If we lynch you today you won't have the same problem.
1) NotIn post 25, notscience wrote:1)(To those who haven't stated so) What is your time zone?
2) Have you ever played Mafia before? If so, on what medium and how many games? (irl, another forum, etc)
3) Do you prefer to play as town or scum?
4) What would your feelings be on a no-lynch?
Unless me saying you won't is an interesting result... you won't.
Take a stand, is it interesting scum or interesing poor play?In post 52, Z7-852 wrote:It's intresting thatnotscienceasked what people think about no-lynch (#25). No-lynch always bad for town execpt in very specific situations like mylo. So anyone wanting to go for no-lynch is either poor player or scum. This was a weird move to ask peoples opinion on thing like this.
I’m terrified that telling you my time zone will out me as scum.
Disagree, his posting has looked more like fluff than useful content.In post 60, Feel It wrote:Z7-852 has been fairly active and been making good observations, already trying to assess and pick up early scum tells, seems the most townie to me so far.
If I’m dead the only people I’ll be speaking to are players in a Dead QT if we have one. However, RVS wagons almost never reach lynch so I doubt there was serious targeting of me by the players on my wagon.In post 63, HopefullyCynical wrote:DDP, can I get a clarification on a facet of your role as IC? If you die, are you no longer able to help the newbie players out?
When your views align with mine you’re agreeing when they align with someone I disagree with you’re sheeping.In post 77, HopefullyCynical wrote:What is the difference between agreeing with someone and sheeping? I am legitimately curious.
We'd probably get an even better response if you voted him as well.In post 93, HopefullyCynical wrote:I hope Z7 comes back in here soon, I'd like to see his response to the DDP vote.
Very reasonable, you should probably vote for him as well for being so reasonable.In post 95, Dessew wrote:Last time Z7-852 posted, there wasn't much going so he couldn't provide much content.
Pretty dubious to call V/LA then post in three other games but not ours mvm.In post 102, notscience wrote:Yo mvm, you have anything to actually say about this game or do you plan to ride our curttails/lurk your way to your scum wincon? He's posting other places, why not here?
It was mostly how he substituted the word interesting for anything useful in his second post that bothered me; it's nothing substansive but felt like I should poke at him a bit.In post 104, HopefullyCynical wrote:Danny, can I get a little bit more on why you don't like Z7 other than he makes you feel uneasy? I know it's Day 1 so there I don't expect incredibly detailed answers, but your reasoning is a little vague.
You mean, let me understand this cause, ya know maybe it's me, I'm a little fucked up maybe, but I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to fuckin' amuse you? What do you mean funny, funny how? How am I funny?In post 107, Dessew wrote:I don't know what to say about DDDP, the way he tried to get votes to the Z7-wagon is funny but maybe it's not even worth noting.
Ya motherfucker! I almost had him, I almost had him. Ya stuttering prick ya. notscience, was he shaking? I wonder about you sometimes, Dessew. You may fold under questioning.In post 122, notscience wrote:btw if your response is serious I am going to die js
It appears hope has been lost.In post 121, FuDuzn wrote:I will make a actual post with content hopefully later tonight.
Of course wording can be a scumtell; for example in that case Z7's wording was safe wording designed not to pick a fight, which is more likely a scum attribute than a town attribute.In post 164, Smudger wrote:the use of wording is a scum tell now? please expand?In post 115, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:It was mostly how he substituted the word interesting for anything useful in his second post that bothered me; it's nothing substansive but felt like I should poke at him a bit.
sorry? had him? Had him doing what? or is this sarcasm?In post 123, Debonair Danny DiPietro wrote:Ya motherfucker! I almost had him, I almost had him. Ya stuttering prick ya. notscience, was he shaking? I wonder about you sometimes, Dessew. You may fold under questioning.
I often write off hypocrisy like I saw from mvm earlier in regards to FuD, but this is more than a little bothersome. Someone else can't be a little inconsistent? Of course there are good possible reasons to disregard a top scumread in favor of lesser reads depending on circumstances, I'd in fact say it's a town attribute not to be wedded to one's stances. The real dodgy part is where he blatently solicitates for other's views; isntead of taking a stance himself he's probing things to see if he can get away with a move there.In post 180, mvmafia wrote:gotta agree with fuzz that z7 isnt following his scummometer at 149.
What you guys think of Z7 ?
Don't forget the part where I get accussed of sheeping despite asking people to vote with me and not moving my vote to vote with other people.In post 202, FuDuzn wrote:*cough* Hello? I am in this game as well right?
Also, so part of your reasoning to vote DDDP is him quoting Goodfellas?
I mean that should've been obvious to anyone paying attention.In post 220, FuDuzn wrote:I thought he was just making a jokey sort of post using the Goodfellas quote.
It's not nothing; it's actually a "classic" scumtell which may mean it's antiquated and wrong but at some point it was apparently actually a scum signifier.In post 256, FuDuzn wrote:Notscience, why are you trying to make somethings out of not really anything? HC is bringing up a good point, when you have a couple flips it is good to look at interactions the dead players had.
You mean the Smudger who curiously came up behind notscience's point with a half-dozen quotes backing up notscience's argument and just leaves them there to try and erode my reputation? But doesn't do anything with them beyond that? Yeah, that was a curious play.In post 257, HopefullyCynical wrote:Reviewing the posts, Smudger was one of the biggest anti-Feel It players here. What do you guys make of that?
If I had to pick one person Feel It was pushing it would be you and I think that's pretty obvious. In fact I think he was the only one to push you so despite his pressure being "minimal" if it was the only pressure why not prune the vine before it has a chance to grow at all? Everyone has a reputation in this game, being an IC generally means you're afforded more respect from the new players whether it's warranted or not. Yours was the sort of play I'd make to damage someone's credibility so that the other players would be less likely to listen to them.In post 266, Smudger wrote:Danny do you really think Feel It was pushing me? As I don"t. In fact his attention to me was minimal and of no pressure yo me. Even your rather weak case here that you are trying to build seems pretty poor in comparison. Now with regard to your observation concerning my quotes of your fluff, so? Sk you feel threatened by them? I think not, and as for not commenting afterwards, I was actually waiting to see your response and that is now duly noted.Finally, your reputation? What reputation?
Completely opposite take, HC isn't bringing up good analysis, he's bringing up what could be good analysis if he refined it a little and thought about it instead of just pushing it out the front door. And that's why he's likely town there's no neat plan he's pushing it's the jumbled thoughts of someone trying to fit things together.In post 271, FuDuzn wrote:Notscience, why do you continue to badger HC about him bringing up good analysis? It is like you are trying to discredit him because he hasn't figured out the scum team yet.In post 269, notscience wrote:Then who is the other scum if they wanted Feel it off their back?
VOTE: notscience
Would you stop whining about process and instead do something about the perception that you're scum? I have absolutely no problem with a quicklynch; I do have a problem with you being quicklynched because despite you being irritating as hell I think you're town.In post 315, notscience wrote:Why? Because town is letting someone get to L-1, have intent to hammer claimed, this early into day 2. There's nothing legitimate about this intent to claim nor is there in Z7s or HC's votes (Z7 at the very least acknowledges that fact) and yet I'm sitting here with the gallows hanging over my head? Lol?