That said... what is this?
Does BBMollaIn post 39, PeregrineV wrote:Would also throw a vote BBMolla's way for scum-placing out.
VOTE: PeregrineV
Does BBMollaIn post 39, PeregrineV wrote:Would also throw a vote BBMolla's way for scum-placing out.
Mastin in post 15 stood out enough that I took note of it as well. And I guess Deas in your opening post but that one was a little less eggregious. I don't find this alignment indicative at this point but it's certainly an interaction worth pointing out in the event either of you flips scum.In post 87, talah wrote:1) What allies did I call for?
Worst proposal ever? Not sure. AtIn post 90, mastin2 wrote:I have a proposal: larges these days have exploded in length. I am proposing we limit posts per person to be five a day, to see if we can get the shortest recent large game.
I agree. I hate the fake scum claim as much as a self vote. I think you are overstating how scummy it is - since we were both in a game where Town did this - but it is annoying and frustrating and can be difficult to see past. Perfectly acceptable reason for an RVS vote. Not a great point to build a case on, though.In post 91, ThAdmiral wrote:I just hate this sort of behaviour. And then he follows it up with "It's just a joke, sheesh" acting all surprised people are jumping on him after he claimed scum.
Serious question; did I ever tell you this isIn post 114, mastin2 wrote:Seriously, every scum win of mine is through creating a narrative, painting the picture that I want it to. No, I am most certainly NOT a good orator as town, because I don't have the whole picture.
Yup. As stated in note 4, it's annoying but totally null. At least ThAd seems to be a little more focused on theIn post 122, SnowStorm wrote:Damon is ignoring everything that's happened in the game so far to focus on something alignment irrelevant
I'm leaning in this direction as well.In post 133, projectmatt wrote:I think that Mister Rodgers is town. There's opportunistic scum and then there's the kind of town who plays on the offensive, "I want to win so badly!' mode.
I was going to say "buddying is probably the right word," but I double-checked Z's ISO. Literally a 3 post in a row chainsaw defense, something random, then another chainsaw.In post 140, ThAdmiral wrote:Maybe white-knighting isn't the right term. Chainsaw defending?
This is yucky. I'm pretty sure I've seen scum pretend to be confused about a Town read on their slot in MOST of the games I've played in. How many games have you played here?In post 151, BipolarChemist wrote:Rach made posts questioning why someone else thought she was town. I think that's pretty town, as I don't see scum questioning that.
ThAd
Gant??In post 201, ThAdmiral wrote:Ok I take back everything I said about zdenek. The fake-vig was golden. bipolar is now basically conf-town, that reaction doesn't look fake at all.
What's weird is that I haven't been reading Zdenek as scum, yet I can't shake the feeling that the fake vig shot interaction looks super contrived. That bjc chainsaw defense is also standing out in a vacuum.In post 204, Damon_Gant wrote:Also, I like the fake vig - a lot.
How "forceful" do you expect a day 1 vote to be? Would I not be allowed to change my mind on Pere if he comes in and Towns up his response to my question? I read the same post you did. It didn't strike me as particularly scummy.In post 216, Mister Rogers wrote:Notice how temporary it feels and like how it lacks force?
I didn't make the allegation - I don't have the burden of proof. That said, I think I've only played with BB 3 or 4 times and I'm pretty sure he's never replaced out [not that I can find, anyway]. Why this strikes me as particularly shitty is because you are basically accusing him of dishonorable play. You'd think he would have a reputation for it if it were actually true.In post 223, PeregrineV wrote:I'll say yes and let you prove otherwise.
I gave my thoughts on that...In post 223, PeregrineV wrote:Someone claimed scum. Thoughts on that.
In post 217, Yates wrote:[@ThAd] I hate the fake scum claim as much as a self vote. I think you are overstating how scummy it is - since we were both in a game where Town did this - but it is annoying and frustrating and can be difficult to see past. Perfectly acceptable reason for an RVS vote. Not a great point to build a case on, though.
Everything? The timing makes it look orchestrated.In post 231, Zdenek wrote:What does the time frame have to do with it?In post 217, Yates wrote:This all happened in the span of like 15 minutes. This actually looks organic to some of you???
What? Why do you think there are at least three people asking you how you jumped to these conclusions? I wasn't even aware of the chainsaw until I went to correct ThAd, looked at your ISO, and realized you called EVERYONE that called bjc scum scum. I absolutely agree with Pere here:In post 242, Zdenek wrote:Your thought progression here makes no sense to me at all.
In other words, you need to be Town reading bjc pretty hard to assume anyone calling him scum is scum. And this is something I pointed out to you and asked you about.In post 238, PeregrineV wrote:I don't feel you can adequately assign alignments to reactions-to-bjc without assigning a bjc alignment...
Sad. But expected. Olive branch?
