vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
THIS IS NOT A JOKE, THIS IS NOT A TEST, I'M A PGO SO IF YOU'RE SCUM PLEASE TARGET ME KTHX
how are you not reading me as town?mastin wrote:13. zMuffinMan
^Eh, will figure him out later, but null for now.
that's actually rather solid, but i want to give morph a chance to defend himself before we lynch himpsychlone wrote:Scum found. And I have a case!
keen insightwayne wrote:Putting them in scum won't change their alignment, ergo scum.
it was serious. i really do think psychlone's case was strong. so strong, even, that i'm not entirely sure it's possible for morph to argue against it. but i'm a fair girl, and i believe in giving them a chance to defend themselves, even if their lynch seems almost inevitable after that case.pieguy wrote:I can't tell if this post is serious or not, which in RVS seems like a bad thing
i was kind of meh about pieguy's apparent confusion here. i dunno how you're reading it as town.gp wrote:pieguyn is an early town read for confusion over this
what about the claim made you think it wasn't real?varsoon wrote:I don't believe the PGO claim
and i didn't like this post. way past the point where RQS even mattersIn post 82, waynegg wrote:Moar RQS answers please. Thanks Mastin.
you're imagining thingsvarsoon wrote:At the very least, it reminded me of someone's PGO claim in a prior game
novarsoon wrote:Have you ever made a PGO claim in a previous game?
novarsoon wrote:Did you use that format for claiming PGO after seeing someone else do it to claim?
novarsoon wrote:Have you used that same format to claim a role in the past?
i'm not very funny and it was the cleverest thing i could think of to start this game :<varsoon wrote:Why did you claim PGO?
if i wasn't super-tired i might entertain this just to absolutely destroy your case. but not right now. the tl;dr version of it is that your original reasons for voting him weren't good (how is it "better" to bandwagon for absolutely no reason? plus even if giving reasons was in some way scummy, or varsoon was scummy for the way in which he gave reasons, as varsoon has pointed out, why attack just varsoon for it?) and nothing in your push since then has made for a good case.pieguy wrote:I want a specific explanation with quotes
nah, i'm townreading him because i like the aggressive responses to you. e.g. while i literally loled when i read, "you're afraid of town-varsoon," that came across as fairly town.pieguy wrote:you're townreading him, for apparently no reason?
for being confused about whether i seriously thought your case on morph was good and that morph needed to defend themselves against it?psychlone wrote:I agree on nacho's townread on pieguy.
why is this the only question you're asking? you're clearly not reading the thread.mafiassk wrote:Varsoon, why is your vote on pieguy?
which stuff are you referring to when you say pieguy was trying to figure stuff out? because most of the stuff i remember him trying to figure out wasn't alignment-indicative (is this a serious post? is that a serious post?) and i wouldn't exactly call his exchange with varsoon trying to figure varsoon outmorph wrote:7. pieguyn - trying to figure stuff out
1. BROseidon - Varsoon vote reasons were bad and he should feel bad.
you don't know what buddying means if you think defending a town read is buddying.wayne wrote:Since when is "buddy" a good thing in Mafia.
how?wayne wrote:[Varsoon] and Pie come off TvT
ok. i disagree that it was not-obviously-off-topic, which is part of the reason i don't like how much apparent confusion there is from him about it. PA's reaction to it is more in line with how i imagined a town player reacting to itmorph wrote:pieguyn's efforts to get the not-obviously-off-topic stuff figured out strikes me as a much more town-like reaction.
... you realise pieguy was the one whowaynegg wrote:Muffin was fueling the flames to bolster Varsoon's mindset
ok. why do you think i'd switch my vote from a scum read to someone else when the wagon on the scum read is bigger?waynegg wrote:without taking a definitive stance, ala voting Pie to echo your sentiment
why?morph wrote:Post 212 makes Cabd very sad.
no, i don't think that single comment is what wayne is referring to when he says i was "bolstering varsoon's mindset", and that single comment is hardly fueling any flames, but there's an easy way to find out for sure.pieguy wrote:no you were doing this even before I asked you to elaborate on your opinion on my caseit's really subtle but even smth like this counts.In post 142, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't like pieguy being confused about stuff that isn't really confusing at all.and the attack on varsoon is pretty meh.
blame you for what? wayne is saying he thinks i'm scummy for the way in which i argued against your varsoon case, i pointed out that the only reason i was doing that is because you specifically asked me to.pieguy wrote:you can just go blaming me when I ask you to elaborate
what do you think of wayne's argument about me not voting you?pieguy wrote:also, these kinds of arguments based exclusively on where people's vote is are invalid.
