There can only be one Dragon, and everyone knows I'm the best Dragon.
-pout-
In post 27, Jabberwock wrote:Friendly notice to all of you newcomers to Vi games: "true activity" is also a measure of the mod's happiness with the thread. That means that pointless bloating of the thread is not only incredibly annoying but can actually affect our deadline, and makes it much more frustrating to wade through useless posts. So pleasedodial back the spam. Yes, we know you're happy about the game starting, and we know you're happy about playing with certain people. You don't need multiple posts to say so without adding content.
In post 34, Jabberwock wrote:We're a Wondercritter. Way cooler than a dragon. (")(ºwº)(")Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You're not even a real Dragon. -pout-
Hey Cabd.You know what we're expecting to see from you. I'll give you... five pages, give or take.
As for Natirasha, please shut up. There is very little gain in talking about such things in the open, as no one will be able to give you further info about how to use that ability, and there is nothing Town to be gained in learning if it's game-wide. Go read recent Vi games if you want to etc.
In post 50, Jabberwock wrote:It's not random. Have patience.In post 45, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I thought this was just random pressure, but now that he has responded I want this explained.In post 34, Jabberwock wrote:We're a Wondercritter. Way cooler than a dragon. (")(ºwº)(")Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You're not even a real Dragon. -pout-
Hey Cabd.You know what we're expecting to see from you. I'll give you... five pages, give or take.
As for Natirasha, please shut up. There is very little gain in talking about such things in the open, as no one will be able to give you further info about how to use that ability, and there is nothing Town to be gained in learning if it's game-wide. Go read recent Vi games if you want to etc.
PEdit: Or that! ^_^ But Cabd--what do you think of Post 44? The other half is wondering if TIP actually believes that crap, but agrees with me that Post 48 is trash (and Post 41 was really freaking bad). Other head is having trouble differentiating between bad and scum, but I think thisdoesremind me of Cold Stone.
In post 55, Jabberwock wrote:I thought it was obvious from the PEdit? I was waiting for Cabd's read on TIP.In post 53, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You know I'm not going to be ok with that. It's a two way street, give me a little to work with and I'll let it slide for now.In post 50, Jabberwock wrote:It's not random. Have patience.In post 45, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I thought this was just random pressure, but now that he has responded I want this explained.In post 34, Jabberwock wrote:We're a Wondercritter. Way cooler than a dragon. (")(ºwº)(")Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You're not even a real Dragon. -pout-
Hey Cabd.You know what we're expecting to see from you. I'll give you... five pages, give or take.
As for Natirasha, please shut up. There is very little gain in talking about such things in the open, as no one will be able to give you further info about how to use that ability, and there is nothing Town to be gained in learning if it's game-wide. Go read recent Vi games if you want to etc.
PEdit: Or that! ^_^ But Cabd--what do you think of Post 44? The other half is wondering if TIP actually believes that crap, but agrees with me that Post 48 is trash (and Post 41 was really freaking bad). Other head is having trouble differentiating between bad and scum, but I think thisdoesremind me of Cold Stone.
In post 59, morph the cat wrote:Jabbers, if the mara head of purpkin, when she gets online, agrees with me, I'm more than confident enough to run him up all the way. Between the two of us, we can read him transparently.
In post 61, Saki wrote:you change your playstyle so muchIn post 58, TheIrishPope wrote:Now, you see, I have found that people are scum when they:
Refuse to answer harmless RQS questions from the beginning, or
Quit when the questions start getting serious.
This quite gives me a slight Town read on Purpkin at best, although, I do need to see Mara posting.
Meta doesn't work. I'm changing my play.
Do not make sweeping generalisations of my play.
you don't even drop a "hi saki <3"?
I find that very hard to believe
In post 63, TheIrishPope wrote:@Saki, I'd get nagged by Tierce.I can't risk that.
@Jabberwock, please sign your posts and explain your votes. Just for the sake of the Town.
In post 66, Jabberwock wrote:BahahahahaIn post 63, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, please sign your posts and explain your votes. Just for the sake of the Town.
