Newbie 1436 ~ Game Over

[cliche_guerva]

Hi! I've been working or sleeping up until now, so sorry for not posting sooner.

Anyway:

VOTE: agi

for his inappropriate language. Oh, my virgin ears!

[cliche_guerva]

Theory

Array is scum for lurking
Jimi is scum for lurking
T S O is scum for unlikely reasoning
Notsci is scum for mediocre reasoning
Sakura is scum for sheeping

Pick two. Discuss.

Everyone UNVOTE: until discussion ends.

It looks like Array and Jimi haven't picked up their role PMs, so I don't think it's really lurking. What do you mean unlikely/mediocre reasoning? You didn't really explain either of those. I don't think Notsci's reasoning is particularly bad, I'd guess that Gravija just missed what was posted. 99% sure T S O is joking, or else the game would be ruined with scum outing their partner. Also guessing that Sakura is joking.Why didn't you mention me or Gravija as scum? I get not pointing yourself out, but you just decided that the two of us couldn't possibly be based on what, exactly?

Honestly after this post, I'm pretty happy keeping my vote where it is.

[cliche_guerva]

It's random voting, and bussing isn't an uncommon tactic, so I don't see that as a reason to discount the theory.

It's possible but not guaranteed. Why?

[cliche_guerva]

Okay, I'm getting really scummy vibes from agi now. He's getting really defensive about his questioning, and I find that suspicious

oplz

If I were scum I would claim scum and dismiss it as a gambit if anyone asked.

What kind of gambit is that? "Oh, yeah, I'm scum. Just kidding, I'm not."

[cliche_guerva]

Can people put, you know, reasoning in their posts? I haven't a clue what's going on because the entire game seems to be based on past histories with other players, or posts that don't seem to be at all thought out.