Mini 1468: Legends of the Hidden Temple- Game Over!
Forum rules
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
What? Why would you? Is there any set-up where you know your partner's alignment barring the case he's your scumpartner?In post 36, Wisdom wrote:I was not aware we would not know our partner's alignment either- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
The Amrun-suggestion was bound to be made. Nulltell in my eyes.In post 49, Wisdom wrote:Whatever
FoS: Amrun, since suggesting such things usually comes from scum going for cred.
pedit: That wouldn't make much sense, then you could simply halve the playerslist or just play as hydra's.
General question: Any guidelines on how to use the private QT properly for scumhunting? I realize it gives you an extra forum in a way, but I don't see why not everything we say could occur here.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I think the above summarizes the first four pages well. Moving on.In post 94, Amrun wrote:The suggestion itself is 100% pro-town. This set-up isn't a mystery so if the plan is adopted, it will be a good plan regardless of the alignment of the originator.
Sure, suggesting it doesn't make me town, since scum also want to appear town. It also doesn't make me scum, either. In fact, traditionally, such suggestions are made far more often by town -- BUT it's still null because the scum motivation for doing it is so cut and dry. So the fact that I suggested a plan should not be treated as a tell in either direction (in my opinion, at least). Analyzing the manner in which I did it is another matter entirely.
I disagree with the reasons for this read. Questioning why people have you as a townread is common practice enough in order to allow scum to adopt it as well.And as I said, some people are rude regardless, but it's a perfectly valid reason to not be interested in pursuing you at the moment. That conviction is only strengthened by you arguing with the basis of my townread on you.
By the way: where was Wisdom rude?
I also question this early townread of him. Sounds to me like you just want him out of your hairs so you give a soothing townread to try and make him back off. What's wrong with just sticking to the arguments that are to be found in the first quote-snippet of post 94? Why do you feel the need to add a townread of Wisdom this early?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 96, Wisdom wrote:Yeah, I don't agree. That suggestion sounds to me like directing a vengekill, basically allowing scum to direct the challenges and therefore the lynches whatever way they want.
This is a strange turn. First you went from a story where you said Amrun was going for towncred by proposing a town-minded suggestion, but now you state this suggestion is not town-minded at all? Or do I misinterpret this?
But if I understand it correctly, I don't agree with this. Why would it be scum directing the challenges in case we follow Amrun's suggestion? They are in the minority, so they have less ability to influence the challenge process if it happens democratically, or at least not moreso than in games with normal lynch-processes.
What is the alternative? Someone is convinced they have a strong case and challenge the other team? The plus side of this is that the challenger knows his own allignment and doesn't allow interference of others when it comes to narrowing down the lynch-pool, but I don't see the problem in looking for support for this case in the form of pseudo-voting. The case falling apart after the challenge has been made would be bad for everyone.
Forcing two teams with scum-suspects to challenge each other looks like the most productive and transparent way to go.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Why wouldn't they? I do it all the time, arguing bullshit sometimes allows you to get the feel of a person, emotions they go through and possibly underlying motivations.In post 122, AngryPidgeon wrote: Town typically doesn't argue bullshit with someone they think is town.
I actually find myself ending up in quite a few bullshit-arguments without really wanting to, but seriously, it happens all the time, for town and scum alike. I'm sure you know that.
Scummy argument to make.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Well, that makes my explanation redundant, but not the questions laid before him.In post 278, Amrun wrote:Grim groove, now he likes the plan once I explained it more thoroughly.
Also, check 275, could you answer the question about your townread on him and your desire to share that so early in the game?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I thought the exact same thing when moving to the next page.In post 125, Wisdom wrote:mollie Im starting to scumread you, stop fluffing
Up to and including page 6 pirate mollie is giving me the strongest scumvibes, lack of involvement with the game at hand. The back-and-forth with Wisdom following this comment is not reassuring at all. What is so important about having a talk with Majify first? What is trolleytracking anyway?
Liking Venmar's entrance on page 6.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I saw you hand out FoS's early on in the game, even before agreeing with this plan. What was the point of those and how are they different from putting bolded votes in this setup?In post 281, Wisdom wrote:
My point was the the suggestion maybe appeared pro-town to most, but it wasn't necessarily so.In post 277, Grimgroove wrote:This is a strange turn. First you went from a story where you said Amrun was going for towncred by proposing a town-minded suggestion, but now you state this suggestion is not town-minded at all? Or do I misinterpret this?
*Disclaimer: apologies if I repeat things that already have been said/asked, feel free to refer me to earlier posts in case I do. Reached page 7 now.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Was this serious? Half of the people hadn't even properly participated in the game and you'd already hand out a challenge?In post 146, Venmar wrote: I'm willing to start challenging people.
When I said I liked your entrance I was referring to your criticism on Angry Pidgeon's case, but your scumread on Wisdom does not have enough argumentational backing to proclaim such an intent. Who would you have challenged and why?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
That wasn't the question. At a time where you disagreed with the suggestion (you said it would allow scum to direct the game), you in essence followed the same procedure as the one you disagreed with. How do you feel the FoS's you handed out were different? And if they weren't, why were you disagreeing with a plan that you were following yourself?In post 285, Wisdom wrote:Yeah as you'll read later we decided to do it via bolding Nominate: (name).- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Part in bold: Not true.In post 149, AngryPidgeon wrote:
P-P-edit:She really did call herself likely town for the planand then defend the plan by pointing to "experience". That is not town motivated.
The rest: Don't agree.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 175, Wisdom wrote:
Does it matter if she said the most or one of the most? That's besides the point I was making.In post 168, StrangerCoug wrote:No, she did not. She said she was ONE OF the most experienced. She did not claim to be the #1 most experienced, which your dropping "one of" implies. I shouldn't even be arguing semantics with you.