nah. well, maybe that's what some people thought was scummy about you, but i was thinking you were scum from your first post. i didn't like anything about it, and the concern for which head of each hydra was posting felt like you trying to fake town concern for this.thezmon wrote:I took like three seconds to write it. I joke about a fake claim, making an obvious joke OMGUS on Mastin, and lo and behold, we somehow got a shitstorm of a wagon on me
how's this going for you?bro wrote:brb finding scum instead.
it's convenient for his stance on mepieguy wrote:wait what, now all of a sudden you think it's town v town? can you explain why the flip flop plz?
this is one of the things i was referring to when i mentioned varsoon's aggression towards pieguy in that conversation, and why i don't think it's like the passive-polite play i saw from him attacking scum reads (or people who were attacking him) in some scum games i've played with him.ghost wrote:Varsoon's shit-lord comment seems genuine
what was the point of your varsoon vote if you thought it was TvT the whole time?wayne wrote:When did I say you v Varsoon was anything but TvT?
er... i pointed out that your attack on me was based on something pieguywayne wrote:Don't misrep muffin. Your whole double team on Pie with with Varsoon smacks of buddying. I already said that, so why are you trying to confine my thoughts to one post when that isn't what I said?
because i don't remember you asking questions about which head posted what or anything similar to that in any of the other games i've played with you. granted, i've never seen you play from the very beginning, but i don't ever recall you being overly concerned with figuring out which head posted what.thezmon wrote:Why is it a "fake town concern" if I want to know who is posting what?
so how are you going to decide? you're not exactly questioning or commenting on either one of them.thezmon wrote:Yes, I have scum reads on wayne and TNE, but they're both weak reads, and I don't know which path to take.
cabd's gut sucks thenmorph wrote:13. zMuffinMan - Cabd's gut is putting up weird flags.
ehmorph wrote:4. MafiaSSK- this matches an interesting meta-tell blackmailed from natirasha about ssk/does not match paradox-town-ssk
what reasons?morph wrote:she has her own reasons for putting you there
correct. that's what happened.pieguy wrote:instead of people thinking of it as you buddying him, they'd think of it as you elaborating "because I asked you to".
no. he's not a town read. i'm still trying to figure out whether he's being derptown or scum.pieguy wrote:I'm assuming you have a scumread on wayne correct?
wayne wrote:You were gloating very much, and I figured that was the easiest way to get your attention.
that's something i tend to talk about with everyone, because you know, it's an important part of my life and i feel the need to unnecessarily talk about wayne and that game at every opportunity.morph wrote:Or, alternatively, it was muffin who told you that about Wayne's scumplay, since he was in that game too.
ok. the much simpler explanation is what actually happened, though.pieguy wrote:that's kind of the point. no one would suspect you of buddying because that is what happened, when your true intent was buddying
i thought you were iffy on morph. if they're scum and you're town, how would that be their loss?wayne wrote:Nope. Run me up. Your loss.
no offense to pieguy, but i don't think he's the kind of player that's capable of lying in this way as scum. he probably is town here.morph wrote:Before the day is over is fine, but realize that sofitng and then revoking it is tantamount to a scumclaim.
bork wrote:>>>Important: There are eyes and ears everywhere. Flavor Claim at your own risk in this game.<<<
i'm a town read now? when did that happen?thez wrote:That’s called the “town” in some mafia games.
why is ghost scum?wayne wrote:13. zMuffinMan
2. Ghostly Penguin (Ghostlin + penguin_alien)
10. thezmon221
Is there another BFF?
he's referring to [REDACTED] fwiwmorph wrote:I'm not really sure what you heard about that game, but whatever reputation was earned was shared rep for the most part.
and what did this mean if it didn't mean you were at least considering them as scum?In post 288, waynegg wrote:Ok, so igmeou. Better?
ignore the obvious contradiction, he's lying.In post 515, pieguyn wrote:how come this doesn't count as interacting with a scumread?
where do you draw the line about "interacting"? 0.0
why are you so overly concerned about some meta thing they have on you.In post 507, waynegg wrote:Morph, have you gotten what you were looking for yet?
hehwayne wrote:Nor have you since provided any reasons.
you actually don't know what buddying means, but what you're referring to as "buddying" is something i do as town, something you've seen me do as town. so yeah, trying to use it as your sole reason for thinking i'm scum is bullshit.wayne wrote:Oh. So first it was "buddying? How the hell am I buddying?" And now it's " ooh huh! BUUDYING! Yeah, I do that as town too..."
hahahahahahahawayne wrote:absence of evidence =/= evidence of absence