No.
In post 68, Saki wrote:why would tierce nag you for saying hi to me.In post 63, TheIrishPope wrote:@Saki, I'd get nagged by Tierce. I can't risk that.
In post 73, TheIrishPope wrote:@Lady, Tierce is a powerful player. If she's scum, Town is fucked. If she's Town, scum is fucked. I need to be on her side either way:
If she's scum, I buddy her so she doesn't night kill me. This ensures more Days for me.
If she's Town, I buddy her so she doesn't lynch me. She might even defend me, although she is voting me now. She will see the error of her ways.
Tierce is a perfectionist. You can't even say hello to your friends. That being said, her cold and monotonous routine to find scum is something I enjoy on my side.
@Jabberwock, how about yes? Even if you believe I am scum, do it for the Town. Of course, this only applies if you are Town.
@Saki, ISO Jabberwock. It evidently says why I can't greet you.
In post 76, Purpkin wrote:LLD is rubbing me wrong so far; her questions are really banal.
In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Silly Lady thinks she's scary. Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him. I consider Natirasha a newbie since he just returned from a hiatus.
Catch up, kiddo.
Buddying can be pro-Town in many situations. You're just thinking too conventionally.
In post 86, Purpkin wrote:I am having trouble seeing how #64-#74 is anything but focusing on minutiae. I am obligated to suspend judgment on that since the exchange is in progress, but that's my gut about it.In post 78, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You think my questions are trivial? Show me why. Quote my questions and tell me why they're banal. Now.
In post 90, TheIrishPope wrote:@Natirasha, if I must be, I shall. I agree with your spirited Town sentiment, but you say it as if you are not part of the Town.
@Purpkin, weren't you researching my meta? What stopped you from it?
In post 93, Jabberwock wrote:Point taken on Skype, but it is hardly "many occasions" and Skype play is not the same as forum play. Furthermore, the bit about buddying Tierce as a good Town plan is bullshit.In post 84, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, I have played with Tierce on Skype on many occasions.
Where are you basing this Empire knowledge on?
Post 90 is all sorts of horrible. Just trying to paint Natirasha negatively without any sort of active analysis.
In post 81, TheIrishPope wrote:Silly Lady thinks she's scary. Empire is a more laid back player, anyway. I am not worried about him. I consider Natirasha a newbie since he just returned from a hiatus.
Catch up, kiddo.
Buddying can be pro-Town in many situations. You're just thinking too conventionally.
In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:Several. But do explain whyIn post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.you, of all people, want Townreads explained.
In post 113, Jabberwock wrote:Wrong person and you should know it~ But you did not answer my question.In post 112, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Perfect, thanks Empire! That's all I needed.In post 111, Jabberwock wrote:Several. But do explain whyIn post 107, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Oh. Kay. Not saying I don't agree, but any particular reason why you're confident in that?In post 105, Jabberwock wrote:The half of the Purpkin hydra that's (I'm assuming) has written all the posts so far.you, of all people, want Townreads explained.
I've read this post 5 times now and I still don't know what you're saying. It's probably my fault, I'm tired. Can you rephrase or explain?
In post 118, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, I'm not trying to defame you or anything. Chill. It seems you're overreacting way too much. And I notice you did it again! "X is crap for no reason" is a nice statement indeed.
@Lady,I'm not understanding the Town motivation in your interaction with Tierce. And I'm so scared, a vote.
Natirasha has identity issues. Noted.
@Daemon, now now, that would be telling. Anything else to comment on? You seem smart. Tell me what you've seen so far. Also, what's your eye colour?
In post 118, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, I'm not trying to defame you or anything. Chill. It seems you're overreacting way too much. And I notice you did it again! "X is crap for no reason" is a nice statement indeed.
@Lady,I'm not understanding the Town motivation in your interaction with Tierce. And I'm so scared, a vote.
Natirasha has identity issues. Noted.