Could you point to where she linked her long experience to being pro-town? It's an argument that obviously doesn't make sense, but I never saw Amrun make it.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 181, pirate mollie wrote:wis why are you breaking up all of strange's posts and not just putting them in 1? see this is why I want to talk to majiffy cos to me it looks like scum burying posts. he will know what I am talking about
How does this make her town? As you said, both town and scum know there are four Temple Guards?In post 171, Wisdom wrote:
Yeah, I stopped reading here.In post 166, Amrun wrote:There are, at most, three scum in this game
You're trying to make plans, yet you don't know the number of scum?
It is KNOWN how many scum there are.
I guess this makes you town though, even though I wouldn't put it past you to fake that towntell.
If anything, I'd regard it as a scumslip. Scum doesn't bother to check the opening post to see how many scum there are. MAybe she just inferred it from the ammount of people present in the scumQT, and if up to that point there were only three there, it could just as easily explain her mistake.
I'm not saying it is a strong scumslip, but it's definitely more of a scumslip than a townslip in my eyes.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
What is burying posts and what good does it do scum? Some people hate walls, others hate double-posts, but if someone has a lot to share, they have to choose one of both. Do you feel people who post a lot of information are scummy?In post 181, pirate mollie wrote:wis why are you breaking up all of strange's posts and not just putting them in 1? see this is why I want to talk to majiffy cos to me it looks like scum burying posts. he will know what I am talking about
Why are you relying so much on Majify in this game? Why can't you make your own conclusions?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Ok, good point.In post 1, Haschel Cedricson wrote:
Four players will have this appended to the above role PM:At least, that is what you are pretending to be. In actuality, you belong to a secret society that has vowed to protect the Hidden Temple at all costs. By disguising yourself as an explorer, your duty is to guard the Hidden Temple and make sure the treasure remains undisturbed. Your fellow guards are NAME1, NAME2, and NAME3, and you may talk to them at any time at QUICKTOPIC LINK.
You win when the number of temple guards is equal to the number of explorers.
But.
I know it's a stretch but given there's three capitalized names in the PM I wouldn't put it passed anyone to somehow register this as "there's three scum" in their brain, even as scum reading their PM.
How do you explain the mistake from Amnur from a Town point-of-view? Where would she get the number "3" specifically?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Why not?In post 183, Elyse wrote:Townread on mollie. I don't really see 181 coming from scum.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I find it very striking you're not opposing the statement that you were in fact milking for towncred. What you're saying here is that you actually deserve it.In post 214, Amrun wrote:
How can you not see that it is a plan? It's a systematic approach as opposed to a willy-nilly approach. In one, challenging whenever you feel like it is acceptable behavior; in my plan, that is NOT acceptable behavior. It's a significant departure from playing this game straight.In post 208, AngryPidgeon wrote:
THERE IS NO PLAN. THIS IS COMMON SENSE. YOU ARE MILKING TOWNCRED FROM NOTHING.In post 190, Amrun wrote:
Do you see any holes in the plan?In post 179, Wisdom wrote:
Okay I read it, and I'll admit it looks better the way you put it now.In post 173, Amrun wrote:If you don't even read, though, then why you expect to be treated seriously is beyond me.
I guess there aren't many alternatives anyway, and I guess you have a point that if scum are capable enough to exploit the plan, they are capable enough to win without the plan too.
ffs venmar, how is Amrun not suspicious to you.
I didn't really like Angry Pidgeon's case up tothis point, but this response was bad in my eyes.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 225, pirate mollie wrote:@ everyone
what do you think of your partner
I was in gchat with majiffy for five minutes before I town read him. although it was probably a little ridiculous to partner majiffy and I together
I noted that Elyse's read (which turned out to be a joke) was questioned by enomis, but not pirate_mollie's read. Why not?In post 228, Elyse wrote:SafetyDance is obvtown.
Pirate_mollie: Could you explain how you reached that read? I hereby refer to my earlier question: is there any guideline/theory on how to use these partner QT's optimally?
Finally got through the topic. I've been through different swings actually in my reads, so not sure if I can already specify those.
@Amrun: Is Wisdom still a townread? Is he your only townread?
Will need to IC StrangerCough later, his posts gave me a bad vibe, but something told me it would be time-intensive to point out the why's and whats, so I'll keep that for a bit later when I got more energy for this game again.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Ok, one last thing: I feel that was a bit uncalled for.In post 265, Elyse wrote:
@enomis
I don't know what you want me to say. That's why I asked the question. Sorry if it doesn't fit with your scum lean on me or whatever you're conjuring up.
Are you calling enomis scum for grilling you? Why do you think he's conjuring up stuff? He never directly stated a scumlean on you, why do you interpret his questioning as such? Why do you feel so obviously theatened?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
You're probably right about that, but it can't hurt to try and scrutinize the supposed townslip either.
Do you agree with Wisdom that it is a townslip? What do you make of the mistake?
Amrun, could you provide an explanation for this mistake yourself? Why haven't you earlier?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
@Amrun: sorry, I missed the fact you already answered this question on this page.
I meant ISO, sorry.In post 305, StrangerCoug wrote:
Aww, are the allergies flaring up again?In post 301, Grimgroove wrote:Will need to IC StrangerCough later,
I'd like to know how my partner is concerned about me when he has the energy to put up a case.
Not sure if I'll have a case yet, but the bad vibe is definitely there. I'll just try to explain why it's there.
Why do you assume I'll have a case, and that I'm not just talking about gut?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Just because a plan backfires doesn't mean you can't have had any intentions that were contrary to the result.In post 304, Amrun wrote:
Of course I'm not milking town cred, which I had already addressed ten billion times. Do I have to repeat myself as nauseum? The whole thing is a farce anyway because I've gotten nothing but patently negative attention for proposing a plan, so who am I supposed to be milking towncred from, exactly?
