The Reckoning III (Math is Hard) Holy crap, perfect town win

Triforce · Post Post #152 (isolation #0) » Sun Mar 02, 2014 1:11 pm

Checking in. Hanging out with AGar today but reading either tonight or tomorrow. Wooooo.

Triforce · Post Post #261 (isolation #1) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:14 am

We caught up yaaay

A few town reads: gamma, pie, CDB, mollie, Mina/Tammy...
Gaylord's claim was really jumping the gun, but haven't figured out if that's town/scum. Fate/Reck dynamic should clear that up?
Iec's claim is probably town regardless of if his name shows up on the hammer assuming he didn't know in the first place.

Um.

vote: DeathNote

Triforce · Post Post #262 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:33 am

Also re: Mollie/Waffles,

Mollie looks fairly townish, but is posting irrationally. Waffles is taking irrational to be scummy and attacking it accordingly, which is causing mollie to become increasingly reactionary and irrational. Insert spiral of distraction and doom and one of them eating a bullet just to end the madness here. Not sure on Waffles' alignment yet, it kind of depends on ~things~ but it's something we're monitoring.

Triforce · Post Post #263 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 11:43 am

Why does everyone stop posting when we show up...

Triforce · Post Post #269 (isolation #4) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:34 pm

In post 264, DeathNote wrote:You voted me... I'm not talking to you.

If we unvote you, will you explain why the extent of your contribution in 259 was white knighting Gaylords against a literally non-existent wagon on a day where he has absolutely zero chance of being lynched?

Because we're willing to take that hit. For our friendship.

Triforce · Post Post #274 (isolation #5) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:43 pm

In post 270, Eleven wrote:
In post 261, Triforce wrote:Iec's claim is probably town regardless of if his name shows up on the hammer assuming he didn't know in the first place.
Why? Think it's more natural to assume it would show up (It'd be super weird if it didn't, if he's scum he'd definitely assume it shows up as SECRET HAMMERER seems kind of retarded as a scum role).

If he claimed without knowing, then it's pretty unlikely that he's scum. As scum people generally want to iron out the details of their role/claim before they claim. The actual answer is irrelevant because of how loose the claim itself was.

Triforce · Post Post #277 (isolation #6) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 12:55 pm

Mehhhhhhh not really, Eleven.

PEdit: Kind of a dumb thing to pretend to not know, plus it seems really silly to be analyzing a D1 "probably town" read to this extent. It's not like we are saying ZOMGZ IECE CONFTOWN BECAUSE AWKWARD CLAIM.

Triforce · Post Post #281 (isolation #7) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:21 pm

D1 MUST HAVE SCUM TEAM NAILED. No, we just have the one scumread so far. One of Fate/Reck could be scum? But again, to be determined.

Preview Edit: that's pretty much what we expected from Iec.

Triforce · Post Post #286 (isolation #8) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 1:28 pm

In post 282, Iecerint wrote:Can we mislynch Axxle D1 again?

I was fakeclaiming and am a lyncher-hammerer on Axxle btw. I become scum if I don't win as a lyncher tho, so better lynch Axxle quick. :[

Pedit: Ohhhhh Triforce's words cut to the bone.

That was a compliment because we said you were town...

Triforce · Post Post #297 (isolation #9) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:00 pm

Well that was pretty protown...

Triforce · Post Post #303 (isolation #10) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:18 pm

We're probably not going to read Tammy's post or the reply.

Triforce · Post Post #305 (isolation #11) » Mon Mar 03, 2014 4:20 pm

Triforce · Post Post #341 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:30 am

In post 339, ActionDan wrote:
In post 336, ChannelDelibird wrote:Ah, sorry for missing that, Pie. The UT-over-Waffles thing was driven more by my townread on Waffles.

VOTE: ActionDan
Voting me even though you implied you had scumread(s) earlier that weren't me.

Vote this to death people.

Also what a crapshot. You should have just shot cdb if you were planning on joining the wagon anyway

Why shoot him first then join the wagon? If he was going to use his shot (provided it's limited or D1 or whatever), there were a couple of obvious options...and he shot one of them.

Nuwen, this statement is directed at you, too. You could always vote the beloved princess if you feel so strongly that this would've been a better option?

Triforce · Post Post #343 (isolation #13) » Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:52 am

Actually, Nuwen's been a pile of useless and we would be fine with her dead.

