this is Nachomamma8.
this will be the only time I will sign my post.
1) yesIn post 14, Humble Poirot wrote:@Hydras:
1) Are you ok with this?
2) Do any of you think they will do this?
3) Do you consider you'll be fully committed to the game despite having a fallback guy who can carry you even if you don't pay attention?
4) Do you have a regular mean to confer with your other head?
It probably was. Unfortunately, I have no idea what you ever wanted to say with this and you missed some other things that happened in thread already :/In post 54, Fegelein wrote:That was fast...
He does come off as agreeable, but I liked his approach to Saki's PGO claim. Why didn't you?In post 31, Sound of Silence wrote:Brian Skies concerns me a little. He comes off rather agreeable. He's on my list to meta-check for completed MS games, but given his join date I don't expect to find any.
Follows these standards, game will be balanced, probably three scum, probably at least one investigative role & one protective role.In post 77, Brian Skies wrote:What assumptions can be safely made?
Anything else, pretty much.In post 77, Brian Skies wrote:What assumptions can we not make?
I think that his hate of hydrae from two years ago is genuine or else he wouldn't make a giant ranty post against it, and the way he's acted upon this hate is more indicative of a town mindset than a scum mindset. I don't really see an advantage as scum of "hydras suck!!!" either, so that's an added benefit. Why aren't you townreading him?In post 78, Rail Tracer wrote:elaborate on why poirot seems rather town to you.
Do you think he sensed it as a point of weakness as scum?In post 91, Sound of Silence wrote:I'm really struggling to see how this raised a flag for you.
Why does your vote need to be on him in order for him to react?In post 103, Dessew wrote:I want HC to react to #98&99 first.
We could have voted Fegelein again, but I'm pretty fine with my vote on him and would find it a little redundant if we unvoted and voted the same person.In post 107, Humble Poirot wrote:Wasn't there anything you could talk about? anyone you could vote?
My sorting process usually goes something like: 1) Read someone as leaning scum, leaning town. 2) Treat them as town/scum, get into their head a bit. etc. etc. I've played enough with SoS that I usually get a strong read from the first few posts, so the "declare town" part usually isn't necessary, and ends up being detrimental when dealing with her as scum (the more uncomfortable, the better).In post 107, Humble Poirot wrote:You ommited SOS. Why? What do you see in us that you don't see in him?
How long does it take you to catch up on 5 pages?In post 105, Fegelein wrote:Yeah, I was writing a catch-up post yesterday but I fell asleep so there's that.
In post 111, Humble Poirot wrote:You're kidding, right?In post 92, Cabd wrote:In post 89, FuDuzn wrote:Mod please delete one......or leave it. Who am I to tell you what to do.
I mean, he might react in a scummy way whether you're voting him or not. Why not vote who you think is scum?In post 114, Dessew wrote:You basically answered your question. He might react in a scummy way. I have enough time to change my vote later.
I have a slight townread on that exchange, simply because he's finding something he doesn't like and biting into it. I have to be careful with him since I occasionally lynch the hell out of him and he's usually not scum when that happens.In post 115, Sound of Silence wrote:What do you make of his posts overall and of our exchange?
And the fewer escape routes you have, the better.In post 115, Sound of Silence wrote:Not so much discomfort as hall of mirrors style self-wifom.
I'm being more transparent than I usually would be because of hydraing with Stubbs, but I'm glad that being transparent has the unexpected side effect of knocking you even more off your game.In post 119, Sound of Silence wrote:I'm talking about my read of you. Figuring out whether town- or scum-nacho is more likely to make this explicit could take a while. It's bollixed up my methodology for reading you almost as much as your ambiguity-injection post-buzzword bingo did.In post 118, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:And the fewer escape routes you have, the better.
Wait, why are you scummy for not placing a vote?In post 120, HopefullyCynical wrote:you are both correct in thinking I am scummy for not having placed a vote yet. I wanted to make sure I understood hydras before I posted further/made a vote.
This is the rational interpretation, yes. But I find emotions to be irrational things, he's going about this in an irrational way, things match up so far.In post 125, Rail Tracer wrote:but he's making a much bigger deal out of it than he should be considering a single bad experience with a single hydra.
