unvote
vote: bjc
it looks like Im only here for a few days, but Ill see who's what.
bjc is scum (he saw what I can do) and this is probably nacho's fault somehow too.
will read up but on phone on 30 pages. Anyone care to post key points?
0.o. why you hurt me so?
RayTown makes a point I think Ill be rehashing later.In post 429, RayFrost wrote:Posting content is not equivalent to the content or the person being town. Even if the content in isolation is pro-town, it must also be considered in how it is delivered (word choice, etc), when it is delivered (after other people say the same thing?), why it is delivered (oh noes wagons on me?), and other things of similar nature.
[snip]
Content that does not further the process of finding scum or is posted in such a way as to indicate that the poster is scum is inherently not going to be pro-town content.
[snip]
If the game were as easy as "posters of content are town, posters of not-content are scum," then mafia would never have become an interesting or worthwhile game.
i do have reads. its killing me not to blurt then out and see what sticks, but Im 12pgs behind and no iso yet. obvious statement though, scum know their way around a game.In post 860, TierShift wrote:I have no idea what you're trying to say here.In post 858, pisskop wrote:fair enough. ^^
@tier, a few things. I almos posted several selects, but I can find them again after if they are so bothesome? i want to iso a few players, one for a percieved readflop.
In post 617, ika wrote:it was a pure test to see his breaking point, he sat at l-1 for a very long time, and he continued to tryt o stall it out and push elsewhere. at first i thought it was flail scum, but his continued fight makes me think hes town. also his last post saying "fuck it lynch me" was all i needed to know to make me think hes town.In post 611, Sakura Hana wrote:In post 607, ika wrote:enough of your survivalism play. at this point your play is becoming more hindeirng to me then helpful if your town.^In post 608, bjc wrote:......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.
Does this look like survivalist to you?
And if his play is hindering you then you're effectively pushing for a policy lynch, now that i finished reading im thinking on bjc as more town. Maybe because I've been in his position before.
Also Ika leaning more scum =/
i still feel like there was survivalism play in it but it wasnt scum driven survivalism.
i cant be the only guy reading this, and iys not the first time hes flopped on a read based on current events. killitwithfire. and a rope.In post 839, ika wrote:i come back and see pisskop first few posts. im almost tempted to sheep him becasue i still want to see a bjc flip becasue it would also contain info.
i was reflecting back on this game at work and was tossing an idea around
ts/bjc are the scums
youve seen what I can do. now youll see it again. he is a twofaced scum. your defense of him is endearing though.In post 915, bjc wrote:ika is still town to me. You're not doing anything to help us either.
In post 253, bjc wrote:I don't know, I can't really get behind a Rob vote right now because he's posted twice I think, or maybe three times.
well, i was.looking at his iso and Im going to have to ask him more about this. willget back to why I thought he was town though.In post 335, bjc wrote:Your posting style makes me laugh.In post 334, Rob W wrote:Hostile place
Is this all that is gonna be offered? At this rate there won't be a replacement, and I don't wanna push for a policy lynch but... Really?
o.o ???In post 365, bjc wrote:I think there's a little bit to be gained by the RobW flip, not a whole lot though. I think we're in a bind though: He posts just enough to not get replaced. So... What the hell is his usefulness to us?
@ ika - Want to know why I feel like "you won't lynch me?" Because I'm town. Just like you said you don't feel threatened due to being town, I feel like I won't be lynched because I'm town. There's a reason I'm wanting to know if someone has intent to hammer.
So tell me: Do you have a serious intent to hammer?
:/ what do you want from me? i dont have an 8ball in my pants, you want reads you let me assess the info.In post 935, TierShift wrote:Good stuff koppie
does this stand? (emerald as town?)In post 670, TierShift wrote:Okay, lemme respond to this.In post 558, emeraldemon wrote:Right, I was saying that between 407 and 478 you dropped from 4th to 2nd. It doesn't matter now.
I'm going off of 505 because it's the last time you stated your case completely I think. These are the things I think are bugging you.
(1) sheeping: bjc sheeped hard in the early game, everyone knows it and he admits it. He played the early game very casually. But there is a town motivation for pushing wagons to generate content. It's not as good as actual pressure, but it's something.
(2) pushing Rob W: I think you're a bit off on this, as I said, he never voted Rob W. Where's the sheeping there?
(3) "Survivalism": 365 and 369 are actually consistent with the behavior of a town PR I think. Not saying he is one and I definitely don't want to force an early claim (and that's why there shouldn't be an early intent to hammer), but certain types of town players get panicky when they are close to a lynch.
You and bjc have been fighting a lot, and honestly it's generating more heat than light. My advice for both of you would be this: Take a step back. Even if you're sure he's scum, look around for his scum partner. Don't get caught up in OMGUS.
1. His sheeping didn't generate anything at all, while making it seem like it did. He's done little to move this game forward but has been pretending he has.
2. He didn't vote robw, but he definitely told all his attackers to move to robw, for reason 'I'm active and he's not and we all have the same chance of being scum'.
3. Putting away scummy things as PR behaviour is awful.
I have been taking a step back and also been considering you as a serious suspect. But as far as I can see, you and bjc are not buddies. Bjc still stands out as scum to me way more than you do, especially after your last posts.
Your hardcore scumreading of me due to disengaging you is something that is a town analysis in every aspect and I would say you do a better job at helping us forward with the little you have posted than with all the crap bjc has posted. You seek reasoning behind what someone's doing except of just scratching the surface. Now what I'm asking of you is to not only do this on me, but also on the other players.
I have emerald as strong town again and you can all go deal with it.
Saying that I'm WK'ing him however is preposterous.
I want a bjc lynch badly and if I'm not getting it I might be okay with a robw lurker lynch.
Ive read most of the ISOs, now out of interest.In post 236, AbboTT wrote:OMG. Right. So stupid. Jailkeeper.
It literally took me this long to understand.
In post 584, Sakura Hana wrote:Hi guys, I've been reading since i sent the replacement request and I'm currently at Page 17.
Reads as of now:
Town: Nacho, the snowman avatar guy, TS.
Scum: bjc, Rob, ED (which means im wrong about at least 1 of these)
Not in any specific order.
Unvote
In case my predecessor was voting someone.
So, now Tier and bjc swap? scummy.In post 682, Sakura Hana wrote:He made several posts between those 2 you know...
more importantly:I guess i should have noticed this before as well, but at the time I was too busy trying to sort TS myself as I already thought bjc was town enough.In post 622, bjc wrote:How on earth is TS's above post pro town in any way?
wibbly wobbly much?In post 169, AbboTT wrote:Updated read list:
ED - townish
BJC - townish
RF - patronizing townie
TS - mildly scummy
Nacho - scum
ika - ? (ISO needed)
RW - ? (post or die)
LMB - ? (post or die)
Can you say Vendetta?In post 980, bjc wrote:Not when pisskop is still in this. Lol