Omgus
You've managed to irritate me as a collective and it's only three pages in. Please stop posting like dickheads.
Regards
Nexus.
In post 52, Zdenek wrote:In post 21, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Interesting ability I should claim: If the day ends in a no lynch (whether from running out of time, or by a majority vote on the "No Lynch" wagon). I enter 2 people into a duel, and they get to plead their case, and I unilaterally choose to lynch one!
Granted, the cases they plead are anonymous, and I don't choose a name, but rather whichever post I liked better, but that's beyond the point~.
Also,Vote: Sixtybecause KITTIES ARE BETTER WHERE IS MY MAFIA WITH THE PUPPIES 2 I WANT HOPE BACK.Vote: LLD
For a change of pace, I'm going to irrationally defend Tierce (Sixty) for a bit.
In post 54, Zdenek wrote:Not compulsive.
In post 62, Zdenek wrote:oh most definitely.
In post 83, Zdenek wrote:It's funny just how hurt Sangres is.
In post 123, Zdenek wrote:And to think, I wasn't even going to read it.In post 102, Sixty wrote:Not likely.In post 100, Untrod Tripod wrote:holy fuckin jesus is sangres always this much of a tryhard?
While 99 is a post to put in their signature for Nexus, the wall gets worse as it goes down. This isn't the puppyhalf with Tammy meta, but those Cerulean posts were starting to stretch belief for me. In addition, somehow Nacho went from "I have no read on F-16" to "I have a Town read on F-16 but not enough of one to actually come forward and say it's a Town read". The Tim Howard read is indeed trying hard, as is the throwout on you (UT) - I don't mind your Cerulean vote but that's probably not significant in the long run.
What would be super-interesting would be sangres moving their vote. Anything is better than No Lynch.
In post 125, Zdenek wrote:Nacho, is your Vi read serious?
In post 134, Zdenek wrote:This is going to be stressful.
In post 159, Zdenek wrote:What's up with 60?
In post 176, Zdenek wrote:SCUM DETECTEDIn post 124, Tim Howard wrote:hey team
these 5 pages suck. Nexus and I are in agreement that we have no reads except "sangres is obnoxious."
IN KEEPING WITH THAT STATEMENT
VOTE: Sangres
-quadz
Vote: Tim Howard
In post 280, Zdenek wrote:I just love opening the thread and seeing the person I'm voting, fake scum hunting.In post 277, Tim Howard wrote:Pretend we have written a long post here professing my love for UT and all of his opinions.
VOTE: Cerulean
We agree with UT that cerulean has been scummy. Pre-emptive IDGAF about inevitable OMGUS accusations because fuck you don't be a dumbass.
In other news, it may just be because sangres hasn't posted as much, but they've fallen off the obnoxious-dar.
Also, apparently making another player feel like a bad person is super pro now, awesomely well done there, sixty.
Yeah that's about all we've got for now. GOALKEEPERS OUT.
In post 282, Zdenek wrote:Katsuki votes are okay with me.
I'm just going to ignore F-16 until he's posted a bunch and then sink him with his scummy, scummy words, which he'll inevitably write if he's scum.
I am definitely not voting him because he's boring.In post 208, Shadoweh wrote:only scumread is a throwaway line about Howard being boring
HI MASTIN!?In post 208, Shadoweh wrote:Wow, wallposting while not rambling is fucking hard, how do people even do this?
In post 286, Zdenek wrote:UT, should we lynch you or CBD next?
In post 363, Zdenek wrote:Poor Reck, caught for the wrong reasons.In post 360, xRECKONERx wrote:mmmmm yes tell me more about why my laziness means I am scum
This is really scum hunting. Man, I need some lessons. I didn't realise the meta had shifted to just making one line statements = scumhunting.In post 377, Zdenek wrote:This just looks like you suspect me for not alignment related things at best and for scum-hunting at worst.In post 375, Tim Howard wrote:Zdenek is trying to be all town-leadery, from my pov, and I don't think he has the skill to do it, so it strikes me as odd.
