I'll be
Gimme roughly 24h to read up/make a significant post. In the mean time, carry on.
In post 1114, Tierce wrote:AGar, darling, no stabbings. We just had a wedding, let's keep it safe and not bloody.
I mean...In post 1147, macmollie wrote:ooba unsure, sd town, kanye town, benmage unsure, zden unsure
do you want an expansion of reasons why
I would expect any player who's invested in this game and interested in seeing correct lynches go through to take the time to actually form an opinion on viable wagons and vocal players. You're going to naturally come to your own reads, but I rolled off 4 players that I would expect most players to have some sort of opinion on either way (and 1 whom I personally wanted to see how some people stand on), and you had opinions on two of them. The fact that some significant action has gone down around them and you have zero opinion on them screams scum to me.In post 1159, macmollie wrote:I assume you are talking about ooba person who your vote is on?In post 1151, AGar wrote:I mean...In post 1147, macmollie wrote:ooba unsure, sd town, kanye town, benmage unsure, zden unsure
do you want an expansion of reasons why
You don't have reads on a player who's one of the four seemingly serious wagons and one of the most outspoken players in the game, and it's been going for a bit under a week (not sure how long the outage was for as it didn't actually impact me at all). How is that even possible? There's 47 pages of content (or a lack thereof, in some cases). This isn't exactly difficult to form some opinions.
no I do not
I don't have any completed games with him so he is not a voice inside my head. I did not like his list of reads but that is mostly cos we were not on it. but do you know what is weird with your angle here? on 1 hand you are bitching at me cos I don't have a read on a player and then you go and say "there are 47 pages of content!" as if the 2 correlated when they are mutually exclusive. it is almost like you are trying to subtly and insidiously imply that we do not have reads period. butsurelyyou wouldn't do that...would you? cos that is what scum would do. cos I am pretty sure that ooba guy has not posted in all 47 pages which is the only thing that would link the 2 statements together.
You need to make up a case, I'm guessing?In post 1202, StupendousMan wrote:Does ooba usually try to make his reads look good with colors and hyphens? He's null for me right now, but I'm really curious about that. Also, Quadz has moved up again on my scum list, so I believe a vote is in order. Reasons coming later.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Quadz
^In post 1218, quadz08 wrote:I have stopped reading anything that is Thor and Benmage talking to one another since it's all useless drivel.
Can wepleaselynch Ooba now? His most recent spate of posts have not improved my view of him in the slightest. He asks questions, but they all seem to be filler-posts. His reasoning for his defenses on Amrun and Zdenek are extremely weak.
Thor is town.In post 1259, Cephrir wrote:If StupendousMan is out of the picture (I'm liking him a little better though), SafetyDance is the best wagon, followed by Thor. I will not vote ooba. Still holding out for Garruk though.
Thor is town.In post 1259, Cephrir wrote:If StupendousMan is out of the picture (I'm liking him a little better though), SafetyDance is the best wagon, followed by Thor. I will not vote ooba. Still holding out for Garruk though.
In going back to highlight points, I realize I mistook one of his lines in a post (specifically, "my reads are my content" in #445) as a deflection rather than the intended meaning when he said that. Strike that single point from my case, though I still hold that he hasn't given us much to work with, even his "reads" post struck me as very barren. A lot of "vibe" and similar "reasoning". The rest of that case stands.In post 1263, Cephrir wrote:How so?AGar wrote:to deflect any attempts to garner insight into his reads,
That sure is a better case than I've heard from anyone else though.
Both of them got slight town-leanings from me in my read-up, but nothing strong on either end. But it was enough to warrant me not bothering to consider them for D1 targets when I saw better ones. I'd have to re-read them (I'll do that tonight) to be more in-depth/see what you might be seeing for great justice and all that rah-rah bullshit.In post 1269, Thor665 wrote:@AGar - a Day 1 lynchbait? Are you serious? Look at the player list, we don't need to be limiting ourself to culling at this stage and it seems silly to choose to do so. Neither of them are being pro town, which is the basic impetus of your Ooba push, but add in Amrun's awkward defense of me or Ceph's aggressive refusal to actually look at motivation and I think they both look worse objectively.
How about you go ahead and clarify what was directed where?In post 1336, Cephrir wrote:Yes, it is not possible I was addressing those sentences to two different targets.
Go ahead, lynch me for my fucking word choice. Let me know when you're ready to play mafia instead.