If he's using it as an excuse for actually scumhunting, then I'm sure we'll find that out really really soon. In the long run, that's not the type of reason that I would accept as valid or vaguely townie so all that wonderful groundwork he's laying down is pretty much all for naught.In post 125, Rail Tracer wrote:In the short run, it makes it seem like he's doing something when he really isn't. Compare the game-relevant content of his posts so far to the amount of times he's mentioned his feelings about his hatred for hydras. It appears he's written a lot, but only a very tiny fraction of what he's written is game-relevant. In the long run, had he not been called out on it, he would have had the option of, at some point down the line, saying, "omg, this is why I hate hydras!!!" if he ever felt like pushing a lynch on one of them. These are just a couple basic reasons I could see it benefitting him as scum.
Minimizing damage.In post 125, Rail Tracer wrote:The better question is, what town motivation is there in talking about his hatred of hydras this much?
The rest of the post was serious. I try not to make my jokes sound too serious.In post 126, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:The only thing that stuck out to me was Rebel's attempted interactions with the mod. The likely-joking tone didn't fit in at all with the content of his posts and that struck me as odd.
HC, you think FuDuzn is scummy AND you think there's scum on his wagon? Why both of these? And why not vote on of them?In post 120, HopefullyCynical wrote:Dessew and SOS, you are both correct in thinking I am scummy for not having placed a vote yet. I wanted to make sure I understood hydras before I posted further/made a vote. I feel like if I posted without somewhat of an understanding it would only be hurting the townies and I since I could potentially mislead them. That being said, it is scummy of me to not have a vote down yet. Thank you for the explanation of the hydras SOS, it helped me a lot. I also want to apologize to the group for contributing to the "hydra nonsense" but it helped me, so thank you.
So far HP, and Rail seem town to me. FuDuzn is kinda scum so far, especially in (116) where he just sort of gives up and resigns to his fate after fighting it quite a bit. Could be an appeal to emotion? I definitely think there are some scum on his wagon though.
I would also like to know why you voted for me Dessew. We have quite a few players not voting, why pick me?
Vote: Fegelein
You summed up his actions decently, but you didn't follow up with anything like "so he's probably town" which is usually the important thing in these parts. I thought this was translating to a HC = scum conclusion, but then you unvote him and go for Fu. Why?In post 134, Dessew wrote:We both played in Newbie 1393, along with Fu, that's why I placed my random vote (I know I said "serious vote", but come oooon) on HC. Because I thought I could get something out of his reactions. He's hasty, joking a little, concerned about the vote on him (even starting to suspect the one (me) who is voting him.) There's also the "I don't know who to vote, I don't want to harm town by voting to the wrong place." Also, there's the fact that he placed his vote on Fege with a stupid reasonong, and his last post (#133) screws up chronology, Mario had contributed to the game as much as Fege had when HC voted Fege.
I pointed that out to Stubbs! <3In post 147, Sound of Silence wrote:His retracting the PGO claim points to town-Saki IMO.
The part where he attempts to mitigate the damage that these hydras will do to this beautiful game. Yes, it is a perfectly valid approach for scum to attempt to discredit the hell out of all hydras. Do I think that's what HP's going for? No, not really. In this game the hydras are generally leading pretty strongly, so I think he would back down a bit as scum when no one really bought his reasoning. Here, he didn't.In post 148, Rail Tracer wrote:so he's being emotional and irrational and this is making you read him as town? or what part of the irrational approach made you think "town mindset"?
Not really, no.In post 152, Daniel Bryan wrote:Anyone else feeling Brian scum?
Signs of giving up are usually just inexperienced or not that confident of a player tells.In post 163, Humble Poirot wrote:Why would a town player act so defeated so fast? This looks like misdirection. It's not done after a wagon, it's done immediatly and without actual intent of showing who you think is scum.
I very strongly agree with this.In post 182, notscience wrote:Mario feels weird. He's not under any fire and yet "If you dont like when I post just lynch me" seems very forced. Like a forceful way of trying to say "I don't care if I die"
So the artemis head of the hydra is someone who plays with mollie/ffery and I in a different place where ffery sort of dominates everything. The fact that she's getting paranoid of ffery here is a strong towntell to me.In post 182, notscience wrote:Kitty is leaning scum. It seems for someone with 14 posts they only have 1 townread and 1 scumread. It kinda looks like they're trying to buddy up to fu.