This is probably your best post, because at least you're justifying yourself!In post 342, Zdenek wrote:Unvote
Vote: Untrod Tripod
Basically, he jumped to defend Tim Howard in posts 284, 285 by attacking Sixty and Cerulean and now he's jumped to attack Venmar who's attacking Cerulean and defending Tim Howard (among other things).
it is almost as though this hydra is quadz (good cop / chill out dudes style) and nexus (bad cop / asshole style)In post 412, Untrod Tripod wrote:good cop bad cop
WAHTIn post 416, Untrod Tripod wrote:I mean meta is trash yadda yadda but I'm still not seeing any scum motivations for his reads or actions? he's poking players, asking useful questions,his votes have been well explained. the framer claim is weird but I really just want to shrug at it because the rest of his play looks town to me
In post 52, Zdenek wrote:In post 21, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Interesting ability I should claim: If the day ends in a no lynch (whether from running out of time, or by a majority vote on the "No Lynch" wagon). I enter 2 people into a duel, and they get to plead their case, and I unilaterally choose to lynch one!
Granted, the cases they plead are anonymous, and I don't choose a name, but rather whichever post I liked better, but that's beyond the point~.
Also,Vote: Sixtybecause KITTIES ARE BETTER WHERE IS MY MAFIA WITH THE PUPPIES 2 I WANT HOPE BACK.Vote: LLD
For a change of pace, I'm going to irrationally defend Tierce (Sixty) for a bit.
In post 155, Zdenek wrote:In post 148, kanyeknowsbest wrote:hello all, would anyone like to lynch 60 w. meUnvote
Vote: kkb
OFF LIMITS!
In post 176, Zdenek wrote:SCUM DETECTEDIn post 124, Tim Howard wrote:hey team
these 5 pages suck. Nexus and I are in agreement that we have no reads except "sangres is obnoxious."
IN KEEPING WITH THAT STATEMENT
VOTE: Sangres
-quadz
Vote: Tim Howard
In post 342, Zdenek wrote:Unvote
Vote: Untrod Tripod
Basically, he jumped to defend Tim Howard in posts 284, 285 by attacking Sixty and Cerulean and now he's jumped to attack Venmar who's attacking Cerulean and defending Tim Howard (among other things).
In post 347, Zdenek wrote:Oh, I just realized what UT meant by weather vane.
Silly Zd.
Unvote
Vote: Venamr
I'd say his vote on you was well explained, otherwise um...nope? Even Zdenek says his votes were generally not serious. So pls tell me what he sexplained well.In post 391, Zdenek wrote:He's pretty obviously scum at this point, so I'm afraid one game of you reading him correctly isn't going to convince me.In post 384, ChannelDelibird wrote:I'm not saying it's a specific link between this game and that, I'm saying that my response - I know him very well, I can read him very well, trust me when I tell you he's town and look elsewhere for the time being - is the same here as it was there.In post 379, Zdenek wrote:CDB, what similarities are you seeing between Nexus' play in this game and in Red Wedding?
He went from Zdenek is trying to lead the town to Zdenek isn't scum hunting and is posting one liners in the space of 23 minutes.
Then he goes to insulting me - Zdenek #1 scum-hunter.
Which is dissonant with him thinking that I'm scum.
Then he acts as though all my votes were somehow serious as a means to insult my scum hunting, and.several of my votes obviously were not serious
Is this intended to be a case / reason for your vote? Because I am pretty sure it's not one even a little bit.In post 566, Sixty wrote:Reck: I VOTE ZDENEK btw UT is scum
Sixty: Zdenek is more likely to be Town. Wanna vote UT instead?
Reck: sure
Sixty: *votes UT*
Reck: *complains about some other totally irrelevant thing instead of actually trying to get things done E.G. LIKE VOTE UT*
Sixty: lol vote Reck
Reck: b'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw but at least I have another person to engage in a rather meaningless one-on-one over some flimsy point
It doesn't even matter at this point if UT is scum (which is not unlikely considering he actually tried to say we and Cerulean are scum together in 285) because you just showed you're only in this to take up space and defend yourself where necessary.
