Mewbie 1442 the second -- Game over

DiamondCrash · Post Post #23 (isolation #0) » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:26 pm

I was a VT last time.

Also can someone explain like I'm 5 what the hell happened last game?

DiamondCrash · Post Post #37 (isolation #1) » Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:11 am

Actually, there could have been 5 VTs or 6VTs, depending on the set-up. Read that wiki page!

DiamondCrash · Post Post #69 (isolation #2) » Thu Oct 31, 2013 1:16 am

CrisP wrote:Of course we are all fishing at the moment GM, still you could try to be proactive instead of defensive.

I'm not sure what GM could have said to the statement "youre scum" [sic] that isn't "hah no".

CrisP wrote:I liked the vote on me plus discussion, given my mistake about the game setup last time it's reasonable, but you could have elaborated more and after that you spent your time defending yourself, which is not pro town in my eyes, there's not much you can say to defend yourself at the start so you might as well show you are town by helping and ignore the random heat (if you're town).

If you ask me, I think the idea of stimulating discussion can be very easily done by anyone, town or not. Moreover, why would a townsperson not be defensive while on the recieving end of the heat; and why would that be a bad thing for a townsperson to do?

CrisP wrote:In my opinion newbs lurk, especially if they are mafia. I want to point out to BW, since he didn't believe me at the time, that following that rule last game we would have found the two mafia after 40 posts day 1.

Coincidence does not equal evidence, I'm afraid, and I'm one of those tricky people who insists on a bit more than "they're not here mostly" as a reason. Also; I don't see how that relates to that jmo16mla quote at all.

DiamondCrash · Post Post #122 (isolation #3) » Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:40 am

Hi there.

In post 98, Buckwild wrote:
In post 95, jmo16mla wrote:shit, i dont think we should even vote. sounds like a good plan?
If you are going to vote, at least have a reason? If you think sheeping is a good reason, maybe we should just all sheep one person and go from there. It is anti-town to sheep and I don't buy the reaction BS.

You yourself voted people in order to garner reactions in 1442 the first. Hypocritical, much?

In post 116, Buckwild wrote:Don't have time for meta reading. So basically he has free reign to be scum because that's what he does? Am I over-reacting because no else seems to think GIF is scum?

Well, considering from what I've seen, your only reason seems to be "he's sheeping":

In post 86, Buckwild wrote:
In post 85, GuyInFreezer wrote:Neither.
Just wagonin' for wagon's sake.
Scum will be scum. At least you are admitting to it.

In post 92, Buckwild wrote:Why would town join a wagon for the sake of a wagon? It could easily lead to a mislynch. Scum oftens jumps on an easy wagon in hopes that it will push through.

...which has been rightly justified as getting a reaction from people. In addition, you have also voted for people as a method for getting a reaction in the previous game; this can only lead me to believe that you are unjustly pushing to throw suspicion at GIF, I can't see that as anything other than highly scummy. I'm not buying it for one second.

Vote: BuckWild