I'm just pointing out that you're a scumbag and that I'm onto you. So really, I'm not shutting other town's scumhunting techniques.In post 1370, macmollie wrote:yes. it is. and I even told you why.In post 1369, AGar wrote:Having half the game in one pile and the other half in another leads literally no trail.
Whatsoever.
It's the next best thing to having no reads in terms of leaving no trail.
Seriously, what the shit?
but it probably be useful to you cos you are too inexperienced with that particular tool for it to be of any benefit not to mention you are not even open to it.
which I find interesting. town doesn't try to shut other town's scumhunting techniques. and tbh your blatant bullying is getting old.
Ok I'm gonna break this one down because somewhere we've had a communication breakdown. (Paraphrasing)In post 1378, Thor665 wrote:Yes, you asked me a question, I responded here;In post 1355, AGar wrote:Also, Thor... I asked a preeeeetty specific question in #1252. And you didn't answer it. You give me a sad. (Yes, I re-read Ceph, no I don't like it for lynching. No, I haven't re-read Amrun just yet, yes that's next on the list.)The other part of your question was "I refuse to lynch either of your scumreads (because I don't consider them lynchbait worthy on Day 1...which is a meaningless answer to their scumminess) - who else should we lynch?" Which...is not really a question I can answer functionally.In post 1269, Thor665 wrote:@AGar - a Day 1 lynchbait? Are you serious? Look at the player list, we don't need to be limiting ourself to culling at this stage and it seems silly to choose to do so. Neither of them are being pro town, which is the basic impetus of your Ooba push, but add in Amrun's awkward defense of me or Ceph's aggressive refusal to actually look at motivation and I think they both look worse objectively.
Hey, AGar, I refuse to lynch anyone you think is scum - who should we lynch? All that is going to get is you randomly picking some meh null read and...what, trying to act excited about that as a compromise lynch wagon of 2?
No.
Also, functionally, I had asked you to defend your position that I disagreed with, and you didn't - making *you* the one breaking the conversation chain (and, indeed, trying to go backwards in it) So...whut?
Something something something self-meta something something something manipulatable.In post 1391, ooba wrote:Agar's post makes some valid sounding points. However the post toally ignores playstyle. I play this way as town - i post reads, when they flip - i quote my own reads and say "Hey i tagged em as scum here". The difference in this game is that the pace has been unrelenting so ive never had time to do a complete reread that i usually do.
Ok this is the main communication breakdown. I didn't take your post as asking me for an alternate, instead rather asking me to consider Amrun/Ceph (I got to the Amrun read... I'm eh about her. The V/LA makes it hard because there isn't much to work with. And Ceph has given me a big ol' "eh" feeling too with his recent posts. I could go either way on them right now). But uh, my first real post of the game said I'd also be happy lynching macmollie.In post 1470, Thor665 wrote:1. Pot meet kettle? Yeah, i never gave an alternate and I *told you* why I didn't. You know who else didn't offer a compromise? You didn't offer one for me...but you *did* say you'd re-look at my primes, so me then waiting to see where you fell on them is pretty ruddy normal I'm pretty sure. Heck, you still haven't done my primary yet. I also ent on the offensive because you did ask me for something that I had *literally responded to*. Now, go read me in iso with Mollie, and watch that mess, and then be aware of why I'm annoyed that apparently no one reads what I write and then wants to know why I haven't answered things I have answered. I'll admit maybe you got worse than you deserved because at least there is vague justification for your point - but I did answer your question, just not the way you wanted me too.
Your reasoning doesn't hold up, especially when he's pointed out the numbers. It's not like he can convince people to jump on a null read, so consolidating to the larger wagon actually makes sense, especially with how weak his town read seemed to be to begin with.In post 1476, displaced wrote:what's unjustified about goaT vote?
diediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediediedieIn post 1480, SafetyDance wrote:First thing firsts looking at recent VC and 3 days to go ~ I am happy to join the Thor wagon, I agree with Benmage's 518 and D1 is the only optimal time to do so.
Vote: Thor665
I'm torn between "oh you" and "pokerface" right now.In post 1551, Thor665 wrote:A scum lynch?In post 1533, AGar wrote:Because that nets us what, exactly?
Who'd you meta off of one game? (If it isn't this, I'm completely lost, because it's been over 6 months since I last played and even longer, probably, since we were in the same game.