I use the term quite loosely. There's gradations when it comes to any kind of slip, and only very few where the conclusion is clear-cut. Usually it's related to certain "mistakes" a player makes, based on prior notions that only scum or town has. In this case, I don't think the mistake was necessarily made by town.Also, please explain how something can be "a little bit" of a scumslip.
In retrospect: Do you feel your mistake should be considered a townslip? What do you think of people reading you as town because of it?
Ok, I was unaware of these traditional ratios, hence the "3" seemed more random than it obviously is.For the record, I assumed three scum because I've never been in a mini with a 4p scumteam to my recollection and I've been in idk how many games, but easily upwards of 100.
Could you reiterate why he's your strongest townread?Yes, wisdom is still a town read. No, he's not the only one but he's the strongest one. His has been relevant to share so far because I think sharing your conclusions after a spat with someone is helpful, at least most of the time.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I would rather not re- explain my town read on Wisdom because I've already explained it far more than I usually like to explain early town reads. Nothing has changed. The concepts are not difficult. If something in particular confuses you, ask a particular question.
Does the quote in bold constitue your reasons for Wisdom-town, or are there additional arguments that I missed?
In case this is it, you can find my doubts surrounding this read just under it.
In post 275, Grimgroove wrote:
I disagree with the reasons for this read. Questioning why people have you as a townread is common practice enough in order to allow scum to adopt it as well.And as I said, some people are rude regardless, but it's a perfectly valid reason to not be interested in pursuing you at the moment. That conviction is only strengthened by you arguing with the basis of my townread on you.
I just answered your own question. If my answer was besides the point, you should have asked a different question.In post 318, Amrun wrote:Of course plans can have contrary results. That wasn't my point.
Lala land mudslinging? What is that? Who is doing that?My point was that I have ready exhaustively explained that I wasn't milking towncred and, in fact, should not be given town cred for it. I already addressed a post to ap about it so objecting to not doing it for like the third time is lala land mudslinging in my eyes.
Thank you for this clarification, I now understand your confusion about my use of the word "slip". In my eyes, there haven't been any slips in this game so far,a ccording to your definition.As for my supposed slip, to be frank, I would probably view it as a town tell if someone else had done it. Not a town SLIP, something that is cut and dry, but something that makes someone marginally more likely to be town. But it's not difficult to manufacture so calling it null is maybe safer. That's the only way it would come from scum (purposefully). Only the dumbest of scum would not know how many partners they had.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I'm not making any friends here obviously
Actually, this isn't a laughing matter. It makes me a bit sad
The "attacking a player with an earlier join date"-argument was already nullified by Wisdom himself. Why do you stick to it? This kind of argument suggest tha any newbie attacking anyone is pro-town per definition. doesn't make much sense, you seem to value join dates a bit too much and I don't just say this because I'm fairly new myself.. But personally I don't really consider join dates as relevant when deciding on how to act towards someone.In post 320, Amrun wrote:No, that's not the only reasons for Wisfom town. He attacked a player with an earlier join date etc. with unknown skill (to him) very aggressively in a way that I think is indicative of town. He was also quick to admit he was wrong even when I was still under fire from other parties.
Why not? Are my reads in general irrelevant to you? If so, why?I don't particularly care if you agree with my town read, though.
I don't fully understand what it is I've done that warrants such an agressive tone.
I have not thrown shit, I have merely asked questions based on an initial reading, in order to integrate myself within this game through discussion and Q&A-rounds. Sorry if me asking for things that have been said is experienced as bothersome or mudslinging, but I did add a disclaimer that one should feel free to refer to earlier posts in case I missed something."La la land mudslinging" is my slang for throwing nonsensical shit at someone and hoping it sticks. In this case, I was referring to you, though I also think it's true of AP (and moreso).
Catching up on 11 pages can be done in different ways, apparently I did it wrongly but bygones are bygones.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Not taking your word for it, I hope you understand, but given this mutual stance and your long history together, I'll take this as the two of you belonging to the same alignment.In post 325, Majiffy wrote:
She wanted me to fully explain the setup mechanics to her. And trolleytracking is tunneling.In post 282, Grimgroove wrote:I thought the exact same thing when moving to the next page.
Up to and including page 6 pirate mollie is giving me the strongest scumvibes, lack of involvement with the game at hand. The back-and-forth with Wisdom following this comment is not reassuring at all. What is so important about having a talk with Majify first? What is trolleytracking anyway?
Mollie is town, move on.
I am avoiding you because you are evidently too magnificent a foe for the likes of me. I think avoiding you will be the best tactic for me to win this game.
Burying posts is overwhelming the thread with more noise than signal while making it look like you're posting content. Adding so much to read to the thread in such a short period of time, and usually with high frequency, makes the town players feel overwhelmed and eventually lazy, which fosters an environment that is pro-scum. Check out the Posh game for a great example of this in action.In post 295, Grimgroove wrote:What is burying posts and what good does it do scum? Some people hate walls, others hate double-posts, but if someone has a lot to share, they have to choose one of both. Do you feel people who post a lot of information are scummy?
Why are you relying so much on Majify in this game? Why can't you make your own conclusions?
Why are you avoidingme? I've stated a firm town read on Mollie and you haven't so much as questioned me about one thing, whilst making posts that seem to indicate you have scum feelings for Mollie.
Yes, I've seen some posts by mollie that gave me scumvibes. Yours didn't really catch my eye in any way.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I repeated myself only once, when asking about the use of the QT's. I'll use it to my best abilities, or just hope StrangerCoug can use it better and secure a warranted town-read on me.In post 322, pirate mollie wrote: now. your questions come across as being a bit useless cos they are persistent and incessant (not to mention repetitive) and seem less like you are trying to determine anyone's alignment from them and more like you just want to look busy which I see as more scum motivated.
They seem incessant because I'm making the most of my time online. I don't see the link between "uselessness" and "persistence".
