Marketplace Mafia III - Game Over
Forum rules
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
HI HELLO THIS IS YOUR CAPTAIN EMPIRE SPEAKING. NACHO AND I TALKED A LOT ABOUT STRATEGY AND I WORKED RLY HARD ON THIS POST PLEASE READ EVERY WORD OF IT AND TELL ME YOUR THOUGHTS.
1) Given that Magua linked a Mafia Left Hand role PM from the last game, I think it’s pretty safe to assume we’re dealing with another multiball situation. The last game had 20 players and two scum teams of 3 slots each – there’s only one additional slot here so it’s likely that it’s still 3/3 here (well there might be some bullshit like a 3rd party from the first game but fuck SKs and fuck that noise for now).
2) Negative utility items (such as investigation immunity, deadline, etc) should be claimed immediately if won by town (and it’s not impossible to outright win one, the N0 Night Kill went for only $31 last game for example). Failure to do so will be considered to have been won by scum. I don't want any dumb lolgambits on this front (this means you, Cabd). This is non-negotiable. If you’re town and do something stupid on this front, my hatred of you will follow you like a shroud for the rest of your days.
3) The last game was won by forming a public town bloc and having suspicious people / non-townreads transfer their money over to the townies. Magua mentioned after the last game and IIRC in the dead QT that he was going to make sure this did not happen in the next installment. The signups thread also talks about making transferring less efficient. I combed the Rules with a comb and noticed something in the Mafia role PM – take a look at where it says “Wire Fraud” under the section called “Dirty Tricks”. The mafia have an ability where they must choose a transferor and a transferee. I’m guessing that this is the mechanic Magua was referring to and that this probably means the mafia have some way of fucking with publicly announced transfers of money. I’m still trying to figure out some way around this as I think this game has similar potential to be broken. One of the ideas I’ve been kicking around is to have a publicly announced town bloc but without announcing any transferors (in other words, the mafia won’t get to know where the money comes from). It’s not foolproof but at least it leaves mafia guessing. We could also do this the old fashioned way (and I’m guessing this is the way Magua wants us to do it if at all) by not having any announced town bloc and just privately transferring money to townreads. Open to suggestions here.
4) The items auctioned last night were incredibly shitty and I think a large part of the problem there was that the town overall did not put much towards advertising good PRs. Nacho and I had a similar thought process here – I told him that given the fact that the mafia started with more money than town last game, mafia would probably still have the starting money advantage here and we would have to put more towards actually winning things than advertising it. I even told him that we’d just let the other townies do the advertising for us. By the looks of things, this line of thinking appears to have been common among everyone, leading to a large diffusion of responsibility which into led to the shit N0 auctions. I’m asking the rest of you guys here to actually set aside some money for advertising good shit like BP, doctor, and commuter.
Anyway, now to read the thread.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Stopping my read through for a moment to answer this:
If I'm remembering it right, no. Magua provides private QTs to individual slots to sort out night actions and that's it. IIRC, the scum teams did not share a QT for money actions but presumably they'd be discussing it amongst themselves anyway. If you're talking about whether both scum teams shared a QT for money actions in the last game, then no as that would reveal the teams to each other and I definitely remember them not knowing each other (I only remember this because MoI unironically read my slot as opposite scum in the last game lmao).In post 45, morph the cat wrote:Can anyone that played the first two rounds tell me if scum shared a qt for money actions or used seperate ones? If it's the former, bald is scum.- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Well, then, Mr. Mafia, I am confused. It seems like your posts so far (I'm up to #156) have such a low signal:noise ratio and your reaction to baldeagle's case on Minaday looks like you're scumhunting the other team as opposed to scumhunting generally. Now I'm not really sure what to think ;_;In post 342, Voidedmafia wrote:But...But...That's not true!- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Eh, I think it's more complicated than you're suggesting. MoI was pushing a scumread on our slot in the last Marketplace game. I remember reading both the Mafia and the Dead QTs last game and he did in fact genuinely scumread our slot as opposite scum. He pushed us in thread and I'm thinking he chose to because he was looking for something genuine to talk about as opposed to being forced to generate fake content, if that makes any sense (multiball is weird).In post 352, morph the cat wrote:
I may be mistaken but I thought left and right are still working together they just don't know who each other are? Am I wrong here?In post 349, Garuda wrote:scumhunting the other team- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I have an idea cooking up that's kind of a compromise. I don't know if it's any good though.In post 365, Pyrotechnics wrote:Can you please comment on my idea that neighborizer should claim because I know you have to have read to that part especially since it was like the first post. Thanks.