Have we played together? I've barely played for like a year, and I don't recall playing with either of your heads (Nexus). This comment makes me uneasy unless you can give me some meta - (unless of course you're going to turn around and say you've been reading all my old games in which case wow)In post 638, Cerulean wrote:combined with the fact that both heads of that hydra are pretty readable when pushed,
You (whichever one of you this is) are being genuinely unpleasant to play with. So, if that's what you want, kindly go fuck yourself. I'm out.In post 714, Sixty wrote:On behalf of everyone in this game I would kindly request that quadz do literally all the posting from this point on. With all that said, just barely enough of their posting has seemed unintentionally genuine enough to warrant this spot.
So maybe I'm misunderstanding, but are you seriously saying that you're scumreading 10 people? Because this is absolutely yelling "FALLBACK WAGONS AHOY"In post 748, Flipping Awesome wrote:Town (Strongest->Weakest): Cerulean, Chamber, LLD, Sangres, CDB, Zdenek, Sixty
Scum are among: {Shadoweh, Plum, Venmar, Katsuki, Nero Cain, NS, Kanye, UT, Reck, Tim Howard}
I could go back and re-read it and quote shit, but I'm really not that interested in going back and doing an in-depth re-read of a fairly unpleasant argument near the end of the game day which did not result in significant read changes. *shrug*In post 992, xRECKONERx wrote:I really don't like that quadz's opinion about the me vs Sixty thing seems to just boil down to, "That was interesting but here's why it's null."
I'd be very interested in hearing him expand on what he means by, "They both made some good points, they both made some bad ones." Which points, specifically, did you think were good or bad from either side?
Are these quotes helpful? Because I read both of these things and agreed with them 100%. (As a note, my Plumscumread hasn't gone away.)In post 1004, Zdenek wrote:What about those things do you think makes Plum scum?In post 876, Tim Howard wrote:I would like to strongly encourage more dudes to hop on this awesome plum wagon. Seriously. Read FA's points on why she is a good place to put your vote!
In post 778, Flipping Awesome wrote:I liked the aggression in this post but I felt your response in Post 725 was underwhelming. You say a lot of stuff that doesn't resonate, then unvote and vote Tim.In post 675, Plum wrote:Do I need to do the scummy thing and MAKE A CASE on NS for things to happen, though?
In post 779, Flipping Awesome wrote:Plumfeels scummy. Her walls feel fluffy and not like she is trying to drive the game forward and I am coming around to Penguin's scumread on her.
I don't have any idea why that is inherently a scummy thing to do, and it seems pretty silly to make a blanket statement like that. I might go back and read it later on in the game when I have more information and a better grasp on my reads and the incident is not in my immediate memory, but it's not happening now. *shrug*In post 1008, xRECKONERx wrote:Okay, then I'll probably vote you?In post 997, Tim Howard wrote:I could go back and re-read it and quote shit, but I'm really not that interested in going back and doing an in-depth re-read of a fairly unpleasant argument near the end of the game day which did not result in significant read changes. *shrug*
I always find neutrality on two players arguing pretty scummy. I am giving you the opportunity to back up your words with actual content because there's always the off chance you believed what you said.
You're right, my disinclination to read that argument is clearly based in a rational / logical thought process rather than an emotional / irrational response, and thus your mathematical refutation of my argument is definitely going to change my mind.In post 1029, xRECKONERx wrote:TOTAL NUMBER OF POSTS THAT HAVE NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH PERSONAL ISSUES:24.
TOTAL NUMBER OF POSTS THAT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL ISSUES:4. And they all occurred at the VERY END of the debate.
Yeah, I'mnot buying that you just "didn't want to read through us arguing about not liking each other" because it's literally four fucking posts compared to the twenty-four posts where we actually have game-related debate.really
This is actively incorrect.
This is poor. Sangres' comment was clearly tongue-in-cheek since he'd just said a few posts before that you could be town if you sheeped him.In post 1186, Nobody Special wrote:I got some odd vibes, also, when Nacho instantly called me town after I followed his vote. I'll look back on this later in the game (if I'm still around).
