You haven't posted in the neighborhood QT yet. What's up with that?
NY 172: Another Large Normal (GAME OVER)
Forum rules
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 31, bjc wrote:Yeah there is nothing town about a joke early in the game. Sheesh.In post 33, bjc wrote:I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.
So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.
A joke usually indicates humor, or can be used to relieve tension. Your opening post did none of that. And if a joke, you forgot to show you are town by self-voting.In post 35, bjc wrote:vote: Doc
I'll be back tomorrow to offer actual opinions, and this vote is based on a skim of the thread.
It's all of 30 posts. What's there to skim?
Vote: bjc
Would also throw a vote BBMolla's way for scum-placing out.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 86, Yates wrote:I'm V/LA due to a brew competition this weekend. I'll be active starting Monday.
That said... what is this?In post 39, PeregrineV wrote:Would also throw a vote BBMolla's way for scum-placing out.Does BBMollaactuallyhave a track record of replacing out of games as scum or are you being terrible for no reason?You are better than this.
VOTE: PeregrineVI'll say yes and let you prove otherwise.
I'd normally give you grief for this, but since we've actually played together quite a bit, I'll allow you to suggest it.
Someone claimed scum. Thoughts on that.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 91, ThAdmiral wrote:I just hate this sort of behaviour. And then he follows it up with "It's just a joke, sheesh" acting all surprised people are jumping on him after he claimed scum. Come on.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I don't think anyone IS voting him.In post 95, RachMarie wrote:Wow thread explosion already?
Talah is a he BTW he was in one of the Newbie games I modded.
Yates is correct that vote on BB is rather suspicious, I have played with BB a lot and he replaces out due to RL issues not because of alignment.
VOTE: PereI will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Why bjc?
He claimed scum with his first post. Maybe to distract from that very fact, maybe to assuage his guilt over the fact.
Maybe he's town and he's trying to catch scum. For everyone assuming he's town trying to catch scum, analyze the total sum of his followup to his scum claim. Then analyze the total sum of the rest of his play. Explain how it is town. Use charts, graphs, links, etc. Use his own words and yours. TIA.
@Mastin- your posts look like scum-Mastin.
Damon is town.
talah is town
ThAd is town.
Yates is town.
Rogers is town.
Some others I want to give town reads, but you have yet to flip the switch.
@Mod-Nero hasn't posted yet, he still in this game?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
How can those reads have any validity without a read on bjc?In post 233, Zdenek wrote:I don't have a read on bjc at the moment. What I have are reads on people's reactions to his scum claim.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I don't feel you can adequately assign alignments to reactions-to-bjc without assigning a bjc alignment (without MSU).In post 236, Zdenek wrote:
Because they aren't about him.In post 234, PeregrineV wrote:
How can those reads have any validity without a read on bjc?In post 233, Zdenek wrote:I don't have a read on bjc at the moment. What I have are reads on people's reactions to his scum claim.
The issue I had with ThAd's post was that he shielded himself from complaints that he was taking the bait by making a joke about it.(Scum bait or town bait?)
The issue I had with Doc's post was the comment about this deserves a vote later. It's him opening up the door to get off the Talah wagon.(To vote scum bjc to bus or vote town bjc to mislynch?)
The issue I had with Damon Gant's post was that he was making out of game excuses. I also didn't like that he called the post peculiar (as opposed to scummy).(so is he distancing from scum-bjc or fencesitting on town-bjc?)I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
So your possibilities from the reactions to bjc areIn post 239, Zdenek wrote:
It's like you just demonstrated how I don't need to have a read on bjc, since you gave possibilities for each of those things regardless of what alignment bjc is.In post 238, PeregrineV wrote:
I don't feel you can adequately assign alignments to reactions-to-bjc without assigning a bjc alignment (without MSU).In post 236, Zdenek wrote:
Because they aren't about him.In post 234, PeregrineV wrote:
How can those reads have any validity without a read on bjc?In post 233, Zdenek wrote:I don't have a read on bjc at the moment. What I have are reads on people's reactions to his scum claim.
The issue I had with ThAd's post was that he shielded himself from complaints that he was taking the bait by making a joke about it.(Scum bait or town bait?)
The issue I had with Doc's post was the comment about this deserves a vote later. It's him opening up the door to get off the Talah wagon.(To vote scum bjc to bus or vote town bjc to mislynch?)
The issue I had with Damon Gant's post was that he was making out of game excuses. I also didn't like that he called the post peculiar (as opposed to scummy).(so is he distancing from scum-bjc or fencesitting on town-bjc?)
ThAd could or could not be scum.
Doc could or could not be scum.
Damon could or could not be scum.
