Hey all, I'm your IC. I'm here to help answer questions and show you how the game is
Keep an eye on how many votes a person has before voting them. You DON'T want to accidentally hammer (lynch) someone.
This is town.In post 111, Skelda wrote:I agree, there is no way he can it all game. But, I'd prefer to lynch someone scummish to someone annoying.In post 110, Nominull wrote:Twee posting styles like that are a good cover for scum, it makes you harder to read, which is something scum wants and town doesn't. But honestly I don't really care about that, I'm just not willing to deal with it. We're here to win, but we're also here to have fun, and having doggerel verse shoved down my throat is not my idea of fun.In post 109, Skelda wrote:The thing is, though it is stupid, do you really think it is scummy? I mean, he clearly thought of this method of posting before, based on his username. I find his posting style annoying, but not necessarily scummy.In post 108, Nominull wrote:I don't see my vote moving off 2Pac or me contributing much until he cuts out his shtick. I'm here to play mafia, not read bad rap parodies.
In post 46, Nominull wrote:You ready to go 1-vs-1 against him? The IC shouldn't say stuff like this, the poor newbies will take you seriously.In post 38, Mr_Ree wrote:Yes. Satan is 100% pure scum. There is no denying it. That tell is flawless.
Let me see if I can find his scumbuddy before we end the day.
See these two posts following it Fuzzy, Nominull hints that it is a reaction test and Archaebob takes it a step further with his own reaction test.In post 47, archaebob wrote:@ SatanHellYeah -
I'm giving you exactlyonechance to prove your innocence. I want a paragraph-length read of every player who has posted so far. I don't care if they've only posted once, or if you think you know next to nothing about them. I'm looking for the feeblest, most spontaneous, most honest gut reactions you can give me. Reach into your psyche and spit out the truth. Picksomethingabout everyone and write about it. Minimum 3-4 sentences each. Also, label them as probably town or probably scum, based on your best guess so far.
If you're town, do NOT try to calculate your response based on what you think the town wants to hear. Just be completely honest, even if you think it might look bad. Trust me.
If you're scum, good look pretending that you've taken the above advice.
Also, if you argue with the prompt I've given you for any reason I can promise you that your ass is grass. Comply first, and ask questions after.
@ everyone else -
DO NOTcomment on or make reference to the request I just made of SatanHellYeah until AFTER he responds to it. We don't want to taint his answers. This is extremely important, for reasons I'll be more than happy to explain afterwards.
Same...In post 324, SatanHellYeah wrote:I'm not at all happy with this turn of events.
Don't like this. don't like this at all..In post 178, Nominull wrote:There's no real skill level qualification for playing as IC. Experience is required, and presumably you get better with experience, but the point of the IC is to provide someone who's familiar with the mechanics and social norms of how the game is played on the site for people to refer to, not necessarily to provide someone who's so amazing at the game they'll automatically win for whatever side they're on. That'd be no fun, after all.
Scumpost.In post 402, Nominull wrote:Here's something for you to ponder, as a show of my good faith: if Mr. Ree is such a good townie, why is he voting for me and not 2Pac?
I apologize for thinking you're town. I was wrong. I'm big enough to admit that.In post 263, Skelda wrote:So, town, who of archiebob and fuzzylogic would you rather see die today? I think I'd prefer fuzzy, but I'd settle for archie too. But no one other than them is dying today.
Actually, the way archie jumped on fuzzy could be majorly opportunistic scum, since he seemed so convinced of fuzzy's innocence until he started getting votes. Thoughts?
Working on it. Going to see how this pans out. I'm seeing some bad play so far.In post 406, Regfan wrote:Ree, I'm pretty damn positive that Nom's town. His last two pages worth of posting has been incredible sincere.
Anyway fully catch up and then vote Satan.
Scumpost.In post 445, Nominull wrote:But whatever. Hurry up and claim, Satan, so we can move on to 2Pac.