UT's ISO mentions plum in 4 posts - This one, Post 1039 in which he says "plum is ripe for a lynch" and says nothing else, post 1190 in which he is responding to something she says, and post 1267 in which he says he won't answer her questions. Why, exactly, is plum in dire need of rope? Can't tell from looking at anything he's said.In post 1328, Untrod Tripod wrote:say it til you believe itIn post 1321, Plum wrote:I mentioned before that the rhetoric was deliberately overstated. I am a believer in actions eventually shaping thoughts and attitudes
wow
that's some next level shit, Plum
is the rest of the game still indulging the fantasy that this isn't in dire need of rope?
The first post was Nexus' thoughts. I was pretty null on Plum until I read Flipping Awesome's comments on her, which I agreed with. Later posts from FA seem to say that they weren't all that confident on their Plum read, but that doesn't change the fact that I thought the reasoning given was good and worth voting.In post 1368, Shadoweh wrote:Well, since nothing was happening today, I got bored and read 3 other completed mafia games (rereading ADWD is always fun for me, I can be like 'oh did that actually happen? I didn't remember I posted that.') I also took the time to reread Day 1 with a better emotional disconnect so I could actually look at words being typed.
VOTE: Tim Howard
Can you explain to me where your read on Plum is coming from? The way you treat your reads in general is very odd to me. To explain:Presumably something Plum said in her first posts turned out town to you, okay.In post 375, Tim Howard wrote: People who can go on the town pile: Nero Cain, Venmar, LLD and Plum. I've liked what I've seen from those people.
-Nexus outConsidering there's not much explanation for why you thought she was town in the first place, it's pretty easy to change your mind, but Flipping's reasons that you quote for changing your mind are literally "Plum feels scummy. Her walls feel fluffy and not like she is trying to drive the game forward and I am coming around to Penguin's scumread on her." If I'm townreading someone it generally takes more for me then 'This person actually feels scummy' from someone who I'm not actually townreading to convince me to vote them. (In #787 you accuse Flipping of making fallback wagons, not something you say about a strong townread.) Your last comment on the issue yesterDay was that your Plum scumread 'hadn't gone away'.In post 835, Tim Howard wrote: Flipping Awesome's thoughts on Plum are actually quite good. (also thanks for the explanation on the big ol' list that makes more sense.)
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Plum
MIRACLES, eh? (This is pretty much a full sheep on Flipping Awesome's reasons.)
And come today:You're sheeping her because her posting is 'stronger'? That doesn't actually change anything she did yesterday so.. you changed your mind because she made a case? How is his response non-useful in reading UT? I don't think that actually means anything, he's reacting pretty snarkily and annoyed (A little like you yesterDay but less rude) and I'd think you'd try to get a handle on thaat better if you actually cared? Your suspicions in my eyes seem to follow this pattern of not actually giving any opinions of your own, declaring someone else's case is good, and sheeping that read until it becomes convenient to switch to another wagon. I don't actually believe you have any reads of your own at all. You throw out town/scum reads, true, but they don't seem to mean anything two posts later or when it's time to actually vote someone.In post 1337, Tim Howard wrote: Plum's 1275 (case on UT) is solid. His response is non-useful in terms of reading him further. However, considering my townread on Venmar, the fact that UT keeps pushing him is really making me feel like he could be scum angling for a fairly easy mislynch.
Plum's posting toDay in general has been stronger than it was yesterDay.
She didn't hop on my wagon, which she had every excuse / reason to at that point. Instead, she basically kickstarted a new one on UT, who there was no serious wagon on at any point D1. Shadoweh had already voted UT, and Plum had voted him prior to making the case, and that was it. Not only was it a fresh new wagon, but she approached her post / scumhunting from a perspective that felt like town actually looking for scum, not like scum looking to invent something scummy.In post 1418, Zdenek wrote:What aspect of it?In post 1408, Tim Howard wrote:seemed to be from a townish mindset.
This is worth repeatingIn post 1419, Nobody Special wrote:Nero, your last four votes were naked. Please explain why.