Does that sum them up?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Because how scum interacts with scum is different than how scum interacts with town. You are trying to contend that all are scum merely because they interacted?In post 241, Zdenek wrote:How do you get from giving me examples of things scum could be doing based on bjc being either town or scum to asking me about whether ThAd, doc or damon is scum or not scum?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I agree. How you find scum interactions between two players enough to call one scum but not call the other town or scum is beyond me.In post 242, Zdenek wrote:Your thought progression here makes no sense to me at all.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.In post 33, bjc wrote:I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.
So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.
OK!!In post 248, bjc wrote:dodging here as well
We look forward to your posts!!!I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I don't have time to crack all of these, but let's hit a few.In post 249, Mister Rogers wrote:Pere-- Neighborhood Q/T joke RVS vote with no other comment even though some genuine conflict has begun. Votes low hanging fruit in BJC but does point out that BJC skimming 30 posts sounds faked. Makes a comment about voting BB_replace_scum; obviously faulty analysis on its face but it DID force some people to bring BB meta up AND it created an easy target for those who are so desirous. I like the genuine scum hunting but dislike the target; the benefit of the doubt here lies in Pere returning to this thread for more genuine content. Conditional null to town
Why was bjc "low hanging fruit"?
Why was BB_replace_scum "faulty analysis"? There was absolutely no analysis involved, it was a bald statement that attracted far more attention than it should have.
I currently have only one target, but he is so busy towning up the thread that I'll probably just shoot him myself tonight.
All content to date has been genuine. Link to any that you feel has not been, and we'll talk.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 249, Mister Rogers wrote:BJC-- Claims scum. Regardless of opinions regarding this post, it DID help to get the game rolling and its impact can STILL be felt in this game. He seems to overjustify his behavior with a timeline of his actions and makes a strange comment about "the usual people are too uptight" which I still don't understand. Votes Doc after skimming which also appears as over-justification of his behavior along with more timeline regarding content. Then, similar to Talah, something clicks and his posts take on a better character. He starts with cog-dis in Thad's joke criteria being OK for Pere but not OK for himself. He queries Doc on how his post can even be termed a gambit as nobody could possibly take it seriously; I found this to be quite impressive logic. He accurately points out Doc's fencesitting his wagon and then tells me I am talkative because he has read my game on site; that really did impress me. I like how he fully accepts Aptil's lynchbait assertion with a certain free flowing joy that is tough to fake. He actually did skim 30 posts. I like him calling DG out for his vote of himself and can only agree with his Luca appraisal as finger pointing. Man I wish this guy was around more but what I have seen can only betownIn post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.In post 31, bjc wrote:Yeah there is nothing town about a joke early in the game. Sheesh.In post 33, bjc wrote:I have nothing so far considering I made one comment right before I left for home, just got home when I made the other comment while skimming the game.
So yeah... I have no "take" on this game so far at all, lol. Except for the usual people that are too uptight.In post 35, bjc wrote:vote: Doc
I'll be back tomorrow to offer actual opinions, and this vote is based on a skim of the thread.In post 82, bjc wrote: Post 24
So my question here is why the above fake-claim/joke is okay while mine isn't?
Post 25
Horrible. First off, since when was this a gambit?
Second, why is something like that posted in RVS even taken seriously?
Lastly, I like that you say this deserves a vote yet stick with who you're voting at the time. Doesn't make a lot of sense for someone that just scolded me for claiming scum in my opening post.
Post 32
Are you the talkative type? After reading the newbie game you were a part of with BB and molla, I'm thinking yes.
Post 36
Forever and always <3
Post 39
Yeah, well that's like, your opinion, man.
What's there to skim? All thirty posts I guess. Self-voting is town?
Post 44
I find your breakdown of my post fascinating.
Bad vote.
Post 48
You have to question why people needlessly ponder why bjc posted it in the first place, unless you're scum pointing fingers this early for something so silly to get an early wagon on someone, I guess.In post 96, bjc wrote:
Both were fake, so I don't see the difference.In post 92, ThAdmiral wrote:
I didn't claim an anti-town role.In post 82, bjc wrote:So my question here is why the above fake-claim/joke is okay while mine isn't?
Let me just say you make a lot of assumptions and then call him town. Perhaps a re-analysis is in order.In post 248, bjc wrote:dodging here as wellI will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
None, really. the three posts of his are not enough to get a read on.In post 252, 4nxi3ty wrote:PV, thoughts on Luca? (whose close to being replaced, yet manages to find time to post elsewhere today)I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Making Shit Up.In post 254, Mister Rogers wrote:Pardon my ignorance but what is MSU?
(like stupid acronyms)I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
You are free to agree with me about why my reads are wrong. In fact, I encourage it.In post 260, Mister Rogers wrote:
Yup. Not seeing the content I wanted from Pere.In post 229, PeregrineV wrote: Damon is town.
talah is town
ThAd is town.
Yates is town.