Triforce · Post Post #377 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 04, 2014 7:32 am

Nuwen wrote:because now we have to deal with a beloved princess LATER in the game.

Nuwen. Please. Pull your head out of your own ass.

kthx

Triforce · Post Post #386 (isolation #15) » Tue Mar 04, 2014 8:16 am

In post 377, Triforce wrote:
Nuwen wrote:because now we have to deal with a beloved princess LATER in the game.
Nuwen. Please. Pull your head out of your own ass.

kthx

^ missed the revelation. Regardless, known chronic lurker who claimed Miller is a fine D1 shot. It's what we would have done.

We like EagleKit too. The mollie vote is terribad.

Vote: Eaglekit

Triforce · Post Post #481 (isolation #16) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:49 am

We haven't really looked at much of CDB's content except that he's making an attempt to post so by default that kind of makes him more town than not? We agree with Prozac that the thing with mollie didn't really seem like anything other than a joke.

Same goes for Cheery Dog, I guess. Voting for mollie just seemed to go along with his other nonsensical/awkward posting.

@Eaglekit...what of Tammy's post convinced you to jump onto mollie? Does is still apply now that Waffles is no longer attacking them?

@Prozac...what are your scumreads?

A note: mollie, we know that you don't use capital letters, or do things like "some1" instead of "someone", but punctuation helps us figure out what you're actually trying to say in your posts (finding the example after this post).

Nothing else has really stood out to us. To be honest, we're kind of expecting Fate, Nuwen, and Reck to all kind of read each other before we even try to read them...

Triforce · Post Post #485 (isolation #17) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:18 am

Ok well I can't find it and maybe it was someone else who went on a period/comma-less tangent, sorry. >_>

Triforce · Post Post #487 (isolation #18) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:24 am

Ugh, I was going to direct Nuwen back to my post about how we weren't really reading closely anymore because "we were kind of turned off from reading a whole lot because of the whole mollie/Tammy distraction" but apparently I deleted that.

1. We weren't the only ones to think his shot was good and only said anything to you because you seemed to think your opinion about it was better. Sure either one would've been fine, ok?

2. What do you mean "our response to eaglekit's fresh wagon"?

Triforce · Post Post #505 (isolation #19) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:21 am

In post 392, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:Eaglekit is gross as fk so I'll let Fate go for now

VOTE: Eaglekit

In post 499, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:
In post 497, ChannelDelibird wrote:How should I read Ythan's six posts
or EagleKit's like ten

:goodposting: right here

Triforce · Post Post #506 (isolation #20) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:23 am

In post 505, Triforce wrote:
In post 392, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:Eaglekit is gross as fk so I'll let Fate go for now

VOTE: Eaglekit

In post 499, Your New Gay Overlords wrote:How should I read Ythan's six posts
or EagleKit's like ten
:goodposting: right here

Fixed quote tags.

Triforce · Post Post #596 (isolation #21) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:44 pm

In post 595, Cheery Dog wrote:Oh good the reactionary mollie has arrived.

More delayed than was expected, but I think I can safely place her towards the town pile now.

Wait, reactionary mollie FINALLY arrived?

How was her OMGUS blowup at Waffles not reactionary?
How was her OMGUS towards Eleven not reactionary?
How was her vote for YOU not reactionary?

Heck, what has she done that

hasn't

been largely reactionary? Are you reading the same game as the rest of us?

Or is this just one of those "oh, Mollie's not getting lynched, I guess I'll find an excuse to not vote her anymore" things?

Triforce · Post Post #599 (isolation #22) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:55 pm

Not sure if you're just not getting the point, but we're saying she's been reactionary to EVERYONE who has gone after her.

How is her-being-reactionary-to-EagleKit different from her-being-reactionary-to-(Waffles/Eleven/You)?

Triforce · Post Post #600 (isolation #23) » Wed Mar 05, 2014 5:56 pm

like, what SPECIFICALLY had you thinking her reactions earlier were scum?

and what SPECIFICALLY has you putting her town NOW?

Triforce · Post Post #826 (isolation #24) » Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:10 pm

Alright so here's the deal. We're not really invested in this game because of shitty Day 1 shenanigans, and if we're going to get lynched because of "trollolol don't care!"/"they ask too many questions as part of the way singer scumhunts and that looks ~suspicious~" then whatever. We figured it was worth playing because there are lots of new people we haven't played with before, and maybe some of the same people wouldn't make the same mistakes as Balto meet, but apparently that's not the case.