My thought process is this: I obviously see the dangers of scum winning the power but it could also be immensely powerful for town (doubly so given the number of hydras here) and I don't want the Neighborizer instantly claiming if town and then dying immediately. But what about the slot that gets Neighborized claiming on D2? The potential Neighborizer / Cop combo is ineffective if both are used N1. If someone gets Neighborized N1, then I think it's more likely that the slot with that power is town.
I don't know this all sounded decent in my head. What do you think?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Fully caught up. I was thinking of writing one of my trademark mastubatory reads list walls that no one aside from boring nerds like Tammy will read but I don't have the mental stamina to do that right now. So instead you'll get a boring town list with no explanations. Might do a wall later after Nacho and I have touched base on reads and we get some consolidation going.
TOWN:
1baldeagle1
Pyrotechnics
Lost Butterfly
---
zMuffinMan
upside down - need Nacho's input here, though, since I don't trust myself to read N- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
^Tammy would like to see your response to this + any other suggestions you might have, thanks in advance.In post 265, Garuda wrote:3) The last game was won by forming a public town bloc and having suspicious people / non-townreads transfer their money over to the townies. Magua mentioned after the last game and IIRC in the dead QT that he was going to make sure this did not happen in the next installment. The signups thread also talks about making transferring less efficient. I combed the Rules with a comb and noticed something in the Mafia role PM – take a look at where it says “Wire Fraud” under the section called “Dirty Tricks”. The mafia have an ability where they must choose a transferor and a transferee. I’m guessing that this is the mechanic Magua was referring to and that this probably means the mafia have some way of fucking with publicly announced transfers of money. I’m still trying to figure out some way around this as I think this game has similar potential to be broken. One of the ideas I’ve been kicking around is to have a publicly announced town bloc but without announcing any transferors (in other words, the mafia won’t get to know where the money comes from). It’s not foolproof but at least it leaves mafia guessing. We could also do this the old fashioned way (and I’m guessing this is the way Magua wants us to do it if at all) by not having any announced town bloc and just privately transferring money to townreads. Open to suggestions here.- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I had the opposite reaction, actually.In post 93, zMuffinMan wrote:voided is scum
Town!In post 109, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Oh, sorry for not analyzing everyone's post in the first hour of the game.
This was awkward. Why didn't you just vote for yourself in your first post?In post 147, Harakiri wrote:Well, I assumed neighborizer wasn't popular, so we advertised it and went all-in on getting it. Sadly, 90 was not enough. Who would have thought Neighborizer so popular...
And I don't care if we be past it, VOTE: Harakiri on principle.
i'm not happy w/morph yet.
i'm not scumreading them either, i think.
Vote: Lord Mhrok- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
what do you think of mork?In post 473, morph the cat wrote:Heh. I'm comforted to know precisely what his win condition is.
i think it's a much better wagon than your voided thing- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Hmmmm.In post 459, Klick wrote:What the hell.
So, the game is already 19 pages long, and I only have three days to read it?
Hmmmmmm.In post 230, Seanald wrote:9 pages already, guys go fuck your selves seriously. ill see you day 2 thanks.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I'm not quite so sure that this is gonna happenIn post 9, morph the cat wrote:Instead I get to sit here watching as morph breaks the streak of fucking towns up.
We also lost the bid for neighborizer.In post 10, Pyrotechnics wrote:We lost the bid for neighborizer. I submit that whoever won it needs to claim it so that we can evaluate them. Also, I don't see neighborizer in the abilities not yet auctioned, so I *think* from what I've read it won't show up again, but if it does or can be advertised it's something that we shouldn't do.
Why didn't you go for Neighborizer?In post 15, Lost Butterfly wrote:We got Investigation Immune! I can't believe it was so cheap. We even bid $80 on it to keep it out of scum's hands.