Rest assured I'm trying to determine alignment with these questions. You have your ways and I have mine. Trying to get a feel of the people and the game mechanics, while at the same time establishing my presence here.
I don't like the general ambiance in this topic. Very long toes and very little goodwill/patience.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Given you're so insistant on this point I want to weigh in on this and agree with others this argument makes little sense. He has a desire to challenge his partner, so what? What would you do if you thought your partner was scum and you were being asked on who you would challenge, Would you not mention your partner at all simply because he's your partner and the game mechanic only allows an indirect approach to formally challenge him?In post 316, Wisdom wrote:Yeah, but you can't directly
Yet he answered the question "who would you challenge" with someone that he cannot challenge directly.
I could even see that as a scumslip, tbh. If both Venmar and AP are scum, then obviously they wouldn't care about being partners since they would already be scumbuddies.
But maybe that's a stretch.
First of all, there's a thing like the informal challenge, which is far more important. Second, the way around it is not complicated. If you want your partner to be in the lynchpool it's just as easy to do, if not easier. Just challenge anyone and it's done.
If pirate mollie's statement in 91 has any truth in it, this is definitely something to be remebered.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I admit my hopes for your understanding were merely ornamental.In post 340, Majiffy wrote:
Does not compute.In post 337, Grimgroove wrote:Not taking your word for it, I hope you understand
Does it compute now?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
@Wisdom: The thing in bold is crucial to your argument. Do you feel it is convincing if you look at it seperately?In post 316, Wisdom wrote:Yeah, but you can't directly
Yet he answered the question "who would you challenge" with someone that he cannot challenge directly.
I could even see that as a scumslip, tbh.If both Venmar and AP are scum, then obviously they wouldn't care about being partners since they would already be scumbuddies.
But maybe that's a stretch.
You correctly called me out for assuming scum doesn't pay attention to their PM's, yet here you are assuming something very similar.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
It's the posts I brought up during my round of incessant questions. Basically it's mainly related to your earlier period in the game.In post 357, pirate mollie wrote:
which postsIn post 337, Grimgroove wrote:I am avoiding you because you are evidently too magnificent a foe for the likes of me. I think avoiding you will be the best tactic for me to win this game.
Yes, I've seen some posts by mollie that gave me scumvibes. Yours didn't really catch my eye in any way.
and explain why you think they are scummy
Note that there will again be many questions in this thread. Even though one of their aims is that you answer them, a secondary function is that they clarify my thought process and reflect my thoughts about you.
First it started with your fluff for the first six pages or so. I thought it was scummy because it showed no commitment when it comes to moving this game forward.
Your explanation of this fluff I also found scummy. You said you were waiting to interact with Majify in order to be able to proceed. You say you explained why (the quote above is what I found), but I don't find this explanation satisfactory, and here is why.In post 132, pirate mollie wrote:eta: chill the fuck out
eta2:cos he is my partner and I do not want to obsessively trolleytrack on him again
First of all, you state that you need to chat with Majify in order to avoid tunneling him. This does not make sense for several reasons, and the lack of sense makes it scummy:
- Why would you tunnel him before interacting with him? You seem to equate "getting into the game before chatting with Majify" with "trolletracking Majify". This doesn't make sense. Why does MAjify have to be your starting point?
- Obviously, getting the read of Majify was just a matter of procedure. 5 minutes was all it took. Then why make such a big deal of it before? If it was just such a short procedure, I don't see why you couldn't get started with other things in the meanwhile until you had it done.
- Why would tunneling him be bad? Considering you read him like an open book, I guess this means that if you do tunnel him, that means he must be scum. Why do you fear trolleytracking MAjify if you later claim to read him easily? The fear seems unfounded given your special connection.
What I also found scummy (now a bit less because MAjify is untroubled by it) was how you seemed to give up your ownership on your own posts and thought processes in post 155 ("cos if I townread him I will probably orient my game around him unless goes after my townreads.") It sounds like we should adress any further questions to Majify instead of to you.
And I'm not sure if it's scummy, but I don't like the attitude you are having here. Yes, I know you won't care, but that doesn't matter. It seems like all you have done so far is secure a townread from Majifyu to cruise through this topic unquestioned and act like big bad-asses, but I'll tell you right now I'm not in the least bit impressed. It could be scummy in the sence that you're maybe trying to paralyze my efforts and you take me for some easily impressionable newbie, but I will not be deterred from my cause of finding scum. If I meet you on the way I'll gladly take Majify with it.
Your macho-prattling in [pos]359[/post] was the most laughable thing I've read since my arrival at Mafiascum. Congratulations.
Where have I been defensive, awfully so?
I did consider Amrun's response as agressive, but that doesn't mean I partuvlarly care about it. It's not a misrep but an honest interpretation. Note I also did not connect any indication of alignment to it. Misreps are made with the aim of painting someone off as scummy. i didn't do such a thing.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
This is mainly in your hands. You've established that you are many things, but I have seen no clear indications that either of you are town.In post 363, Majiffy wrote: Nope. Start townreading Mollie and myself, pronto.
I seem to have given off the impression I'm a push-over. Sorry for the misunderstanding, please cease any efforts that have this idea in mind.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 371, Amrun wrote:Grim, I can be, have been, and will be aggressive when and if it suits my mood and/or the game.
Lol, what is up with you people? No need to take yourself so seriously. I get it, you like to roll your muscles.
I didn't mean to tell any of you how to behave, I just gave my view of how I don't really like these "I don't care what you think about me" posts. They are not very engaging.
Maybe it will grow on me, who knows.
Yes, I'm a delicate little flower.Are you always so sensitive to aggression?
Not really. But maybe Elyse can weigh in on this, as she told me I need thicker skin. I recently had a (supposedly over-)sensitive reaction when she called my contributions fluff in another game. But that's is an ongoing game, so you won't be able to get any conclusion alignment-wise based on that, if that's what you're after.Do you have evidence of this?