On page 3? In a large normal? I guess it didn't bother me because a. half the player list had yet to vote b. I was one of those players and c. we still had pretty much the entire day phase ahead of us.In post 250, Mister Rogers wrote:Just verifying, you read his post where he used the phrase, "Vote parking here until more people join the game" right?
I was and continue to be voting Pere. For reasons...In post 253, Mister Rogers wrote:Errrm, what? No vote? Meh. I guess there is only so much 1 guy can do at one time.
That vote has nothing to do with our current game [at least I don't think it does]. I'll leave it at that.In post 253, Mister Rogers wrote:Can't fault Nero here though.
Are you guys high? If you think scum have day talk, isn't thatIn post 281, Mister Rogers wrote:Ok, so here we now agree (with the appropriate edit).In post 278, ThAdmiral wrote:...Bipolar sort of just jokes about it -and the asking to see if he could post before the mod confirmed his "death" justfeelsreads genuine.
In post 286, DeasVail wrote:considering that the dayvig gambit has become so common that it's often used as a joke, I don't know if I trust his reaction.
I'm voting for Pere. What's my scummy reason?In post 285, Mister Rogers wrote:There is a sort of bizarre dynamic here because he only has two votes and both people are voting him for a scummy reason
Oh. Well, that's just weak. You are condemning me for not unvoting Pere while I was away from the game? lol. Pere responded [kind of unsatisfactorally - as you note yourself] after my last post and before this one.In post 297, Mister Rogers wrote:I am not liking Yates for it especially because he hasn't moved an inch while the "thread has exploded". Although again, a bizarre dynamic, but you haven't given him a reason to move either.
Uh. How am I "advocating" a Pere lynch? My vote? You realize votes are scum hunting tools, right? My vote is on Pere specifically because I'mIn post 302, Mister Rogers wrote:How about I join Yates and adovcate your lynch
Part RVS, part reaction fish, part information required.In post 303, PeregrineV wrote:Meh, I consider both votes to be RVS based.
Welcome to the game. You should probably read it first.In post 324, pisskop wrote:Nope, that's a lot of not matching my limited experience with him.
So he *could be* scum but he's at least scum that claimed VT so whatevs?In post 330, Zdenek wrote:I think that if he's scum, then he's scum who claimed VT on one day one of a large game and will get busted any way.
Yes. It should have looked even more scripted. <- That's sarcasm, btw. I felt the need to point that out since you are missing a lot of obvious points lately.In post 333, Zdenek wrote:So you think it should have happened faster?
<3In post 340, AngryPidgeon wrote:Uhhh, Zd lets not pull bullshit gambits on people. There was nothing town about that reaction, ESPECIALLY the certainty that came with it... Every fucking fake hammer in the game ends up being on scum and they go "LOL IM VT WHATEVER" and then everyone calls them probtown. Fucks sake.
<3 x2 - Welcome to the game!In post 340, AngryPidgeon wrote:Actually it makes perfect sense. You are trying to assign scum motivation to people's reaction to the bjc post whilst leaving the -exact- motivation up for interpretation.
In post 400, Mister Rogers wrote:I can't figure out which is worse Yates pushing daytalk or...
Are you trolling me right now?In post 363, Mister Rogers wrote:Quote me the post where ANYONE says they think scum have daytalk.
I can't figure out which is worse Rogers pushing daytalk or pretending he didn't.
A. Low hanging fruit is low hanging fruit because it's low hanging. But that's not really what I'm doing so who cares...In post 363, Mister Rogers wrote:The BB issue is a non-issue and low hanging fruit. Its a great thing for scum to make noise about just as you seem to be doing. I would expect better from you.
That sometimes happens when I call scum out on their bullshit. *shrug* But then, you already know that about me, right?In post 363, Mister Rogers wrote:I am not liking you.
In post 399, DeasVail wrote:YOU GO GURL!
I get it.In post 414, Zdenek wrote:It means he can never do the nk and there are a variety of power-roles that could potentially catch him if he's scum. It means that he has very little wiggle room to get out of anything.
If it happened over the course of a day or two it would look less contrived. This is a minor point in a big picture gut read.In post 415, Zdenek wrote:If it happened slower and I would have thought that he was taking time to perfect lies.
Probably the fact you immediately dropped your pursuit after a VT claim.In post 420, Zdenek wrote:What makes you think, that I think that it is some sort of game-changer? I don't think that, by the way, it's just strange that's the impression that you have.
In post 180, Zdenek wrote:Well at least we know you're town.
Right. To me a normal conversation looks like what we are doing now. When there's just a back and forth between two people over a super short period of time? It stands out.In post 421, Zdenek wrote:We were both there typing at once.
It's a theory. Again, because it stands out. I'm trying to justify why my "gut" reaction to reading that exchange was "this looks forced" and this is just one of the variables feeding it.In post 421, Zdenek wrote:This is probably the first time I've seen someone suggest that interactions taking place over a longer period of time seem more legitimate.