Didn't get a p-edit for whatever reason.In post 1639, Tierce wrote:He just did. Easy.
nononononononono stahp. No more of this nonsense. We need to focus on shit like lynching ooba and not having a repeat of yesterday.In post 1823, Tammy wrote:VOTE: tierce
That was the most opportunistic piece of bullshit jump on thor yesterday and I'm still pissed. Hey, I said, roles before alignments. Faraday has used millers I said. I've played in the last two faraday upicks I said. Did you listen? NOOOOO. Let's abide by some bullshit model made up by you to decide what faraday wouldn't do and just ignore the person who's played in every faraday modded game here and offsite for almost two years because clearly I don't know what I'm talking about. Oh but wait, town miller, good job.
And yeah I know empire's going to come in here and yell at me, but I just don't care right now. If you're town I have no idea what the hell you thought you were doing.
~=*MaGiC*=~ of course.In post 1830, Messiah Complex wrote:We find it highly unlikely that there would be no N1 deaths in a multiball setup.
]In post 1855, Cephrir wrote:ooba continues to be town. I could see an argument that 1565 is scummy if SD is town but that isn't nearly enough for me to revoke my read.
I had forgotten that post. Yeah, it's unconvincing.In post 1889, Cephrir wrote:Agar I literally made a post yesterday about why I thought ooba was town. It's not overwhelming or likely to convince anyone but myself, but there it is.
Still? Thor being town doesn't really change that for me, if anything people were resisting moving off him and onto Thor and kept trying to get the wagon going again. Whereas the SD wagon fled to all corners of the earth to get off him stat.
I don't see much townpanging coming from that post.In post 2058, quadz08 wrote:AGar, read Elle's 2057 and try to tell me she's scum again, please. Your vote is bad and it makes me sad.
Everyone seems content to give him a free pass at this point. I still have him highest on my list, but realistically, generating some pressure elsewhere right now is more effective it seems. The only add-on to the points I laid out yesterday we've gotten is "He's disappeared and functionally gotten all of you to forget he exists," which we've pointed out and no one is seeing anything wrong with that.In post 2058, quadz08 wrote:Guys I want to point out that the Ooba wagon is stagnating / disappearing because Ooba has become a non-presence today. This is scummy all by itself. Please don't leave me dudes.
Uh... I don't see a question?In post 2073, Tierce wrote:!Syr, AGar a question for you. And me and my absolutely appalling puns will be over there. (>")>
Holy. Shit.
It is now after 1:30 AM Eastern Time Wednesday (last I knew she was EST/borderline-possibly-CST, so after 12:30 AM Wednesday). She promised us content on Tuesday - said she was spending an ENTIRE DAY to get caught up and give us content. She has posted 9 times since midnight Tuesday -- 6 times after 8 PM Eastern, if you want to discount the times she posted prior to saying she was gonna sleep. 6 posts, no content. No reads. 1 status update, 2 questions with regards to Kanye, and 3 posts complaining.In post 2178, Cephrir wrote:Let her post the damn content and then judge. Sheesh.
You find it more acceptable that someone hammered off of 12 pages of reading than someone voting to put someone at L-1.In post 2249, Garruk Relentless wrote:Not really helping your case, Agar. I clearly stated intent and gave a timeframe. You know, like how people who are not fools or scum do things. I wouldn't have even done it though if you hadn't set up the hammer though--half of this game is understanding tempo, and with the L-1 vote lain, someone was going to take the bait. I was hoping to head it off with our intent, but it didn't work.
And I am not giving a pass on SpyreX's hammer, but I find it paradoxically MORE acceptable than the person who sets up the hammer, ie you--you were baiting the hammer with that vote and you fucking know it. I mean, I pulled the exact same ploy in Syryana's Open, so I should know.
Thanks. Nothing was actually *wrong*, work just overwhelmed me (36 hours in 3 days turned into 45) due to other managers having life issues.In post 2340, Tierce wrote:AGar--when you get back, less anger, less frustration, less pointless aggression, please. Need you to be as objective as possible. Hope everything is well.