In post 208, Rail Tracer wrote:i can see some things that i can maybe see as town, but i really don't like how he has apparently arrived at his scum reads.
What WIFOM is created from you defending yourself?In post 211, Dessew wrote:I responded to your reads where I thought I can say something that hasn't been said yet. Or should I have responded to your read on me? Because I don't want to. It would create only WIFOM, so it'd be pointless.
Sure. I finally got over my hangover! I have not seen you claim to be obvtown. Should I be worried?Notscience wrote:Hey stubbs, care to talk?
Town. Nacho forgot to unvote.Rail Tracer wrote:btw, what's your read on ns? is there a reason you're still voting him?
Why do you feel the need to bring this up, after Ns's #231?Daniel Bryan wrote:Idk what it is, but I feel like notscience is too agreeable here, Im getting a light scum read on his slot. I dont like his attack on kitty by saying that they have 14 posts, ergo they must be scum.
Explain how this affects your read on Rail Tracer.Daniel Bryan wrote:Well its ironic that Rail Tracer has been accusing HP of hiding behind the hydra discussion when the attempts at scumhunting are there and the only reason HP keeps talking about hydras is because Rail Tracer keeps bringing them up. Makes sense?
What about that sentence makes you doubt it?Dessew wrote:"I can see the reason why he calls me scum"
Yeaahh, Im doubting my scum read on Dessew..
I have told Nacho I was townreading you, he agreed with me. What disruptions are you talking about exactly?Sound Of Silence wrote:He's expressed more interest in disrupting my game than in figuring me out.
Maybe, maybe not.In post 223, Sound of Silence wrote:Yeah, well I'm not getting town read that easily.In post 222, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:I pointed that out to Stubbs! <3
I think Dessew is town. I think that some bits of his thought process are awkwardly transparent (I won't respond to you because it would look too weird), and some of his attacks are pretty clearly geared towards scumhunting (such as his sorting out of HC), so I'm pretty good with the mole thing for now.In post 224, Taskmaster wrote:Nacho what do you think of Dessew?
Fair enough.In post 228, Rail Tracer wrote:i don't think him not backing down means much.
No, not really. I don't have any pushes I feel particularly strongly about at the time of my last wall, and I'm not an unvoting type.In post 228, Rail Tracer wrote:btw, what's your read on ns? is there a reason you're still voting him?
hahahahahahahaIn post 229, artemiskitty wrote:Since the "cat" is out of the bag anyways
Hmmm.In post 234, notscience wrote:I can't be the only one bugged by that middle paragraph. It looks like he's trying harder to SEEM townish rather than find scum.
What did you find?In post 247, Sound of Silence wrote:I metadived his completed scum game this weekend.
I've told you that I'm going to be playing more transparently than I usually do for Stubbs's benefit. I think that is pretty much the opposite of disrupting your game, no? I mean sure the meta might look a little different, but my play this game will be most effected by my hydra partner and not by you.In post 258, Sound of Silence wrote:He's expressed more interest in disrupting my game than in figuring me out.
I don't like wasting my time, and I feel that public shaming for playing anti-town is a waste of my valuable time when I can lynch scum instead.In post 286, Humble Poirot wrote:It would be cool though, if people refrained from giving this "be anti-town" card out so often.
Are you inviting me to a party??In post 299, Sound of Silence wrote:Hate to be a pain, but I'd like to answer that question after Rebel accepts my invitation.
However, it's hard to gauge FuDuzn's flailiness when he's not posting.
This frustration about people looking too far into things and getting convinced too strongly about things seems like a towntell in the early stages; not only is he failing to blend in, but he's bitching at others for trying to scumhunt and do things. That seems surprisingly ballsy from Fu-scum.In post 63, FuDuzn wrote:Right so poking someone a bit about the way a post was worded is obv scum tell now.
I hate early game time, no one is catching scum from a couple posts, you aren't that good.
