You can call me phok.In post 262, Titus wrote:Welcome phokdapolees! Any chance you have a nickname you like?
~Amrun
You can call me phok.In post 262, Titus wrote:Welcome phokdapolees! Any chance you have a nickname you like?
In post 263, phokdapolees wrote:Do not talk about ongoing games. I know you are dead, but the game isn't over. This is a common confusion for newbies, so don't panic. This is an official warning. Until a game is declared over by a mod, pretend it doesn't exist. Don't do it again and you'll be fine.
~Amrun
Sorry about that! Didn't realize it would be that big of a deal if I said that, but I'll refrain from it in the future.In post 266, notscience wrote:DONT TALK ABOUT ONGOING GAMES
Okay, but I PM'ed you too...In post 311, Amrun wrote:In post 273, phokdapolees wrote:Also, I will be V/LA from tomorrow to Sunday night/Monday morning, EST.I missed this post, and so am redacting phokdapolees' prod. Please bold such notifications in the future.
Bert replaces JKMatthews, effective upon posting.
Why, and why are you now "completely reassured" about notscience?
And are you certain that I'm mafia? No, nothing is certain, especially on day 1, so to call me out for simply stating my opinions is wrong. And I really wasn't even that "uncertain" in that post in the first place.In post 338, Bert wrote:Reading backwards and I came across this, so...In post 272, phokdapolees wrote:Pertaining to the actual game, I just finished catching up on everything, and here's what I think so far (forgive me if I mix up facts or something like that, it's hard absorbing 271 posts in a short amount of time). Nacho and Shii are my strongest town reads so far, both are actively scumhunting and analyzing information accurately. I'm also getting the feeling that Brian is town, he has a lot of reasoning behind his actions, and his analyses have been better than I would expect for a newbie. I get the vibe that Flammus is town too based off of his posts alone, but that gambit in the beginning by Mail still makes me a little suspicious. I'm not sure exactly what to think of Titus, some actions seem pro-town, some seem anti-town, null on this one. Verbs, null-scum in my opinion, seems suspicious because of the supposed reasoning behind Mail's gambit, but that's not enough to make me too suspicious of him. I'm suspicious of JKMatthews and notscience the most, JKM because of the situation with Mail's replacement and asking for a lynch, and notscience because of low levels of activity and not much reasoning behind the vote for Shii.
Vote: phok
For the moment.
This is filled with uncertainty, this post...."yeah, I'm not sure, it seems this way, but yeah some don't seem that way, but yeah those posts are X, but yeah...." you get my drift
It's way too roundabout and makes no sense, it's like this person is trying so hard to look down
So then why didn't you call me out earlier for it instead of waiting until now, way after that list was made? All I was doing in that post was stating my opinions, maybe some of them were aligned with the majority, but that was all what I thought so far.In post 340, Nachomamma8 wrote:I think you're scum because your reads list was extremely safe. Reads that are controversial (Titus and Verbs) are put as null and null-scum, you sheeped reasoning on JKM to a T and you had some weak suspicion on NS for "inactivity" which, as he noted, was completely inaccurate. Even your townread on Flammus (town on his play, scummy on the gambit) pretty much reflects public opinion. Generate some original content.