Open 538: Diffusion of Power (Game Over)
Forum rules
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
I've played a bunch of face to face mafia before but I'd say I'm relatively new to playing forum mafia (played it on another site that I forget and then found this) so I'm not too sure what to expect. But I've been able to read a bunch of articles on the wiki...or at least whenever the site is up...so I do have a good understanding of some of the terms.- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
Wasn't surprised that BB wasn't a night 0 cop but Wake's rather cool, relaxed response caught me off guard especially being at L2.
I'm concluding that the set [BB, Wake] contains one or zero scum, but definitely not two. IMO, if both were scum I can't see why BB would immediately bus his partner at the start of the game. It might be either, or neither, but not both.
(I'm also leaning towards Wake being town for reasons other people say, but this conclusion is a lot less solid.)
Sidenote: I feel a night 0 cop would give the town way too much power since they are already given some info to start the game, but that's just me.- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
Wow, lots of posts since I checked last time!
I agree with this, I assumed lucky's vote was just a joke and he'd eventually get around to something. However, lucky's next post completely disregards the whole BB gambiting Wake thing, and doesn't haven't any feelings about whether or not about if it's scummy or not. Lucky, do you have anything else to say about what happened then?In post 78, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
Up to 131...
My vote was to pressure lucky, he's wasn't commenting on anything substantial until I voted him.In post 124, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
@Bo: something about this post really pings me. The waffly nature he took by agreeing with wake about me, asking lucky for input, but then voting him anyway is weird.In post 114, gamsimbre wrote:Wow, lots of posts since I checked last time!
I agree with this, I assumed lucky's vote was just a joke and he'd eventually get around to something. However, lucky's next post completely disregards the whole BB gambiting Wake thing, and doesn't haven't any feelings about whether or not about if it's scummy or not. Lucky, do you have anything else to say about what happened then?In post 78, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?
VOTE: gam
What exactly makes my vote terrible? Also, look at the bold. Your wording assumes you think BB is scum, yet you decide not to vote him?In post 128, Lucky2u wrote:
Ignoring your terrible vote in the post following this one and responding to your question. I take gambits like that with a grain of salt. The rules don't leave much to the imagination so a night 0 cop is a bit ridiculous.In post 114, gamsimbre wrote:Wow, lots of posts since I checked last time!
I agree with this, I assumed lucky's vote was just a joke and he'd eventually get around to something. However, lucky's next post completely disregards the whole BB gambiting Wake thing, and doesn't haven't any feelings about whether or not about if it's scummy or not. Lucky, do you have anything else to say about what happened then?In post 78, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, I don't like this from you two. His first post wasn't serious, and was a playful poke at MS for its problems. I'd do the same. Your reason for voting him is nonexistent.having an unserious post isn't Scummy, and you know that, so what are you doing?He could have done it in an attempt to seem townbecause there is a stereotype that only town players make reaction test gambits. It doesn't sway my opinion of either player since wake didn't give anything away during the gambit. The only knowledge I really gleemed from it is that if BB is scum, wake probably isn't on his team. I don't think BB would have targeted a scum mate for that gambit if it was a fake.- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
Up to 158? Got so many tabs open I'm losing track
My reasoning is pressure. Wagoning is a great tool to see how people react which is what I got from lucky. Keep in mind too my vote on lucky was not random. Kalimar put wake at L2 when the game immediately started, so we need to hear his reasoning whenever he decides to show up.In post 146, Zebe wrote:@DBK: I find 34 interesting. Kalimar is just visiting here to vote Wake (to -2 as he mentioned). It's also nice you remember me...
@ETL:
Null: Mr_Blonde, Smudger and aptil because almost nothing to read.
Scummy: Gam and Kalimar leaning scum (more or less) because I cannot see reasoning behind some of their votes except wagoning.
Nothing: KBW, simply no posts...
I didn't include either Cheery Dog or lucky, I'm not decided where to put them yet.
I don't like delaying time, it's scummy. What's you're one reason you're hiding....that is, if you have one?In post 156, Does Bo Know wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Gam
If you guys want reasons, wait until later, but there is one reason I'm hiding, no questions asked. The rest of the reasons are basically outlined by ETL in his further explanation, I'm too lazy to go back and look.
Yeah the Lucky wagon probably wasn't going to make anything else come out. That and I'm bored with it.- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
Up to 200.
I'll be waiting, but if I don't hear anything you can certainly expect a vote.In post 191, Kalimar wrote:Prod dodge, back tomorrow.
In my opinion, I found your questions pretty weak and irrelevant. Note that I don't think this is scummy, could just mean you are a weak townie. However, you seem to be the statsboy when it comes to how many posts someone has made and oftentimes just sitting on the fence like you're waiting for something. That I think is scummy. Up until this point I still can't figure out who you think is scummy, so I'll ask who do you think is scummy?In post 197, Wake1 wrote:
Fortunately for you, we cannot discuss ongoing games.In post 195, Does Bo Know wrote:^^Yeah, Wake's questions to me seem pretty lame. Trying to know exactly why I can't read him well this game?
But don't switch over, I wasn't done with the Gam wagon yet.
My questions are valid, and I ask you them because I'm trying to understand you. There's nothing lame about it, and I challenge how you judge which questions are lame and which are valid. If a question is game-related, it is valid. Do you disagree with this?- gamsimbre
-
gamsimbre Townie
- gamsimbre
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 28
- Joined: November 15, 2013
--> If memory serves me right the only people that have voted for me were ETL and Bo. I found ETL's case on me valid, but like I said before my vote on lucky was to pressure him, because up until that point he didn't really post anything of value. Bo's vote I found to be more of a pressure vote, and trying to be the one starting the bandwagon.In post 221, Wake1 wrote:Gamsimbre
———✹Would you please share your thoughts on ETL and the other players who have voted for you?
———✹Do you still feel there is one or zero Scum between either me or BBMolla?
———✹Between me, ETL, and DBK, in what order would you rank us from Towniest to Scummiest, and why?
--> Honestly, I'm not sure. Both of you are towards the middle of that line where I think you are town or scum. Let me throw the same question back to you. Between you and BBMolla, do you think there is one or zero (or two if you are so kind) scum there?
--> ETL is my strongest town read because she seems to be asking the right questions and hasn't done anything scummy. Between you and Bo I'd have to say you are the scummiest, because like I've said I don't think you're really taking an active role in this game which is scummy.Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre
- gamsimbre