The thing is, I'm not playing you. I'm playing Pere. Why you are in the middle is the mystery. The fact he isn't posting bothers me only in the sense that I'm not getting the information I need from him [and maybe not using my vote in a more productive way given new evidence] but he isn't posting anywhere so...?In post 422, Mister Rogers wrote:Ok. This is kind of amazing because both you and Pere are playing at me the same way. It is kind of confusing actually.
I was going to requote and prove you wrong. But okay, I see what you were saying in 276. You were saying you agreed "that scum don't necessarily have daytalk." I was thinking you and talah were saying Pere and ThAd *DID* have day talk. That's why it stood out to me.In post 422, Mister Rogers wrote:Yes I did leave that post out there. But nowhere do I say I think scum have daytalk.
On the plus side, I found myself shaking my head in agreement a lot to your Rogers read.In post 424, pisskop wrote:Fine. Ill meta a bit and get back to your in-game contents.
Are you being serious right now? The point isIn post 425, Mister Rogers wrote:The point is DID THIS FAKE VIG SHOT WORK. Specifically this case, not across the board generalizations
Yeah. I think I'm done talking to you. No one is really this obtuse.In post 438, Mister Rogers wrote:@Yates: You are using generalizations to say, "naww, this can't be"
Fair enough. I kinda like it, actually. What do you think about pisskop's replace in?In post 444, PeregrineV wrote:The object was for the replacement to come in already under suspicion/pressure (such as it was) and see how they reacted (if at all).
You knew I wasn't going to let an "out of game reasons" vote slide.In post 444, PeregrineV wrote:But, good to see the passion.
Lurking? I'm pretty sure I've posted every day. My post count isn't huge but my content per post should speak for itself. Is there something you think I'm ignoring/hiding [which is why I assume most people lurk]?In post 445, AngryPidgeon wrote:I think hes been lurking.
I'm not saying he isn't scum [obvs]. I'm saying he is now claiming it was a fake scum claim as per:In post 446, PeregrineV wrote:Why do you think it is a fake scum claim?
In post 82, bjc wrote:So my question here is why the above fake-claim/joke is okay while mine isn't?
I agree with all of this. I'm not one of the people claiming bjc is scum for his fake claim. I said I don't like the play - and I don't for all the reasons I've outlined in my previous post. BUT I also told ThAd [who is the one calling it scummy] "I think you are overstating how scummy it is." I also went on to say "Perfectly acceptable reason for an RVS vote. Not a great point to build a case on, though." It's all in post 217, which you quoted. If you're asking for myIn post 446, PeregrineV wrote:I watch the follow-up posting for signs of scum-claim followup or town posting, since any of that can alleviate the above crappy RVS.
Amen. Amen. Amen.In post 458, PeregrineV wrote:So, my take on the ENTIRE DAYVIG scenario:
Creates a null-read on Zdenek (as in, it does not affect how I read him either way).
Creates a null-read on Chemist (as in, it does not affect how I read him either way).
I will take this as a compliment! Tell you what; Nero, Pere, Mastin, Rach, ThAd, and AP have all been scum with me, against me, or as mod for me. Some of them have seen me a LOT. If one of them raises a meta concern? I'll address it.In post 465, pisskop wrote:Especially given the difficulty I in separating his scum and town games to begin with.
You know what?In post 455, PeregrineV wrote:He has one vote (mine) and 9000 people townreading him.
In post 516, bjc wrote:I think I agree with this.
Are you lurking because you're scum or just stupid?In post 521, bjc wrote:Are you voting me because you think I'm scummy or just to be stupid?
Ohh...In post 530, bjc wrote:And if I'm content with lurking?
Are you familiar with the Beetlejuice tell? Also, to ask this question a different way, How doIn post 649, projectmatt wrote:How do you make the distinction between "intentionally" lurking and "simply" lurking?
Guess not.In post 288, projectmatt wrote:Vote: Aptil
I would consider a pisskop scum case.In post 611, PeregrineV wrote:Out of the high posters, cases require more validity. Only ones I'd really consider at this point are talah and pisskop.
What do you like about the "fuck you -ish attitude?" Do you think scum don't get "fuck you -ish?"In post 612, talah wrote:He's not inaccessible and has a rather 'fuck you'-ish attitude which I like.
In post 612, talah wrote:Oh and the last couple of posts from matt made my brain feel like it was out of sync with the universe.
In post 613, Mister Rogers wrote:What bigger fish like Aptil??
Why is your push here so fake??????????????
Don't even go there. I will see you hanged if you continue along this path.In post 638, talah wrote:Do you have information that Luca really *is* having RL issues which are affecting his ability to post - anything at all?
Another one accusing me of this?? WTF... Anyone calling me a "lurker" needs to check themselves. I have more CONTENT than you, Gant.In post 657, Damon_Gant wrote:List of people I consider to be lurkers:
SnowStorm, aptil, Rach, bjc,Yates
Wow. Am I missing some meta thing between you two??In post 668, AngryPidgeon wrote:Its not much, but I have nero as a townlean for his reaction to my post.
