Micro 242: Les Miserables Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
It's not better than an opera (yet), though.
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
Mhork, I think your vote on Shos was very strange - it felt like sheeping while not completely understanding why. At least funky had the decency to quote what he thought was scummy. I said that already, but you conviniently didn't catch that.In post 74, Lord Mhork wrote:For what it's worth, I'm null/town on Malakittens for that early funky attack, nullish/sorta town on elle for general feel, but I don't trust that, and null/townish on Kazekirasomethingorother but that's a really weak guttish thing based on his whole 'Morton's Fork' discussion and general attacks on funky. I'm actually feeling null/scum on Maemuki because fluffity fluff fluff and the fact that she didn't attack my following funky onto shos and scum on funky (obviously).
[Totally gonna go off topic and answer bv: 25th Anniversary Les Mis can go die in a hole. 1988 Symphonic Recording is where it's at. Phillip Quast = GREATEST JAVERT EVER. I did enjoy the 25th Anniversary Phantom, though, as much as I can enjoy Phantom of the Opera.]
I really want to lean town on bv but I just can't due to lack of evidence and all that. Please post more so I can think you're town, bv! And of course I'm solid null on Grimgroove and I think he should be prodded with a big heavy stick. Maybe a truncheon.
Malakitty, I'm interested in this back and forth you were talking about in 27 with funky as soon as your V/LA ends.
ElleI'm sorry I didn't understand the wine reference until just now when it clickeddo you have scum games I can look at? I haven't seen you as scum yet. Also can you do that thing where you're really, really protown? I've seen you do it a lot and it's awesome. Who are your scum reads?
Kazikiramira: Whatcha thinking, pal? You look fairly townie thus far.
Funky,why are you scum?if you aren't scum, who is?
Maemuki, you're fluffing really hard. Granted you only have 6 posts, but most of them don't really contribute anything? Why didn't you pursue the following funky thing? What are your thoughts?
BV: Other than the shos WIFOM thing, is there any reason you suspect him? What do you think of funky?- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
You only voted after funky did. Which is the definition of sheeping. Are you following?In post 80, Lord Mhork wrote:You mean when you said this? Where did you say it felt like sheeping? The part where you pointed out I voted after funky did? That just looks like a random observation.
And are you saying I didn't point out why I thought shos looked scummy?
Also, yes.- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
UNVOTE: bv (that was my RVS vote, btw, I think shos asked).
So, apparently, we already have walls of text on page 6. (b'-')b And the case on me is that I have done nothing all game? Mmmm. Let's think.
1) Most of my posts were fluff. We agree on this one.
2) Most of my posts were during the RVS period.
3) The RVS isn't very known for it's content.
Now, I don't know about you guys, but some people (I'm looking at you, shos, funky, since you're the other people who are under the most suspicion) are keeping me as a second backup lynch while not actually voting me. (If you're going to accuse me of active lurking, at least make an effort and try to check my posting history. I haven't really posted on the site ever since.) Also, I disagree almost 100% with Grimgroove's reads. I think that Ellie and Mhork sound... close, so to speak. I don't know if they've played a lot, or if this is just coincidence, but their interactions sound off.
And you only thought of that after funky posted? I find that unlikely. I'm not sure if you didn't understand my question (fine, I didn't use question marks, but the idea was there) or if you didn't want to understand.In post 60, Lord Mhork wrote:...was it not obvious when I said he was bullshitting reasoning for thinking that funky was town on that one post?- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
... I haven't posted since page 6. Or 7. Really, guys, this sounds like an awfully opportunistic wagon. Also, people obviously don't know the difference between active lurking and just... Lurking. There are 10 pages of content /but I haven't around to read them/.
I swear to God, if I get lynched because you all don't understand that, I'm jumping on to a Paris sewer. I'll read this game tonight, and I hope there is something else to this than 'she hasn't posted since RVS! Lynch her!!!'.- Maemuki
-
Maemuki Mafia Scum
- Maemuki
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1617
- Joined: July 19, 2009
- Location: my house
First off, I think that one of {Mhork, funky} is scum. I am leaning towards Mhork, though, and here's why:
This is a bad argument. You're not actually refuting anything that Mastin is saying, you're just redirecting (or attempting to, anyway) his suspicion. On my own experience, people usually only do that when they don't actually have anything to say.In post 243, Lord Mhork wrote:0.o
Right. But Mae is the pinnacle of towniness and good feels, right?
Do you literally have no other reads other than myself? It's awfully easy attacking someone who you can assume that won't answer, especially if you've checked their activity elsewhere. Out of your 20 most recent posts, 14 are about me. There is literally nothing else in them other than 'prove she's town', 'where is she', etc, etc. I think it's more likely for scum to stay hung up on what can be seen as an easy mislynch (because a lurker is an easy lynch, no matter what, especially on this case, since you have literally nothing else to hold against me other than my inactivity).
Now, you can think 'why Mhork? Why not Grimgroove, or elle?' Because I know their reads other than myself, especially Grimgroove. Mhork has nothing recent.
Let me put my money where my mouth is.
VOTE: Lord Mhork
Just so you guys don't say I'm tunnelvisioning (which would be a valid argument), here are my thoughts on the rest of the people in the game:
Malakittens, tbh, I don't remember any of your posts except the very last one? I've checked his ISO, and tbh, I have a bit of a null-town read on him because he does bring up some good points.
Mastin. Oh, Mastin. I don't know if you're scum buddying or not, but I really hope not, because you're pretty much the strongest town read I have. You bring up very good points so far -
Grimgroove, I like your posts. Or better yet, I like how you make your posts, but I'm not so sure of your reads
bv, I also had to go and check your posts, but I don't really have any feelings on you.
shos is...weird. Very weird. And by weird I mean he seems incredibly wishy-washy. Behold:In post 201, shos wrote:well it's a good time to VOTE: Maemuki. This is an L-1 vote, lawl, had to say itIn post 223, shos wrote:(etc.) ^^^blending in the crowd. has it not been repeated a dozen times now? gg LITERALLY quoted the entire ISO earlier and did it better.In post 224, shos wrote:the reason to not hammer is that by your post, you're policy lynching.In post 225, shos wrote:(etc.) Having seen these last 8 pages of content, don't you think it is time to let go of this? I mean, what can mhork possibly say that would help you? you're moving astray again, and this will only promote your lynch.
This whole progression is extremely weird. In the span of one page, you have literally held every single postion on my lynch, from 'lol L-1' to 'nah maybe not'. Would you care to explain?In post 231, shos wrote:VOTE: funky mae's posting giving me gut feeling that I'm doing something wrong. better safe than sorry.
Funky, I don't like your posts much either tbh. But! As I said earlier, I think that you're still the towniest one of the pair.
Elle, I'm on the odd situation where I simultaneously think you're town and maybe Mhork's partner. I'll think about this properly later, I'm pretty tired of looking through ISOs.
Short version for people on the go:
Mhork is scum. If Mhork is scum, then Elle has a big chance of being scum too, but she's town if he's not. Shos doesn't seem too good, mostly because he seems wishy-washy.
Mastin and Grimgroove read town. Funky is weird - on one hand he's scummy, but I'm almost 100% sure that he isn't scum with Mhork.
I have no clue about bv or Malakittens (Mala does seem closer to town than bv, though).
I might have forgotten something or someone (or left a sentence unfinished), and if I have, do let me know! I'm kind of tired of looking through this game.
You can now continue with your regularly scheduled lynching. (b'-')b - Maemuki
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki
- Maemuki