-Nobody Special
No, as I said before, I'm now the primary posting head and we talk occasionally about what we think of the game.In post 1424, xRECKONERx wrote:quadz is Nexus even posting in your hydra anymore?In post 1408, Tim Howard wrote:Not impressed with UT's sheepy OMGUS vote on us and I approve of the additional votes on him!
Also you know better than to use OMGUS as a scumtell so this is just gross.
What about it?In post 1434, Zdenek wrote:LLD might be scum for her interaction with sangres early in the game.
This is shitty and bad. Stop it.In post 1437, Flipping Awesome wrote:That is, I am saying Regfan would only replace into slots he thinks are town and if Cerulean are town. If either condition isn't met, he wouldn't replace in. Cerulean feels town so.
Kanye wagon died because he lurked it away, basically.In post 1442, Plessiez wrote:I didn't really understand where the kanye votes were coming from, but the points made in 1313 and 1318 seem pretty strong and I'm not sure why the kanye wagon basically collapsed soon after this. Kanye says he moved his vote away from Tim Howard because (1) nobody was interested in voting for him and "even Venmar was a bigger wagon" and (2) he didn't realise how close deadline was. Zdenek and Shadoweh point out the conflict between this and the actual vote counts / what kanye said at the time and the result is ... general indifference?
I really don't like Tim Howard's 1337. UT's 1340 captures my reaction to that fairly well. Reasoning like "I think X is town, Y is pushing them so might be scum" just seems ... off. Who scumhunts this way? (Also, Tim says they don't thinkVenmarcould fake frustration but they still can't get a read on a hydra withTammyin? After Tammy's big replace out post in day 1? This doesn't make sense to me.)
You should vote UT then! It's good for the soul.In post 1532, Cerulean wrote:1) The one thing I see off about the Reck/UT interactions, on a reread, is that sometimes I feel as though UT is talking to Reck as if he already knows Reck's town. It's hard to describe but it's like UT is trying to play Evil Chancellor to Reck in posts like #1073 and the ensuing ones. I want to go over what Tammy thinks tomorrow when she feels better (she told me she's sick/exhausted from work and can't really post today) since I know she's felt really strong on her UT townread. On Reck's end, the interactions with UT seem pretty much in line with what I've seen in the past.
You are such a card. plz remove thxIn post 1533, Flipping Awesome wrote:Heh, well, I guess however we're interpreting it, we're both concluding CDB-slot is towny, so I'll take it.
But F-16 and I keep playing chicken with one another saying the other's welcome to move our vote onto Tim Howard, so.
VOTE: Tim Howard
--PA
In post 1533, Flipping Awesome wrote:Heh, well, I guess however we're interpreting it, we're both concluding CDB-slot is towny, so I'll take it.
But F-16 and I keep playing chicken with one another saying the other's welcome to move our vote onto Tim Howard, so.
VOTE: Tim Howard
--PA
Would vote Kanye. Lurked his way through D1 and lurked his way out of the beginnings of a wagon on D2, which is unlike the kanye I've seen elsewhere.In post 1538, Plessiez wrote:"Him" is meant to be UT, right?In post 1532, Cerulean wrote:I'm really bad at looking at wagons so I won't be much help here. Only thing of note to me is his placement on the Tim Howard wagon when I believe he was still scumreading my slot.
I'm rereading day 1 again at the moment and I don't think UT ever voted for Tim Howard then. I'm ... actually not sure if UT was scumreading you as of 745 or not. (On the one hand he says you've "been towntelling lately"; on the other hand your early posts are said to be "incredibly scummy" and he says he'd support a wagon on you. And after this he doesn't really talk about you again, except for a throwaway line about not having played much with Tammy.) But I haven't got the impression UT was scum-reading you today.