Is it "devoid of substance" because you can't answer either of the following?In post 695, projectmatt wrote:Yate's analysis is so completely fake and devoid of substance that it hurts.
Or is it because you have no explanation as to why you pretend to be calling people out for lurker voting [even though no one is actually voting bjc for being a lurker] while voting a lurker?In post 684, Yates wrote:Are you familiar with the Beetlejuice tell? Also, to ask this question a different way, How do you make the distinction between "intentionally" lurking and "simply" lurking?
It's more than just harsh, though, it's wrong. I have no control over other people hyper posting. I can start breaking up each of my points into seperate posts - like some others seem to be doing - if you would like for me to clutter up the thread in a large normal?In post 725, Damon_Gant wrote:I will admit that it may be harsh to call you a lurker... it's just that everyone else is drowning out your posts.
And as to this gem...In post 725, Damon_Gant wrote:Yesterday I looked at the ISO of literally every person in the game except yourself [Mister Rogers] (because heavens knowsgoing through your ISO is going to be a chore).
Is this really coming from someone that *JUST* posted this...?In post 725, Damon_Gant wrote:...your posts may be long but they're packed with nothingness.
In post 725, Damon_Gant wrote:...honestly, most of my thoughts are still going by gut
So... you're saying you know Mister Rogers is Town? And one of pisskop/talah is your scum buddy?? Good to know.In post 734, Damon_Gant wrote:Now if I were scum, I'd be doing things very differently. I'd be chasing after someone like pisskop, talah or even you because:
a) It would keep people like you who think voting for lurkers is scummy off my back
This is pretty much the only thing you've said recently that I agree with. And it's a general mafia discussion point that you never bring back around and apply to the game state or to determine the alignment of a person. Scum 101? [See what I did there?]In post 734, Damon_Gant wrote:However, with regards to strategy, you just seem to have an odd idea of what experience does to a player. Beginners are the ones more likely to follow a strict set of "mafia theory". Experienced players know what theory is good, what is bad, and when to break all the rules dictated by this "theory".
I loled.In post 739, talah wrote:I'm an Oracle.
In post 738, aptil wrote:Hopefully the situation will be sorted by tomorrow .
Well... really I'd like for you to respond to the points in post 684 that pertain to you.In post 744, talah wrote:Which was?
I was wondering about your "fuck you -ish" attitude statement, actually. And you used that to claim you had a "Townish" read on bjc for displaying it. I just found that odd.In post 748, talah wrote:Well the other two points are you commenting about my take on matt and not liking my call on AP.
Huh? This isn't AT ALL what I thought you were saying. Can you instead just give me your Matt read?In post 748, talah wrote:The matt thing was just when you glaze over when a post's meter seems slow?
You started down this path of "how do you know it's RL issues? Maybe he's faking it!" Don't use out of game excuses for a read. I burned Pere on this earlier. It's super scummy.In post 748, talah wrote:The other thing - err I don't even know what you're getting at.
I thought you had your eye on EVERYONE...In post 749, Damon_Gant wrote:I've got my eye on you.
Reaction Test: failed. YOU have been playing mafia too long to be dumb enough to think that was an ACTUAL scum slip accusation. If I were scum I'd push that point and call it a "slip" until you were hanged. Point of that post, though, is that it's dumb to tell people what you would do as scum and to try to pretend that the fact you aren't doing that is why you are town even though you just showed that you are aware of your scum meta and could therefore alter your meta accordingly.In post 749, Damon_Gant wrote:And no...no I am not saying that. I'm not sure I can let that one go - you've been playing mafia too long to be dumb enough to even suggest that - particularly the point that you seem to think I have "let slip" that Mister Rogers is town, which is just laughably stupid.
I note that you have noted noted post - and edited to remove context.In post 752, pisskop wrote:noted post is noted.
You're right. I insinuated - which isn't the same as an explanation. So let me explain... I would have expected you to either shrug it off or ask me my intent. I wouldn't expect you to focus on it as a valid point unless you were feeling guilty about it - which is what you did. For an example of a Town reaction to something like this, take a look at how I responded to pisskop when he replaced in and voted me for "meta reasons."In post 753, Damon_Gant wrote:...you didn't explain at all how my reaction gives you any idea about my alignment.
Well, aptil isn't really contributing yet due to "internet problems" and my read on pisskop isn't on the right side of null. Also, I don't really care too much about his meta since he isn't posting enough that anyone should be able to meta read him. Also also, as I've said before, screw meta.In post 754, talah wrote:Why don't you ask piskop or aptil about him...
I *thought* you were saying that he was posting bad and failing at logic - and THAT is what was making your "brain feel like it was out of sync with the universe."In post 754, talah wrote:I'm genuinely interested in what you thought I would say.
