In post 51, Amrun wrote:Well, yes, depending on context, but I don't care about that.
VOTE: lngrr
Tonally, the passive voice is very strange there, and strange how he went out of the way to say that without remarking on squilly's alignment.
This interaction with LNGGEGRRRR reads town. Amrun has this tendency to go from interrogation to interrogation as town to a level that doesn't mesh with her scum gameplan of sticking below the surface.
In post 64, Fegelein wrote:Firstly, it's sloppy because it doesn't make any sense whatsoever. They may have been voting each other a lot, but what else can you say? If you think it's because they are a trio, you're either an insanely paranoid Townie or scum looking for as many people as possible to incriminate. You're trying to use that as a scum-tell when none of them have even flipped scum yet.
Secondly, I don't like the self-meta. You're trying to use your behaviour in the past as a "Get out of Jail Free" card, and self-meta is scummy in its own right.
Thirdly, I have a feeling from your interactions with Amrun that one of you is probably scum. And I'm feeling you more.
And ditto on this response to LNGRGEERRRR by Fegelein.
And here my townread on Amrun is reaffirmed already.
Also like this post; it's the type of thing that would be awkward for scum to say (oh i'm sad i pushed you as scum because you look really town now) but is a pretty natural thing to say as town.
Also looks town for the same reasons.
These are the same people I would be townreading and that makes me happy.
In post 132, penguin_alien wrote:I see where people say Squilly was scum-hunting, but it still seems like the kind of fake scum hunting scum like to do.
This is an awkward comment and seems to be framed more towards throwing doubt on the townread as opposed to actually determining alignment. As town, I don't think she'd be afraid to say "I don't think he's scumhunting".
Unfortunately, this doesn't have the same effect when other people have already beat you to it.
In post 152, Toomai wrote:I really want to post but I have nothing to contribute. I have weak, aggregate reads on four players and doubt the correctness of all of them.
I appreciate the honesty!
In post 208, fferyllt wrote: In post 207, Syryana wrote:Not anymore. I was feeling kinda heebie jeebie about how easily Amrun and CDB started working with each other after that early "Amrun is scum" crap in RVS, but that last post by CDB gave me a raging hardon, so I'm not as concerned about him anymore.
How quickly do they usually sort each other? (I used to sort Nacho on the basis of 3-4 early day 1 posts. Then he had to go and eliminate his tells. :/)
I love when I replace into a game and people talk about how awesome I am.
In post 208, fferyllt wrote:
Pedit: Oh, is that what you meant by timing? Makes a hell of a lot more sense.
Pedit2: You know you want to vote Stubbs nao, fery.
Yep. Checking vote count. And it's 3
Vote: Stubbs
This vote is not so likely from ffery-scum at all. I can see her sheeping Syryana onto her scumpartner, yes. But usually bussing is a bit of a big deal for her (since she has the tendency to set her scumpartners up for endgame scenarios instead of endgaming others herself), so the fact that she so immediately sheeped Syryana sheeping CDB's case is a good town tell for me.
In post 210, RachMarie wrote:Will take a look at CDB's links for his case. Still think Jason is scum, and it is not just his activity level, it is what he posted when he did post. Definitely not getting good vibrations here, unlike the Beach Boys song.
Fery has cut down on the amount she has posted but what she has posted definitely feels like town fery not scum fery.
feeling good about Amrun and CDB too.
yeah that whole Rach is scum, oh wait she posted a list, Rach is town bothers me too....
Rach is reading town for this post. It's light, it's easy. I also feel she's more likely to complain about people reading her as scum as town than she is when she's caught scum.
In post 218, Toomai wrote:I like the case on Stubbs, I'll think about it more while
I'm on V/LA for today
.
I didn't really like this.
In post 237, Toomai wrote:Now that that's over, I can say for sure that yeah Stubbs is pretty scummy. The case in 200 currently has me convinced; 157 in particular stands out to me as awful. But I won't be voting him until he can reply to all this.
This is sort of weak. I figured if you were gonna think the case over then you would have more stuff, but maybe I'm wrong on that.
In post 239, penguin_alien wrote:Tempted to put Stubbs at L-1. Much as I thought Squilly was scummy, and Marquis is pinging oddly, that Stubbs and LnGrrrR are on the wagon makes me uneasy. Whereas I like nearly all of the Stubbs wagon participants. Will see what Stubbs has to say when he gets back in here.
Don't like this either; talking about two other scumvibes yet not following up on any of them to any extent whatsoever was awkward and scummy.
