Do influential people always provide better arguments?

This forum is for discussion related to the game.
Forum rules
User avatar
mykonian
mykonian
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
User avatar
User avatar
mykonian
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
Frisian Shoulder-Demon
Posts: 11814
Joined: August 27, 2008

Post Post #10 (isolation #0) » Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:51 am

Post by mykonian »

Yes, mafia is a social game. We can pretend we are logical machines who read and make arguments, but that would be a first in history. Humans aren't perfect, there are people you like, people you like less, and people who you don't mind following. Those interactions between people beyond the game and it's role pm's influence how a game plays, and which lynches make it.

If you don't believe me, just look at it like this: if the above wasn't the case, the amount of times one would be lynched would be averaged out. With that perfectly logical scumhunting, people could easily correct for a certain person putting it's arguments more eloquently in general. Look around, is everybody getting lynched about as often?
Surrender, imagine and of course wear something nice.
Post Reply