Or was "he" meant to be somebody other than UT?This is pretty close to my current thoughts about Tim Howard. On the one hand, it feels like this is probably the wagon that should have happened on day 1 (the Katsuki stuff really came from nowhere much in the last couple of RL days; Tim Howard had been a solidly popular wagon for a lot longer than that). But CDB was very confident in his town read on Nexus and sangres also had Tim Howard as a "solid town read" (in 821) and that makes me worry I'm just conflating "I don't like this approach to mafia" with "this slot is probably scum".In post 1532, Cerulean wrote:What are your updated thoughts on Tim Howard? Part of me really wants to trust CDB's Nexus read but it's like every bone in my body aches to see them lynched whenever I read the slot's posts. Would also be interested in your thoughts on their meta's.
(On the subject of meta, I don't suppose you have a good links for town- and scum-Venmar?)
Going back it looks like I never actually said this in thread, but our response to Sixty there had nothing to do with whether they were correct about Tammy's behavior, and everything to do with the fact that they were assholes about it. Not sure why this was a scumtell anyway, since that entire conversation was pretty tangential to the game anyway; we mentioned more than once that it wasn't alignment-indicative in any way.(1) the way you attacked Sixty for upsetting Tammy, without ever seeming to acknowledge that you thought Tammy was scum or that you actually thought Tammy was doing the very thing Tierce claimed she was doing at the start of that whole exchange
They're different people. I've seen Tammy get frustrated multiple times before, it's null on her to me. She's kind of an easily frustrated person, so far as I can tell. Venmar doesn't come across as someone who gets frustrated like that a whole lot.(2) town-reading Venmar for "frustration", again ignoring Tammy's whole angry-replace-out thing
I've covered why I did this already in my discussion with Reck. If you're gonna call that scummy, then it's your right to call it scummy, but you're stupid for doing so.(3) saying that Tierce and Reckoner had both made "good points" in their day 1 argument, but refusing to say what those points were
I did deny this you are correct sir!(4) apparently scum-reading people purely because they've said they're suspicious of your town-reads (I say 'apparently' because I have a memory of you denying this but I haven't gone back to check yet)
Katsuki ignored it while it was happening. He posted(5) your reasons for pushing Katsuki seem ... well, hypocritical at best.
>_> so he is. ummmmm... ok so I apparently suck at reading either one of them. I learned something new today, team.In post 1555, Plessiez wrote:... but Empire is the one doing most of the posting .In post 1552, Tim Howard wrote:I don't remember how many games I've played with Tammy, tbh. At least a couple, and I've modded for her in a couple of others. I've found her hard to read in the past, IIRC, and the fact that Empire isn't posting isn't making things easier for me.Let me try this from a different angle. What would you have expected a town!Katsuki to say about the Reck/Sixty posts?In post 1552, Tim Howard wrote:No, it doesn't seem odd to mebecause they happened at different times. The situation is completely different.
Then why are you voting him?
Dunno? Not really an alignment thing, like I said, you just seem easily frustrated.In post 1685, Cerulean wrote:How many times have you seen me get that frustrated as scum?
This. Please explain.In post 1946, Plessiez wrote:Chamber, what was the point of the short-lived switch to kanye?
In post 2094, chamber wrote:This bothers me a lot. Not going to advocate flipping instead of LLD or anything but getting it out there.In post 2072, Flipping Awesome wrote:I think an LLD/Kanye scumteam is not only possible but also likely
Yeah, this LLD feels like she's tryharding to avoid a lynch.In post 2097, Nobody Special wrote:I am reading. You people argue a lot.
Haven't had time to do a re-read on them, but what I've seen from them today have given me slight townvibes on Plum and no alignment-feelings at all on UT.In post 2090, Shadoweh wrote:So what do you think of her content so far, also your tomorrow's wagon feelouts reads on the other two? More importantly, you know everyone wants to know who you're giving your card to. To me. Give me something to do. I hope you're not just planning to give it to Flipping again, he's already gotten a turn.
Why does this bother you / what bothers you about it?In post 2094, chamber wrote:This bothers me a lot. Not going to advocate flipping instead of LLD or anything but getting it out there.In post 2072, Flipping Awesome wrote:I think an LLD/Kanye scumteam is not only possible but also likely
Christ on a bicycle, WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE SHOOT HIM FOR GOD'S SAKES. Or do something useful? Ugh.In post 2097, Nobody Special wrote:I am reading. You people argue a lot.