The only game I've been in that's finished was a micro-game together with Wisdom. I don't recall any major bursts of aggression there, the issue was never brought up in any case.
Come to think of it: why is this relevant?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
No harm done I think, but I'll keep it in mind. In this case it's probably better Elyse does NOT weigh in on it, in order to not make matters worse.
Will get into your wall now. I started on it earlier, but my computer shut down due to overheating in the middle of it. You can imagine my frustration.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Before the wall, maybe this appetizer first: it is not.In post 374, pirate mollie wrote:
^ this is ridiculously overdefensiveIn post 370, Grimgroove wrote:
This is mainly in your hands. You've established that you are many things, but I have seen no clear indications that either of you are town.In post 363, Majiffy wrote: Nope. Start townreading Mollie and myself, pronto.
I seem to have given off the impression I'm a push-over. Sorry for the misunderstanding, please cease any efforts that have this idea in mind.
Basically Majify is not trying to convince me either of you are town, he's simply TELLING me to believe him. If he truly believes this will work, he must think I'm a push-over. Hence the reaction you bolded.
I did, however, mark a hint of comedy in his edict. I like the occasional laugh just as much as any hyena. This is why I added a similarly silly request, of ceasing certain activities. There was a similar hint of comedy in that request, which mirrored Majify's, and which shows I was not being overly defensive.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I realize I didn't. This was merely an introduction to the answers you were looking for. I'm glad to see you found them right after making this redundant remark.In post 373, pirate mollie wrote:
you mean those posts where your questions were already answered by the time you got to the end of the thread? you asked questions but you never stated why you found those posts scummy.In post 369, Grimgroove wrote:It's the posts I brought up during my round of incessant questions. Basically it's mainly related to your earlier period in the game.
I found the posts scummy because they were fluff.
I want you to post which posts you find scummy and explain why. you don't just get to sit back and call all of my posts until p6 scummy unless you can think of a scum motivation for doing so. fluff posts are alignment neutral unless they persist throughout the game.Note that there will again be many questions in this thread. Even though one of their aims is that you answer them, a secondary function is that they clarify my thought process and reflect my thoughts about you.
First it started with your fluff for the first six pages or so. I thought it was scummy because it showed no commitment when it comes to moving this game forward.
I find fluff scummy because of the reason in the snippet you just quoted of me: lack of commitment to get the game forward.
Doing what you ask me to do would basically boil down to me showing why your first posts were all fluff. An unnecessary exercise, considering how you agree with that.
Sorry, I don't care much about meta-arguments. Definitely with a person with your gaming history: I'm sure you have a mafiagame where the scenario benefits your defense for many different occasions, obviously including this one.here is a game where every single one of posts were "fluffy" until d2:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=25693
in fact, I think I made only 1 post with content and that was to point out that we had a missing kill and that I blocked nacho. flawless town victory. I trolled the fuck out nacho while I was looking for his partner in fact, I think the post that I outed was the only non fluff post in the game other than my guille vote.
Oh, and to beat you to it: the reason I pointed to other games myself when Amrun was asking me for evidence that I don't react well to aggression is precisely because she asked me. I'm assuming she didn't want a psychiatric report. If people ask me to provide them with my meta I'll do so, but I'll never use it as an argument myself.
Yes, that's all fine and dandy, but I don't really have a scumread on you. You're null. I never claimed otherwise.what is weird is that you read on me should have progressed as you got caught up with the game. and it hasn't. you are still scumreading me cos of early posts. do you know who are sticky with their reads in lieu of gathering and assimilating new information? scum that is who.
I probably gave you this impression because I just listed all your scummy posts and told you why I thought they were scummy. Why I did that? Oh, because you asked me to.
There have been positive vibes coming from your slot as well. Sometimes I posted something, and when I continued rereading I saw you sometimes make the same remark or thought process as I would. MAybe you considered this mere repetition from my part, but from my PoV this made me feel better about you in the later stage of the game. Apart from the bad ass image you are trying to portray, that is.
My computer is heating up again and I don't want to lose what I already typed (again), so I'll go ahead and post this and get to the rest of the wall in the following post.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I guess it was, and maybe I should apologize. I was in a state of defiance after reading remarks of me being eaten alive and getting crushed if I'd get anywhere near you. I tend to use sarcasm a lot, which is meant to be taken lightly as I just think it's a funny instrument. I'm going to refrain from making any further comments on this topic (also with reference to pirate_mollie's wall from which I will omit certain segments for precisely this reason). This isn't about who is boss, this is about who's scum.In post 385, Majiffy wrote:
Actually I read it as more passive-aggressive snark.In post 374, pirate mollie wrote:
^ this is ridiculously overdefensiveIn post 370, Grimgroove wrote:
This is mainly in your hands. You've established that you are many things, but I have seen no clear indications that either of you are town.In post 363, Majiffy wrote: Nope. Start townreading Mollie and myself, pronto.
I seem to have given off the impression I'm a push-over. Sorry for the misunderstanding, please cease any efforts that have this idea in mind.
Then I guess I'm a bad player, because I really don't see why you simply saying "Read us as town" should immediately result in actually reading you as town. I don't understand why you're making me spell out something this obvious.
False. I truly believe it will work if you have any semblance of competence at this game. Consider it a reaction test of how good you are.In post 378, Grimgroove wrote:[Majiffy]'s simply TELLING me to believe him. If he truly believes this will work, he must think I'm a push-over.
Why are you reaction testing for how good players are? Won't that become clear over the course of the game? Why do you want to know if I'm a good player or not?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
No comment.In post 382, pirate mollie wrote:
yes. it is. mebbe you don't understand what overly defensive isIn post 378, Grimgroove wrote:Before the wall, maybe this appetizer first: it is not.
