacho to be under pressure from L-1, you declared you would be willing to hammer him...
Yet when I suggested you put him at L-1 you were reluctant to vote for him at all.
So why was hammering him to an official lynch a preference to putting non-final pressure of the L-1 on him?
No meta there, the facts of the game. Answer me that one.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
So you lied about being willing to hammer him?
Not a great start feel it but ok.
And then you say moving your vote loses pressure on antagon. But antagons reaction to being at L-2 was a desperate jump on the other wagon to bring him out of the firing line, when we were nowhere near the deadline. And when I acted on that you seemed to react o it negatively. Yet my moved ADDED pressure to your bigger suspect.
Am I the only one finding this story to not add up? If I am I will stop wasting my time on something I have clearly read totally wrong, but to me feel it thinks antagon is more suspicious and in need of pressure but when he reacted badly and I applied more to him feel it took issue.
And this push on nacho you desired, he responded without needing to be at L-1, and with far more analysis in the game than anyone else. Put that against what antagon did at L-2 and tell me I was wrong to move my vote.- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
- Generic
-
Generic Mafia Scum
- Generic
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2392
- Joined: June 11, 2013
Ok, with under two days left this is still a clusterfuck.
Antagon, one more chance. Short snalydis of the rest of us or at the very least your top two and your bottom two.
I still maintain the best lynch is feel it, but if I am still the only one who thinks this is the best option in the next 24hours I will assess a secondary vote, because I think letting deadline decide the lynch is a cop out. Lets think this through guys, we have the following options:
Fegelein
Champino
Nacho
Antagon
Feel it.
Unless we have a major slip from someone else time is against us for a whole new case. I will present my feel it case later, I as use gen wolf to either present the fegelein case or move his vote.
Nacho, lets see the summary champino case, and then so done on the nacho and antagon wagons present those cases.
We put the short summary cases together, we each devise who is the best lynch other than our current vote if we are voting and then see if one player features in the majority of people's top two. That's the guy who goes in my opinion. - Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic
- Generic