This, especially the last quoted line, seemed like Fu was drawing a line in the sand, in a way, which reads as an attempt to shut down all the ridiculousness of the people posting in early game. I liked that quite a bit, and it has nice trajectory with his previous mindset in mind. "OH YOU FUCKS ARE TOO SCARED TO VOTE ME" is interestingly suicidal, but I see scum going for early ballsy plays like that in chatmafia as opposed to forum mafia where they actually have to take a step back and explain themselves.In post 84, FuDuzn wrote:Rail, explain my anti town intentions in my questioning? Enlighten us all as to how they are scum and not town motivated?
It is early Day 1, people were still stuck in stupid rvs and rqs or being overly concerned about the hydra infestation in this game, I chose to question a player about something that seemed a big off to me. When they didn't answer my question in a way that satisfied me I prodded a little bit.
Again, explain anti town motivation.
I will not back down from this and will question everyone who is voting me, and those who are apparently too scared too vote me(and that isn't a scum tell?),until I get a solid explanation about this.
I chuckled at this because of a conversation we had a while back where you said these exact words. I don't think FuDuzn as scum would be likely to start this type of lecture with you and I'm not really sure that he would really have a goal with the whole "let me teach you mafia" line as scum. It's not like he has a distinct reputation advantage in this game or something like that.In post 87, FuDuzn wrote:In this game it is more about the forest, not the trees.
Here, he backs off you (because he's scared? scum-FuDuzn hasn't been showing many signs of fear) and starts to look at others suspecting them. This reads a lot like he's sorting out his primary antagonist, and then when he's satisfied on that front, moving in on other people.In post 93, FuDuzn wrote:Ok SOS, I [don't] get really get a bad vibe from you. Though trying to reads purely off of meta is a bad strategy imo.
Those piggybacking off of SOS's weariness of me, scum in there me thinks.
And mod, shut it. I told you I couldn't tell you what to do
This screamed town. The last line alone means I won't be able to vote him today, most likely.In post 135, FuDuzn wrote:To those leading my wagon, answer my damm question please. To those sheeping, I am getting ready to vote one of you.
If I am lynched, the blood will be all over one of the sheep.
It's odd, yes. What's stranger to me is that you didn't pick it out to be a joke.In post 126, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:The only thing that stuck out to me was Rebel's attempted interactions with the mod. The likely-joking tone didn't fit in at all with the content of his posts and that struck me as odd.
Here, Mario tries to say that HC's choice of attacking Fegelein over other lurkers was somehow special and that it made him scummy in a significant way? In particular, suspecting him for attacking a lurker with "just the right amount of posts" seemed contrived.In post 126, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:Interpreting this post, it (somewhat) makes sense to translate it as "oh, since I need to throw out solid reads on players to make people think I'm trying to find scum, I'll give the name of a player who has just enough posts for me and others to remember their name, but not enough posts for people to disagree with me on the inactivity callout. I'm not looking at the playerlist at all, since only accusing specifically Fegelein for lurking shouldn't garner too much attack."
I didn't like this post because it had very strange parts joking/not joking. "I'm going to tunnel you" was a joking tone but sets up for him making a poor push. "I rely mostly on gut" was the not/joking portion, but all that seemed to do was explain why he wasn't going to see him as town even if he probably was. And it makes no sense for me for a player to realize they tunnel too much, announce they are going to tunnel even though they don't seem to believe they are passionate and then ???.In post 126, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:Sorry if you want to appeal to me now, but I'm most likely going to tunnel you for the rest of the day with limited evidence that other people won't understand, and rely mostly on my gut and what I believe was your most likely train of thought at the time of your scummier posts. I'm a tone and voice player; if it sounds scummy when read to myself, I will see it as scummy in its original context as well.
Less leaning town spot.In post 309, Sound of Silence wrote:Which is the spot you moved Brian Skies to?
Give Stubbs a moment to push the case.In post 317, notscience wrote:Nacho can you walk me through the DB case please
"Leftovers" = Not Town = Scum.In post 321, Humble Poirot wrote:You're either defending someone or finding someone to be town. In fact, your list doesn't even call anyone scum, you seem to put mario/saki/DB in some sort POE so I'll vote one of them.
I'm reading them all as leaning scum. Daniel is the hardest lean, then Mario, then Saki.In post 323, Dessew wrote:If my assumption is right, than you're reading Mario and Daniel as (leaning) scum, aren't you?
