Mini 1464 - Game Over
Forum rules
- Zhero
-
Zhero
- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
In post 45, mnemonicdevice wrote:Now the thing is, is that Zhero's response was deleted to my questionnaire, which was my main vote change reason.In post 47, Haschel Cedricson wrote:What specifically about his response caused the vote change?
So my response was not the reason?In post 67, mnemonicdevice wrote:Sorry, my response didn't post to 47. Mostly my Zhero vote is an OMGUS, because he voted me. I also want to see his reaction. But apparently that isn't happening.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
"Yes, no, yes, yes, no", I think.In post 69, mnemonicdevice wrote:and I don't remember what your response was, for it was deleted.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
Eh, the only thing I care about RQS-wise is that initiating one is a scumtell. Other than that, the actual answers are meaningless.In post 86, 2birds1stone wrote:I'm also pretty pissed off that someone had to go and resurrect an RQS that was lost in rollback. Losing RQSes and the baggage that comes with them is a good thing for the game. The thread's now got plenty of noise regarding what the questions actually were and who said/thought what about them. This is not fucking helpful, and everyone contributing to it is gaining scumpoints.
Was me voting you scummy?Mostly my Zhero vote is an OMGUS, because he voted me.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero
- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
I voted mnemonic before Haschel did, if that's what you mean. I guess my 'RQS is potential scumtell' post got lost to the void, but I'm not sure how I'm sheeping here.In post 118, Daemon385 wrote: Honestly I feel your hiding behind someone you think (or know is town). Not saying your scum (yet), but I think it is pretty suspicious to just hang back this early on and wolf your way into sheep clothing.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
If you are suspicious of Haschel, why didn't you list him as a suspect in post 113?In post 132, mnemonicdevice wrote:Toomai: I simply wanted to let him know that his actions were causing me to be suspicious.
This sounds like scumbuddy talk.In post 134, pitoli wrote:I don't like that mnemonic is so vague, but I'm not sure he's scum yet.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
"don't like that mnemonic is so vague" sounds like coaching, and "not sure he's scum yet" is both a soft defense and also leaves room for future bussing if necessary. Both mnemonic and pitoli have ben very reluctant to take a stance on each other's wagon.In post 139, 2birds1stone wrote:
Is this elaborable?In post 138, Zhero wrote:I don't like that mnemonic is so vague, but I'm not sure he's scum yet.
This sounds like scumbuddy talk.
I'm cool with being wrong about Toomai if Zhero and mnemonic are scumbuddies.-Zhero- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
- Zhero
-
Zhero Goon
- Zhero
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 611
- Joined: August 13, 2009
Reread the thread, and can still definitely see a mnem/pit team. Contrary to my last post, I'm okay with either lynch.
Big scumpoints here.In post 206, Infinity 324 wrote:Hi guys, I agree that pitoli was scummy, but my role PM said I'm town, so :/
Actually I wouldn't be that opposed to my lynch because it would give lots of info
This also flags me. Basically waiting for someone to make a case for him, and when Toomai obliges, switches gears from a Toomai vote to a 2birds vote accordingly.In post 210, Infinity 324 wrote:I'll wait for others to weigh in on the toomai/2birds thing before explaining.
Also as mentioned above, he seems to be casting a wide net, without really getting into many details.
VOTE: Infinity-Zhero - Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero
- Zhero