This isn't entirely true: Garruk had put a 12-hour timer on the hammer. Other people were vocally frustrated with Amrun and not quite there on voting yet. Someone else could've easily swooped in pulled the trigger (I was taking a calculated gamble putting that L-1 vote on Amrun, but I was worried about the wrong subset of players - and when Garruk put the twelve hour cap on, I decided to leave the vote and go to bed. I wasn't aware of SpyreX's fast-hammer tendencies).In post 2422, Messiah Complex wrote:I'm going to reiterate that:the quickhammeronlybenefitted him if he got a scum role PM.
Do you care to expound with your own reasoning behind this, or are you just sheeping the general groupthink because you have no real opinions of your own?In post 2424, Zdenek wrote:AGar - I don't have a strong read here, but him putting Amrun at L-1 was bad.
Your argument here hinges on "SpyreX spent 4+ years quickhammering just so he could troll one game in 2013."In post 2449, Messiah Complex wrote:I don't give a fuck if you have a history of quickhammering. Why? Because you have a history of quickhammering for situations precisely like this one--so you can pretend like you've defeated my argument by telling me you've done this before as town so LOL TRY AGAIN!!!!
See we have players like SpyreX.In post 2458, SafetyDance wrote:See: Benmage & The Self-Vote, Jan 13, The Wire.In post 2454, AGar wrote:Your argument here hinges on "SpyreX spent 4+ years quickhammering just so he could troll one game in 2013."In post 2449, Messiah Complex wrote:I don't give a fuck if you have a history of quickhammering. Why? Because you have a history of quickhammering for situations precisely like this one--so you can pretend like you've defeated my argument by telling me you've done this before as town so LOL TRY AGAIN!!!!
You do realize that, right?
Pardon me for losing my internet. I'm not phoneposting in a large.In post 2463, Garruk Relentless wrote:Replace zed with AGar and we're pretty much in the same boat. Shit got lurky in here.In post 2460, kanyeknowsbest wrote:i got prodded. i still want zed dead i still dont want spyuerx dead and i dont have much more 2 add.
I knew there was an outside shot of quickhammering, but SpyreX was not on the list of people I concerned myself with when I made that. My mindset was "The competent players aren't gonna do anything stupid."In post 2469, Zdenek wrote:What is this supposed to mean? What were you gambling?In post 2429, AGar wrote:I was taking a calculated gamble putting that L-1 vote on Amrun
Right. Sheeping the groupthink. Cool.Zdenek wrote:I think that everything that needs to be said has been.In post 2429, AGar wrote:Do you care to expound with your own reasoning behind this, or are you just sheeping the general groupthink because you have no real opinions of your own?
Agar, what is your read of Spyrex?
In post 2509, Tammy wrote:oh also i still believe in my spyrex vote
Tammy, do you think scum-SpyreX comes in and says "I would do it all over again even if I had read every post?" re: his hammer?In post 2510, Tammy wrote:and i think you should too.
Let's just say I have enough respect for Spy that I don't think he would use games to build a meta just so he could game said meta. I think he's above those kind of shenanigans.In post 2523, Messiah Complex wrote:I only made that point in response to Spyrex's gross attempt to defeat my argument by self-metaing. In any case, it wasn't specific to this game--Spyrex quickhammers as town so that he can quickhammer as scum and get away with it. Unless there's a hidden benefit to derpass troll hammers that I'm missing?In post 2454, AGar wrote:Your argument here hinges on "SpyreX spent 4+ years quickhammering just so he could troll one game in 2013."In post 2449, Messiah Complex wrote:I don't give a fuck if you have a history of quickhammering. Why? Because you have a history of quickhammering for situations precisely like this one--so you can pretend like you've defeated my argument by telling me you've done this before as town so LOL TRY AGAIN!!!!
You do realize that, right?
Short of going through 61 games in my history to check the playerlist on every one, I do not recall actually ever playing with SpyreX. If we have played together, it was in a rather forgettable game. I read a few games he was in a few years back for Scummies judging, and I know who he is on site because he's a presence and when you're onsite for 4+ years, you know who the presences are. I don't meta people. I've said before, I feel it's a fairly unreliable tool save for a few circumstances. I couldn't tell you the first thing about SpyreX's actual play beyond his reputation is that of a good player. Generally speaking, I don't expect good players to fast-hammer without solid reasoning.In post 2523, Messiah Complex wrote: @ AGar, re: 2498: I'm confused. You make it pretty clear that you know who Spyrex is and have formed an opinion of his play, but then you say that you didn't expect Spyrex to quickahmmer because "the competent players aren't going to do anything stupid." But everyone is contending that Spyrex's meta = town trollhammers all day err day. Explain?