@Daemon, now now, that would be telling. Anything else to comment on? You seem smart. Tell me what you've seen so far. Also, what's your eye colour?
In post 128, TheIrishPope wrote:@Lady,I have no scum read on you.Who told you that? I am merely saying that your behaviour is kind of iffy, but that's all.
@Jabberwock, someone told me. I like to know my player list before I jump into a game.
In post 131, TheIrishPope wrote:Hold the fucking phone. Did you just daykill Natirasha? And what's Personal Note?
In post 143, TheIrishPope wrote:@Natirasha, post more before you die.
@Jabberwock, if you haven't noticed, RQS is all about reactions. You'll thank me when we reach LyLo. I cannot disclose the name of this person nor would I if I had the capability of doing so HOWEVER I may only say that this person is in this game.
@Lady, wow, I can't believe you misinterpreted me. Feeling a post is scummy is not the same as having a scum read on someone. Do not make assumptions, for they hurt Town. Only applicable if you are Town.
I personally feel the dayvig was fake.
In post 128, TheIrishPope wrote:@Lady, I have no scum read on you. Who told you that? I am merely saying that your behaviour is kind of iffy, but that's all.
@Jabberwock, someone told me. I like to know my player list before I jump into a game.
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 128, TheIrishPope wrote:@Lady,I have no scum read on you.Who told you that? I am merely saying that your behaviour is kind of iffy, but that's all.
@Jabberwock, someone told me. I like to know my player list before I jump into a game.
In post 146, Natirasha wrote:I am in this position where I am unsure that I am even going to die. If this is some sort of retarded gambit bait, I don't want to give out more information. If I'm dead, my role will become apparent on the upcoming modpost. My thoughts, though? You're annoying and for someone who called me a newbie is the pot calling the kettle black(PS I THINK YOU'RE PROB SCUM),Lambdadelta is secretly probably good at this game,Tierce is obviously good at this game, and DTMaster is ballsy as hell. I actually respect him for it, even if I feel impressed to vote for the man who is attempting to kill me.
In post 163, TheIrishPope wrote:@Lady, scum suddenly means null-scum? Do I need to draw a diagram for you?
TOWN ============©=======® SCUM
If I had a scum read on you, you would be the ®
I have a null-scum read on you, therefore you are the ©
@Cabd, why are you posting these? I told you meta won't work here, and the generalisations are best kept inside your mouth.
@Purpkin, wow. This short post must be scum. Thanks for catching up and just letting everyone know you're scum. I'd expect more from you, Mara.
@Jabberwock, there are no broken site rules. What are you on about?
In post 166, Jabberwock wrote:That you should not have any problem at all saying who it was that said that Empire is a laid-back player, regardless of whether this person is in the game, and that you should not have taken several posts of dodging to come out with how you have this knowledge.In post 163, TheIrishPope wrote:@Jabberwock, there are no broken site rules. What are you on about?You keep addressing minor points to dodge the crux of matters brought up against you.
In post 169, Purpkin wrote:NP, now why don't you let us Bus you and make us look even more town?In post 163, TheIrishPope wrote:@Purpkin, wow. This short post must be scum. Thanks for catching up and just letting everyone know you're scum. I'd expect more from you, Mara.
In post 171, Jabberwock wrote:@DTM:I had the same knee-jerk reaction to #73 that you had but when I spoke to Tierce about it what she said made perfect sense - it's an easy way to gain towncred as scum and it doesn't take much in the way of competence or experience to post. While I'm here, though, what's your read on LLD (particularly interested here since I think I remember you guys having played with each other a bit in the past when I sifted through ancient meta)?
---
If you don't mind, I actually really want to have this discussion now.In post 142, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Anyway, if I'm scum, then I must be bussing TIP. So let's go ahead and kill his ass dead, and we can have this discussion tomorrow.
I have a few reasons for reading bork as town but one of them involved me agreeing with his #76. I'd read your questions up until that point (and a bit beyond) and I don't really see how any of them would illicit alignment-indicative replies.