Everything you said after this could really apply to ANY lurker. My point is that you shouldn't make it ABOUT the out of game reason unless you somehow KNOW someone is lying. If Mastin said his grandmother was dying and couldn't post but you saw him at a craps table in Vegas drunk posting in another thread? That's one thing. But don't challenge the excuse itself. Personally, I didn't post why my post count has been a little lower than usual because it's nobody's business that I was asked to help a film crew shooting a commercial at work. And I'm not going to go through the whole process of uploading video of the shoot to youtube and posting a link as proof because screw that. You see how questioning an out of game thing can get distracting and out of hand?In post 754, talah wrote:I disagree wholeheartedly.
Probably fewer than there are among the more active players, actually. I appreciate the impulse, though, and it's part of what's driving my vote on bjc. Of the lurkers, he's the only one that beetlejuiced and then used his "fuck you -ish" attitude to act like he doesn't have to post. Well... okay but I guess that means I don't have to unvote him. *shrug*In post 754, talah wrote:How many scum do you think are in the lurkers?
What does this have to do with what I said to Gant? Because the portion of the post you quoted has nothing to do with the question you asked me or anything I have said or even hinted at.In post 755, talah wrote:Can I just ask placidly what kind of person you think is not aware of their scum meta, and adjusting accordingly?
This is annoying.
It's when you call a lurker [or their attacker] scum and all of a sudden they post out of nowhere. Case in point; bjc hadn't posted in over 24 hours. Pere was driving the bjc wagon. Rogers calls Pere scummy for pushing bjc without actually scum hunting. An hour later bjc is suddenly on to agree with a point about the person driving his wagon [Pere]. Basically, it shows that the person is reading the thread and just not posting. In other words, a beetle juice tell illustrates intentional lurking.In post 761, projectmatt wrote:I am not familiar with the beetlejuice tell.
Is this a joke or serious?
Oh. You're playing this game?In post 789, 4nxi3ty wrote:And I wish Yates had a comment about me or the events surrounding me, but there's alot going on in this game sooo maybe just paranoia there?
Alright. That was a little snarkier than I intended. Is there anything specific you want me to comment on? I really haven't been paying you much attention or you haven't made any posts worth commenting on so...In post 789, 4nxi3ty wrote:but there's alot going on in this game
Nero being Nero. Completely null. He takes more than a day to read.In post 794, 4nxi3ty wrote:reaction to nero?
lol. What's with you and pisskop jumping on that? Yes. That's what I was doing. But in a mocking way. And that was the point. To show him how silly it was. Why is it *he* seems to be the only one that got it? Context people! Or pisskop/ThAd scum team??In post 796, ThAdmiral wrote:Wait. Aren't you doing exactly that? Saying what you would do as scum? See bolded.
Glad I unvoted your slot. Guess who I'm voting for RIGHT NOW.In post 841, Snork wrote:I really dislike pisskop right now.
??? You may want to reread that post. He's saying that Nero is acknowledging that he's played with a lot of us and saying *WE* should know he'll yell about whatever he thinks needs to be yelled about. What's with people skim reading the game?In post 869, RachMarie wrote:Wait a minute? you are scum reading [Nero] cause he uses a Southern slang term for the plural you?
Ha! No. I'm not putting ANY faith or trust in Nero. I am, however, saying that he takes time to read. The thing about Nero is that he will either sort out his supspects if Town or will expose himself as scum. There are enough people in this game familiar with his meta [as you probably know based on your focus on his "y'all" post] that he won't make it very far as scum.In post 886, Mister Rogers wrote:Yates is putting faith in you
I'll check in tonight. Looks like the Luca wagon is picking up steam. Still not sure why but whatever. Looks like the pisskop town reads are picking up. This makes me sad.
In post 1105, Mister Rogers wrote:You know who reads SK?
Noted. I googled "things tha make you go hmm" and thought this picture pretty much says it all:In post 1161, Mister Rogers wrote:Are you town aligned neighborhood encryptor?
What does this mean?In post 1195, Mister Rogers wrote:I get this and Yates, I mean c'mon its a valid query.
Show me. I must have missed it.In post 1113, Zdenek wrote:You ignored Rogers when he did it.
So do your catch up posts. *shrug*In post 1113, Zdenek wrote:This looks like bullshit.
Because she was the MOD. lolIn post 141, talah wrote:@RachMarie-Mayor-Mod- are we able to have a votecount tally and timer please?
Was going to do it last night but was too tired and crashed instead. VC coming up....Rach
How gracious of you to offer to be available 72 hours before deadline. I don't understand why anyone is town reading this.In post 1180, pisskop wrote:Ill try to read upon monday, but tuesday afternoon at latest
I legit have no idea what either of you are talking about. Is it post 704? Because I thought that was to the thread.In post 1228, Mister Rogers wrote:I think you'd better ask PK that sir and tbf, that is quite long overdue, in fact.
I've had some interactions with him. Feel free to glean what you can from my ISO. More importantly, what's YOUR opinion on DG? I'm assuming there's a reason you are focusing on him?In post 1230, aptil wrote:@MR and Yates : What is your opinion on DG ?