We're Shea Trying Get Everyone To Wear Green Shirts. Our official role is Green-Shirt Giver, and we're a modified survivor.

We can give someone a Green Shirt every night. That person gets doc-protected that night, and then we become immune to abilities from them for the rest of the game. We win if we're alive at the end of the game.
We investigate as not-mafia, not-werewolf, etc.
If someone we have given a shirt to dies, they flip their normal role + a note that they were wearing a green shirt.
People we give shirts to will be told they were given a shirt.

We're not going to bother waiting to be rung up to L-1 and wasting people's time and effort, including our own.

Triforce · Post Post #835 (isolation #25) » Fri Mar 07, 2014 3:48 pm

We'd actually been toying with the idea of being upfront about the claim just because chances of us winning are slim anyway, you know my alignment at heart is always town, and it's definitely not worth losing sleep over.

Shea's obsession with GST was clearly a thing since we're not lying, but we didn't submit it so someone else can confirm that for us.

We obviously won't make it to lylo so that doesn't even need to be thing.

Triforce · Post Post #890 (isolation #26) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 4:09 am

In post 884, Untrod Tripod wrote:
In post 826, Triforce wrote:We're Shea Trying Get Everyone To Wear Green Shirts. Our official role is Green-Shirt Giver, and we're a modified survivor.

We can give someone a Green Shirt every night. That person gets doc-protected that night, and then we become immune to abilities from them for the rest of the game. We win if we're alive at the end of the game.
We investigate as not-mafia, not-werewolf, etc.
If someone we have given a shirt to dies, they flip their normal role + a note that they were wearing a green shirt.
People we give shirts to will be told they were given a shirt.
so this isn't a cult

not at all

uh huh

Honest to god if we were a cult I would have replaced out on principle. This isn't a bastard modded game.

Triforce · Post Post #899 (isolation #27) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:19 am

Hama, have you ever been a survivor in forum mafia?

Drawing on experience, both times Glork has been a survivor he has played strictly protown and won doing so. McDonalds Mafia and one other where he was a Survivor Mason but he forgets the name. In McD he eve claimed D1 and caught all three scums in two days.

The scums aren't going to waste a night kill on us so there's no reason not to help the town. Fuck your ~theories~, it works.

Triforce · Post Post #900 (isolation #28) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:20 am

EBWOP: Gamma. Phoneposting.

Triforce · Post Post #901 (isolation #29) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:21 am

Also apparently I claimed D2 in McD b/c I'd caught scum D1 and there was a missing kill that I was p sure was on me. Memory.

Triforce · Post Post #903 (isolation #30) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 6:29 am

Don't suck at mafia and that won't be an issue.

Lynch eaglekit and UT and ride the gravy train to victory.

Triforce · Post Post #928 (isolation #31) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 4:47 pm

In post 924, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:
In post 886, EagleKit wrote:
In post 878, Fate wrote:I 100% do?
flavored doctor sounds plausible on its own, why even bother with the survivor part? it's needlessly complex (aka likely the truth).
This is actually a good point.

No, it isn't. Put on your Mafia 101 cap and take a wild guess as to what happens on N1 to the claimed protown protective role.

Not including our win con would have been suicidal.

As an aside, I'm p sure that role would be stupidly OP of it were protown. Every night it either protects a town player or makes itself immune to a scumbag? Seriously, kids.

Triforce · Post Post #936 (isolation #32) » Sat Mar 08, 2014 5:47 pm

In post 929, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:
In post 928, Triforce wrote:
In post 924, Sir Waffles Wafflington wrote:
In post 886, EagleKit wrote:
In post 878, Fate wrote:I 100% do?
flavored doctor sounds plausible on its own, why even bother with the survivor part? it's needlessly complex (aka likely the truth).
This is actually a good point.
No, it isn't. Put on your Mafia 101 cap and take a wild guess as to what happens on N1 to the claimed protown protective role.

Not including our win con would have been suicidal.

As an aside, I'm p sure that role would be stupidly OP of it were protown. Every night it either protects a town player or makes itself immune to a scumbag? Seriously, kids.

You do realize that the point she's agreeing with is that the way you claimed sounds like it's the truth, right?

yeah def thought that said "unlikely"