- Des
Not my point. My point was that the accusation was that Spy spent all of his time quickhammering so he could do it in one game and point to his past meta to go "Ha! I'm town!" First, it's been said he does it alignment null a few times I believe. And second, I've said above about how I feel about that kind of accusation.In post 2533, Nautilius wrote:If you do something as town, you can do it as scum.In post 2454, AGar wrote:Your argument here hinges on "SpyreX spent 4+ years quickhammering just so he could troll one game in 2013."
You do realize that, right?
I wanted pressure/content from Amrun, and if that didn't come, a lynch. I knew there was a risk that someone would come in and quickhammer the wagon, but I felt the vote needed to be there to help really lay the pressure on and get something done. Hence, gambling.In post 2579, Zdenek wrote:Agar's comment about gambling by putting Spyrex at L-1, still makes no sense. I have no idea what he was hoping to win. I also don't understand why he likes Spyrex's conviction about his hammer, since I don't think Spyrex would have done anything differently as either alignment.
Read the preceding paragraph in my post. I laid out pretty well how I think today is most likely to go. I was laying the read down for posterity. Some of the more polar reads are actually coming around, but I'm not holding my breath for a full-on wagon.In post 2570, elleheathen wrote:In post 2564, AGar wrote: Zdenek is scum.Then why are neither of you voting him and actually making it a viable wagon option? Your votes are doing so well there in that 'Not Voting' pile.In post 2566, Cephrir wrote:No time to go in depth but the zdenek wagon is the best of the three options.
There's the option of just saying "It happened, deal." or something to that effect.In post 2589, Nautilius wrote:Yes. I sure as hell would. What other position do you think he would take? "Sorry guys that was actually a horrible thing I did?"In post 2564, AGar wrote:Tammy, do you think scum-SpyreX comes in and says "I would do it all over again even if I had read every post?" re: his hammer?
That group has been such a vocal minority, I wasn't aware they existed.In post 2589, Nautilius wrote:And there's a third, unacknowledged group that thinks peacebringer was actually scummy and SpyreX hasn't done anything close to helping dispel those bad feelings. There's also a bunch of townies floating around everywhere and his slot is in the bottom of the bottom half of "reasons to call this person town".In post 2564, AGar wrote:A group feels I'm scummy for putting Amrun at L-1 to bait a quicklynch. Another group feels SpyreX is scummy for quickhammering.
I haven't taken you as seriously starting since... ever, so I await your "triumphant return."In post 2661, Garruk Relentless wrote:We're not done yet, Agar,
Ceph, why the fuck do I not understand at all what you're trying to paint with this post? Is this supposed to be all connections to Spy? Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum, Goat-scum seems highly improbable, and the odds of everyone not voting for SpyreX being scum is pretty... improbable.In post 3142, Cephrir wrote:This is the first post containing a vote after the initial SpyreX wagon. Therefore, it is the first step to the derailing of said wagon in favor of the Zdenek/AGar wagons. And of all things it's for white knighting SpyreX. I'm not saying anything about this really, vote documenting the derailing.
Here's another alternative wagon, and with a lame excuse not to vote SpyreX to boot! "I think the guy everyone is voting for is scum but nyeh so I'm gonna do something to actively derail the wagon"? Yuck.In post 2220, PrideandJoy wrote:Tammy
Shadoweh
AGar
Benmage
elleheathen
kanyeknowsbest
Messiah Complex
ooba
SpyreX
quadz08
scum are in here ^.
But it feels gross to vote SpyreX.
So I will
VOTE: Elleheathen
Here's yet another alternative!In post 2228, Goat on a Raft wrote:The Spyrex vote is pretty great and we're-a let you finish but Agar made one of the scummiest moves onto the Amrun quickwagon of all time. OF ALL TIME!
{...}
VOTE: AGar
Let me go ahead and make this a real bandwagon even though I literally just voted someone else. Try a little harder to stop this please. At this point I would characterize the initial SpyreX push as completely dead.
But on the off chance it wasn't, here's a really poorly reasoned wagon hop. Like actually, read this post and cringe with me as you near the end of it.In post 2237, Garruk Relentless wrote:I liked the Agar vote more. The lolhammer I can justify as a lolhammer, but putting her to L-1 like that is just complete bullshit.