This seems like an insanely crazy assumption, but one of those crazy town assumptions as opposed to a crazy scum assumption.In post 23, 1baldeagle1 wrote:
So basically, anyone else that did win something aren't scum?In post 22, Pyrotechnics wrote:
Last game scum could pool their money for bids, so yeah.In post 21, 1baldeagle1 wrote:
Ah, scum gets more money? Lame.In post 19, Pyrotechnics wrote:We only started with $100. All of those items went for over $100.
Like Butterfly's post.
That wasn't that good of a point at all?In post 54, Lord Mhork wrote:Oh wow that's actually a really good point. Pyro just jumped up, like, three town notches for me.
I liked Molla being aggressive with Mina early.In post 82, BBmolla wrote:Mina you guys left or right scum?
Why?In post 108, Voidedmafia wrote:I largely adverted EV for myself. Had thought of the possibility for better people than me to get it, but largely for myself (and to make sure scum didn't advert or get it later).
This doesn't seem like you're trying to figure him out; it seems like you're trying to help him play better.In post 129, morph the cat wrote:
What is it about a player doing the bolded that strikes you as scummy?In post 118, 1baldeagle1 wrote:
The latter is called ISO.In post 116, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:is that a case or just a quote of every post they've made?
Yes, I went through his posts and it wasmostly just claiming/questions/answering questions and trying to derail his own wagon.
It's part of who she is. Why do you want her to change who she is?In post 213, morph the cat wrote:I'd like to state for the record that this shit you do about calling yourself obvtown really does no good here, tammy.
I could so happily flashwagon this.In post 230, Seanald wrote:9 pages already, guys go fuck your selves seriously. ill see you day 2 thanks.
9 pages isn't shit and certainly isn't an excuse to lurk for an entire day. I would probably be happier if he complained and then disappeared, honestly.
And yet cabd is the only one that's doing anything.
This seems pessimistic.In post 394, Pyrotechnics wrote:16 pages in and I have no hopes of synergy like that happening here.
His potshots in this game have been better, at least.In post 429, morph the cat wrote:occasional pot shots at me, and declare at random that nacho is scum?
I liked this quite a bit, actually.In post 456, morph the cat wrote:Aside from the lynch what else should we try to accomplish? We've talked about sharing what we advertised on N0.
Go forward with that?
i liked this, felt honest.In post 478, Lord Mhork wrote:I bid $30 on Gravedigger 'cause I thought it sounded cool.
Yep. Empire is harassing me about it now.In post 487, Lost Butterfly wrote:Were you aware that your slot was voting Voidedmafia for most of the game before this?
I think that him thinking you guys are town is good "scumhunting for one team" evidence. He hasn't brought up anything else that I liked, though.
It wasn't, it was to the bit of frustration directed at Sakura. My current thought on Mhork are that I think he is town and am not particularly interested in lynching him. His claim was pretty cool too, although it was odd someone advertised Medium but didn't actually put anything into it.In post 487, Lost Butterfly wrote:Also, was your "I like this" in response to Mhork's claim? What are your current thoughts on Mhork?
Yeah, I'm looking for a place I want to vote.In post 489, Lost Butterfly wrote:(EBWOP: I apparently can't read. I'm still confused by your post, though. You like it, but you still feel okay about voting him? Could you elaborate, please?)
How?In post 490, morph the cat wrote:We feel like he's kinda avoiding the thread atm.
I don't understand where this happened. He usually gets paranoid of you in one way or the other.In post 490, morph the cat wrote:And we didn't like that his major contribution to the game last night was a pretty much gratuitous injection of morph-fery meta wifom.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
This push felt great, actually. It was a push on something that actually was fake (always helps) and it seemed like a post prohawk was probably gonna attack.In post 52, ProHawk wrote:
^ This Isn't Nearly As Fake As VIn post 21, 1baldeagle1 wrote: Ah, scum gets more money? Lame.
VOTE: Lost ButterflyIn post 15, Lost Butterfly wrote:We got Investigation Immune! I can't believe it was so cheap. We even bid $80 on it to keep it out of scum's hands.
In post 151, ProHawk wrote:
On a scale of 1-10?In post 145, morph the cat wrote:This is why voided is scum btw.