In post 253, penguin_alien wrote: In post 240, StubbsKVM wrote:penguin alien wrote:Stubbs, what's your rationale for voting Squilly-slot over JasonWazza?
Pressure votes don't seem to work on Jason.
But if he's a scum read, he's a scum read and thus worth voting. And pressure votes without follow-up pressure aren't super-useful.
VOTE: Stubbs
L-1
Question-answer-vote transition is weak as shit.
Why did you read Rach town here? Marquis question?
In post 289, penguin_alien wrote:I don't think I've played with town-Jason, but his pointed comments and veneer of...being infalliable? are reminiscent of his scum play from the large Mainstream game where he snowed us town. I don't have town reads on Marquis or LnGrrrR, but I don't trust Jason at all right now.
UNVOTE: Stubbs
VOTE: JasonWazza
Had Marquis and LnEEETGGGGRRRRAAAGH scumreads earlier, but ends up settling on the strongest player out of the punch for paranoia reasons?
In post 318, penguin_alien wrote:Two JOAT claims. Could be town-town, town-scum, or scum-scum. Considering how much sense either of them makes is kind of the point. Jason not addressing the other JOAT claim is sketchy, and I'd rather not speculate further until he does, as it seems like we have more time now.
Didn't mind this initially, but continuing reading brings us to:
In post 352, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I was really looking forward to playing this game, I read the Harry Potter books more than twice. I'll post in more detail once I catch up but upon a skim, the first thing I noticed was that Stubbs claimed Colin Creevey giving justification as "protecting Harry from accusations." This isn't true. Colin follows Harry around with a camera and takes pictures despite the fact that Harry doesn't want it. He is annoying more than protective. He even gossips about Harry being the heir of slytherin (I need to double check the last point). Whatever he does, there is no "protection" no matter how much I stretch it. I think the claim is fake.
There's no way in hell a replacement comes in and attempts to renew interest in his scumbuddy when there are so many options and free town lynches available to him.
In post 359, RachMarie wrote:2 JOATs though seems rather odd? I have never played in a game with 2 JOATS before have you CDB?
Rach attacking what could be a free out given to her by CDB is also pretty town, considering the whole "not bussing" meta.
In post 382, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:The role PMs in Nexus's philosopher's stone game were a bit unusual.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p5126063
The wierdest one was peeves as the the vanilla cop because despite him causing chaos, hogwarts is his home and he wants to protect it. The protection part is not true but peeves makes sense as vanilla cop because he is always snooping around. I am a little undecided on the Colin Creevey claim but between Creevey and Filch, I find it much more likely Filch is the JOAT considering he helps out a lot with miscellaneous stuff. I'll think on it though.
I dig this followup.
What made your Amrun read stale here?
Toomai responding with the graph within 18 minutes is pretty strong evidence of him being town, I think.
I liked #549. I could see the makings of a move against penguin in her previous posts, so it's good to see the culmination of that.
#570 by Amrun is reassuring.
For what it's worth, Syryana told me that he was reading ffery as town but I might be called to defend her honor. His townread on her didn't go stale at all.
The low hanging fruit I was concerned about was pretty much Squilly/Marquis. The rest is just too much fencesitting; you seemed to have come around to a stubbs scumread, but it didn't seem like you were moving to lynch him.
In post 656, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:he would withhold on his graphs and charts despite people saying that he wasn't contributing. He had a ton of behind-the-scenes work that he only posted after I prodded him. I am close to 100% certain that he is town.
I'm not as confident, but the graph didn't sell me last time I played with him and I still feel pretty good about him, just want to see something more.
In post 658, MSG wrote:As the net starts to close on Stubbs Syr and ffery put votes down on Stubbs (post 207, post 208,) but after Stubbs claims (post 257) Syryana vigorously opposes any effort to restart the d1 bandwagon (post 376, post 437, post 443.)
It seems an odd move as a scumteam to have a voting block bussing method of your scumbuddy. Syryana did defend Stubbs day 1 based on the strong JOAT claim, which was not something that should have been touched day 1. Leaving night to give us a hint of their identities was just a good move.
That's what usually happens when Syr or I or Cabd gets a strong townread on ffery; sometimes her slow moving style is interpreted as scummy in the MS meta, townffery is gold, so protect her we must.
Ffery has a tendency to townread people who attack her.
"Playing with Nacho is like playing with a religious conservative." ~UncertainKitten
-- Fate, Vanilla Townie, was brutally stabbed by a throwing sword in endgame.