Rogers is town.
Some others I want to give town reads(snip)I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Take medicine and post better. And feel better.In post 267, talah wrote:I never said anything about scum buddying regarding Pere/Admiral. I lean town on both, Admiral more strongly than Pere right now.
I'm not buying the "fake vig". Nor the "town reaction". But I'll have to take a look back to see what exactly irked me about it.
I saw Zdenek's vote coming from halfway around the map.
My vote is still on Doc because I've got no reason to move it unless he answers my questions.
I am 100% conflicted on Mister. I see effort; I see questions; I see pushing the game forward by way of this, and a *lot* of posts. I was waiting to see what was going to happen with the questions he was asking and something about the way his reads are being formed is irritating me. I don't know - it may just be hangover from feeling ganked at gamestart.
And this, is a prod dodge until tomorrow. I have a headache.
And post better.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Meh, I consider both votes to be RVS based. We'll see how Yates responds and how Rach steps up before assuming anything about thier votes.In post 285, Mister Rogers wrote:Pere throwing out as many town reads as he possibly can and retaining his focus on BJC's 1st post is not the quality I needed to see. He is downgraded tonull to scum.
There is a sort of bizarre dynamic here because he only has two votes and both people are voting him for a scummy reason; there are still ways it can make sense though.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Why do you think I'm trolling? Because I disagree with you?In post 302, Mister Rogers wrote:How about I join Yates and adovcate your lynch until you stop trolling or leave the game at the end of a rope?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I did. I think I read them twice, and quoted them at least once.In post 293, bjc wrote:I already offered a few thoughts Saturday, I believe. Did you not read them?
I also asked this:
Responses so far have been underwhelming, but I eagerly await your (further) input. Anything you can do to erase the scumvibe I have from your posting would be appreciated.In post 229, PeregrineV wrote:Why bjc?
He claimed scum with his first post. Maybe to distract from that very fact, maybe to assuage his guilt over the fact.
Maybe he's town and he's trying to catch scum. For everyone assuming he's town trying to catch scum, analyze the total sum of his followup to his scum claim. Then analyze the total sum of the rest of his play. Explain how it is town. Use charts, graphs, links, etc. Use his own words and yours. TIA.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Yes. Ask the logical question, and then think through each answer.In post 297, Mister Rogers wrote:RE: Pere
Why was BJC low hanging fruit
Because he made a post that was very easy to attack.
But their hasn't been analysis on it yet. I wanted to see who would react and how. But, both are players that reacted in a way that does advance my reads on them. If you get reads from their reactions, then I approve.In post 297, Mister Rogers wrote:Why was BB_replace_scum "faulty analysis"
Well I like how it brought people to attack you. Yes you are making a good point here. You were low hanging fruit too. I have Rach as scum for that (among other things). I am not liking Yates for it especially because he hasn't moved an inch while the "thread has exploded". Although again, a bizarre dynamic, but you haven't given him a reason to move either.
OK.In post 297, Mister Rogers wrote:Very funny. At this point he is prod-dodge/lurking. Seeing his first post as null, I shall be judging him based on subsequent posts and/or lack thereof.
On page 10? Your lucky I have any reads at all. And for me, "town" means I scumhunt them slightly less vigorously than my non-town reads.In post 297, Mister Rogers wrote:Throwing out a bunch of town reads with only one "scum suspect" is scumtastic. It is not genuine town play. This is a game with 19 other players and almost all of them have posted and a handful of them are scum (and probably not BJC imo).I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
No worries. Everyone has a different way of playing.In post 305, Mister Rogers wrote:Sorry if I overreacted. Carry on.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I strongly recommend Excedrin Extra Strength. Let me work through a deafening sinus infection.In post 313, talah wrote:Yeah, thanks, in order to do that I probably needed to not have a headache, and to actually read through rather than just read along. But noted, and I've just read (properly) up to page 10 this morning.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
It's a function of free time, as in "how much do I have?" that affects my mafia playing. And PoE is not super realiable, but it's a good springboard to start day1.In post 313, talah wrote:I have a question mark on townreading you mainly because you seem a bit more proactive (or maybe 'pushy') than I remember and also don't remember you having scumhunted using PoE before.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Page 13 (quoted for my reference).
I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I've played games where he has replaced out. I don't know his alignment in those games, nor do I care. The object was for the replacement to come in already under suspicion/pressure (such as it was) and see how they reacted (if at all).In post 323, Yates wrote:I didn't make the allegation - I don't have the burden of proof. That said, I think I've only played with BB 3 or 4 times and I'm pretty sure he's never replaced out [not that I can find, anyway]. Why this strikes me as particularly shitty is because you are basically accusing him of dishonorable play. You'd think he would have a reputation for it if it were actually true.