VOTE: Agar
Augh! I still can't talk about this!In post 2253, Goat on a Raft wrote:We decided that we would wait in order to avoid giving scum a reason to nightkill us early on, given that the ability could be pretty useful and we're pretty keen on being alive (for this head at least, it would suck if we died before the numbers thinned out a bit). If one of us had been around late Yesterday like we'd meant to/before a lynch happened, it's possible we'd have decided to break it out then. On the other hand, we might have waited longer if we had had more scumflips before Today.In post 2250, Benmage wrote:Why did you wait to use this ability?
Having not been online when the Amrun lynch happened, we came into Today with fresh deathrage towards both Agar and Spyrex. The urge to whip it out became overwhelming. We're out, we're proud, we have two votes. LOCK 'N' LOAD.
This immediately follows a big post about ooba from shadoweh (accompanied by a vote). The picture I'm trying to paint here is that we have some players who appear to be really aggressively hunting for alternative wagons without actively defending Spyre (as kanye did). Primarily P&J and Benmage.
Case in fucking point.
This follows my fake hammer. Those claims really did not change things (I assume claims plural means Alchemist and Spyre). I guess Alchemist's might have a little but Garruk was voting Spyre so that is not incredibly relevant. Spyre claimed a weak protective role. Why on earth should we care about that claim? It shouldn't affect anything, if you want to unvote then just unvote. Note that this post assumes, at least to my reading, that Spyre is aware he has not been hammered.
On an unrelated note, I am having trouble shaking my early townread on elle, even though a few things have made me uneasy. Someone convince me, I guess?
Update on my suspects:
Alchemist: We're not lynching this until Tierce does her thing but I still want it to die.
Messiah: I have very mixed feelings about their interactions with Spyre. I guess this is a good thing for them.
Garruk: Looks worse than before, see body of post.
Goat: Using their double vote on Spyre I actually liked, but they do remove it before too long. Not much change here in light of the new information.
Titus: See Messiah, I suppose, but less so. Hopefully having just played with town Titus will help me out here.
P&J: Welcome!
I really don't give a shit. I wanted other people dead, I had a wagon calling for my head, and I made a read. Congrats, I was wrong - it happens more often then not lately.In post 3150, Nautilius wrote:bro this fucking sucksIn post 3070, AGar wrote:That's literally the entire crux of that read right there. His posting on D3 was purposeful. He managed to keep himself engaged in the light of the wagon. Those are things I expect town to do, not scum.
Re-read me pushing on Garruk early D3, and then Tierce's responses.In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:I was examining the area around his wagon for anyone who might have been deliberately detracting from it. I was also looking for potentially awkward half bussing but I didn't find anything that stuck out.
???Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum
Scum doublevoter isn't a terrible stretch, although I would expect it to be limited. Scum giving out a # of how many scum there are doesn't seem probable at all.
So the answer is no. Gotcha.In post 3171, Nautilius wrote:I'm doing something else atm.In post 3167, AGar wrote:Wanna stop fucking pussyfooting it?
No, it clearly has.In post 3255, SafetyDance wrote:Whether I got ninja or strongman mixed up in the initial post is irrelevant to what I used N2 and what I claimed I used. It has never changed.
In post 3085, SafetyDance wrote:Pfft. More than happy to volley snarky bs back with interest.In post 3081, Cephrir wrote:Well that was unnecessarily hostile.
You confused Ninja with Strongman, your brilliance.
Ninja's avoid detection, which is how Naut would avoid being detected doing anything night 2.
In post 3178, SafetyDance wrote:I love how everyone's a hindsight expert and no one said boo D3.In post 3089, quadz08 wrote:*sigh* basic mafia theory, man. You out tracks if they give you pseudo-guilties, not pseudo-innocents, unless another claim contradicts your results or it's fullclaim time.
Curious to see how he responds to Garruk's question.
I don't need to respond to GR, since he's being stupid because there's no confusion or contradiction.
Yesterday was Day 3. Today is Day 4.Therefore day 3 IS yesterday and yesterday was when I claimed to have blocked Naut D2.
Can't have visited Naut and Quadz on the same night, they would be kinda impossible.
If this is TrueFax, then we need to lynch Titus.In post 3348, Tierce wrote: As it is, since I was not vanillized by SCUM on N1, I'm fairly sure I was already shot by them and that a missing kill last Night came from somewhere else.