Don't know his meta. The only people who would read him or you as town simply because he says so are pushovers in my book, so him seriously thinking and believing I would respond positively to his request does imply that. You say it doesn't and maybe you're right, but my interpretation was not as farfetched or overdefensive (remind me to look up this difficult word) as you're making it out to be.
he never said this nor did he imply that you were a "pushover". majiffy says that to everyone hence the avvie title "go with the flow". click on his sig (flowchart), he really does believe that shit. he could think you are the hercules of mafia and he would still say that.Basically Majify is not trying to convince me either of you are town, he's simply TELLING me to believe him. If he truly believes this will work,he must think I'm a push-over. Hence the reaction you bolded.
My mistake.
you are seriously playing this little game inside your head that doesn't seem to have a lot to do with reality. majiffy was being serious. like he really does believe you should just accept what he says at face value. he isn't really joking.I did, however, mark a hint of comedy in his edict. I like the occasional laugh just as much as any hyena. This is why I added a similarly silly request, of ceasing certain activities. There was a similar hint of comedy in that request, which mirrored Majify's, and which shows I was not being overly defensive.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Part Two of 379.
"Asap" is a notion that's out of your hands. Not getting into the game while you're waiting for yourt chat with him does not speed up getting a read on Majify.In post 373, pirate mollie wrote:
except me saying I want to interact with majiffy is not "fluff". there is motivation behind it as in I want to get a read on him asap.Your explanation of this fluff I also found scummy. You said you were waiting to interact with Majify in order to be able to proceed. You say you explained why (the quote above is what I found), but I don't find this explanation satisfactory, and here is why.
It's like not wanting to read a book while you wait for the bus, because you want to leave as soon as possible. That motivation makes no sense.
Could you explain in more detail how this quick townread came to be? Maybe it could convince all of us?
erm, your interpretation does not make sense. it is implicit that I want to get an early read so I don't spend the whole game paranoid over him like I sometimes do. he gave me that town signal right off the fucking bat and it was beautiful cos I am fairly certain he is town. and we work well together when we are both town even though we have a tendency to fight over our reads.First of all, you state that you need to chat with Majify in order to avoid tunneling him. This does not make sense for several reasons, and the lack of sense makes it scummy:
- Why would you tunnel him before interacting with him? You seem to equate "getting into the game before chatting with Majify" with "trolletracking Majify". This doesn't make sense. Why does MAjify have to be your starting point?
My interpretation does make sense. Step-by-step:
- You post fluff until you had a talk with Majify.
- You want to talk to Majify because you don't want to tunnel him.
=> You post fluff because you don't want to tunnel Majify.
You consider tunneling Majify the only alternative to posting fluff before he gets to posting.
You brought it up as the reason for your fluff and why it wasn't scummy, so you're the one who made this a central element in our discussions.
I am not the one who is making a big deal over it you and wis were. I also wanted him to explain the set-up to me cos I frankly didn't understand it. the obtainment of the read took a lot less time than I thought it would.- Obviously, getting the read of Majify was just a matter of procedure. 5 minutes was all it took. Then why make such a big deal of it before? If it was just such a short procedure, I don't see why you couldn't get started with other things in the meanwhile until you had it done.
Well, you've been sending mixed messages on how easily you read him. Now you claim it was rather exceptional that you read him this easily and quickly, yet in an earlier post you said this:
did you miss the part where I said, "again"? I am guessing you did. I am just going let you work that one out on your own, by your sarcasm I am guessing you can!- Why would tunneling him be bad? Considering you read him like an open book, I guess this means that if you do tunnel him, that means he must be scum. Why do you fear trolleytracking MAjify if you later claim to read him easily? The fear seems unfounded given your special connection.
.In post 225, pirate mollie wrote:@ everyone
what do you think of your partner
I was in gchat with majiffy for five minutes before I town read him.although it was probably a little ridiculous to partner majiffy and I together
I think it would be veryhelpful if you clarified how you got the mutual townread off eachother.
You said you'll orient your game around him. What do you mean by that? I took it as him being your primary source of information and reads. So if the time would come that you are being questioned, you'd orient your defense around Majify as well. In short I thought you were saying you'd be sheeping him as soon as you read him town. Please tell me how I should read it then.
how the fuck did you getWhat I also found scummy (now a bit less because MAjify is untroubled by it) was how you seemed to give up your ownership on your own posts and thought processes in post 155 ("cos if I townread him I will probably orient my game around him unless goes after my townreads.") It sounds like we should adress any further questions to Majify instead of to you.thatinterpretation out of what I said? why would you ask majiffy questions that you wnt me to answer? that doesn't even make sense.
Ok.
lol. if I thought you were some easily impressionable newb don't you think that I would be coddling you like you want me to? I don't think you are stupid, just new, so I am not going to treat you like you are stupid. is that okay?And I'm not sure if it's scummy, but I don't like the attitude you are having here. Yes, I know you won't care, but that doesn't matter. It seems like all you have done so far is secure a townread from Majifyu to cruise through this topic unquestioned and act like big bad-asses, but I'll tell you right now I'm not in the least bit impressed. It could be scummy in the sence that you're maybe trying to paralyze my efforts and you take me for some easily impressionable newbie, but I will not be deterred from my cause of finding scum. If I meet you on the way I'll gladly take Majify with it.
I thought you thought I had a scumread on you?
you know what I find laughable? that you are scumreading me cos you think I didn't show commitment by p6 and we are now on p13 andYour macho-prattling in [pos]359[/post] was the most laughable thing I've read since my arrival at Mafiascum. Congratulations.you have yet to cough up a single read. I don't think I am the one with commitment issues here. <----- that is laughable.