If I truly thought BBMolla replaced out as scum BECAUSE he was scum, I would keep that secret and bust him/his slot in every game.
But, good to see the passion.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Why do you think it is a fake scum claim?In post 323, Yates wrote:
I gave my thoughts on that...In post 223, PeregrineV wrote:Someone claimed scum. Thoughts on that.In post 217, Yates wrote:[@ThAd] I hate the fake scum claim as much as a self vote. I think you are overstating how scummy it is - since we were both in a game where Town did this - but it is annoying and frustrating and can be difficult to see past. Perfectly acceptable reason for an RVS vote. Not a great point to build a case on, though.
A self-vote is different.
If he had self-voted with the claim, then a little suspicious, but hahaha-not funny-moving on.
If he had not claimed but self-voted anyway, a little suspicious, but ok-what about the thread-moving on.
Since then, I watch the follow-up posting for signs of scum-claim followup or town posting, since any of that can alleviate the above crappy RVS.
I have, so far, found none of it. Point it out if you have.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I don't want to fight about this, but what is a "good" (as opposed to poor) reaction to a day one scum claim?In post 330, Zdenek wrote:Nope. I contend that a bunch of people reacted poorly to a day one scum claim.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I just want to point out here that he has succeeded in avoiding attention. He has one vote (mine) and 9000 people townreading him.In post 399, DeasVail wrote:Bjc townread
I believe there is more credit to the townreads based on his first post than some people think. Actually consider it.
Scum generally want to avoid attention. This already makes his post quite undesirable for scum, and I think that someone fairly new (as bjc seems to be) would be especially hesitant to do something so potentially controversial. The other scum option is to attract attention, and use it to create early townreads on oneself (e.g. by claiming scum and then making it clear it was a reaction test and 'scumhunting' from it). However, the posts that follow his 'scumclaim' seem to suggest that he isn't trying to look good, but at the same time, the fact that he actually scumhunts from it leads me to conclude that he's genuinely scumhunting while not being showy about it as I feel scum would be.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
It has been a trend, but not really an issue unless the "dayvigged" person dies.In post 407, Mister Rogers wrote:Anyone else think "scum dayvig" here?
I put the Chemist response up to not knowing the dayvig mechanics, so technically it looks town. But that's a dumb reason, and the whole thing *could* be orchestrated.
So, my take on the ENTIRE DAYVIG scenario:
Creates a null-read on Zdenek (as in, it does not affect how I read him either way).
Creates a null-read on Chemist (as in, it does not affect how I read him either way).I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 448, AngryPidgeon wrote:Ok, so the issue with bjc claiming scum is that all the conversation about it has been pretty fucking pointless.In post 449, pisskop wrote:No the issue is he's bjc and we cant judge him on that alone.
82 is the only post of actual substance on bjc.
And its a towny post.In post 229, PeregrineV wrote:[post=Why bjc?]Why bjc?[/post]
He claimed scum with his first post. Maybe to distract from that very fact, maybe to assuage his guilt over the fact.
Maybe he's town and he's trying to catch scum.
For everyone assuming he's town trying to catch scum, analyze the total sum of his followup to his scum claim.
Then analyze the total sum of the rest of his play. Explain how it is town.
Use charts, graphs, links, etc. Use his own words and yours.
TIA.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Welcome, and thank you to the replacers.
I dislike the fact that both of you used post-by-post to catch up, but I'll probably get over it.
Right now, AP is looking the townier of the two of you. Seems like you would compare notes in thread while catching up, but that didn't seem to happen until 450.
Quantity v quality
Everyone thinking lurkers should not be lynched, I want to point out that Yates has 6 posts, and town-bjc has 8. I will contend that Yates 6 posts have more content and scumhunting that town-bjc's 8 posts.
I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 335, pisskop wrote: also, for a player who says this:
And then doesn't meta Luca.In post 118, Damon_Gant wrote:Mastin's play continues to be very bleh. Giving garbage reads, and now trying to spoonfeed us what his meta is. That's not going to work - when I have time tonight I'll be looking at Mastin's meta for myself. It does need doing, because of the unorthodox playstyle - but I'm not going to be told by the player himself what his meta is, and essentially that his meta this game corresponds with his meta for town.My experience with Luca is as a lurker/very unhelpful player until laterand additionally there are better fish in the sea to eyeball.
Wow, it's like two people are reading the same thing and have entirely different opinions.In post 466, Damon_Gant wrote:Checked Luca's meta - Luca pretty much doesn't have a meta, with as far as I could see, only 1 finished game to speak of. None of Luca's posts from that one game read as scummy as the one post Luca has here. I reiterate - I'm happy with my vote.
@Damon- Do you agree/disagree with the bolded Pisskop statement?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Am I on the sideline? I think I've been pretty clear. And you are just as clearly agreeing with me while chastising me about it.In post 511, Mister Rogers wrote:Too tired must sleep.