His thought process is pretty clear here, and I think that Cabd holding onto his vote was pretty strange, especially after #145. You calling his attack on you "meta-wifom" seems a bit like discrediting him, which I find weird after our "people need to listen to prohawk more" discussion.In post 162, ProHawk wrote:
Sounds like you both are scum-reading him then. You not voting is making me worry.In post 155, morph the cat wrote:
I'll let ffery talk about her reasons but for me it's around a 6 or 7.In post 151, ProHawk wrote:
On a scale of 1-10?In post 145, morph the cat wrote:This is why voided is scum btw.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I liked this.In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:I don't recall, but that doesn't make him scum.
I liked this a lot.In post 86, Voidedmafia wrote:The day will end when the day will end. We can start worrying when it gets to be near 10 days, if you're that worried about it. Rushing lynching just for the sake of money won't get us anywhere.
I liked this.In post 156, Voidedmafia wrote:Your misrepresentation of my post is cute, though. (unless it's not at me, but still.)
I liked this.In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:This kind of self-boasting never rubs me the right way.
I liked this.In post 267, Voidedmafia wrote:A.) I'm busy doing more than just this game. Don't worry your little butts.
I liked this.In post 278, Voidedmafia wrote:P-EDIT: Please. On that note, Cabd and Ffery, stop boosting each other in-thread.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I can see why it bothered him.In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I decided to without really deciding to.In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:Why did you and Empire decide to claim to have lost it now?
Yep!In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:I take it you read ahead by now?
Sometimes molla bullshit pushes people without an end result in mind.In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:Also, I'm not sure what reaction he was expecting from me as either alignment (he should know I don't fold easily to stuff like that as scum). And, if anything, my frame of mind when I wrote the post he called nervous was completely relaxed; I knew everything would be cleared up once I claimed, and I'm used to drawing early wagons that dissipate quickly because of my wacky early-D1 scumhunting style.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
It seemed strange that you two hadn't voted when it seemed pretty clear you synced up and both agreed that Voided was scum. I know you have a meta of holding onto your votes a bit, but Cabd doesn't, so not voting when you were synced up and ready to vote looks like playing to your meta.In post 506, morph the cat wrote:
Then please explain so I can maybe dismiss the niggle.In post 505, Garuda wrote:
I can see why it bothered him.In post 503, morph the cat wrote:I "play to my meta" because of my philosophy and approach to the game. Dismissing my tendencies and reasons to hold my vote and stew on my reads as "playing to my meta" appears to me to be pretty much intentionally focusing on the trees and ignoring the forest.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I think a mass advertising campaign is something to consider but we should get the more suspicious / non-townreads people to pledge the ad money? That way collective townreads can focus on actually winning abilities to ensure they go to town.In post 434, Lost Butterfly wrote:I'm going to bed, but quick strategy thoughts:
1) What do people think about a mass-advertisement claim (which we use to find out how much money is on each ability), and then a coordinated advertisement campaign? I originally wanted just to claimwhatwe'd bid on, so scum wouldn't know how to stop it, but maybe each town can pledge to pay a certain amount so that abilities aren't lost. The obvious caveat is that scum know by how much to outbid us, though. But something like, "These two players are responsible for advertising however much they want on these three abilities, these players for advertising these ones," etc. Is that more trouble than it's worth?
2)*pokes Tammy with a stick*To be honest, I'm sick of Neighbourizers right now. What's the obsession with them being so dangerous? I actually think it's a protown power in this set-up (although it becomes strongly proscum in really specific instances). You can transfer money with a town read, plan gambits, claim role information, buy abilities, etc. Meanwhile, if scum have neighbourizer, then there's nothing we can do about it to stop them communicating with the other team. It's not something like Investigation Immune that we can plan around. Garuda's plan of having the neighboree claim D2 is a good compromise, but that doesn't stop scum from just using the second shot to neighbourize a partner.
3) @Empire: I was thinking "This is a list of townies and this is a list of not-townies. These not-townies must send money to the townies every night, but don't claim which one. Afterwards, if the townies a certain not-townie claims to have sent money to keep winding up dead, not-townie starts looking fishy." I'm not sure if that's the same as your plan, or if the not-townies are a crucial new element.