I agree that it is superfluous to speculate about a no lynch scenario but do you actually think that's scummy? Especially given the lack of activity by certain players [*cough* you *cough*] and the announced V/LA's of others [Zdenek, Mastin, pisskop] that will actually put us up against the clock?In post 1243, aptil wrote:That last line just screams look how town i am , i want a lynch today
If Rogers wasn't replacing out I'd make this my new sig.In post 1248, 4nxi3ty wrote:don't care for lowhangingfruit arguments,fruit is fruit, and you eat it before it goes bad.
As someone recently pointed out to me in another game, the reason someone creates an alt is because they want to be read with fresh eyes. I got spanked for asking someone who their alt was because I don't think about that stuff. Also, these alts are created BEFORE the roles go out - otherwise you could just look at the sign up thread. So there really isIn post 1252, Nero Cain wrote:there's nothing necessarily wrong with trying to hide your alt.
Disagree. Getting tunneled sucks. Also, screw meta.In post 1256, Mister Rogers wrote:Being attacked isn't a valid excuse for not producing his normal town ISO
I don't like this post. Like - at all. Please provide the points that caused YOU to read Talah scum. No one can defend against "read ISO." It's also lazy posting and gives you an easy excuse to jump on a leading wagon while providing no information about your alignment after a flip. Commit to your read.In post 1269, SnowStorm wrote:Anyone who has doubts should just ISO him. It worked for me.
To the bold - You really REALLY do need to get into "particular arguments."In post 1277, SnowStorm wrote:we don't even need to go into particular arguments,talah has the second highest post count and all his effort has been put in overreacting to people and generating mostly pointless arguments. That's not how you play as town.
So YOU were the one!In post 1283, Snork wrote:RachMarie has done fuck all and when questioned returns with the fact that she has a headache.
In post 1225, Yates wrote:I don't remember who was picking on RM for making "lurker" excuses with the sinus stuff but this stood out to me:Because she was the MOD.In post 141, talah wrote:@RachMarie-Mayor-Mod- are we able to have a votecount tally and timer please?
Was going to do it last night but was too tired and crashed instead. VC coming up....Rach
I don't know you. Yes? Is that the answer? Or maybe if you were scum you would play this badly so you could ask us this question? If I have to choose between lynching Talah and lynching you, guess which one I'm going to lynch...In post 1294, Luca Blight wrote:If I were scum would I play it as badly as this?
Why would you wait until "closer to deadline?" Congratulations - that's the dumbest thing said in this thread to date. Also, FTFY.In post 1294, Luca Blight wrote:Closer to the deadline I will probably get scumhunting, although Talah looks a decent bet for nowbecause she's the best chance I have at continuing to not contribute and stay alive
FTFY. Now I agree 100%. The fact Luca hasn't been replaced makes me think maybe he *IS* playing to his wincon...In post 1297, Damon_Gant wrote:Dude, if you're town, by not scumhunting you are frankly playing contrary to your win condition, and that isagainst the rules.
How do you plan on doing this when you JUST SAID you won't bother scum hunting until closer to deadline??In post 1315, Luca Blight wrote:When I find out who is scum, you will be the first to know
You *MAY* elaborate later? WTF...
STOP WITH THE LOW HANGING FRUIT!!In post 1337, RachMarie wrote:that is definitely scummy of you going for the low hanging fruit
Woot! Reads on pisskop and Zdenek, please!In post 1353, penguin_alien wrote:let me know if there's anything in particular you want me to address
Are you suggesting that he defends and/or ignores Talah throughout his ISO?In post 1378, Snork wrote:I want to know if other people see it or if I'm just seeing things that aren't there
He gave this face to summarize his list of people that moved their votes to Luca:In post 1393, AngryPidgeon wrote:I don't see what is so interesting about PV wanting to look at the counter-wagoners to wagon hes voting for.
Well... it's not Townie. Anyway, I'd rather he replied since this is about his post and his logic as opposed to something you might think he's thinking.In post 1400, AngryPidgeon wrote:I dont think its scummy.
This isn't even worth entertaining until tomorrow at the earliest.In post 1439, RachMarie wrote:how likely do ya all think it is that we have one large scum team or two scum teams and how likely do you think it is we have a SK?
We have 20 players.
Response to post 1390 when you get a chance, please? TYIAIn post 1445, PeregrineV wrote:Quick drop in
I think you should put Luca at L-1 and advance the game if you expect anyone to listen to you.In post 1437, ThAdmiral wrote:VOTE: APTIL
Shhh... I'm trying to scum hunt here.In post 1446, DeasVail wrote:What makes you think this is in anyway relevant to Luca's alignment?