I know you're an alt. I want you to post like an experienced player and do something useful for once.In post 324, Mario and the Diamonds wrote:Obligatory response: inactivity is not lurking, and inactivity is not a scumtell except in the case of newer players who don't know how to play as scum. I am an alt, and while you have no confirmation of any of this reasoning applying to me, simply trust in the fact that an individual would not wish to be known simply as "Mario and the Diamonds" for everything they do on this site.
What do you think I mean when I say "found him", HP?In post 308, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:Vote: Daniel Bryan
I personally will speak on this subject later. Stubbs gets first dibs because he found him first, though.
Why does NS's predecessor matter? I'd say that he's produced more content than ak, yet they've produced enough content for you to get a more solid read on them.In post 320, Brian Skies wrote:Null. I liked the catch-up post, even if it was done pretty roughly. Is willing to offer
information to help get a better read. I need more content though (previous slot-holder didn't
generate anything worthwhile). information to help get a better read. I need more content though (previous slot-holder didn't generate anything worthwhile).
Why does it matter what we call you? A scum by any other name will flip just as red.In post 328, Daniel Bryan wrote:303 So why not just directly call us scum?
Don't mention ongoing games, just say that you know he can do better.In post 335, Humble Poirot wrote:"Mini 1480: Uncreative Paradise",
I would too!In post 339, Sound of Silence wrote:@Random-Stubbs, I'd like to see your case on Brian.
September 08, 03:19PM.In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:When did Stubbs found him?
If it wasn't signed by Stubbs, it was probably me.In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:Who wrote 303?
We could have, that's just not how the way I decided to write the posts decreed it would go. I might be misunderstanding what you're saying here though.In post 345, Humble Poirot wrote:Could you/him/both (This is confusing) have written DB as scum earlier than 308?
What do you think about Daniel?In post 347, notscience wrote:I say we wagon Dessew-scum, because as HP said we're too far apart and it's risking a deadline scramble.
So the questionsDaniel Bryan wrote:In any case, its probably not alignment indicative that he hates hydras, but those questions seemed like they were there to give excuses to vote for hydras.
He did, actually. You even commented on the post where he did. Looks like you're not really reading.Daniel Bryan wrote:you liked his stance but you "never said you liked his questions" well why didnt you say that earlier?
It's only logical to discuss with your other head before laying down a vote. You don't want to vote someone your other head is townreading. The fact that you see it as scummy, raises question marks for me.Daniel Bryan wrote:86 kinda feels like "i dont want to look like we're having hydra dissonance because theres a player here who doesnt like hydras and has stated he wont accept dissonance as an excuse".
Ask a question first. If the reaction to it is unsatisfactory or there is no reaction, then you vote. I don't see why you're attacking Dessew for this.Daniel Bryan wrote:So if you dont vote Cynical and simply tell her to react or something, then she wont react. Its like "person A is scummy, but I'd rather not vote yet"
Daniel Bryan wrote:108 im not sure, i dont feel like theres much scum hunting going on here, or in any of rebel's posts for that matter, except for the point about Dessew.
I'd like to know how you got from that first quote to the second.Daniel Bryan wrote:Im getting town vibes from Rebel
Again, he tries to paint players in a negative way. Encouraging the scumreading of Dessew, but also claiming a scumread on NotScience. This was after NotScience already claimed he was wrong on kitty. Why the need to bring it up?Daniel Bryan wrote:Idk what it is, but I feel like notscience is too agreeable here, Im getting a light scum read on his slot. I dont like his attack on kitty by saying that they have 14 posts, ergo they must be scum.
I think he may have a point about Dessew but Im having a gut scum read on him.
Why? When HC claimed the same thing, you thought it was scummy.(See Below)Daniel Bryan wrote:"I can see the reason why he calls me scum"
Yeaahh, Im doubting my scum read on Dessew..
Daniel Bryan wrote:120 "You are both correct in thinking Im scummy" theres a level of self awareness I not liking here. Agree with your FuDuzn point but you saying youre scummy feels off to me. Like "I know it was scummy, hence im not scum"
This doesn't answer why you brought it up, after he claimed he was wrong.Daniel Bryan wrote:There's an off feeling about his posts. I've seen ns in a game to get a grasp at his meta and he is usually uhm, less serious(?) when he is town. Thats why I felt his posts were odd.