The one thing that is burning in my mind is:
Pere should not be allowed to sideline, posting helpful read guidelines & screaming about BJC. This without actual scum hunting is scummy.
PEDIT: @ZD -- I want to puke.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I do sort of do that, but if I engage in things that don't interest me, then it's probably fake. Maybe a judgment thing that comes with experience.In post 514, AngryPidgeon wrote:Hes engaging in things that are interesting to him (imo)I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
First read was kind of glad, although I didn't clikcback everything.In post 518, Yates wrote:Fair enough. I kinda like it, actually. What do you think about pisskop's replace in?
But then I looked more closely, and a lot of extraneous crap was thrown in where it probably didn't need to be. I've both seen and used post-by-post posting as scum and as town, so now I tend to look for a more conclusive summary or salient points raised in the PBP. I didn't really see that with Pisskop. I did see it more with Angry.
Right now I have him as a scum lean, and like some of the votes he has so far.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Same here. And it makes my laugh and cry at the same time.In post 520, ThAdmiral wrote:Yeah I think next time I'm scum I'm going to claim scum at the start of the game and then just ride the townread wave all the way to victory.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 533, talah wrote:
I feel like Larry David here.In post 504, Mister Rogers wrote:
Ya I mean holy crap unless we decide we are going to wagon these prod dodgers to lynch unless they contribute. Odds are there is scum in that lurker list (if you count ALL of the lurkers) but its really a crap shoot.In post 495, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Pisskop? Did I miss something specific?In post 494, Mister Rogers wrote:I think the PK issue needs addressing though.
Do you think aptil votes are just as useless/bad as luca votes? I mean I guess aptil has slightly more content, but I see a slew of people voting both of these players who, imo, are lurking and nullville.
But its not like the wagon will be helpful because its on a lurker and our D2 will lack a beneficial wagon to analyze.
Aptil is not any better than Luca.
We should be able to do better than a crap shoot and I bet we have better odds in the lurker voters.
"Can't vote the LURKERS, oh no, don't vote the LURKERS, the LURKERS are SACRED, no voting the LURKERS"
That's just horseshit. How do you propose that lurkers *ever* get read, then? Cover our ears with our hands, look elsewhere, and hope they work it out between themselves in a few game days?
No - you wagon lurkers and if they refuse to provide content and opinions you lynch the living shit out of them.
And you do it *early* so it doesn't become an emergency deadline lynch and so there's time to think clearly about what's occurring.
Sure you will. No pressure from us.In post 481, aptil wrote:Will finish work and get to this today .
No worries mate. Take it easy, you've got a free ride into Day 2 if Rogers has anything to do with it.In post 287, Luca Blight wrote:Apologies for my lack of activity thus far, I will commit a bit of time later to going through this thread and will post my reads then.In post 534, talah wrote:Actually Luca's a much better vote than aptil. There's that scum-cerity where he's expressing that he's sorry he can't post (because making a scum post he's happy with is so draining and unsatisfying). I've known the feeling.
VOTE: Luca
Talah,In post 536, talah wrote:Why not Luca then? He's due for a prod if he doesn't post and I saw him logged in yesterday where he didn't bother posting. You should be asking pisskop (or potentially aptil if you want double the value given aptil is more likely scum) about bjc if you haven't played with him before.
Luca kind of randomly called out bjc as something to say in RVS so it's not so likely that bjc is scum if Luca is, but is says pretty much nothing about Luca if bjc's scum. If you're considering one or the other on a coinflip, Luca's your man.
(I'll just gloss over the fact you voted me for essentially advocating wagonning lurkers and seem to be as switchy as a diode in your opinions... )
Can't help but notice your distinct lack of mentioning bjc at all in a post about lurkers. Nor about his attitude about the pressure being applied to him. Nor about the fact he finally posted.
Please help me to understand.
Sincerely,
~PI will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
If BJC is lynched, then Nero will probably be vigged.In post 537, RachMarie wrote:Still working on getting in this game, but one thing I DO know about Nero is he is far more active as town and lurks a lot as scum, he has even admitted this to people.
I want to see more from you Nero.
Also feeling better about Pere.
VOTE: NeroI will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Nah, but he is the most obvious, and it'll be informative to match townreads to his scumflip.In post 538, Mister Rogers wrote:I just noted you you did that. The reason I am voting for you is a lackluster approach to scum suspects & a bizarre cog-dis in your approach to the game. It just appears like you are trying to skate through by simply commenting combined with a "lynch me or lump it" attitude.
With that being said, I don't like how ZD is being so mysterious with his reads either. Pere's ISO reads: BJC is the entire scum team, you all are town and everyone else bleh.
[/quote]I got a couple of town reads lurking like Snow & Matt too.[/quote] I'd put both at null-scum.