For reference:In post 1449, Nero Cain wrote:Yates also asked you about this and don't really remember you responding to it
In post 1390, Yates wrote:Are you suggesting that he defends and/or ignores Talah throughout his ISO?In post 1378, Snork wrote:I want to know if other people see it or if I'm just seeing things that aren't there
If so, why aren't you equally concerned about Pere's chainsaw post?
So if you think this and ThAd won't do it, why not put Luca at L-1? Don't you need a Luca flip anyway to prove this theory?In post 1459, PeregrineV wrote:[Luca's] probably scum and talah is bussing so she earns towncred for his scumflip
Grazi.In post 1460, PeregrineV wrote:#Yates- I saw you say something, but I'll be back later.
Absolutely nothing. Of the two leading wagons I felt like talah was townier or at least more useful. So really I was just pressuring for this...In post 1446, DeasVail wrote:What makes you think this is in anyway relevant to Luca's alignment?
I don't know how convincing it is given all the Town cred given to Chemist when he claimed VT but at least we have a claim out of a distracting slot.In post 1464, Luca Blight wrote:I am also a VT
Edited for my thoughts. ^^^
I'm assuming you are basing this off the wagon momentum? Possible. But that would only be if both were scum. If this is the case, your "chainsaw" post makes sense for looking for the busser.In post 1465, PeregrineV wrote:And I think that if talah is scum, and Luca is scum, that the scumteam would rather save talah than Luca.
Are you thinking Luca-ThAd scum team? talah-ThAd scum team? What? I have to double check but my impression of ThAd is that he'd bus his mother.In post 1471, Damon_Gant wrote:Also, ThAd's vote on aptil is at best, really odd. I didn't like that.
Fair enough. Still, it had no traction. I would still be overjoyed to get pisskop lynched but he's conveniently V/LA.In post 1474, PeregrineV wrote:pisskop wagon was 3.
In post 1609, Snork wrote:Why am I even in this list?
WorriesIn post 1662, penguin_alien wrote:I'm not town reading Yates, which worries me.
I wouldn't rule out a limited shot SK or some kind of odd-night vs even-night scum team. But I'm inclined to believe Aptil. While I don't do NKA I also don't think scum would waste a shot on a potential easy mislynch. [then again - what an awesome play for an SK to earn an obv-Town read!] I'm playing as if we have one scum team because I don't think it matters.In post 1439, RachMarie wrote:how likely do ya all think it is that we have one large scum team or two scum teams and how likely do you think it is we have a SK?
What am I looking for here? That mastin ISO looked like stream of consciousness drivel. Looks pretty different from this game but mastin hasn't been posting here so I suppose there's still time... Anyway, are you calling mastin scum or just noting a pattern? You pretty much nailed her from the word go in that one so color me intrigued.
What? I don't understand what you are saying here.In post 2091, SnowStorm wrote:I find the amount of town reads on her [Rach] pretty odd, I mean, considering how scummy her posts are. So I'm inclined to believe Rach is town.
I sort of see what you are saying. I'm not sure that's how it plays out irl. I'll have to check some games to see if this bears out. Is this a new theory or something you've seen elsewhere?In post 2099, SnowStorm wrote:if she kept playing like this she'd be bus material.
Agreed. ^5In post 2103, RachMarie wrote:I think pisskop was the scum off both wagons.
Pretty sure he was active for the majority of it. Plus, have you READ his ISO? I've been scum reading that slot since Day 1. I realize TWIE can't answer for that but he has also been playing pretty terrible since replacing in. No solid reads. No scum hunting effort. No attempt to understand the game state. Bleh. It looks like someone trying to hide and - ironically - stands out like a sore thumb [no pun intended!].In post 2106, ThAdmiral wrote:Pisskop was inactive. I don't think he necessarily chose to be off both wagons.
So... scum caught for the wrong reasons?In post 2114, ThAdmiral wrote:In all seriousness I guess the case for town-thad is that no one has been able to really quantify why they think I'm scum, or if they have reasons they are weak/invalid
Not posting is not the same as not reading. He was posting for 5 days after his last post here. Are you going to try to tell me that you don't think he even bothered to READ this game while posting in others??In post 2117, TheWayItEnds wrote:In other news pisskop stopped posting on page 52 before he was replaced.
The first part of this is fair. I checked and Talah had 7 votes when pisskop ACTUALLY stopped posting [March 24]. The second part, though, is actually part of his scum case. That's a vote park. Vote parking is scummy.In post 2117, TheWayItEnds wrote:7 people were still not on either of the leading wagons. With his vote that he hasn't moved since page 29.
Yeah. Not why I'm voting your slot but it is likely and just more fuel for the fire.In post 2117, TheWayItEnds wrote:And seriously if the case against me is that one of the 2 people off the scum wagon HAS to be scum
I'm actually able to type a little better from work and on fewer pharmaceutical grade pain killers so my activity should be somewhat better. I just have to remember to hit the space key with my index finger instead of my thumb!In post 2127, penguin_alien wrote:Yates, I know you're on V/LA, but when you're able can you give me a rundown more specifically on why you think TWIE is the best lynch for today?