By now, the scummyvibes you were giving me in the start, are back. So I've got a scumread on you. Through association I've got a scumread on Majify as well. The main reason right now is the unexplained read on one another. You could be scumpartners trying to power your way through as a tandem. In the worst case, a mislynch on one of you would leave us with a conftown for the rest of the game, which seems like a pretty good trade-off.
I don't really have much strong reads yet, I got caught up in this discussion with you, and my read-through didn't provide me with any striking reads except for that parts that I mentioned.
Overall you, Majify and Angry Pidgeon lean scum.
Enomis and StrangerCoug are null, leaning scum.
Elyse is null leaning town. So is Venmar.
Wisdom looks town to me, also because of the way he insisted on holding on to that untenable argument of Venmar scumslipping. I think scum would have realized earlier this argument does not make sense. In this regard I want to ask you if you were serious when saying that Wisdom makes stupid arguments as scum.
NobodySpecial and SafetyDance are null due to lack of activity.
Amrun leans town for me as well. I was worried for a bit since I had the impression she was trying to get a big bag o' towncred, but she convinced me this isn't the case.
How so?
you have been defensive in this very post, lolWhere have I been defensive, awfully so?
Also, I didn't realize you were a clairvoyant. Where was I overdefensive before you said I was being overdefensive?
Glad we got that sorted out then.
well I don't know what your intentions since you have not given a read on amrun I am just giving you my honest interpretation.I did consider Amrun's response as agressive, but that doesn't mean I partuvlarly care about it. It's not a misrep but an honest interpretation. Note I also did not connect any indication of alignment to it. Misreps are made with the aim of painting someone off as scummy. i didn't do such a thing.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
You said I hadn't answered to your questions while responding to a quote where I did so a few paragraphs later.In post 383, pirate mollie wrote:
watIn post 379, Grimgroove wrote:I realize I didn't. This was merely an introduction to the answers you were looking for. I'm glad to see you found them right after making this redundant remark.
I fucking can't follow what the hell you are saying at all. like I am not even sure what kind of convoluted point you are trying to make here.
I follow you, but I don't agree with you that in this case your fluff was obviously not scummy. As I explained before, the link between your fluff and Majify's absence doesn't make sense to me.
dude. read what I am trying to tell you. not all fluff posts come from scum. <----------- are you following me here? what it comes down to is motivation of posts and body of work.I found the posts scummy because they were fluff.
I find fluff scummy because of the reason in the snippet you just quoted of me: lack of commitment to get the game forward.
Doing what you ask me to do would basically boil down to me showing why your first posts were all fluff. An unnecessary exercise, considering how you agree with that.
read aboveSorry, I don't care much about meta-arguments. Definitely with a person with your gaming history: I'm sure you have a mafiagame where the scenario benefits your defense for many different occasions, obviously including this one.
I digressed a bit, but like you said, conversation is a two-way street, and when it comes to my replies I get to decide which points I want to make. I did not ignore your points, I just added to them. Just making my point on meta clear.
jesus christ you are not overly defensive at all.Oh, and to beat you to it: the reason I pointed to other games myself when Amrun was asking me for evidence that I don't react well to aggression is precisely because she asked me. I'm assuming she didn't want a psychiatric report. If people ask me to provide them with my meta I'll do so, but I'll never use it as an argument myself.
you aren't at all addressing an argument that I haven't even made and is no where near the original point that I was making.
No.
wat. the. fuck.Yes, that's all fine and dandy, but I don't really have a scumread on you. You're null. I never claimed otherwise.
I probably gave you this impression because I just listed all your scummy posts and told you why I thought they were scummy. Why I did that? Oh, because you asked me to.
you are the one who originally posited that I was the only player whom your were getting scummy vibes from.
Some people would call that overdefensiveness.I asked you to put up or stfu.
I live and I learn.all that you have given me is that you cannot seem to differentiate between playstyle and actual scumtells. <---alignment neutral IMO cos I see scum and town both make really dumb arguments with really bad reasoning.
See my reply to Majify. Sorry if I seemed condescending, but read your own post 359 and tell me that it wasn't. I guess your first interpretation was correct.
lol, I am not the one running around and going "ack! ack! ack! I am not a pushoveeeeer! " so I hardly think that I am the one who is trying to be a badass here.There have been positive vibes coming from your slot as well. Sometimes I posted something, and when I continued rereading I saw you sometimes make the same remark or thought process as I would. MAybe you considered this mere repetition from my part, but from my PoV this made me feel better about you in the later stage of the game. Apart from the bad ass image you are trying to portray, that is.
do you have any idea how condescending your posts come across? they are pretty insulting and slathered in sarcasm which I am reading as you being overly defensive and I am wondering why. I can't tell if you are some insecure newbtown and who is trying to prove how incredibly secure he is or if you are newbscum who is hedging on reads and trying to argue nonexistant points in order to look busy and and engaged. I find it hard to believe that by now you do not have 1 single read.
You got 'em now.I want a list of your reads.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
And equally important: why is pirate_mollie?
Again I have to wonder why you would have to rely on your partner in order to know what to think?In post 392, enomis wrote:I don't know what i think about this. Will discuss with amrun.
Do you have a read on your partner?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Are you confident enough about your Amrun-townread in order to be able to essentially leave your read in her hands? Sorry, but I don't see you as the guy who would normally do such a thing. Why do you think Amrun is in a better position to read what has been going on?In post 403, enomis wrote:Because i am unsure of my read.
Do you have any other townreads?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 413, Elyse wrote:It's like he had this whole drawn out conversation with Mollie, knowing she thought she was a scumread of his, and then at the end, he was like "I never said that!"
What would the point of me doing such a thing be?
And it's true, I never said she was a scumread of mine, not counting our latest interaction. How can something that's objectively true be insincere? It's like saying 1+1=2, it doesn't matter if you're sincere about it, it's just truth.
pirate_mollie obviously assumed this because of my string of catch-up posts. I don't know if you've ever seen people catch up on things, but I don't think my procedure was out of the ordinary: go over the topic and quote those posts which strike you as odd. I did exactly this.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I think you clarified your point very well, and your question is legitimate.
