It's you.
Only if you can explain to me why a scum-AA9 chose to undermine a miller claim that would have been good lynch bait and why scum-me came in and organized a lynch on my partner who was under approximately zero pressure when I could have just shut up and let you go down.
:::crickets chirping:::
Yeah, that's what I thought.
Since bork has made you confirmed town, any slightly more serious thoughts to share?
In post 677, BROseidon wrote:...why the fuck would you not investigate.
And I didn't want to push it because being wrong meant an insta-lose.
1) Did I say I didn't investigate? And while I'm not the bestest player around, I know darn well you've played with me enough to know that I'm not a complete derp. So why the soft-suspicion?
WRT to not pushing your goodmorning read yesterday, that's weak. You weren't even questioning goodmorning. Yes, if we'd lynched someone else and been wrong, we'd have lost at 5p LyLo when two scum voted MC RIDE, made the one-to-one trade, and then gone into night at 1:2 scum:town to lose. HOWEVER, if we'd lynched MC RIDE yesterday and been wrong (as I'm assuming we would have been, since either town-tracker-bork cleared him or scum-fake-tracker-bork cleared him) we'd still be coming in here at 5p LyLo and lynching an incorrect scum read would still be insta-lose. Yes, investigative roles might have given us more definite information for today, but I'd say that's not the case. And if you had a read you'd ever thought worth pushing, why didn't you at least pursue it a bit, apply pressure to get more information? Maybe you wouldn't have pursued a wagon until today, but having those interactions with your suspect would have helped for your ultimate case, plus you'd have been able to see how other people reacted and been able to work on finding GM's partner.
You're also not addressing the issues with having two townies who can take someone down with them. Claim order went: MC claimed Hated, you claimed Vengeful, you indicated it only worked Day One, MC claimed L-1 Supersaint. In a Micro Role Madness game, with all the possibilities out there, you have zero problem with someone claiming a very similar effect to you? Instead, you say in your next post after his SS claim:
In post 542, BROseidon wrote:My vengekill is only good day 1. Now I'm a VT, which is pretty weak.
Also, having a hated supersaint makes a lot of sense from a design perspective.
This explains away your claimed vengekill overlapping with his SS claim, as AS was pointing out. And you deflected onto praising how much sense the role of hated supersaint made. Now that MC RIDE is confirmed and never ever ever going to be lynched, your claim looks pretty bad.
I do wish bork had tracked BRO last night, but given that MC RIDE's claim would have let him ride to victory if he was faking I can't complain overmuch.
bork, given this:
In post 634, borkjerfkin wrote:TMT wrote:We should lynch in these 3. Please.
That is a convenient piggyback off of BRO's reads that just happen to not include you as scum especially after pretty much offering no reads yourself.
BRO wrote:Either letters is town or Rach trolled me hard. Scum should be White Witch and Aslan, as the three I listed were White Witch, Aslan, and Caspian X (of which I got none, obviously). Given that two of those aren't listed here. This also implies that scum got safeclaims.
Yeah UPicks are designed so that you're generally not able to make these kinds of inferences.
I want letters hammering MC or we're lynching letters straight up.
what's your current read on TMT? And seeing as you cleared MC RIDE and we established yesterday that you don't think I'm scum, who do you favor lynching, BRO or TMT?