TBD Point of that statement was to point out it was a poor defense.In post 2131, AngryPidgeon wrote:This feels more like indignant town to me.
That was so obviously grasping at straws that I didn't even bother to comment. Plus, that "reads list" is pretty much the "Town Consensus List." Way to stick your neck out and have an original opinion.In post 2132, AngryPidgeon wrote:THIS feels like scum upset at being called out for the wrong reasons.
Do I have to be the one to say it? Fine - cognitive dissonance. TWIE's claiming his slot isn't scummy because his predecessor was lurking to the point it got replaced. Okay. Might buy it. But then he says Mastin *is* scum for lurking even though - of the two - MASTIN was the one that posted a V/LA in the game. Frankly, Mastin should probably replace out [I know that probably comes across as cold but she's got more important crap to deal with]. Still, you can't have two conflicting standards when it comes to activity and how it reflects upon someone's alignment.In post 2132, AngryPidgeon wrote:... lurking like pisskop... the defense really looks like an attempt to make mastin look bad instead.
What's your opinion on PereV? I bring this up only because he is posting elsewhere but not here.In post 2080, TheWayItEnds wrote:PV all have essentially nothing worth commenting on today.
^^ That's old Yates meta - and I did that as both alignments. Look at my last few completed games. It's actually BECAUSE OF our last game together that I made the conscious decision to be less of a spammer.In post 2168, Nero Cain wrote:The Yates town that I know and hate is way more active and wants to be in the forefront of the game.
First, that was real derp, but that's beside the point. You accused me of this in that game as well [you used "derp" a LOT in that game]. I guess I should call you scum for not faking a QT result on me? The counter is you are scum reading me and PA - whom you called a scum team in that one as well. So at least your inability to read my slot is consistent. Plus I have a Town read on PA so...In post 2168, Nero Cain wrote:Fake derp is a big part of his scum game
Cards on the table - You're one of three people I'mIn post 2152, PeregrineV wrote:@Yates- How about YOUR read on me?
Looking forward to it.In post 2157, Damon_Gant wrote:Yates: Honestly no idea what to think of this, and the subject of my next detailed ISO read.
My votes tend to be more nimble towards the end of the day. Just because I'm most suspicious of your slot doesn't mean I'm not reading the game. If someone comes along with a more convincing case, I'll bite. Even a cursory glance at my ISO should be sufficient evidence to prove I *AM* looking elsewhere.In post 2159, TheWayItEnds wrote:What I want from you is any indication that you're aware that scum teams usually have multiple members and you don't appear to be looking anywhere but my slot.
Yeah. I need to reread your slot. It's possible I made that assumption based on something you said.In post 2161, TheWayItEnds wrote:And also I never said Mastin was scum for lurking.
That was me in How I Banged Your Mother Mafia... It's like - he gets tunnely on certain players and carries it over from game to game. Makes him hard not to scum read which is why I'm surprised he's in your "Town Block." I'd replace Nero with PA.In post 2189, AngryPidgeon wrote:I was getting mega frustrated in GoW mafia cause I thought you had some sort of vendetta against me, so this is mostly me getting frustrated that you won't consider me being town, but eh.
So we're not lynching Snow, please. I could settle for TWIE but I'm starting to think I'm mostly conf-biasing the slot based on pisskop's play. So meh... I feel like matt, egg, and mastin are all kind of lurker lynches. I could hang any of them and not feel like we lost anything of value.In post 2193, AngryPidgeon wrote:I want TWIE, Matt, or Snow right now the most. Could maybe do mastin (not really a scumread, but decent compromise at this point), Egg (replaced Bipolar, doesnt feel like town-egg really).
I've never seen Mastin lurk. Also, it's probably unfair to call that a "lurker" slot due to V/LA stuff. But, as I stated earlier, if he's Town I think he should probably replace out. If I had chopped my thumb clean off I would have replaced. Bigger things to worry about and all.In post 2201, PeregrineV wrote:Based on your Mastin experience, do you think this would result in a town or scum Mastin?
Want to see?In post 2203, RachMarie wrote:how is your thumb doing BTW Yates?
Our exchange. His defense seems sincere. It would be easy for scum TWIE to tunnel or buddy and he did neither. I still haven't reread him and pisskop but I intend to.In post 2204, AngryPidgeon wrote:What made you change your mind about TWIE?
Check pisskop's activity. Or really mastin's for that matter. They both site flaked.In post 2206, PeregrineV wrote:You might have better luck looking at the off-brands, such as they were.
He posted a V/LA. He wasn't posting. I'm not in other games with him. I believed his V/LA. *shrug*In post 2223, Nero Cain wrote:It seems like the logical think to do would be do check his on site activity or have you started posting random things?
Good so vote Mastin with me!!In post 2580, Nero Cain wrote:+I'm starting to suspect a Mastin scum and PA would make sense as a buddy.