The next couple of days will be mostly Mina posting, so expect shittier reads and fewer votes!
About my compromise plan: scum can't use the second shot to neighborize a partner really because they will not be able to communicate with the other team freely in that QT given the presence of possibly a third slot that's town (communication across scum teams is the whole reason scum want that thing in the first place). It's going to look mighty bad for the Neighborizer if the N1 neighboree dies N2 and then the QT is used in the hypothetical scum way.
You pretty much nailed it w.r.t. transferring so I don't have anything new to add there.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Pretty much agree with all of this. Nacho and I talked a bit about upside down; he told me was going to try to read it based on Quilford's posting but that N looked good and I agreed.In post 453, Lost Butterfly wrote:Also, Zdenek is town (both because of the claims and how he seems more gleeful and spontaneous than his more robotic scum meta). Other town reads I'm getting are Pyro, Garuda (although this would be more solid if they'd done more scumhunting, the way they're approaching the strategizing feels like a town PoV), and baldeagle (although his last big post I didn't like as much). I have a weaker one on upside down based solely on tone and them seeming really relaxed. I'll get back to you on scum reads later.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Quoting this so everyone remembers how much of a scumpost this is.In post 459, Klick wrote:What the hell.
So, the game is already 19 pages long, and I only have three days to read it?
Is there anything in particular that I need to know?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
No, I only said it wasn't worth it to put a whole lot of money into advertising and to make sure we have enough to win it since that was more important.In post 561, Lost Butterfly wrote:p-edit: Garuda, didn't you claim to have advertised nothing before?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Yeah, I think it might be better to organize town blocs on D2 given that we don't have much time to create them and they might not be as accurate as they should (and I dislike that a lot of people haven't even checked into the thread yet) in order to ensure success of the plan. So yeah, general advertising suggestions might be preferred for today but we definitely need to hash out town blocs when we get normal Day phases again.In post 561, Lost Butterfly wrote:My only worry is I'm not sure how feasible it is to organize town blocs today given the short deadline and how many people have barely posted (and aren't the most reliable people to count on to submit money). I prefer just suggesting what abilities should be advertised.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Oh, believe me, I already chewed Nacho out about this over AIM when we were discussing reads earlier (he apparently hasn't been feeling all that well and wasn't thinking when he claimed it ._.)In post 504, Lost Butterfly wrote:Why did you and Empire decide to claim to have lost it now?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I doubt it. It's far more likely that whatever ad money they put in was put towards pro-scum abilities like Hitman (because let's face it no townie in their right mind would ever put in money towards advertising shit like that).In post 521, Lord Mhork wrote:Garuda, do you think it's possible whomever put money towards medium was scum trying to flood the market with useless junk?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I dunno what banal means because I'm not a smart person like you and Mina but that line of questioning right there was following a line of thought that I noticed as well. It didn't seem like she meant to discredit you, it was just an odd post to get a townread from because there was nothing special about it.In post 568, Pyrotechnics wrote:is it really really banal Mina? Is it. I would like to know how often as town you decide to underhandedly discredit the points of people you are town reading. You know for a fact scum don't always just kill someone because of a role. They often kill who the most town person is or who is a threat, so reducing it to a role based on paranoia isn't actually accurate.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Ok holy shit you really need to recalibrate Syryana's scumdar stat.In post 577, Pyrotechnics wrote:he's suspicious of eagle.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
In post 680, Hermy wrote:It's late and I'm way too tired to post truly useful stuff. But if anybody wants my opinions on anything then I'll be happy to give them.