[/quote]Luca fencesat BJC, he didn't call him out. He town postured the issue which is like barfable but at least he's not saying "I'm lurking deliberately".[/quote] I'd vote Luca too.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
EBWOP:
Nah, but he is the most obvious, and it'll be informative to match townreads to his scumflip.In post 538, Mister Rogers wrote:I just noted you you did that. The reason I am voting for you is a lackluster approach to scum suspects & a bizarre cog-dis in your approach to the game. It just appears like you are trying to skate through by simply commenting combined with a "lynch me or lump it" attitude.
With that being said, I don't like how ZD is being so mysterious with his reads either. Pere's ISO reads: BJC is the entire scum team, you all are town and everyone else bleh.
I'd put both at null-scum.I got a couple of town reads lurking like Snow & Matt too.
I'd vote Luca too.Luca fencesat BJC, he didn't call him out. He town postured the issue which is like barfable but at least he's not saying "I'm lurking deliberately".I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Scummy lurkers.In post 552, AngryPidgeon wrote:
-Shrug-, I prefer to vote actually scummy people and either investigate lurkers or have them replaced by someone who WILL contribute.In post 542, Damon_Gant wrote:Oh, and I definitely agree with this post by talah.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I'd rather have you harassing me to think all game than just ignoring me.In post 571, Mister Rogers wrote:
C'mon, He didn't start this game out lurking AND being defiant about it.In post 562, PeregrineV wrote:
Am I on the sideline? I think I've been pretty clear. And you are just as clearly agreeing with me while chastising me about it.In post 511, Mister Rogers wrote:Too tired must sleep.
The one thing that is burning in my mind is:
Pere should not be allowed to sideline, posting helpful read guidelines & screaming about BJC. This without actual scum hunting is scummy.
PEDIT: @ZD -- I want to puke.
Most people have a wait and see attitude regarding your play but well that thought was literally burning in my mind.
And I've found that my earlier reads are better than my later ones.
Angry suggested Gears of War Mafia.
Subject: Gears of War Mafia - ( Game Over! )
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4798959PeregrineV wrote:
So you don't like meta cases, which are mostly completely subjective anyway, and, in addition, bork's meta case feels "off"? Like, he shouldn't be able to produce it, or he produced it badly, or he's wrong, or you want him to think he's wrong?In post 92, Knight of Cydonia wrote:That seems kinda a reach for this early in a game... I don't even particularly like meta cases at any point in a game, but this early just feels somewhat off.
@Angelius: have both heads posted, or is this just Arc/just Nero so far?
Vote:Knight of Cydonia
Super extra lynch vote:Majiffy
My early read was on scum (he talked me down from it enough to unvote) and my townreads where extraordinarily (for me) high.PeregrineV wrote:Lost me post from here earlier.
In summary:
Town
1. Colonel Guile ( Uberninja/guille2015 hydra )
5. Angelious Nero ( Nero Cain/ArcAngel9 hydra )
6. PirateCat ( Pirate Mollie/Malakittens hydra )
8. Majiffy
9. AngryPidgeon
10. The Goat
15. Jal
17. mastin2
Not so much:
The Rest
Later in the game I started seeing things not there, and half-pushing weak cases on scum so that they never got lynched.
So, I'm going to stick to an early scumread this time unless the scum himself can convince me otherwise.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
They are all over now, but I had a period where 6 of my 7 games at the time I was scum. Vapid would have been an understatement to describe my overall play, including the one where I was town.In post 576, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Someone in this game used the word "vapid" to describe your scumgame. I sort of agree, no offense to your scum game . I think you just wear your town-cards on your sleeve if that makes sense. Its hard to fake genuine interest. Mastin is kind of similar, but mastin spins things actively and mimics meta well as scum so you have to peel the onion to get to the stinky center first.In post 563, PeregrineV wrote:
I do sort of do that, but if I engage in things that don't interest me, then it's probably fake. Maybe a judgment thing that comes with experience.In post 514, AngryPidgeon wrote:Hes engaging in things that are interesting to him (imo)
That Talah is actually scumreading Luca over non-posting is worrisome. The distinction with which he assigns reads to lurkers is inscrutable and scummy.In post 566, PeregrineV wrote:Talah,
Can't help but notice your distinct lack of mentioning bjc at all in a post about lurkers. Nor about his attitude about the pressure being applied to him. Nor about the fact he finally posted.
Please help me to understand.
No one ever said anything about info? BJC is actively refusing to post anything readable which is anti-town at best, scummy at worst.In post 568, projectmatt wrote:Tell me some of the good info we'll get from his lynch.
I would vote Matt before most other lurkers. I skimmed his ISO at one point and it felt a little uninspired?