For example, I thought your focus in #65 was really weird. The bork/TIP exchange had been decently developed by that point and the bolded just seemed like a pretty small thing to highlight or dig into (personally, I thought TIP's remark there was some throwaway facetious thing). Maybe it's because I'm tired or something but I read over that question and thought about possible responses TIP could have given and I don't really see what TIP could have said that would have given you some insight into his alignment. I have the same problem with #74 too. I just don't really see what the point of those questions were.
Anyway, I know it's probably frustrating to do, but can you walk me through what you were going for there?
(P.S.: I haven't taken a shot at the VN yet, but I wasn't a fan of the Umineko anime personally.)
In post 207, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Andrius, I don't speak for Grey. We are separate people with separate opinions.
I find that you're often mean to me in both playing League and in the thread, but League is a toxic game anyway and makes people do dumb shit. Look at DRK.
So yeah, we're cool.
In post 217, Jabberwock wrote:Yeah, thanks for that. I still have to think about things and regardless of what TIP flips I'm actually really really annoyed because at least two slots haven't even fucking checked into this game yet and my reads are still coagulating.In post 209, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:JABBERWOCKKKK
READ AND RESPOND TO THAT NICE BIG POST I WAS SO NICE TO TAKE THE TIME TO MAKE FOR YOU.
THANKSSSSSS
P-edit: ninja'd by my other head, what the hell
In post 229, Jabberwock wrote:I'm tired, hungry and we had a hammer early in the game. You'll probably be around Tomorrow and you were the one who said one of this hydra's heads can't read you. So, huh, wait a while longer?In post 226, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Stop focusing on the baddies and focus on meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Even with the game's short life time, it really bothers me that Saki only comes back to the thread when all's said and done and yet keeps posting nothing of worth. There are plenty of non-walls in the game, but damned if he should comment on any of those short posts--no, we just have complaints about those terrible walls.
In post 232, Andrius wrote:We can have a nice teatime tomorrow.In post 221, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want you to read me Andrius.
I'm a cat in a rage, and I need to knowwwwwww
I really must be going now. Got an interview in... 7 hours.
In post 234, Jabberwock wrote:Come now. The Wondercritter is obvTown, and I don't see what response you want fromIn post 231, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Don't get saucy with me, you :<.In post 229, Jabberwock wrote:I'm tired, hungry and we had a hammer early in the game. You'll probably be around Tomorrow and you were the one who said one of this hydra's heads can't read you. So, huh, wait a while longer?In post 226, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Stop focusing on the baddies and focus on meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Even with the game's short life time, it really bothers me that Saki only comes back to the thread when all's said and done and yet keeps posting nothing of worth. There are plenty of non-walls in the game, but damned if he should comment on any of those short posts--no, we just have complaints about those terrible walls.
I don't see how you being able to read me has anything to do with me wanting to hear your response to my response in this discussion. I feel hearing your response benefits my read on you more than it benefits your read on me.
But like I said, I'm torn between giving you that extra time because I'm a nice kitty, or pressuring you because it was your other head who wanted the discussion done right Meow.me. I scumhunt by intent too, but that whole discussion wasn't spurred by me, and I don't see anything in it that you wouldn't say as scum either, so :hitoshrug:.
As for my other head, he's off sulking and playing Castlevania. Some people drink to forget, others etc. We'll talk Tomorrow if we're around.
In post 235, Oil Tycoons wrote:HAI GAIZ
THERE'S NO NEED TO FEAR
SYRYANA IS HERE
TIERCE BABY COME GLAMOR ME WITH YOUR SWEET SWEET VIBES
CABD COME RUB ME SHOULDERS, RHEUMATISM'S A BITCH
In post 236, Oil Tycoons wrote:Man, it's been like a whole minute since that arrival. I'm somewhat disappointed none of you have reacted to my blazing glory.
In post 237, Oil Tycoons wrote:Wait, holy shit, there's been a lynch? What the fuck are you people doing?
In post 245, Oil Tycoons wrote:Hey, LLD? Can I borrow your knife?