I have a proposal: larges these days have exploded in length. I am proposing we limit posts per person to be five a day, to see if we can get the shortest recent large game.
In post 10, talah wrote:*yawn* Actually I know more folks playing here than I realised, so -general hello- and down to business.In post 8, Mister Rogers wrote:Your entrance to this game is not genuine.
@Mister, not genuinehow?
(Rogers is town.)
DV's town, too.
Fixed that for him. (He is.)In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm town.
ThAdmiral, you are aIn post 24, ThAdmiral wrote:In other news I like being out of rvs within 3 live posts. While its sort of forced (what super early day 1 case stuff isn't) I still like rogers better for it.Lemme guess: "reaction testing"?In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
vote: bjc
There you go, now you can call me scum for "taking the bait".
This is probably scum, too, though not certainly so.In post 25, Doc Holliday wrote:There is no legitimate purpose to this as Town. bjc is either scum or not worth listening to. Obtuse gambits are anti-Town.In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
Sticking with talah for now, but this deserves a vote later.
No, I actually think Rogers is being reasonable (not hyper-aggressive). He's one of my strongest townreads already.In post 34, 4nxi3ty wrote:hyperagressive scum?
Also town.In post 36, aptil wrote:Doc's RVS vote was bad and the vote by Deas was something i would have done too . But his posts afterwards read town to me .
Bjc already looks like he is going to be a lynch bait here .
Talah is bad all over . He has one decent post explaining his decisions otherwise he has been bad all over .
Probably town.
This, however, is definitely scum. You want a town voting bjc? (Or, at the least, more likely to be town.) Look at PV's. That, genuine-or-at-least-appearing-so. This, not so much.In post 44, Damon_Gant wrote:What a peculiar post. No meaning, no purpose, no humour. Everything else in this game thus far is smoke clouding my vision.In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.Vote: bjc
Also town.In post 72, SnowStorm wrote:Hi, hello.
Vote: Damon Grant.Why say anything about it even? It looks like you just picked up the easiest thing to comment and base a vote on and didn't even bother to read the posts after it. It looked like posting just for the sake of posting, as if you just wanted to blend in.Damon_Gant wrote:You're going to have to excuse me for being stupid here. The only point I see zdenek making about me is "#4", which you'll forgive me if I don't find it to be spectacular analysis. Obviously I'm missing something here so can someone explain it to me? I'll pre-emptively point out that I barely read the post I was supposed to be sheeping. Honestly,there's only so much one can say about a post that says "I'm scum", so it's unsurprising we have similar things to say about it.
And yes, I guess I did overjustify my absence which is turning out not to be so much so anyway thanks to this nifty iPad keyboard I got today. I appreciate the birthday wishes, even if they are laced with poison!
The defensive tone of this post also bothers me.