Awesome, and the Luca and aptil wagons are better alternatives or are you just defending people randomly?In post 573, projectmatt wrote:Anyway, I don't like the wagon on BJC at all. No, claiming mafia is not objectively a towntell or anything but the way I see it, it looks like he got put as an easy target pretty early in the game and the amount of people jumping on something that is absolutely not a tell at all makes me worried.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
It's off-topic, but sure.In post 582, Mister Rogers wrote:In post 9, PeregrineV wrote:Vote: ThaD
You haven't posted in the neighborhood QT yet. What's up with that?
I mean I kind of just stumbled onto this but its really kind of bizarre how this all went down and you both end up taking the exact same tact. Is there any explanation for this?In post 24, ThAdmiral wrote:
Lolz, I'll get on thatIn post 9, PeregrineV wrote:Vote: ThaD
You haven't posted in the neighborhood QT yet. What's up with that?
In other news I like being out of rvs within 3 live posts. While its sort of forced (what super early day 1 case stuff isn't) I still like rogers better for it.
Lemme guess: "reaction testing"?In post 21, bjc wrote:I'm scum.
vote: bjc
There you go, now you can call me scum for "taking the bait".
Spoiler:I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I get that alot.In post 581, Mister Rogers wrote:
LOL. I mean I just don't get this. I mean seriously, I think right now you fit a scum profile better than he does.In post 578, PeregrineV wrote: So,I'm going to stick to an early scumreadthis time unless the scum himself can convince me otherwise.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
His vote and accusation are his way of asking you about it maybe. And calling him out for NOT asking about it gets less mileage, since if you know that's the topic you can give your reasoning without prodding.In post 591, pisskop wrote:1) Lets look at why ZD is voting me.
In post 496, Zdenek wrote:
[quotes post 433]
LOLZ
Unvote
Vote: pisskop
Poorly explained.
And then this:
In post 525, Zdenek wrote:
I figure Pisskop isn't talking about his Talah read because he's scum and he's hoping no one will notice his shifting read on the slot.
I'm not talking about my talah read because nobody is asking about it. And when I call it out he sits back and instead of elaboration let's you swoop in.
His reason for voting me is weak, and his support poor and wifomy. Yea Im going to discredit a weak vote for arbitrary reasons. If he wanted discussion on my reads he would ask about them.
Yeah, annoying as shit, huh?2) No, I'm pointing out that if he thought I was scum he would make a case or at least point them out. He hasn't done any of it, because he isn't hunting for scum. What makes his vote valid? There's no genuine effort in it.
Another Luca situation. Check 2 town-Zdenek games and 2-scum Zdenek games and you might get have your answer.3) rather than address me directly he takes a path of ignoring me. He still hasn't directly talked to me. I don't care that he used your post to vote me, I'm noting that he is making a deliberate attempt to avoid directly addressing me. Is this a style of his?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
My bjc read is not based on ThAd, although I liked his reaction and found it town. And I liked his reaction to bjc's reaction- I also found it town.In post 594, Mister Rogers wrote:@Pere: Why are you tunneling BJC when Thad has moved on?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Curious as to how you are going to resolve the argument of meta between the two when, between the two, it's entirely subjective.In post 599, 4nxi3ty wrote:Talah/Mastin Meta Dispute: instinct: when it comes to meta, ime, there's usually at least one scum involved. Either from the two fighting over meta or the person that steps in and defends/attacks one of the others - haven't parsed through this, thought it should be noted anyway.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
Activescum- posters are easier to catch as scum later. Pless-mod is on top of prods, etc., so lurkers will most likely be replaced. Scummy lurkers should be hung/vigged. Town lurkers should nut it up and get in here anyway.In post 607, Mister Rogers wrote:@Pere: Your organizational skills. Are we going to pressure a lurker or are we going to lynch an active poster. At this point its becoming concerning because deadline is approaching and I don't think we can afford to waffle about. Scum I think would love a divided town to waste more time towards the deadline.
I would rather lynch bjc, but would consider Luca, maybe Aptil, maybe Snow. Probably not 4nxiety or DV or BiPolar out of the low posters.
Out of the high posters, cases require more validity. Only ones I'd really consider at this point are talah and pisskop.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
bjc has responded. ISO him and base your townread on what he has said, if you could be so kind.In post 629, projectmatt wrote:I feel as though there's been a pretty clear misinterpretation on what I've said versus what you guys are trying to make it look like I'm saying.
Can lurkers be scum?
Absolutely.
If someone is lurking, does this mean they are scum?
No.
Currently, the way I see it - there is no logical justification to vote BJC other than for the idea of a liability lynch (which I disagree with strongly) or because he is lurking. Lynching someone solely on the basis of lurking is not a good idea. I am not, nor have I ever implied that because certain people (like Aptil!) are lurking, that they are town. This shouldn't be hard logic to follow, thank you.