Why does it seem more likely? I'd like you to answer in your own words.In post 452, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:@ Ree- what makes you think Satan will flip town. Also what do you make of Reg's scumslip read on Satan...you seem to think that he has pretty good reads. I guess I am asking why I should I should flip my vote to Null since Satan seems like a pretty sure bet. Not saying am 100 percent sure he is scum but it seems more likely than not he is.
Not happening. I haven't had one single iota of a townread off your play. You are intelligent, I'll give you that. Your case against 2pac is uninspired and based off a playstyle that is nothing but null. He has given reads. He hasn't backed down. Your play has been anti-town through and through. You have no intention of helping town win this and your cases are as hollow as the inside of the twizzler I can currently eating. Why should I, or anyone, for that matter, follow your lead?In post 451, Nominull wrote:I have a guess as to Satan's alignment. So do you. We're in agreement on that, at least. How about you join me and we can get a counterwagon going on 2Pac?
Yeah, lets get that mislynch gogogo!!In post 468, Skelda wrote:This is ridiculous. We were so close to getting done with time to spare...
Ree, we are not lynching Null. All he has done is tunnel on 2Pac and be attacked and defended. Satan's flip is what we need right now. End of story. You just don't have the votes to kill Null.
In post 398, Regfan wrote:Okay, answer me this then; How is him not posting for three days any different to the following situations:
1) Mr Ree not posting from the 13th to the 16th
2) Sthar not posting in the last 3 days
3) Skelda not posting from the 18th to the 20th
4) Satan not posting from the 12th to the 15th and from the 18th to the 20th
The answer is that it isn't any different and you're fabricating reasoning to continue pushing towards 2Pac for what really is a policy lynch. And what about his posts do you read as fluff other than his rap-sections because there is actual stances and reads in his ISO. None in yours though.
This is absolutely 100% wrong. I want you to be right. I can swallow my pride and 70% of day 1 lynches are wrong anyway.In post 513, Regfan wrote:The truth is you're opposing a 2Pac lynch becauseI'mleading it and you don't want me to be right.
Want to make a deal? We lynch 2Pac; he flips scum you sheep me for the rest of the game or if I die you lynch Satan and if that doesn't end the game then perhaps Skelda afterwards. If he flips town I'll vote whoever you want tomorrow. Do we have a deal?
In post 632, Skelda wrote:Gah!
VOTE: SatanHellYeah. I am still convinced. And Nomni, give us your reads right now.
In post 513, Regfan wrote:The truth is you're opposing a 2Pac lynch becauseI'mleading it and you don't want me to be right.
Want to make a deal? We lynch 2Pac; he flips scum you sheep me for the rest of the game or if I die you lynch Satan and if that doesn't end the game then perhaps Skelda afterwards. If he flips town I'll vote whoever you want tomorrow. Do we have a deal?
Now do you get the reasoning for the counterwagon? Scum had to work for that lynch. Both are on that wagon. Your ead on Nom is probably going to get you lynched if he flips scum.In post 627, Regfan wrote:I still don't believe it; I think you'd have claimed in your last post if you were the cop knowing that the lynch was between two people one being you.
Happy to wait to the flip and be vindicated or eat humble pie.
Yes I can be. I wont apologize for it either.In post 646, Skelda wrote:God, you are a jerk!
No, I won't vote Nom. I have a townread on him, I will not vote Nom. If that makes me lynch-worthy, so what? Unlike scum, getting lynched isn't a complete disaster, so you still have 2 more mislynches after today.
But, you would be a really terrible player if you tried to dictate the game like that. I'd seriously be more liable to see Reg as scum as Nom. Just voting me because I didn't agree with you would be stupid.
What if scum is someone like Ranawey, who is just watching us destroy each other and appeasing us? And what if whoever you lynch today flips town? Are you just going to go systematically destroying us? No, that won't happen. If I'm alive, I will not let that happen.
VOTE: Ranawey for the appeasement. We would have been idiots not to lynch 2Pac, and you aren't using that against us.