In post 166, Lord Business wrote: In post 150, Mac wrote:Lord Business wrote:A player focusing entirely on the game setup and theme stands out as trying not to interact with the players.
A question I must pose
I've wondered all my days
But can you point to some posts
You feel support this little phrase?
Do you have a post restriction?
Oh yes I surely do
For to post like this all game
I'd have to be mad!
And mad is not my aim.
In post 166, Lord Business wrote: In post 42, CupcakePanda wrote:OBLIGATORY NO FLAVOR KNOWLEDGE
THIS GAME SEEMS FLAVOR INTENSIVE THOUGH GG NO RE
ALSO WTF ISNT COPPER A STEALTH HYDRA AS IS??!?!
TOO MANY HYDRAS THIS GAME
THOUGH D1 IS EASY
VOTE: JUS
LYNCH THIS SLOT D1
PROBABLY SCUM
AT WORST WE GET RID OF AN ANTITOWN SLOT
SHEEP GIVEN IF READS ARE SOCIO-ACCURATE.
Bold the setup and theme talk.
Two posts in the entire game and almost all the text is on it. One caps locked vote and the reason tacked to that is vague and seems designed to be easily written off as ridiculous during RVS.
Or was this not what you were asking?
This was exactly what I wanted
Thanks for making it clear
But personally I don't see it
As focusing on setup spec here
I know the first post is jokey
But I get the same feel from post two
Because it's referencing the OP "mod" role PMs
How does it differ to you?
I guess we won't really know
Until Cupcake steps up to the plate
And answers what we question
If he's not too late.
@ Titan. It was apparent the response from you to me came from different people, but you haven't actually addressed why one of you chose to panic post and declare a need to lynch me and then one of you came in with what appeared to be a an attempt to respond to my issues, albeit in a belittling fashion.[/quote]