And in terms of the bigger fish I mean that literally as I have indicated, I think that BJC is very likely to be town and therearebetter things to do than vote someone out of policy. As for the mafia? Dunno, I'm working on it.
Also, look at the votes on him and why. Is anyone, in your opinion, voting him "solely for lurking"?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
You think Aptil scumtold in 36?In post 630, projectmatt wrote:And to be clear, "lynch all lurkers" is a horrible strategy, in my opinion. I think that in this case the lurker I'm voting has scumtold, which is me lynching somebody for scumtelling and not for lurking.
Talk me through it like I'm 6.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 633, projectmatt wrote:In post 573, projectmatt wrote:Anyway, I don't like the wagon on BJC at all. No, claiming mafia is not objectively a towntell or anything but the way I see it, it looks like he got put as an easy target pretty early in the game and the amount of people jumping on something that is absolutely not a tell at all makes me worried. You can say that BJC is scum for not contributing but of course that fails to account for your reads on literally 40% of the other players who are also not contributing. I might be off the mark here, but there's usually a player like BJC in every large normal game that's, well,lynchbait. However, this doesn't make them mafia.
OK, then go beyond "his reaction to people voting him for claiming scum".
is the basis for my townread along with me feeling that his tone and reaction to getting pushed on was a fairly natural way of reacting that I read as town. To me, voting BJC for the reasoning of saying "I'm scum" on page 1 is fairly ridiculous, and I have failed to see any other logical case towards BJC, which leads me to believe that he's either being lynched for liability purposes or because he is currently lurking. In Mr. Rodgers case, it appears to be both. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'll give you those additional posts.In post 521, bjc wrote:
And you're a moron.In post 517, pisskop wrote: I think I agree with this.
You're a terrible person.
List why you think this.
I also have no clue why you're calling me a terrible person.
No... Not at all.In post 518, Yates wrote:
VOTE: bjcIn post 516, bjc wrote:I think I agree with this.
@bjc- Is voting for you the only way to extract content?
Are you voting me because you think I'm scummy or just to be stupid?In post 527, bjc wrote:Well, I did claim my role before getting voted on so there's that.
And lol at that fucking question. I claimed scum and drew like three votes pretty quickly. So of course the content generated after that was in response to being voted on. Le'sigh.In post 530, bjc wrote:And if I'm content with lurking?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
EBWOP:
OK, then go beyond "his reaction to people voting him for claiming scum".In post 633, projectmatt wrote:In post 573, projectmatt wrote:Anyway, I don't like the wagon on BJC at all. No, claiming mafia is not objectively a towntell or anything but the way I see it, it looks like he got put as an easy target pretty early in the game and the amount of people jumping on something that is absolutely not a tell at all makes me worried. You can say that BJC is scum for not contributing but of course that fails to account for your reads on literally 40% of the other players who are also not contributing. I might be off the mark here, but there's usually a player like BJC in every large normal game that's, well,lynchbait. However, this doesn't make them mafia.
is the basis for my townread along with me feeling that his tone and reaction to getting pushed on was a fairly natural way of reacting that I read as town. To me, voting BJC for the reasoning of saying "I'm scum" on page 1 is fairly ridiculous, and I have failed to see any other logical case towards BJC, which leads me to believe that he's either being lynched for liability purposes or because he is currently lurking. In Mr. Rodgers case, it appears to be both. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I'll give you those additional posts.In post 521, bjc wrote:
And you're a moron.In post 517, pisskop wrote: I think I agree with this.
You're a terrible person.
List why you think this.
I also have no clue why you're calling me a terrible person.
No... Not at all.In post 518, Yates wrote:
VOTE: bjcIn post 516, bjc wrote:I think I agree with this.
@bjc- Is voting for you the only way to extract content?
Are you voting me because you think I'm scummy or just to be stupid?In post 527, bjc wrote:Well, I did claim my role before getting voted on so there's that.
And lol at that fucking question. I claimed scum and drew like three votes pretty quickly. So of course the content generated after that was in response to being voted on. Le'sigh.In post 530, bjc wrote:And if I'm content with lurking?I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
So he shouldn't be lynched for failing to scumhunt?In post 649, projectmatt wrote:
1. How do you make the distinction between "intentionally" lurking and "simply" lurking? Those two seem like they are exactly the same thing. Bjc is just honest about his own apathy.In post 636, Mister Rogers wrote:@Matt: Yes you are wrong on your assertion as to why I am voting BJC. It is because he is deliberately lurking (as opposed to Aptil who is simply lurking) and because of the bizarre attention that he got for his simple "I'm scum" post.
I think moar people should be voting him.
2. The second reason you listed is, to me, a very good reason why you should not be voting him and instead be focusing on the people who bizarrely attacked him.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends. - PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV