overstating a tad hereIn post 11, Mister Rogers wrote:That's even more scumtastic.
Obfuscation is now added to the lack of sincerity.
post 20 logic's got an overexplainy vibe
hyperagressive scum? shrug, too early to tell.
overstating a tad hereIn post 11, Mister Rogers wrote:That's even more scumtastic.
Obfuscation is now added to the lack of sincerity.
Should I be holding my vote back?In post 91, ThAdmiral wrote:"Too early to tell" but you'll vote him anyway?
pretty sure it's not spoonfeeding when talah brings up mastin's meta and he responds in kind - if the meta was brought up unprompted, you might have a point. Which reads were garbage and why?In post 118, Damon_Gant wrote:Giving garbage reads, and now trying to spoonfeed us what his meta is.
this isn't his first rodeoIn post 143, ThAdmiral wrote:Damon gant - There's something about the way he posts that screams slightly-inexperienced town.
The Doc read would be my preference of focus, mainly how it compares to mastin's garbage read.In post 138, Damon_Gant wrote:I will elaborate on my reads of talah, Doc and Luca tomorrow as requested.
read again plz. I'm not calling Mastin's read garbage. I was referring to how Gant called the reads garbage and challenging him to compare cause I see nothing scummy about the way mastin presented his docread. Also I wanted to shift focus to doc over talah cause I am leaning town on talah and Doc is null for me, and Luca is more involved with the conversation with his vote on doc.In post 187, Zdenek wrote:Anyway, what I don't like about 4nx's post is that he both Mastin and Gant are scum reading Doc, 4nx is interested in Gant's scum read, calls Mastin's read garbage. The only way this makes any sense is if Anx is town reading Doc, but as far as I can tell he doesn't have a read on him.
yes, that's the point, it's the opposite. What's the motivation for someone to leave room for a read to be town, i.e. less credit for a lynch? Compared to leaving the door open for suspicion, i.e. giving credit to lynch while defending against it? And I never showed any doubt with my DG read.In post 205, Mister Rogers wrote:Ahem. But didn't you do this with both myself AND DG but at the opposite of the spectrum? O_oIn post 163, 4nxi3ty wrote:Although I would be up for wagoning Luca, not for Luca's solitary Doc vote (that's null), for defending bjcwhile leaving room for doubtwith "but it could be some sort of ridiculous buff"
That's assuming I would actually need the wiggle room that early in the game, when it is impossible to tell which lynch will go through or who is likely to be NK'ed.In post 215, Mister Rogers wrote:Are you seriously asking this question? How about Player A as scum knows Player B is town but wants some wiggle room in case the lynch goes through or the player is NK'ed?
ORLY? The term "vote parking" means a temporary place to put your vote until later. The word "until" indicates a time in which your vote will no longer be on DG and "more people enter the game" is a clear condition for when your vote will move.
-__- no need to get sassy with me, I already get where your coming from.In post 216, Mister Rogers wrote:How about I "park" my vote here until I am done with my analysis post?
Vote Anxiety
Notice how temporary it feels and like how it lacks force?
The thing is I've parked in a bad part of town and I have alot of typing to do and so I might just return to the car and find it up on blocks... (WELP)
In post 283, Mister Rogers wrote:@Anx: What prompted you to change your mind on DG?
I liked post 202, the overall tone, there's no panic in it despite being the largest wagon. He had his own individual take on Luca rather than solely agreeing with my previous reasoning. And the way he described his talah and doc read felt really genuine.In post 288, projectmatt wrote:Why?
nah I was saying that it looks like Luca is whiteknighting for cred but still wants the wagon to stay, ergo "but it could be some sort of ridiculous bluff"In post 372, AngryPidgeon wrote:I think Anxiety is saying that Luca could be defending a scum buddy but trying to leave wiggle room should he flip? I just reread that like 5 times and Im still scratching my head.In post 367, talah wrote:Where does credit for a lynch factor in here?
not true. Sure I'm not doing what the majority is doing (flooding the thread with quote stripes and readslist), but I'm still throwing ideas out there and interacting with multiple people.In post 358, ThAdmiral wrote:It's probably, you know, his lack of content.
nah, I'll leave that for later. Rather have mastin around before getting into that shit. Perfectly fine as a loose end, someone else can pick it up maybe, or I can if I'm still around.In post 734, Damon_Gant wrote:Well who is the scum here then? If he believes that there is nearly always a scum involved with meta talks then surely this should be top priority line of inquiry for him.
story of my life this game: be honest about my uncertainty->get accused of leaving my options open.Not sure how you feel? What does that even mean? It looks like he's just keeping it open to use this against DV later if he feels like it.
it sortish in the tone when he attacks damon, like he is building towards a lynch. This phrase is a good example about what I'm getting at: "So you're knowingly basing your vote on bad logic."In post 791, PeregrineV wrote:Snow reads as town based on postings so far. I disagree with his bjc opinion, but like his posting.
In post 73, SnowStorm wrote:I like Mr. Rogers. I agree with him on Doc and his wagon-happiness; and on 4nxi3ty and his unconvinced votes, they're easy to backtrack and pretty much pointless.
also, why does Luca's wagon-happiness not show up on his radar?In post 122, SnowStorm wrote:I kinda like bjc's #82. I like the tone and his points against Doc and Peregrine.
you're not comfortable posting reads til you catchup, but you are comfortable placing a vote?In post 670, Luca Blight wrote:I have been terribly busy recently which is the reason for my lack of posting, I have a day off tomorrow so will try and catch up then. It wouldn't feel right to post reads without having given the thread my full attention.
You don't really need to modify your posting. Your attitude is perfectly fine. Only the amount.In post 1298, Mister Rogers wrote:I have been officially asked by two people to modify my posting and criticized by two others. Out of courtesy I will do so.
about what?In post 1568, Snork wrote:Let's chat.
[/quote]In post 1573, talah wrote:This I agree with. It's going to degenerate into a clusterfuck no information probably-town lynch if we start flashwagonning.
iirc you just hammered <.< one updated townread and scumread from you before thread is locked would be niceIn post 1740, aptil wrote:Thats for day 2 .In post 1739, 4nxi3ty wrote:not til you share which people have meaningful interactions with talah and/or more thoughts on others.
VOTE: Luca . Finish the day please .
Never had a chance to go back. By the time I got back to thread Luca was already at L-1 and I wasn't going to hammer until I got something outta aptil, and possibly mastin.In post 1810, Snork wrote:Also, 4nxi3ty saying he much preferred the Luca wagon, but voting Talah as a "compromise" and then never going back to Luca, despite that being his preferred lynch is rather strange.
that is the point, scum usually take the time to make sure their attacks line up. Obviously he could fake it, or was just being realllly lazyscum. But the whole exchange read genuine to me.In post 1814, AngryPidgeon wrote:Really? I dont see how making a point on someone and then taking it back because its provably wrong is a town tell?In post 1813, 4nxi3ty wrote:(snork might be town for the "oops nvm you posted that today" - showed a genuine reaction imo along with taking time to look at a player and going back to look at the context)
In post 1074, SnowStorm wrote:As for 4nxiety, I have mixed feelings.
In post 1087, SnowStorm wrote:I just can see him go either way. I like that he seems to have his own opinions and I like that he seems honest about them (like when he says he's not very confident), on the other hand, I don't really agree with said opinions and I could see his honesty coming from scum who's not confident in them because he knows they're fabricated.
The way I feel about talah is similar to the way I feel about 4nxi3ty, only with 100% more chaos. And while I wouldn't like to lynch 4nx today, I wouldn't really mind a talah lynch.
also wondering if snowstorm is currently bussing thad.In post 1120, SnowStorm wrote:I didn't like the Luca wagon and the players on it. I didn't like the 4nxi3ty wagon and the players on it. Then we have Luca and 4nx on each-other's wagons. What that means? IDK, but I don't like it.
In post 1483, SnowStorm wrote:Let's do it.In post 1479, Snork wrote:ThAd lynch would be good too, imo.
Vote: ThAdmiral.
This is not what I am saying at all. I'm saying you are preparing false leads incase you flip. No where do I even remotely mention you're doing this to look town, that would be silly.In post 1948, SnowStorm wrote: That if I was scum I would be using wishy-washy reads to tie myself to him as a mean to look town?
Yes I do think your post is a strong association tell yet that doesn't exactly change my read on ThAd, it is still weak.He doesn't think both ThAd and me are scum, that's the point. He's accusing me of "totally bussing" someone whom he doesn't have a scum read on.
I kept going back and forth on your posting D1, which is why I never brought anything up besides "guts undecided". D2 I expected you to pick up where you left off so your switch to Rach weirds me out. Mastin's comments does potentially make you town, only if Mastin is scum though. But I am not certain Mastin is scum or that all three of us were paint jobs. Basically I have a very weak scumread on you independently while I think a snowstorm scumflip makes you look worse and a mastin scumflip makes you look better.In post 1932, ThAdmiral wrote:Wait what? Since when have you had me as scum?
In fact I thought you recently implied I was town with:
So wait: you felt better about me when I waspushing for your lynch, rather than when I started pushing for someone else's?
after Roger's replace I decided to give that slot a clean slate and not let my own biases affect it. So far I haven't seen anything scummy from penguin and actually like the tone in her posts.In post 1998, Egg wrote: 4n, reads on penguin and Deas
. . . . (would like to see a thought process instead of just quoting a post and calling it scummy)In post 1813, 4nxi3ty wrote:Mastin, still waiting for you to further explain your scumread
hmm? talk to me. You've seen my scumgame, so what's up?
I see towneffort throughout his posts.
-On 4nxi3ty
He's logical, and I've seen him before, but something about his posts unsettle me. Watching.
I believe you meant to type PeregrineV. Well I wasn't calling PV out as much as I was bringing up history to get a better read on PV. And it's not like pisskop and PV have the same experience with my meta.TheWay wrote:For example, claiming that you make playstyle changes between games after calling Mastin out because "shes seen your scum game" feels really disingenuous back to back.
cuz I'm not talah and have my own opinions of people. Tho I should be open to considering the reads of dead players, true.DV wrote:4nx, why are you not considering talah's townread of me, considering that he was the one that mentioned crossed t's and dotted i's being a scumtell of mine in the first place?
It does too! Less about talah's actual view and more about your reaction to talah bringing up meta.In post 2125, DeasVail wrote:You are using talah's view of my scum-meta though, so this doesn't quite cut it!
Nope, Penguin is not a non-read; started with a scumread on Roger, changed my mind, changed back, then I don't what the hell to think with the replace out. So gave penguin a clean slate and leaning town atm.In post 2133, Egg wrote: So Penguin is a non-read because your previous read on the slot is considered a "bias" to you? No. If Roger was scummy, that's scum points against the slot. And there's no reason for Deas to be a non-read. I don't like this response.
well you stick to your "content" and I'll stick to my "feelings"(I ain't afraid to have them >.<)In post 2143, PeregrineV wrote:I'm not talking feelings. I'm talking content-wise.
posts 335, 338, 350, 410, 424, 437, 465, 476 all look like towneffort. And pisskop doesn't hesitate to attack people or speak his mind. I'm surprised people thought pisskop was scummy.In post 2178, PeregrineV wrote:@Anx-Use your feelings. Keep them, cherish them. Then go look at actual content. And let me know what you see.
this is an incredibly silly reason not to vote someone you want to voteIn post 2191, PeregrineV wrote:Want to vote Mastin, but don't like 4nxiety on there.....
felt the reasoning for those votes were fairly weak and wanted to poke him on it and maybe get a reaction from him on you.In post 2246, mastin2 wrote:Define interesting.In post 2155, 4nxi3ty wrote:btw, so you know, I think your hops on luca, rach, and snowstorm areinterestingalong with mastin's scumread of you.
the way you talk about me paints a different pictureIn post 2252, mastin2 wrote:the strength of my read wavers from post to post?
skim pisskop's ISO and give me a quickread, plz and ty.
In post 695, projectmatt wrote:Yate's analysis is so completely fake and devoid of substance that it hurts.