I didn't have any read on her at the time. I didn't want to give the impression that I had a townread on her by saying I had no scumread on her. I also didn't want to sound apologetic for mentioning the posts that I did in my catch-up.In post 415, Elyse wrote:Why didn't you just tell her that you didn't have a scumread on her?
These reasons may seem incomplete, but my reaction was also not that thought out in this regard. It was the result of a very natural reaction, even though I realize calling something natural is makes it more unnatural. But it was.
This analogy is very good. It would have made things easier, but less interesting. My thoughts about abortion have evolved through it, I have clarified why I think certain elements of abortion are bad and invited feedback on those comments, giving me further input for my opinion on abortion.I'll try to make an analogy because you make good ones that help most of the time. Mine will probably suck but oh well.
You mention something about (hm, a controversial topic. let's say abortion). You talk about someone you know getting an abortion and why you don't think it was a good decision. Mollie then asks why you think abortion is bad. You get into this whole argument about it and then you say "I don't think abortion is bad, you just asked me to say the points against it." It would have been much easier if you just said, "I don't think abortion is bad, it was just the wrong decision for the person I know" or something like that.
It makes sense, but I believe there was a point to the argument: why I thought his posts were scummy and her reaction to these arguments. I didn't mind she thought I thought she was scum, it results in a more involved and passionate discussion.It wasted time and made you look like you were scumreading Mollie when you weren't. So there wasn't even a real point to the argument. Does that make sense?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I think the Silver Snakes being in the challenge pool was bound to happen so I'm not surprised. It was a matter of either AngryPidgeon, pirate_mollie or Majify to start ego-tripping, all of them have the personality to do so. My mistake for rattling their cages I guess.
Of the current lynchpool, I have to say that since pirate_mollie's latest post has started to convince me of the sincerety of her read, I think I'll be voting either my own partner, who seemed to be buddying up to people in the latest posts, or Majify, who simply senses a lot of support for a lynch on me but doesn't have to reasons to back that up. In that case pirate_mollie will be wrong inh er read on her partner, but I won't even begin trying to convince her of that for obvious reasons.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Are you drunk?In post 436, Majiffy wrote:Lol don't have reasons ok.- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I had hoped you'd respond more specifially to my wall, because that would have showed more clearly if you were trying to understand my point of view of things, but ok. I see the added value in case you can fully trust the other person (like in a hydra), but in this set-up this is not the case. With regards to scumhunting in a 1on1 QT: I don't see how it can be done effectively. MAybe it's lack of experience, maybe it's lack of skill, but I don't see any ways of creating such an atmosphere in a QT where my partner would somehow slip. All the reading can be done in the main topic I think.In post 420, pirate mollie wrote:@ groovey kid
I am not going to do round of wall wars with you cos tbh I find them boring and tedious. I will do a round or 2 but anything beyond and my brains just shuts down. so I am not going to respond to you point by point, I am just going to go over the highlights.
- I am guessing that eno's response (who was more succinct and more articulate in his explanation than I ever could) as to why someone might want to talk to their partner cos you seem satisfied with the answer. the only thing I would add is that discussing reads with your partner is a good way to bounce off ideas cos one person might see something the other miss. it is 1 of the reasons why I like hydras (I am in 6), cos I have another person to talk to and it helps me to stay grounded. left to my own devices I am likely to be consumed by paranoia, get confused, jump at shadows and make terribad decisions. I am well aware of my strengths and weaknesses in mafia so I try to hydra with people who can balance that out. what I am wondering is why coug has not explained the benefits of having another person to bounce things off of in your qt and why you did not just ask him there instead of bringing it to the thread.
To return to my bus metaphor, you have explained why it is important for you to take the bus, yet you still didn't explain why you didn't want to read a book while wiaiting for the bus.
I don't know, I guess you know him better, I've been told not to discuss ongoing games to in this game by several people, but I don't consider them as town. Enforcing/reminding others of objective rules is more of a null-tell in my eyes.- why I am town reading majiffy: in gchat (and you may or may not understand this) he said, "don't mention ongoing games" cos he thought that I was referring to a game that was in the late stages where we pretty much went 1v1 for 3 game days. I wasn't. I was referring to if I do not get sort him out early I will remain paranoid for the entire game. <----- he came to this conclusion, all on his own through no help from me. the reason why I read tht as pure town was cos his chastisement came from a place where he was genuinely trying to get a read on me and didn't want an outside influence that he could not use. he was genuinely trying to read me where as scum he would already know my alignment. does this make sense?
That explain you reading Majiffy as town. What about the other way around and his read on you? (@Majiffy)
Do you also have a toolbox for when you're scum?I have been playing mafia for a long time just on different sites. I have a different playstyle than most and a very large scumhunting toolbox. sometimes I will flirt, joke, get confrontational, talk about the weather or whatever in order to get players to drop their guard and give up a tell. the whole point is to disarm the player in order to get a read. I base my reads on how people react and try to determine if it comes from a town or scum mindset. I once got uber goober to let down his guard and tell me why scum was keeping me alive in posh. <----- still couldn't get him lynched even though he stated it right there in the thread.
Sticky reads or tunneling has been done by town and scum alike. I don't think this is a strong argument, regardless of whether or not I agree with my read on you actually being sticky.I am simply not everyone's cup of tea and I am pretty sure you will never understand "mollie logic". I don't think like most people and a lot of people scumread me for this but what I have noticed is that it is usually scum who are sticky with their read cos when I am town I freaking scream town.
is there anything else you would like to know
You discussed mollie logic, what is your impression of Grimgroove-logic?- Grimgroove
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Grimgroove
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove
- Grimgroove