Gomen, kanye-kun =/
I just couldn't keep that vote up in good conscience after reading his stuff.
In post 243, Tammy wrote:But I also don't think much of the quadz wagon. However, he's easy to read, yeah? Empire? I mean I know you guys are voting there, but he doesn't seem off the wall to me?
I remember not too long after
#194, Llamarble pointed it out to me and we both had the same kneejerk "WOW LOOK AT THE OBVSCUM" reaction. I'll do my best to sum up our AIM convo about quadz but it basically ended up resulting in this:
-> Llamarble found the post scummy because something either is a slip or it isn't; he found the "this looks like a slip" comment to be scummy because scum want to go after things that :look like: slips in order to bolster the credibility of their votes and make them appear more believable.
-> I hate to use the "o" word here, but personally, I found his vote opportunistic given the above "slip" logic. Scum tend to care a lot more about making sure their actions appear justified in the eyes of everyone at large so I feel like he shoved the slip logic in there for that reason.
-> Shadoweh already pointed it out, but I really dislike his unvote in
#213. Seems more like a backpedal after he began drawing some heat for it rather than it being a genuine "my bad".
#227 doesn't make sense either since there's plenty of scum motivation in unvoting once something like 4 people react to the vote negatively.
As far as elleheathen goes, both of us really disliked
#110 -- lots of stuff had happened between that post and her first one, so her coming returning to the thread again only to comment on a fairly throwaway post by PB was fairly shitty. Llamarble also thought her responses to the wagon felt like scum responses ("huh what I do" -> "that's not worth voting me for", which I agree because it implies that the conclusion, e.g. that she herself is scum, is true). However,
#282 seemed townish to me and I want to give your game a good once over since I didn't really follow it while it was ongoing (and I definitely want to get 'marble's second opinion as well). The "Wight" discussion went way over my head because I know almost nothing about the flavor and it completely slipped my mind to ask Llamarble what that was all about >_>
In post 247, Tierce wrote:I had hoped Empire would draw scum for my long-delayed revenge.
Oh you have absolutely no idea how much I was dreading opening that PM box and I think the sheer force of my sigh of relief when I saw I was town caused extensive property damage to my immediate area. Plus, you know I wouldn't be posting as scum as I'd have already drowned in an ocean of my own tears so I'm pretty obvtown already.
In post 288, Goat on a Raft wrote:Saw what you were doing - and appreciated it, it gave you townpoints - but disagreed that it was worth a vote (and, unlike Cephrir, we had more posts to consider by that point). Cephrir came in, had to have seen that you were already creating an issue and, considering that town's goal early on is to do as much as possible to facilitate reads rather than prolong randomness, should have reacted to your vote but chose not to.
If you saw the PAJ wagon as a good thing, what do you think about chesskid's responses to the wagon?
---
@Cephrir:
What was the comment directed at Shadoweh in
#77 ("Keep this up") for?
Also, I don't think Shadoweh is doing what you think she is doing but I'll talk about that later.
---
People who will be undergoing the Intense Meta Examination in the next few days:
quadz (at Tierce's request)
elleheathen (because Tammy vouches for her scum game and I want to take a look at it myself)
Amrun (I agree that her early catch-up seemed like her pointing out "things-that-look-bad-but-aren't-really" but I vaguely remember her doing stuff like this pretty frequently as town in game's of hers I've followed and I remember her being a lot more sideline-y in Balto Meet as scum, not as cocky/aggressive as she appears here)