Now I believe he said he's changing his meta, so I dont think this would make much sense
But you had him leaning town in your catchup post??Daniel Bryan wrote:Because i dont feel like he's scum hunting as much as he is trying to discredit HP.
Why is not having big scumreads a problem at this point of the game?Daniel Bryan wrote:Again why mostly "leaning" reads and no hardline "SCUM" read. it feels like you dont want to call anyone scum.
again us as town read? Yet you have not commented in a positive way about anything we have done, on the contrary.Daniel Bryan wrote:So I have HP, Mario,Rebeland SoS as town
Yeah, Stubbs decided DB was scum before I posted the list, and it was consistent with the list.In post 394, Humble Poirot wrote:in general terms, when stubbs had decided DB was scum and if that was consistent with the list you (head) posted. Considering you didn't state DB in a separate category beforehand.
1. you never used the word scummy.In post 426, Daniel Bryan wrote:Rebel
1. Yes. His questions are alignment indicative. I was calling him scummy for that
2. No idea what youre talking about
3. Well I've seen hydras who do vote without consent, then the other head retracts. So I thought it was odd for them to aboid the dissonance
4. Lol. We all have our own ways of hunting.
5. Its called Gut.
6 . Apparently suspicion always means painting negatively
7. I said it felt weird. But then I saw it in Dessew, so I thought again
8. No idea what this is supposed to attack
9. Its weird how my reads are supposed to be constant and cant change according to new situations. That my catch up read him town but apparently his current actions CANT change that
9. Because it shows a lack of commitment, a lack of conviction to call someone scum, like theyre scared.
10. Again, Gut.
But consider that gone, your case on me is bad. I felt like you had to blow up minor points to make me look bad.
7. Explain this. Why did it not feel wrong when someone else did it?Again, he tries to paint players in a negative way. Encouraging the scumreading of Dessew, but also claiming a scumread on NotScience. This was after NotScience already claimed he was wrong on kitty. Why the need to bring it up?
9.what actions made you change your read? He had been going at HP pretty much the entire time.Again, he tries to paint players in a negative way. Encouraging the scumreading of Dessew, but also claiming a scumread on NotScience. This was after NotScience already claimed he was wrong on kitty. Why the need to bring it up?
I would prefer someone who is discussing with their town reads, not being sure of their scum reads, other than someone who points out the negativities in everyone's posts, doesn't question anything about the posts, but supposedly has a number of scumreads he's not pressuring.Daniel Bryan wrote: Because it shows a lack of commitment, a lack of conviction to call someone scum, like theyre scared.
What do you think is good about DB's answer?In post 438, Dessew wrote:Daniel's answer is actually pretty good, I'd like to hear Rebel's response if there's any.
And the Fu-wagon is stalling right now, consider as if my vote was on him, but
UNVOTE: Fu
VOTE: Brian Skies
HP has a big role in this read. First: his #430 is on the spot (maybe his other posts are, too, I won't iso now.) Especially the Daniel-vote seems off, Rebel announced he had a case on him, and Brian joined the wagon with some stupid, made-up reason. And I also don't like that in his read on HP the hydradiscussion is overrepresented, but that's a minor issue in comparison.
So you think it's logical he's leaning gut town on our slot, when he has only mentioned us in negative ways?In post 446, Dessew wrote:Rebel: I kind of belived him the 1., I didn't look it up, and it does come off bad, after all. But his answers 3, 5, 6, 9, 9, 10 were proper, and his other answers (except 1 and 2, but the latter isn't a big deal) make sense, too. But, yes, there's that fisrt one, I can't find the part in that post when he calls HP scummy, he gets "town vibes" from HP at the end of his post.
You should read the case on Daniel Bryan and the follow-up. Why didn't you comment on it?Titus wrote:Please tell me if there's anything you think I should focus on.
ZINGIn post 443, Natirasha wrote:Truthfully, I forgot you were in the game for a moment there.In post 442, notscience wrote:No shoutout for me?