For now, a tentative VOTE: voidedmafia
For reasons that have pretty much been listed. I've seen his gameplay and ISO and voided is marginally scummier than Harakiri. Though at this point both of them could possibly be scum. Though if it has to be one, I'm thinking voided.Vote: Hermy- Garuda
-
Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
You should claim what you put towards advertising last Night, if anything.In post 688, guille2015 wrote:Ok, I'm going to go read some of this game (Skim really), so, I don't want to read everything. So, can somebody point out the highlights. That will probably speed up my skimming.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Posturing. (#757 adds to this too.)In post 694, Pyrotechnics wrote:Garuda - Did you guys ever answer what it was about Klick's one post that gave you both a scum read?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Yeah, first step towards this is to figure out what abilities we want to put up and how many of them. It's gonna be hard picking out who is going to put down the money towards advertising given that so many people have posted little-to-nothing but maybe we can work something out? Heading to lunch now but I'll be around later to hammer this out with Nacho.In post 764, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:hey since we've decided the lynch for today, should we sort out who's doing what tonight? We need to make sure we don't lose any more abilities like Accountant.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Explain please.In post 751, morph the cat wrote:11. Banakai - of the one post wonders, Banakai's one post was by far the most town IMO.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
Yeah, that's why I asked. I don't really see anything in Banakai's posts and it really doesn't take much in the way of effort / competency to be like "hey dudes, I'm reading and will post later" as scum. (And by your criteria, I think Seanald is way better in the "not giving a shit" townvibes front.)In post 771, morph the cat wrote:That post was pretty good too!
It's not a lot to go on, but to us, it's decidedly not null content. Do you disagree?
I feel like we should have a stronger read on Nero, but there's a same-old same-old feel to what he's posted so far.
I feel the same way about Nero w.r.t. feeling like I should be getting a stronger read there but he looks pretty solid to me so far.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
The second line is mostly what I'm talking about (though I think the whole thing is forced). Take a look at it in context: it comes not too long after Deadline is activated and it just feels like he's trying to fake being blindsided by it.In post 773, zMuffinMan wrote:459? how? the second line of 459 was kind of meh but i don't know what you mean by posturing here.
P-edit: Voided, I feel like Seanald would have probably more of an attempt to be "helpful" as scum though? He certainly didn't have a problem trying to look pro-town in the last game as scum by attacking Tammy early despite a fast moving thread and then being apologetic when his attack backfired.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
He's scum.In post 518, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Garuada, what's that vote for?
In particular, this line sounded incredibly fake.In post 459, Klick wrote:So, the game is already 19 pages long, and I only have three days to read it?
Is there anything in particular that I need to know?
Not really. Wasting money on putting useless junk on the market leaves you less money to advertise for useful shit and get good things. I think that scum meant to get Medium for figuring out dead scum buddies then ended up spending most of their money on countering what actually got to market.In post 521, Lord Mhork wrote:Garuda, do you think it's possible whomever put money towards medium was scum trying to flood the market with useless junk?
The first quote is Voided responding to a question about a possible scumslip with "no clue what you're talking about, but whatever it is, that doesn't make him scum". This is more ballsy than the Voided scum I know.In post 523, zMuffinMan wrote:i'm null on like all of those quotes. i don't see town tone in any of them and they're all pretty alignment-neutral posts. why did you like them?
The second quote is Voided in a weird position because he knows that scum has and will likely activate Deadline (since it went for over $101) and he's reassuring bald eagle that quick lynching won't really be necessary.
Third quote Voided rebuts someone who he *thinks* is misrepping him but doesn't go back to check.
Fourth is good paranoia.
Fifth is good dismissiveness.
Sixth is good paranoia.
Getting a small townblock together doesn't seem like it would be too difficult, especially with the likes of you/Tammy/Empire/ffery in the game.In post 561, Lost Butterfly wrote:My only worry is I'm not sure how feasible it is to organize town blocs today given the short deadline and how many people have barely posted (and aren't the most reliable people to count on to submit money). I prefer just suggesting what abilities should be advertised.
I laughed.In post 593, morph the cat wrote:Ffery meant "I'm a little discouraged that we'll NOT be able to work effectively together night 1."
Molla is upgraded back to good town.In post 640, BBmolla wrote:Lynching Lost Butterfly day 1 is a HUGE waste, even if you guys are scum, cause I still think you'll legitimately scumhunt to find your buddies. I just wanted to see Mina's reaction to it more than anything.
upside down is a more confident townread after this post.In post 651, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Ughbluh.
Why?In post 672, Seanald wrote:Also what the hell, I advertised for austerity measures.
Neither.In post 690, morph the cat wrote:
I have a more pressing question. Should we gift you or Lost Butterfly with our tuppence tonight?In post 689, Garuda wrote:So how much longer do you guys think it will take for Tammy to realize that Lost Butterfly is town? Any guesses?
I don't remember at the moment, but I'll check back when I have my date with Empire this afternoon.In post 746, morph the cat wrote:Nacho, you played Newbie 1409. Are you seeing Hermy's play here as significantly different from her early play in that game?
He looks OK, but grrrr! kinda creeps me out even though it shouldn't.In post 771, morph the cat wrote:I feel like we should have a stronger read on Nero, but there's a same-old same-old feel to what he's posted so far.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
+1In post 798, Lost Butterfly wrote:I mean, the post I voted her for was pretty much the textbook Incompetent Scum Entrance. "Hi, there's lots of stuff going on, and instead of saying what my opinions are on any of this stuff, I'm going to be very vague and try to look helpful by offering to answer questions. Oh, look, here are two popular wagons. I guess they could both be scum, or they could both not be. I don't actually have any idea. But I'm still going to add my vote to the largest wagon because of 'reasons listed' and 'his posts and ISO.' Boy, I hope this lynch goes through quickly and I make it to Day Two without anyone noticing I exist." Her reaction to the flash wagon was also atrocious.
Aside from emphasizing the hedging again, would also like to add that she hasn't come back to this thread at all to actually defend herself or explain anything which considering the circumstances is just lol
By the way, Mina, thoughts on what we should actually advertise? I want to get some things like doctor, bulletproof, and commuter up in this personally.- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I'd rather lynch scum, thanks.In post 817, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Can we just please lynch Voided?- Garuda
-
Garuda Goon
- Garuda
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 521
- Joined: October 4, 2013
I feel like we should be advertising only one of Doctor / Abductor and that Doctor should clearly be the one getting top priority.In post 814, Lost Butterfly wrote:Abductor x 1: More useful to town than scum. Decent, but I prefer the other protective roles on the list.
Auction Detective x 2: Very potluck, but has the potential correctly, gives you a 1/__ chance of getting a guilty if you hit scum (just ask if a player won Cop, Deadline, or NK on N0).
Bodyguard x 2: Useful for town, useless for scum. Good for someone scummy to pick up.
Bulletproof x 2: Useful for town, useless for scum. Good for one of the trusted town bloc players to pick up.
Commuter x 1: Meh since it's one-shot, and is situationally useful for scum.
Coroner x 2: Useful in conjunction with Auction Detective. Otherwise, not that useful.
Doctor x 2: Useful for town, useless for scum.
Federal Reserve Chairman x 1: Meh. Since there are more townies than scum, that means more money is going in town's hands than scum's. But the advantage isn't as meaningful knowing that scum can coordinate more effectively.
Forensic Accountant x 2: Like coroner, useful in tandem with Auction Detective, but there are much better abilities.
Governor x 1: Situationally useful for town, dangerous in the hands of scum.
Love Potion x 1: Really dangerous if scum get it in LYLO.
Market Analyst x 3: Meh (only situationally useful)
Messenger x 2: Mediocre--can be used for gambits in the hands of town or scum.
Ninja x 4: No (duh).
Roleblocker x 3: No because it's a red power, so scum have a secret advantage in bidding for it.
Self-Watch x 1: Meh.
Tailor x 3: No no no.
Tracker x 2: Yes, because in this set-up, it's easy to catch someone useful.
Vote Nullifier x 1: Antitown (but that didn't stop someone from advertising Vote Freeze).
Wage Freeze x 1: It's free money in the hands of town, so better than nothing, but not as powerful as some of the others.
Watcher x 1: Yes (watchers are a broken role).
Auction Detective is a decent pick too just for the potential of guiltying someone with it (even if it is not very big). Maybe not a whole lot of money spent here?
Bodyguard / Bulletproof / Commuter (which functions as a BP in essence) are all must-haves and absolutely need to be advertised. I am curious as to what would happen if we force scum to BG the NK target as it says that the NK fails if one scum team targets another scum.
Wage Freeze could be incredibly useful and at the very least it's worth having up there. FRC is a maybe.
I don't think we should be putting anything towards potentially negative utility stuff like governor unless there's some plan I haven't fully thought about to take these things off the market for scum? - Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda
- Garuda