I don't think you answered the question quite how I wanted you to. Less question numbers and "I like this answer" and more reasons why you like those answers, please.In post 446, Dessew wrote:Rebel: I kind of belived him the 1., I didn't look it up, and it does come off bad, after all. But his answers 3, 5, 6, 9, 9, 10 were proper, and his other answers (except 1 and 2, but the latter isn't a big deal) make sense, too. But, yes, there's that fisrt one, I can't find the part in that post when he calls HP scummy, he gets "town vibes" from HP at the end of his post.
Talk to me about your read on us a little bit because I might have just been away too long but I don't remember it.In post 462, Natirasha wrote:My town block right now is SOS, Rail Tracer, Humble Peirot, Bryan Skye.
Scared to come out and play?
Not necessarily, no. Should I be?In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
Do you wanna lynch Daniel Bryan with me?
I would too if he didn't push that "lurking isn't scummy because I'm an alt and didn't need to lurk" crap earlier. If he was good enough not to lurk as scum, he would be good enough as town to not feed us that sort of thing.In post 546, Rail Tracer wrote:and i'm kind of null on mario atm. i don't think it's "apathy" in his posts. he could be town who just has no solid reads (i felt kind of like that a bit earlier in the game). i find the lack of reads more townish than scummy.
There's no shame in admitting you were wrong, Muffin.In post 561, Rail Tracer wrote:i really hate these drive-by post-and-runs by DB. it's so blatantly scummy that it's making me second guess.
I like your theory. Scum aren't expected to vote in blocks here (even during a counterwagon attempt), so I'm not sure that DB would expect that his buddy was making the counterwagon case for him or follow along so quickly, but this shows an independent thought process that I was hoping to see before.In post 591, Dessew wrote:My theory is that (they might be scumbuddies and) DB thought it was a counterwagon attempt and Titus will come up with an actual case. He didn't know that Titus wanted to dive deeply into nullishness, so he won't post any case. But he later clinged to his RT-vote, because the connection either would be unnoticed or would be considered so obvious that Titus gets towncred. So I'm saying that if Daniel flips scum, I'm willing to lynch Titus tomorrow.
It is, but that's a defense to an accusation.In post 598, notscience wrote:I see it as a response to the comment of her playing fluff-like such as her predecessor.
Lately. It certainly did have a hell of a heyday though.In post 602, Rail Tracer wrote:i'm sure it's been used to mislynch more than it has to correctly lynch scum using the "tell"
Are you really that bad at reading mantis?In post 606, Sound of Silence wrote:Your propensity for naked votes is starting to bug me a little.
Wait, what do your reads look like?In post 617, Sound of Silence wrote:Dessew's nearly in that 2nd group.
That would be cool, yeah.In post 618, Natirasha wrote:Hope you're with us nacho!
Yup. I was probably wrong.In post 625, Sound of Silence wrote:You disagree about dessew?In post 621, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:Wait, what do your reads look like?
I think both are scum. Talk to me about Mario.In post 661, artemiskitty wrote:i think nat and mario are town.
can we lynch notscience today?
VOTE: notscience
Why wait?In post 666, Natirasha wrote:Rest assured, I'll place a vote on him when I'm ready. Let's see how he enters the thread today at least.
I did! What are your thoughts?In post 706, Ranawey wrote:You didn't even gave me a day
Mario.In post 740, Rail Tracer wrote:who are you thinking about voting nacho?
Why is this obvtown ffery?In post 764, Cephrir wrote:Also I'm pretty sure this is ObvtownFfery so there's really no point in poking her with sharp things.
What, am I not cool enough to get a reaction after you call me scum?In post 780, Natirasha wrote:I'm not sure what you want me to address?
You usually look pretty fucking town by the end of Day 1 because of your frustration with it, but you haven't really seemed that town here. This is concerningIn post 807, Brian Skies wrote:I don't consider myself a strong Day 1 player and so far, Day 2 feels like Day 1 again.
#811 did look townish, but I feel uncomfortable. Why do you think he's town?In post 821, Rail Tracer wrote:i think brian skies is town. remind me to talk about why #811 was almost certainly a town post at some point later on today.
I agree with this.In post 823, Sound of Silence wrote:Ceph inherited a slot I had as town. He seems to be doing something that I do with a few players if they happen to be in a game with me - using me as a sort of stake in the ground for judging other players' reactions. Given how cautious he was about me in the Dixon Hill game, this raises a small flag.
I don't think you answered RT's concerns about you and Mario. If you actually wanted to policy lynch, I figure you'd call it a policy lynch and push it like a policy lynch but you aren't. Why?In post 833, Natirasha wrote:The come chat sometimes was due to wanting to chat with them. Perhaps it was unfair to lump the HP slot in their, but that was worded in such a way as to deliberately not be much of a judgment of scumminess.
On the second point, once again, I was speaking in the hypothetical. I do that quite a bit.
You kinda dropped off the face of the planet. What's going on with you?In post 851, notscience wrote:I'll provide a formal case for titus later tonight.
We're sorting out his partners, mostly.In post 861, Cephrir wrote:At the risk of sounding like Scumrir, why isn't Mario dead yet?
Seriously, can anyone honestly answer that question?
I don't think I'll be able to lynch ns ever.In post 898, artemiskitty wrote:because i very much think NS is scum.
Why is this obvtown ffery?In post 764, Cephrir wrote:Also I'm pretty sure this is ObvtownFfery so there's really no point in poking her with sharp things.
What, am I not cool enough to get a reaction after you call me scum?In post 780, Natirasha wrote:I'm not sure what you want me to address?
You usually look pretty fucking town by the end of Day 1 because of your frustration with it, but you haven't really seemed that town here. This is concerningIn post 807, Brian Skies wrote:I don't consider myself a strong Day 1 player and so far, Day 2 feels like Day 1 again.
#811 did look townish, but I feel uncomfortable. Why do you think he's town?In post 821, Rail Tracer wrote:i think brian skies is town. remind me to talk about why #811 was almost certainly a town post at some point later on today.
I agree with this.In post 823, Sound of Silence wrote:Ceph inherited a slot I had as town. He seems to be doing something that I do with a few players if they happen to be in a game with me - using me as a sort of stake in the ground for judging other players' reactions. Given how cautious he was about me in the Dixon Hill game, this raises a small flag.
I don't think you answered RT's concerns about you and Mario. If you actually wanted to policy lynch, I figure you'd call it a policy lynch and push it like a policy lynch but you aren't. Why?In post 833, Natirasha wrote:The come chat sometimes was due to wanting to chat with them. Perhaps it was unfair to lump the HP slot in their, but that was worded in such a way as to deliberately not be much of a judgment of scumminess.
On the second point, once again, I was speaking in the hypothetical. I do that quite a bit.
You kinda dropped off the face of the planet. What's going on with you?In post 851, notscience wrote:I'll provide a formal case for titus later tonight.
We're sorting out his partners, mostly.In post 861, Cephrir wrote:At the risk of sounding like Scumrir, why isn't Mario dead yet?
Seriously, can anyone honestly answer that question?
I don't think I'll be able to lynch ns ever.In post 898, artemiskitty wrote:because i very much think NS is scum.
didn't miss it.In post 977, Titus wrote:Rebel, you totally missed NS's formal case and my response.
You can say "why are you reading me as scum?" without me full tilting at you. When I tilt you, I'm lynching the hell out of you.In post 985, Natirasha wrote:You didn't sound particularly confident in that conviction. You didn't give me anything to really respond to. My reaction was somewhere between complete apathy and mild surprise. Rail Tracer came at me with gusto, and engaged me in a dialogue. You didn't.
Nastyrasha.In post 986, notscience wrote:What do you want to talk about Nacho?
Hell yes.In post 987, Rail Tracer wrote:would you help me lynch nati today?
This seems townish from you.
So what happens if Nati flips scum? Do you drop the Titus scumread?In post 1017, notscience wrote:Titus-Nati scumteam.
Titus is where you lose me. I think Prohawk or Brian both make more sense for the middleman.In post 1040, Rail Tracer wrote:nati+titus+mario
In post 1094, notscience wrote:Nacho I still want to know why you think Titus is town
Why don't you think Titus is town?In post 1017, notscience wrote:2- I don't see the possibility for a Titus-Nati scumteam.